The definitive SM codes for getting the most from your sony! - Page 3 - AVS Forum
Forum Jump: 
Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools
post #61 of 71 Old 01-16-2006, 12:50 PM
AVS Special Member
 
SurfingMatt27's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 2,770
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
Adjust QPDC for overall focus on the screen, ?And for SYSM you have to adjust it for each input and resolution, mine are all at 3.

Matt~
SurfingMatt27 is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #62 of 71 Old 01-16-2006, 01:07 PM
AVS Addicted Member
 
Ratman's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Collingswood, N.J.
Posts: 14,409
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 145 Post(s)
Liked: 281
Why don't you post under CrocHunter anymore?
Ratman is offline  
post #63 of 71 Old 01-16-2006, 09:56 PM
Member
 
Jaded's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 98
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
man Nick,Croc/Matt and Ken are amazing. i get they day off today so im going to go thru all your advices and hopefully ome out on top with my 30HS :)
Jaded is offline  
post #64 of 71 Old 01-16-2006, 11:32 PM
Member
 
Jaded's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 98
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
should i really use Pro mode when adjusting? it seems dull and not that bright.
Jaded is offline  
post #65 of 71 Old 01-17-2006, 05:42 AM
AVS Special Member
 
Jediphish's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Greenville, SC
Posts: 1,109
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Liked: 10
Yes you should be using Pro.

One of your first adjustments should be to SBRT - which adjusts Brightness, or the Black Level, of the set. Use a Pluge pattern to do it correctly. This should give you good Brightness with the User Menu Brightness slider set to the mid point (31). You also have to adjust Pictures/Contrast ("White Level").

Afterwards, you probably won't think of Pro as being as flat.
Jediphish is offline  
post #66 of 71 Old 01-17-2006, 05:55 AM
Member
 
Jaded's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 98
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
ok i should adjust with Pro at it's normal settings right(pic,contrast...etc)?
Jaded is offline  
post #67 of 71 Old 01-17-2006, 06:07 AM
AVS Special Member
 
Jediphish's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Greenville, SC
Posts: 1,109
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Liked: 10
My suggestion (and this is what I did) is to go through the entire thread Sony Service Manual thread and locate the 15 or so Articles that KenH has written (beginning with the first couple of posts in this thread). Cut and paste them into a word processor document program (MS Word) and then print it out. Read it a couple of times. Also print out the Chart KenH attached on a page or two back from this last post. If you can look at the chart while reading the Articles, it will make more sense. Then just follow his instructions and your basic questions will be answered.
Jediphish is offline  
post #68 of 71 Old 01-17-2006, 07:18 AM
AVS Special Member
 
SurfingMatt27's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 2,770
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
Yup what Jedi just said, get a pluge pattern then adjust SBRT for brightness in the service menu.Once brightness is set then move onto contrast and adjust that, According to DVE though it seems my contrast setting was already set right, right in the middle is where it should be according to DVE and after carefull observation it was right since there was some minor blooming raising contrast up a bit.

Then after that you can adjust to get rid of red push use items RYR and RYB.I would recommend downloading the service manual of these sets to see what the settings in the service menu are.Because theres an awful lot of enhancements that need to be turned completely off for your picture quality to really shine through.

Oh and Ratman, my IP address was blocked somehow with that name on my computer so i had to use another name and use my dads computer downstairs instead.
SurfingMatt27 is offline  
post #69 of 71 Old 02-06-2006, 07:38 AM
Advanced Member
 
Napoleon D's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 589
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8 Post(s)
Liked: 10
Ken Tech

In response to your "Image-Processing Codes6b.pdf" article/document. I've seen that since you posted that message, you've changed a few opinions on things. I saw the whole discussion on whether to use SYSM -2 or 3. I have gone back and forth myself, with calibrating my 480P dvd component input. My calibrator set it on 3. I think ultimately this is the way to go, it is a much smoother and cleaner image. SYSM 2, although it brings all that fine detail neatly to the surface, the tradeoff is a noisier picture. I have come to the conclusion that SYSM 3 is the way to go, although it needs some help, since the picture is so smooth that you need to strain to see the detail more. The calibrator turned off every edge enhancment in the service menu, except for a MIDE setting. He set MIDE to 17, although I don't think this was a strong enough setting. You mentioned you created a MIDE 60 setting, which i tried out with the appropriate sub-category settings etc. While it looks ok, and brings out fine detail a little more, the image still needs some help in making details more "visible."

