2008 Samsung DLP's Discussion (HLxxA650/A750) - Page 7 - AVS Forum
Forum Jump: 
Reply
 
Thread Tools
post #181 of 5059 Old 01-30-2008, 08:47 PM
Newbie
 
displaytechfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 9
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
Hi, I'm also interested in this TV. Did you notice if the screen looked uniform and how was the black levels on this TV?
Thanks
displaytechfan is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #182 of 5059 Old 01-30-2008, 09:39 PM
Advanced Member
 
TetsujinWave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Durham, NC
Posts: 605
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
The screen was uniform. The blacks looked fine, but the clip being shown was a bright, vivid CG cityscape sequence that didn't really test the blacks that much. The colors (which the clip was trying to accentuate) were vibrant and rich.
TetsujinWave is offline  
post #183 of 5059 Old 01-31-2008, 05:51 AM
Member
 
slamduncan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Toronto
Posts: 61
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
Thanks for the info TW.. and in hindsight your thought process makes good sense... I wouldn't go up to a sony booth and say 'but what about the green blobs'... lol

Not sure if these tv's will be available in Canada at the same time as US and I can't wait much longer anyhow...

thanks again !
slamduncan is offline  
post #184 of 5059 Old 01-31-2008, 07:19 AM
AVS Special Member
 
davegow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: In the glorious open countryside of Eastern Ontario.
Posts: 1,686
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
Samsung had the 87/89 LED models here in Canada quite soon after they appeared in the States. I was watching for them.
davegow is offline  
post #185 of 5059 Old 01-31-2008, 07:40 AM
Member
 
ranger2131's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 134
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
Quote:
Originally Posted by TetsujinWave View Post

The screen was uniform. The blacks looked fine, but the clip being shown was a bright, vivid CG cityscape sequence that didn't really test the blacks that much. The colors (which the clip was trying to accentuate) were vibrant and rich.

Thanks for all your posts.

Since they are supposed to be brighter, I am hoping for better off angle viewing. I know some disagree but imo current models are not quite as good as bulb rptv in this regard. Obviously you didn't have an 87s side by side, but did off-angle viewing appear better? Did it appear to be a lower gain screen?

You mentioned sse looked reduced, making me hopeful this is the case.
ranger2131 is offline  
post #186 of 5059 Old 01-31-2008, 07:43 AM
Member
 
Sennat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 40
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
I could see from the beginnings of the 87/89 thread that those sets were shipped in early April '07. What I couldn't find was when the first real information about those sets was available (I'm mostly interested in dimensions, also of course the internal tech). Does anyone remember? It would give a clue as to when similar info will be available on the 650/750s.
Sennat is offline  
post #187 of 5059 Old 01-31-2008, 08:08 AM
Newbie
 
Slydoggydogg68's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 2
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
Quote:
Originally Posted by TetsujinWave View Post

No problem at all. I don't know if you can see it very well, but the blurred picture on the adjacent set is due to the 3D demonstration, which was also running at the TI booth.

I was told the 67" set would retail for $3000.

Thanks, Tetsujin, and JohnAV! I may have missed it already within these pages, but will ask this question anyway. Any price ideas on 72" and 7 series 67" DLP's?

I was just about to buy Pioneer 6010FD Plasma, b4 I read this post. THANKS AGAIN
Slydoggydogg68 is offline  
post #188 of 5059 Old 01-31-2008, 09:37 AM
Member
 
Tony Touch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 79
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
This thread definitely has me reconsidering my plan to buy the 6187. We are moving into a new townhome in late March and had planned on buying the 6187 at that time. But I'll definitely wait if the new 61" comes in April, and is priced $2500 or less.
Tony Touch is offline  
post #189 of 5059 Old 01-31-2008, 12:30 PM
Advanced Member
 
TetsujinWave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Durham, NC
Posts: 605
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tony Touch View Post

This thread definitely has me reconsidering my plan to buy the 6187. We are moving into a new townhome in late March and had planned on buying the 6187 at that time. But I'll definitely wait if the new 61" comes in April, and is priced $2500 or less.

I think there has been an improvement on off angle viewing and SSE. It doesn't equal LCD off angle viewing by any means, but it is better than last year's models. I am not sure about the lower gain screen, but again, SSE had been reduced.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Slydoggydogg68 View Post

Thanks, Tetsujin, and JohnAV! I may have missed it already within these pages, but will ask this question anyway. Any price ideas on 72" and 7 series 67" DLP's?

