Austin, TX - HDTV - Page 242 - AVS Forum | Home Theater Discussions And Reviews
Forum Jump: 
 38Likes
Reply
 
Thread Tools
post #7231 of 7245 Old 08-07-2017, 01:12 PM
AVS Forum Special Member
 
xnappo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 2,867
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 115 Post(s)
Liked: 107
Quote:
Originally Posted by austinsho View Post
I'd go for an outside antenna and either a TiVo or a Philips/Magnavox DVR.
Thanks for the input. My Mohu leaf seems to be doing fine (even with KTBC) and I want integration with AndroidTV/FireTV - so will try out the SiliconDust.

xnappo
xnappo is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #7232 of 7245 Old 08-27-2017, 02:46 PM
AVS Forum Special Member
 
grittree's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Austin TX
Posts: 2,526
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 331 Post(s)
Liked: 182
I wonder why KEYE OTA has been bad all weekend. Lots of dropouts. No problems on the other major locals.

Their DirecTV signal is good. Do they get a direct feed?
grittree is offline  
post #7233 of 7245 Old 08-27-2017, 03:52 PM
** Man of Leisure **
 
AustinJerry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 16,242
Mentioned: 206 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7569 Post(s)
Liked: 4226
Quote:
Originally Posted by grittree View Post
I wonder why KEYE OTA has been bad all weekend. Lots of dropouts. No problems on the other major locals.

Their DirecTV signal is good. Do they get a direct feed?
I have not been watching the KEYE OTA feed, but I tuned in when I saw your post. The signal is solid on my system.
AustinJerry is offline  
 
post #7234 of 7245 Old 09-18-2017, 02:49 PM
Member
 
bc022372's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 58
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7 Post(s)
Liked: 10
Question regarding KTBC OTA reception.

I'm looking into becoming a cord-cutter so recently I got an antenna to see how my reception was of Austin OTA channels. I am in the 78728 zipcode so I should be able to get all the Austin channels. I could get all the channels except for KTBC. What was really odd about not getting KTBC is that my TV said my signal strength for KTBC (when I manually tuned the channel) was zero.

My first thought was maybe I bought a UHF only antenna. The box wasn't marked with what bands the antenna covered so I took it back to Fry's and got a different antenna that was explicitly marked "UHF/VHF". But even with the new antenna I got the same results on my TV...zero signal strength for KTBC.

Any body know what's going on here?
bc022372 is offline  
post #7235 of 7245 Old 09-18-2017, 02:53 PM
Senior Member
 
WSZsr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Round Rock, TX
Posts: 240
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10 Post(s)
Liked: 12
Quote:
Originally Posted by bc022372 View Post
Question regarding KTBC OTA reception.

I'm looking into becoming a cord-cutter so recently I got an antenna to see how my reception was of Austin OTA channels. I am in the 78728 zipcode so I should be able to get all the Austin channels. I could get all the channels except for KTBC. What was really odd about not getting KTBC is that my TV said my signal strength for KTBC (when I manually tuned the channel) was zero.

My first thought was maybe I bought a UHF only antenna. The box wasn't marked with what bands the antenna covered so I took it back to Fry's and got a different antenna that was explicitly marked "UHF/VHF". But even with the new antenna I got the same results on my TV...zero signal strength for KTBC.

Any body know what's going on here?
Did you buy a VHF or VHF/UHF antenna? Fox requires UHF

Onkyo TX-RZ810 Receiver
Polk Audio RTI A3 Bookshelf Speakers
Polk Audio RTI A1 Bookshelf Speakers
Boston Acoustic VR10 Center
Energy ESW-310 Subwoofer
Samsung UN65ES6500 TV
WSZsr is offline  
post #7236 of 7245 Old 09-18-2017, 04:15 PM
** Man of Leisure **
 
AustinJerry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 16,242
Mentioned: 206 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7569 Post(s)
Liked: 4226
Quote:
Originally Posted by WSZsr View Post
Did you buy a VHF or VHF/UHF antenna? Fox requires UHF
?? According to this link, KTBC is VHF.


https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/KTBC_(TV)
AustinJerry is offline  
post #7237 of 7245 Old 09-18-2017, 04:21 PM
** Man of Leisure **
 
AustinJerry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 16,242
Mentioned: 206 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7569 Post(s)
Liked: 4226
Quote:
Originally Posted by bc022372 View Post
Question regarding KTBC OTA reception.

