New TV. How big and how close? - AVS Forum
Forum Jump: 
 
Thread Tools
post #1 of 18 Old 09-21-2012, 05:16 AM - Thread Starter
Member
 
ocezam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 84
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
My 57" Mitsu DLP is 5 years old. It's been a great TV but it's time to upgrade. I'd like to go a bit bigger, but how big is too big? My TV is in a 14 foot room. Because of the depth of the TV and couch, my eyes are approximately 11 feet from the screen.

It seems to me a 65" screen wouldn't be a problem but then I'd be considering a 638 series Mitsu and aren't they still 60 Hz? I'd love the newer series 73" but am concerned it would be too big in my room.

I've done some internet searches and the "expert" opinions were all over the board. I'd like to hear some thoughts of AVS members please. What direct experience do you have, good or bad, with screen size and viewing distance?
ocezam is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 18 Old 09-21-2012, 05:35 AM
Senior Member
 
JackVette's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: York, Pa
Posts: 210
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Liked: 10
I'm interested in the take from others.....

I also sit right at 11 feet from the screen, and I'm also looking for a replacement unit.


But, I've had a 73" HDTV for quite some time. Its definitely NOT too big. I want to go bigger. I'm actually thinking about 90". I don't know if that's too big.
JackVette is offline  
post #3 of 18 Old 09-21-2012, 07:40 AM
AVS Addicted Member
 
videobruce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Buffalo NY
Posts: 15,205
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 216 Post(s)
Liked: 150
Quote:
my eyes are approximately 11 feet from the screen.
57" is fine. I wouldn't go more than 60 06 maybe 65". I sit around 12' and mine is a 5 year old Mits. 57" wink.gif

Other than size, what's wrong with what you have?

.
.
Abundant OTA television is what makes this country different from all others. Lets keep it this way. If you like Wi-Fi so much, OTA fits right in. After all, it is wireless.
videobruce is offline  
post #4 of 18 Old 09-21-2012, 08:03 AM
Advanced Member
 
lobosrul's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 857
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 32 Post(s)
Liked: 30
I've had a 73" Mits for about 6 months now and I sit only 9' from it. Watching a movie on BD is almost like being in the theater, I love it. Only trouble is compression artifacts on DBS and sometimes OTA, become really obvious. I suggest going with the biggest you can afford, and can fit in the space its going.
lobosrul is offline  
post #5 of 18 Old 09-21-2012, 04:51 PM
AVS Special Member
 
gtgray's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 3,422
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 36 Post(s)
Liked: 53
Get an 80" class display.

Just another blank signature.
gtgray is offline  
post #6 of 18 Old 09-21-2012, 05:14 PM
AVS Special Member
 
colour's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Fenton, Mo.
Posts: 1,752
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Liked: 29
My farthest seating distance from my 73" is 14 ft but I really don't get the benefit of HD at that distance at 10 feet I really see the difference. I would have bought the 82" but I didn't like the pic on the 82" at that time. There's nothing wrong with sitting 14 ft away from a 73" but you're just not utilizing the potential of HD.
colour is offline  
post #7 of 18 Old 09-21-2012, 05:41 PM - Thread Starter
Member
 
ocezam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 84
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
Wow great replies. Thanks.

Any more?
ocezam is offline  
post #8 of 18 Old 09-21-2012, 06:22 PM
g4s
Senior Member
 
g4s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: St. Charles, MO
Posts: 221
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 17
We sit about 10 feet from our 92" set. It's about the recommended THX viewing angle. Here's a good distance calculator. http://myhometheater.homestead.com/viewingdistancecalculator.html You can play with the numbers and get an idea of what a larger display would look like in your room, by moving closer to your 57" to match the viewing angle a larger display would give you. Hope that makes sense.
g4s is offline  
post #9 of 18 Old 09-21-2012, 06:33 PM
Member
 
colohtpc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 108
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 13
A quick and easy way that I have seen and heard from more than one "expert source" calibrators, is to measure the viewing distance in inches and divide by 2. Best screen size for your spot 66".

colohtpc is offline  
post #10 of 18 Old 09-22-2012, 05:12 AM - Thread Starter
Member
 
ocezam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 84
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
Quote:
Originally Posted by g4s View Post

We sit about 10 feet from our 92" set. It's about the recommended THX viewing angle. Here's a good distance calculator. http://myhometheater.homestead.com/viewingdistancecalculator.html You can play with the numbers and get an idea of what a larger display would look like in your room, by moving closer to your 57" to match the viewing angle a larger display would give you. Hope that makes sense.
Quote:
Originally Posted by g4s View Post

We sit about 10 feet from our 92" set. It's about the recommended THX viewing angle. Here's a good distance calculator. http://myhometheater.homestead.com/viewingdistancecalculator.html You can play with the numbers and get an idea of what a larger display would look like in your room, by moving closer to your 57" to match the viewing angle a larger display would give you. Hope that makes sense.

Wow! 10 feet from a 92" screen! Sure wish I could experience that.

Yeah, I'm aware that THX recommends a fairly close distance.

Moving my couch closer to the TV is a great suggestion, thanks. I think I'll do that this weekend and watch a couple of movies.
ocezam is offline  
post #11 of 18 Old 09-22-2012, 05:55 AM
AVS Addicted Member
 
videobruce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Buffalo NY
Posts: 15,205
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 216 Post(s)
Liked: 150
Quote:
We sit about 10 feet from our 92" set. It's about the recommended THX viewing angle.
I bet you don't watch analog, SD or "HD Lite". wink.gif
That's fine if you have a BluRay player, but even with OTA, I would say it's too close.

