Why 1000kW ERP ceiling? - AVS Forum
Forum Jump: 
 
Thread Tools
post #1 of 10 Old 05-09-2002, 08:45 AM - Thread Starter
AVS Special Member
 
sregener's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Southeast MN
Posts: 3,085
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
Okay, this is a serious question: Why are digital stations broadcasting at a maximum ERP of 1000kW when analog UHF stations are broadcasting at up to 5000kW? Is it because the "experts" figure that you need a lower powered signal to receive digital? Or are the broadcasters all just agreeing that 1000kW is as high as they want to go?

It seems to me, with all the problems receiving HDTV out there, that a boost in ERP might be in order...
sregener is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 10 Old 05-09-2002, 08:52 AM
jhe
AVS Special Member
 
jhe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Lexington, MA, USA
Posts: 1,274
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
Could it be an FCC regulation to try to control the clutter?

We already have lots of stations overlapping and interfering with each other, due to the doubling of transmitters for the transition, and the government getting rid of a big part of our TV spectrum.

I've seen problems with:

ch 19 in Boston and Adams Ma
ch 30 in Boston and Hartford
ch 57 in Boston and Springfield

etc, etc. More power would just make the situation worse.

What I'd like to see is not more power but say 2 times the number of TV channel slots, and all broadcast towers required to be on Mountain tops at over 3000 ft elevation. Then we'd all get better tv coverage.
jhe is offline  
post #3 of 10 Old 05-09-2002, 09:27 AM
AVS Special Member
 
Man E's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: The Wilderness Near Hell
Posts: 4,460
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
It is partially interference, partially competition. I remember reading about an AM station that broadcast from St. Louis during WWII. It was strong enough that it could be received in Europe by our troops (curvature of the earth and low frequency). Anyway, after the war other stations around the country started to complain that their signal was encroaching or such and the FCC moved to limit power output.

Or at least that's how I remember it. I'll try to find the article online.

Still looking, but this was interesting.

HBO is guilty of Crimes Against Filmanity!

From Paragraph 44 of the 5th Report and Order: We note in this regard that broadcasters and networks have emphasized their commitment to high definition television.

Our Silent Angels Please visit The Manny Page!
Man E is offline  
post #4 of 10 Old 05-09-2002, 09:35 AM
Advanced Member
 
NightowlKY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Winter Garden, FL USA
Posts: 725
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
Well, digital is supposed to be received with less power, from what I understand. And, going to VHF should help even more.

There's a PBS station 40 miles ENE of me that's only at 49.7kW. The terrain where the tower is located is quite hilly but relatively flat near me. And, their tower is less than 700' HAAT. It's a directional antenna but I'm in a decent spot with a Relative Field Value of about 0.83 and I lock consistently on that station. Even before I went to the stack on my roof. I even lock on it with my attic-based antenna.
NightowlKY is offline  
post #5 of 10 Old 05-09-2002, 10:02 AM
Senior Member
 
RickRS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Ft. Walton Beach. FL
Posts: 463
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
FCC estimates that DTV coverage in UHF for the equivalent of analog TV's Grade B contours requires a DTV signal of 41dBuV/meter at your antenna. The Grade B contour for analog TV is based on a UHF signal level of 64dBuV/meter. So from this little exerise, the FCC is estimating that DTV is ok at a 23dB reduction in signal level compared to analog TV.

1 MW vs. 5 MW is a reduction of 7dB. Should work then, huh?

And, yes, too much signal will cause interference with other stations, etc.

Of course, I'm just crunching numbers, this has nothing to do with the real world.

Rick Steverson

Surely you didn't make the mistake of thinking I know what I'm talking about?!!
RickRS is offline  
post #6 of 10 Old 05-09-2002, 10:15 AM
Advanced Member
 
Jon J's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Music City, USA
Posts: 881
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Liked: 23
Quote:
Originally posted by Man E
I remember reading about an AM station that broadcast from St. Louis during WWII. It was strong enough that it could be received in Europe by our troops (curvature of the earth and low frequency). Anyway, after the war other stations around the country started to complain that their signal was encroaching or such and the FCC moved to limit power output.
Could you actually be remembering WLW in Cincinnatti? Referred to during the war as the "Nation's Station", I believe the FCC allowed it 500kw in order to be heard in Europe. That authority was revoked after WWII and it returned to the clear channel power of 50kw that has always been the limit.

When news breaks...we fix it.
Jon J is offline  
post #7 of 10 Old 05-09-2002, 10:33 AM
AVS Special Member
 
Man E's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: The Wilderness Near Hell
Posts: 4,460
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
Could be Jon. Your facts are certainly more specific than are mine :D I wasn't able to find any other information. Gee, guess I'll do some work now ;)

HBO is guilty of Crimes Against Filmanity!

From Paragraph 44 of the 5th Report and Order: We note in this regard that broadcasters and networks have emphasized their commitment to high definition television.

Our Silent Angels Please visit The Manny Page!
Man E is offline  
post #8 of 10 Old 05-09-2002, 10:36 AM
Advanced Member
 
Jon J's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Music City, USA
Posts: 881
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Liked: 23
Upon further review...it was actually 1934 to 1939 it was at 500kw.

I found a very comprehensive link just in case you are interested.

http://hawkins.pair.com/wlw.shtml#nationstationsect

When news breaks...we fix it.
Jon J is offline  
post #9 of 10 Old 05-09-2002, 11:34 AM
AVS Special Member
 
Man E's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: The Wilderness Near Hell
Posts: 4,460
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
Thanks!

HBO is guilty of Crimes Against Filmanity!

From Paragraph 44 of the 5th Report and Order: We note in this regard that broadcasters and networks have emphasized their commitment to high definition television.

Our Silent Angels Please visit The Manny Page!
Man E is offline  
post #10 of 10 Old 05-09-2002, 12:05 PM
AVS Special Member
 
jdmcdonald's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,051
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
DTV and NTSC stations are rated differently. DTV is average power,
NTSC is peak (sync tip). The peak/average ratio of NTSC depends
very much on brightness, the peak/average ratio of DTV is constant.

1 MW DTV and 5 MW NTSC are very roughly equivalent in average power.

Doug McDonald
jdmcdonald is offline  
Closed Thread Local HDTV Info and Reception

User Tag List

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page


Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off