Any body know what's going on here?
Very strange. My OTA antenna (Zip 78750, just north of the Pennybacker bridge with a clear line-of-sight to Davenport Ranch antennas) receives KTBC just fine. According to the signal diagnostics on the TV, the signal is 44/100.
AustinJerry is offline  
post #7238 of 7245 Old 09-18-2017, 08:25 PM
Member
 
bc022372's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 58
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7 Post(s)
Liked: 10
Quote:
Originally Posted by WSZsr View Post
Did you buy a VHF or VHF/UHF antenna? Fox requires UHF
Like I said, I bought a VHF/UHF antenna so I had both bands covered.
bc022372 is offline  
post #7239 of 7245 Old 09-18-2017, 08:29 PM
Member
 
bc022372's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 58
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7 Post(s)
Liked: 10
Quote:
Originally Posted by AustinJerry View Post
Very strange. My OTA antenna (Zip 78750, just north of the Pennybacker bridge with a clear line-of-sight to Davenport Ranch antennas) receives KTBC just fine. According to the signal diagnostics on the TV, the signal is 44/100.
Thanks...glad to know it's not just me that finds this strange. It's also very frustrating.
bc022372 is offline  
post #7240 of 7245 Old 09-19-2017, 08:30 AM
AVS Forum Special Member
 
xnappo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 2,867
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 115 Post(s)
Liked: 107
For KTBC you need to point the antenna quite carefully. VHF is a lot lower power than UHF. You might have to go as far as moving to an attic antenna.
xnappo is offline  
post #7241 of 7245 Old 09-19-2017, 08:51 AM
** Man of Leisure **
 
AustinJerry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 16,242
Mentioned: 206 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7569 Post(s)
Liked: 4226
Quote:
Originally Posted by xnappo View Post
For KTBC you need to point the antenna quite carefully. VHF is a lot lower power than UHF. You might have to go as far as moving to an attic antenna.
I don't think the OP specified the location of the antenna. To clarify, the signal strength I reported earlier is from an outside antenna mounted on the top of my chimney. I have no experience with indoor antennas of any kind.
AustinJerry is offline  
post #7242 of 7245 Old 09-19-2017, 09:06 AM
AVS Forum Special Member
 
xnappo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 2,867
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 115 Post(s)
Liked: 107
Quote:
Originally Posted by AustinJerry View Post
I don't think the OP specified the location of the antenna. To clarify, the signal strength I reported earlier is from an outside antenna mounted on the top of my chimney. I have no experience with indoor antennas of any kind.
Yes - the type of antenna is pretty important here
xnappo is offline  
post #7243 of 7245 Old 09-21-2017, 03:49 PM
Member
 
bc022372's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 58
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7 Post(s)
Liked: 10
Quote:
Originally Posted by xnappo View Post
For KTBC you need to point the antenna quite carefully. VHF is a lot lower power than UHF. You might have to go as far as moving to an attic antenna.
Quote:
Originally Posted by AustinJerry View Post
I don't think the OP specified the location of the antenna. To clarify, the signal strength I reported earlier is from an outside antenna mounted on the top of my chimney. I have no experience with indoor antennas of any kind.
I bought an RCA SLIVR Amplified Indoor Flat HDTV Antenna Multi Directional.

I can understand how pointing a directional antenna in a better direction will improve the signal. But would does having an antenna point in the wrong direction really result in zero signal strength?
bc022372 is offline  
post #7244 of 7245 Old 09-21-2017, 04:08 PM
** Man of Leisure **
 
AustinJerry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 16,242
Mentioned: 206 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7569 Post(s)
Liked: 4226
Even with my outside antenna, FOX measures 43/100 compared with ABC, which measures 79/100. This demonstrates that the KTBC signal is not as strong. As I said in my previous post, I have no experience with indoor antennas, but it would surprise me if that antenna were very efficient. If you are serious about getting OTA signals, you should consider an outside antenna.
AustinJerry is offline  
post #7245 of 7245 Old Yesterday, 10:14 AM
AVS Forum Special Member
 
xnappo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 2,867
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 115 Post(s)
Liked: 107
Quote:
Originally Posted by bc022372 View Post
I can understand how pointing a directional antenna in a better direction will improve the signal. But would does having an antenna point in the wrong direction really result in zero signal strength?
Yes - it really can. If it gets below ~35, the tuner will usually just report 0 because it can't tell the signal from the noise.

That antenna isn't going to cut it, unfortunately. Those flat antennas are not really built to receive VHF - them claiming it does is no good... Sure it will receive VHF, but at a much shorter range than UHF.
xnappo is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply Local HDTV Info and Reception

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page


Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off