.
.
Abundant OTA television is what makes this country different from all others. Lets keep it this way. If you like Wi-Fi so much, OTA fits right in. After all, it is wireless.
videobruce is offline  
post #12 of 18 Old 09-22-2012, 11:00 AM
g4s
Senior Member
 
g4s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: St. Charles, MO
Posts: 221
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 17
Quote:
Originally Posted by videobruce View Post

I bet you don't watch analog, SD or "HD Lite". wink.gif
That's fine if you have a BluRay player, but even with OTA, I would say it's too close.
Anything HD looks great. Well mastered DVD's are fine, but we don't really watch much SD content anymore. I still have my huge VHS collection. Don't think we'll be watching those.

We started with a 45" mitsubishi in the mid 80's. This is the 5th one. Never once said "I wish I got the smaller one". smile.gif
g4s is offline  
post #13 of 18 Old 09-22-2012, 01:41 PM - Thread Starter
Member
 
ocezam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 84
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
Quote:
Originally Posted by g4s View Post

Anything HD looks great. Well mastered DVD's are fine, but we don't really watch much SD content anymore. I still have my huge VHS collection. Don't think we'll be watching those.
We started with a 45" mitsubishi in the mid 80's. This is the 5th one. Never once said "I wish I got the smaller one". smile.gif

I was concerned 5 years ago that the 65 would be too big so I got the 57. The 65 definitely wouldn't have been too big. I think this thread has convinced me the 73 won't be too big either.

The 82 might be a bit big for me, but it's also more than I want to spend so I guess it's the 73 for me.


Thanks for all the replies.


...
ocezam is offline  
post #14 of 18 Old 09-23-2012, 06:21 AM
Senior Member
 
JackVette's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: York, Pa
Posts: 210
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Liked: 10
Quote:
Originally Posted by g4s View Post

We sit about 10 feet from our 92" set. It's about the recommended THX viewing angle. Here's a good distance calculator. http://myhometheater.homestead.com/viewingdistancecalculator.html You can play with the numbers and get an idea of what a larger display would look like in your room, by moving closer to your 57" to match the viewing angle a larger display would give you. Hope that makes sense.

I'm thinking about getting the 92" also. I would also just about 10 feet from the front of the set.

Are you happy with that? Do you ever wish you got the 82" instead?
JackVette is offline  
post #15 of 18 Old 09-23-2012, 07:56 AM
Advanced Member
 
squeakybirnbaum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: MO
Posts: 554
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8 Post(s)
Liked: 18
Quote:
Originally Posted by JackVette View Post

I'm thinking about getting the 92" also. I would also just about 10 feet from the front of the set.
Are you happy with that? Do you ever wish you got the 82" instead?
Damn this enormous TV!! I feel like I'm TOO there!!!
squeakybirnbaum is online now  
post #16 of 18 Old 09-24-2012, 03:24 PM
AVS Special Member
 
gtgray's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 3,422
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 36 Post(s)
Liked: 53
Quote:
Originally Posted by colour View Post

My farthest seating distance from my 73" is 14 ft but I really don't get the benefit of HD at that distance at 10 feet I really see the difference. I would have bought the 82" but I didn't like the pic on the 82" at that time. There's nothing wrong with sitting 14 ft away from a 73" but you're just not utilizing the potential of HD.

The 2009 82" was disappointing compared to the later displays. The 2011 and later 92" sets are much better than the 2009 82" ---lots more light, CMS works much better. Blue is still slightly deingatured in Natural but luminance dials in on the colors pretty much perfectly. Very nice and easy to get low color dEs. Honestly, the 82" 2009 is a POS compared to the 2011 and 2012s. The 2011 82840 would be very compelling if someone had the right room and couold still fine one out there for sale..

Just another blank signature.
gtgray is offline  
post #17 of 18 Old 09-24-2012, 03:59 PM
AVS Special Member
 
colour's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Fenton, Mo.
Posts: 1,752
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Liked: 29
Quote:
Originally Posted by gtgray View Post

The 2009 82" was disappointing compared to the later displays. The 2011 and later 92" sets are much better than the 2009 82" ---lots more light, CMS works much better. Blue is still slightly deingatured in Natural but luminance dials in on the colors pretty much perfectly. Very nice and easy to get low color dEs. Honestly, the 82" 2009 is a POS compared to the 2011 and 2012s. The 2011 82840 would be very compelling if someone had the right room and couold still fine one out there for sale..

Yes I know I may upgrade to the 92" just don't know if I can deal with the high contrast screen.
colour is offline  
post #18 of 18 Old 09-25-2012, 10:27 PM
Advanced Member
 
mtallent's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Cecilia,KY
Posts: 867
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Liked: 13
I set 7 feet from my 65 inch and it looks great. I can just resolve a 1 pixel wide 1080P test signal at that distance, with 20-20 corrected vision. I have 1:1 pixel mapping so it looks great with no re-sizing artifacts. This compares very close with the distance that is shown in the chart linked in my sig.

Mike T
mtallent is offline  
Reply Rear Projection Units

User Tag List

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page


Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off