I originally thought that ANY edge enhancement is bad, but in this case the image actually benefits, and even needs it. The trick is to bring the image just at the surface so details are able to be seen, but not overshooting. The calibrator has sharpness middled/leveled out, which is where i should probably leave it. My question, is there another sharpness enhancing feature i should be using instead of, or in addition to a strong MIDE setting? I want to give that smooth picture the appropriate sharpness boost (with setting on SYSM 3) without giving the image too much visible edge enhancement. Your articles give some suggestion on what settings to use, but when getting to a specific input, they can get vague. (I understand you were generous enough to post them in the first place, as they have helped out many) Perhaps there was an article i missed, which is probably the case.

Thanks Ken, or anyone else that can help!
Napoleon D is offline  
post #70 of 71 Old 02-06-2006, 11:18 AM
AVS Special Member
 
justsc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 2,689
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
Quote:
Originally Posted by Napoleon D
Ken Tech

In response to your "Image-Processing Codes6b.pdf" article/document. I've seen that since you posted that message, you've changed a few opinions on things. I saw the whole discussion on whether to use SYSM -2 or 3. I have gone back and forth myself, with calibrating my 480P dvd component input. My calibrator set it on 3. I think ultimately this is the way to go, it is a much smoother and cleaner image. SYSM 2, although it brings all that fine detail neatly to the surface, the tradeoff is a noisier picture. I have come to the conclusion that SYSM 3 is the way to go, although it needs some help, since the picture is so smooth that you need to strain to see the detail more. The calibrator turned off every edge enhancment in the service menu, except for a MIDE setting. He set MIDE to 17, although I don't think this was a strong enough setting. You mentioned you created a MIDE 60 setting, which i tried out with the appropriate sub-category settings etc. While it looks ok, and brings out fine detail a little more, the image still needs some help in making details more "visible."

I originally thought that ANY edge enhancement is bad, but in this case the image actually benefits, and even needs it. The trick is to bring the image just at the surface so details are able to be seen, but not overshooting. The calibrator has sharpness middled/leveled out, which is where i should probably leave it. My question, is there another sharpness enhancing feature i should be using instead of, or in addition to a strong MIDE setting? I want to give that smooth picture the appropriate sharpness boost (with setting on SYSM 3) without giving the image too much visible edge enhancement. Your articles give some suggestion on what settings to use, but when getting to a specific input, they can get vague. (I understand you were generous enough to post them in the first place, as they have helped out many) Perhaps there was an article i missed, which is probably the case.

Thanks Ken, or anyone else that can help!
This is very well-written and echoes my thoughts and questions perfectly. I am amazed at how much difference I perceive between SYSM 3 and SYSM 2. While I have happily settled on SYSM 3, I just have to believe there is some detail yet to be exposed (rather than added). This is especially important for me since I have the HS420 series set without the super fine pitch tube.
justsc is offline  
post #71 of 71 Old 02-06-2006, 02:50 PM
AVS Special Member
 
SurfingMatt27's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 2,770
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
Nothing wrong with my SONY 34HS420 with SYSM-3 and all image processing codes in the MIDE-5 chart set to 0.

Picture looks razor sharp!!It's the content now that determines the clarity of the PQ not the tv set.If it's a good signal it will show, if it's bad it will be blurry.
SurfingMatt27 is offline  
Closed Thread Direct View (single tube) CRT Displays

User Tag List

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page


Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off