I was just about to buy Pioneer 6010FD Plasma, b4 I read this post. THANKS AGAIN

I was told the 67" would retail for $3000. They did not give a clear retail price on the 72".
TetsujinWave is offline  
post #190 of 5059 Old 01-31-2008, 02:40 PM
Member
 
ranger2131's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 134
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
Quote:
Originally Posted by TetsujinWave View Post

I think there has been an improvement on off angle viewing and SSE. It doesn't equal LCD off angle viewing by any means, but it is better than last year's models. I am not sure about the lower gain screen, but again, SSE had been reduced.

Thank you very much again for all the info and taking time to post pictures. I was hoping you'd say this.

In your last set of pics the 3rd one sure makes it look like the off angle is better. But since it's impossible to tell with pics, especially really bright screenshots, your opinion means much more
ranger2131 is offline  
post #191 of 5059 Old 01-31-2008, 03:24 PM
Newbie
 
Slydoggydogg68's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 2
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
[quote=TetsujinWave; I was told the 67" would retail for $3000. They did not give a clear retail price on the 72".[/QUOTE]

THANK YOU, TW! If I said that New 6 Series are NOT LED, and 7 series ARE, would that be accurate? Or is there other differences?

And what is your opinion of these TV's compared to mtsu's Laser DLP's?
Slydoggydogg68 is offline  
post #192 of 5059 Old 01-31-2008, 04:06 PM
Member
 
nesto719's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Colorado Springs ,Co
Posts: 190
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
Quote:
Originally Posted by TetsujinWave View Post

I think there has been an improvement on off angle viewing and SSE. It doesn't equal LCD off angle viewing by any means, but it is better than last year's models. I am not sure about the lower gain screen, but again, SSE had been reduced.



I was told the 67" would retail for $3000. They did not give a clear retail price on the 72".

hey t.w you are the **** bro. i am a mits tv fan , and i have never bought a samsung product but i have noticed latley that the samsungs pq looks sharper then the mits. so this may be my first samsung purchase.

SAY HELLO TO MY LITTLE FRIEND.
nesto719 is offline  
post #193 of 5059 Old 01-31-2008, 05:17 PM
AVS Special Member
 
arthurvino's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: NJ
Posts: 1,308
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
Lets wait until both products are released and then we ask this question again?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Slydoggydogg68 View Post


And what is your opinion of these TV's compared to mtsu's Laser DLP's?

arthurvino is offline  
post #194 of 5059 Old 01-31-2008, 08:45 PM
Advanced Member
 
TetsujinWave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Durham, NC
Posts: 605
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
Quote:
Originally Posted by arthurvino View Post

Lets wait until both products are released and then we ask this question again?

For certain.

I think both sets show a great deal of promise. As I said earlier, I was a bit disappointed in the thickness of the laser tv, because I'd been led to believe they'd be much smaller. The picture quality was very impressive. Speckle did not seem to be an issue and the colors were spectacular.
TetsujinWave is offline  
post #195 of 5059 Old 02-01-2008, 09:30 AM - Thread Starter
AVS Special Member
 
JohnAV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 6,450
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 11 Post(s)
Liked: 71
Quote:
Originally Posted by Slydoggydogg68 View Post

THANK YOU, TW! If I said that New 6 Series are NOT LED, and 7 series ARE, would that be accurate? Or is there other differences?

And what is your opinion of these TV's compared to mtsu's Laser DLP's?

The series 6 are bulb models and the series 7 are LED models.
There simply is not enough information available to state what the other differences are.

As everyone is saying it is way too soon to make a fair comparison between 2008 LED DLP models and some preproduction Laser TV's.

Oppo Beta Group
JohnAV is offline  
post #196 of 5059 Old 02-01-2008, 02:10 PM
Newbie
 
OnlyEwe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 7
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
Am I right that the 7 series (w/LED) do not include 50" anymore??
That implies that 50" LED models stop with the current x87/x89??
OnlyEwe is offline  
post #197 of 5059 Old 02-01-2008, 02:16 PM
 
ElwayLite's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 5,559
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
Quote:
Originally Posted by OnlyEwe View Post

Am I right that the 7 series (w/LED) do not include 50" anymore??
That implies that 50" LED models stop with the current x87/x89??

Only 61 and 67 from reading this thread.
ElwayLite is offline  
post #198 of 5059 Old 02-01-2008, 05:05 PM
Member
 
nesto719's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Colorado Springs ,Co
Posts: 190
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
hey t.w did you notice if the new sammy's were using some kind of motion processing like how the sony a3000 uses?

