Greensboro, NC - HDTV - Page 399 - AVS Forum | Home Theater Discussions And Reviews
Forum Jump: 
 36Likes
Reply
 
Thread Tools
post #11941 of 11943 Old Today, 08:17 AM
AVS Forum Addicted Member
 
foxeng's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Where ever I am is where I am.
Posts: 14,329
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 168 Post(s)
Liked: 68
Quote:
Originally Posted by eacalhoun View Post
This is a simple technical personal interest question - just to see if I correctly understand the "co-habitation" of adjacent channels. For example - in the Charlotte market, WCNC and WBTV currently are on adjacent channels, 22 and 23. This works because their sites are within close proximity at the Dallas tower farm. Theoretically, could WJZY and WMYT (also at the Dallas farm) occupy channels 21 and 24, or 24 and 25, or 20 and 21? For the purpose of my example in my perfect RF world, no stations within 200 miles occupy channels 20, 21, 24 or 25. If my thinking is on the right track - so far - how many miles out does that "site proximity" end where interference kicks-in and channels CANNOT be adjacent? Or - as an alternate example - can adjacent channels exist at both Dallas and in NE Charlotte at WSOC and WCCB's sites?

Thanks - tried to make that example as simple as possible.
Your theory is correct by "co-habitation". Due to the tightness of the mask filter digital stations can do that where analogs couldn't. Also, the first adjacent channels need to have about the same power levels so the receiver doesn't try to lock onto a station with a much greater power level, say, one station is 100,000 watts and another is 1 millions. I was trying to remember off the top of my head what the on channel separation distance is and if I remember correctly it is 150 miles, but if you can get a waiver or can prove you will not cause additional interference, you can be closer.

All opinions expressed (unless otherwise noted) are the posters and NOT the posters employers. The poster in NO WAY is/will speak for his employers. "Arguing with an engineer is like mud wrestling with a pig. After a couple of hours, you realize the pig likes it"
foxeng is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #11942 of 11943 Old Today, 09:57 AM
AVS Forum Addicted Member
 
Trip in VA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Alexandria, VA, US
Posts: 15,405
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 624 Post(s)
Liked: 171
Send a message via AIM to Trip in VA
To expand on what foxeng has said, distance separations are dead. Whether a station is permissible is now governed by modeling the stations' coverage and interference and determining whether you're within a rounding tolerance of 0% population. It's not quite that simple, but that's the basic premise.

So yes, adjacency is permitted. To provide a good example, in Los Angeles, there are full powered signals on 31/32/33/34/35/36. They can be all in a row like that because they're all very close together on Mount Wilson or Mount Harvard and at roughly the same power, height, and antenna pattern. At the receiver, then, all the signals look to be roughly the same strength and are easy to pick out. By contrast, also in Los Angeles, KVCR-26 is the only full-power station on a different mountain. As such, the big full-power stations cannot be on adjacent channels. However, there are LPTV/Class A stations on adjacent channels on Mount Wilson and Mount Harvard because they're weak enough that they do not cause interference to KVCR.

So getting closer to home, you'll find that on the NAB Clearinghouse, the FCC's final channel assignment tool has assigned WCCB to channel 18 next to WSOC on 19, and that's because they're at similar location, height, power, and antenna pattern. Similarly, you'll see WCNC on 24 and WJZY on 25 for the same reason. You can't have full powers adjacent to each other at the different locations, but note that WCCB is on 27 and WGTB-CD is on 28 despite being at the different locations. WGTB-CD is weak enough that it does not step on WCCB's signal despite the distance.

Does that help?

- Trip

N4MJC

Comments are my own and not that of the FCC (my employer) or anyone else.

RabbitEars

"Ignorance and prejudice and fear walk hand in hand..." - Rush "Witch Hunt"

Trip in VA is online now  
post #11943 of 11943 Old Today, 10:39 AM
Senior Member
 
eacalhoun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Valdese, NC
Posts: 455
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 46 Post(s)
Liked: 17
Thanks FoxEng and Trip for the explanations - yeah, that helps me understand it more. Particularly interesting is FoxEng's point on the how the power levels need to be very close - that's something I had a hunch about in the back of my mind when I posted my question, but failed to mention. The "exception" is also interesting - using Trip's example of WCCB and WGTB given the distances between each site, yet on adjacent channels. Would part of this also be that WGTB (which I believe is LPTV) does not have the same interference protections as full power TV stations?

Eric Calhoun

"If it was simple, anyone could do it" - Roy Clark from Hee Haw
eacalhoun is online now  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply Local HDTV Info and Reception



Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off