SAY HELLO TO MY LITTLE FRIEND.
nesto719 is offline  
post #199 of 5059 Old 02-01-2008, 10:12 PM
Advanced Member
 
TetsujinWave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Durham, NC
Posts: 605
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
I didn't see anything like that outside of the 240Hz prototype at the TI booth. I'm not sure that the DLP chips need that kind of processing because they are quite a bit faster than the SXRD chips were WRT response time.

So no, I didn't see anything like that advertized on the 6 and 7 models. This is the first year since 1080p DLP sets have been available that I didn't see a 50" or a 56" model displayed at the Samsung booth.
TetsujinWave is offline  
post #200 of 5059 Old 02-02-2008, 11:00 AM
Member
 
dontknow09's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 15
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
Wasn't the 240Hz feature included just to improve the 3D feature, having 120Hz screens on each eye instead of 60Hz?
dontknow09 is offline  
post #201 of 5059 Old 02-02-2008, 02:40 PM
Member
 
nesto719's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Colorado Springs ,Co
Posts: 190
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
i think it would be nice if they had motion processing in the new dlp. i just kind of like the way it makes the picture look , but most importantly is pq overall , and price.

SAY HELLO TO MY LITTLE FRIEND.
nesto719 is offline  
post #202 of 5059 Old 02-02-2008, 05:52 PM
AVS Special Member
 
moonhawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: La Madera, New Mexico
Posts: 3,188
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 34
I suspect the reason they don't have the smaller size DLPs is because the larger ones are where they really have a price advantage over flat panels.

Could be wrong, of course.

______________________

__________

Dave

moonhawk is online now  
post #203 of 5059 Old 02-02-2008, 07:27 PM
Advanced Member
 
TetsujinWave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Durham, NC
Posts: 605
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
Quote:
Originally Posted by dontknow09 View Post

Wasn't the 240Hz feature included just to improve the 3D feature, having 120Hz screens on each eye instead of 60Hz?

No, the 240Hz prototype was demonstrating motion improvement in video. It may have been on the 3D and DualView demo sets as well, but they weren't advertizing it in that way, IIRC.
TetsujinWave is offline  
post #204 of 5059 Old 02-02-2008, 08:17 PM
Member
 
chunkysoup's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 17
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
the game begins, thank you for some great info and pics.
chunkysoup is offline  
post #205 of 5059 Old 02-03-2008, 07:47 PM
AVS Special Member
 
vfrjim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: West Warwick, RI
Posts: 4,479
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
Would this be the 2nd or 3rd generation LED RPTV's from Samsung?

Support C-band, the only true satellite signal, More information HERE
vfrjim is offline  
post #206 of 5059 Old 02-03-2008, 08:11 PM
 
ElwayLite's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 5,559
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
Quote:
Originally Posted by vfrjim View Post

Would this be the 2nd or 3rd generation LED RPTV's from Samsung?

2nd.
ElwayLite is offline  
post #207 of 5059 Old 02-03-2008, 08:18 PM
AVS Special Member
 
fitbrit's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 2,059
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Liked: 24
Quote:
Originally Posted by vfrjim View Post

Would this be the 2nd or 3rd generation LED RPTV's from Samsung?

3rd gen. The HL-S5679W was the first generation 1080p LED DLP in 2006, although it became tough to find a few months after its release.
fitbrit is offline  
post #208 of 5059 Old 02-03-2008, 08:20 PM
 
ElwayLite's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 5,559
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
Quote:
Originally Posted by fitbrit View Post

3rd gen. The HL-S5679W was the first generation 1080p LED DLP in 2006, although it became tough to find a few months after its release.

Ooops, sorry. I thought we were heading into the 2nd gen.
ElwayLite is offline  
post #209 of 5059 Old 02-03-2008, 09:21 PM
Member
 
nesto719's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Colorado Springs ,Co
Posts: 190
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
i think now that the superbowl is over we will start to hear more info on the new sammy.

SAY HELLO TO MY LITTLE FRIEND.
nesto719 is offline  
post #210 of 5059 Old 02-03-2008, 10:23 PM - Thread Starter
AVS Special Member
 
JohnAV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 6,450
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 11 Post(s)
Liked: 71
Quote:
Originally Posted by fitbrit View Post

3rd gen. The HL-S5679W was the first generation 1080p LED DLP in 2006, although it became tough to find a few months after its release.

Correct. The HL-S5679W was a lot dimmer, and suffered green push compared to the 2007 xx87s/xx89s series. The HLxxA650/A750 is the third generation.

Oppo Beta Group
JohnAV is offline  
Reply Rear Projection Units

User Tag List

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page


Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off