Epson 1080ub vs 2012 projectors? - AVS Forum
Forum Jump: 
 
Thread Tools
post #1 of 7 Old 02-24-2012, 04:59 PM - Thread Starter
Member
 
caperguy33's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 55
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
Hello everyone, I have a Epson 1080ub refurb that I purchaced a year ago for $950 with 2 year warranty (great deal I thought) I also have 3 spare lamps.(long story) It has been a big step up from my previous beamer Epson hc720. (resolution/black level) I am very happy with the 1080ub but I wonder if I am missing out on on newer technology? Would a newer projector ex: JVC hd250 , Mitsubishi hc4000, Benq w6000 be considered an upgrade? From what I have read I understand the the $2500 / $3000 range would be an upgrade. I have the itch to upgrade if the picture quality would justify it. I still smile when I fire up the UB. Humm .The higher end JVC models? Are the really worth the premium price? My wife thinks I'm crazy for wanting to upgrade. Sorry for the rant and thanks as always.
caperguy33 is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 7 Old 02-24-2012, 06:54 PM
Senior Member
 
Bsims2719's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 461
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 26 Post(s)
Liked: 11
Quote:
Originally Posted by caperguy33 View Post

Hello everyone, I have a Epson 1080ub refurb that I purchaced a year ago for $950 with 2 year warranty (great deal I thought) I also have 3 spare lamps.(long story) It has been a big step up from my previous beamer Epson hc720. (resolution/black level) I am very happy with the 1080ub but I wonder if I am missing out on on newer technology? Would a newer projector ex: JVC hd250 , Mitsubishi hc4000, Benq w6000 be considered an upgrade? From what I have read I understand the the $2500 / $3000 range would be an upgrade. I have the itch to upgrade if the picture quality would justify it. I still smile when I fire up the UB. Humm .The higher end JVC models? Are the really worth the premium price? My wife thinks I'm crazy for wanting to upgrade. Sorry for the rant and thanks as always.

I can comment on the HC4000. I had it for a few weeks and returned it for a refurb 1080ub. In my opinion the 1080 is a better projector.
Bsims2719 is offline  
post #3 of 7 Old 02-25-2012, 03:42 PM - Thread Starter
Member
 
caperguy33's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 55
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
Thanks for you response, anyone have any comparisons Epson 1080ub to JVC hd250 or benq 6000? or higher end JVC? thanks as always.
caperguy33 is offline  
post #4 of 7 Old 02-26-2012, 05:28 AM
AVS Special Member
 
dragonbud0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Monmouth County, NJ
Posts: 1,898
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 22
From Art's review dating back to 2008:

"The JVC RS1 until just a couple of months ago, has been the generally considered best overall 1080p projector selling for under $10,000. Even with the price drop to $5295, most people will have a hard time justifying the extra $1500+ over the Epson. That said, the JVC, I think, is still the better projector, despite the slightly softer image sharpness. It has a slight advantage in both shadow detail and black levels, and is almost perfect out of the box. I'll still consider it a step of from the Epson, but, the Epson is the better value proposition. Those really into the last ounce or two of performance will still want the JVC, and can easily justify the price difference. The JVC will also appeal to those with larger screens. Ultimately it is still much brighter in best mode than the Epson."

The HD250 is essentially an updated RS1 at 1/2 the price. If movie viewing is your main objective, then you'll be surprise how contrast will impact depth and detail. The RS20 will blow the 1080ub out of the water, but then the price is almost 3x, so it's not fair to compare.

You may also consider the Sony SXRD/LCoS series for movie/sports experience.

I'm sensitive to RBE, so I cannot comment on the BenQ.

GL
dragonbud0 is offline  
post #5 of 7 Old 02-26-2012, 01:59 PM
AVS Special Member
 
dragonbud0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Monmouth County, NJ
Posts: 1,898
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 22
On 2nd thought, blow out of the water was too strong. I'm just not a fan of dynamic iris in general but found the high end Sony and later vintage year more acceptable.

I do know folks who are very happy w/ their Epsons and would buy again, e.g. 8700ub, especially if viewing habits cross sports, games and movies.
dragonbud0 is offline  
post #6 of 7 Old 03-01-2012, 05:04 PM - Thread Starter
Member
 
caperguy33's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 55
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
Thanks for you response. I think I will just stick with the Epson 1080ub until there is a major improvement in projector technology. I already have good blacks, decent convergence, and good contrast. I love reading about the different projector models on this forum. It has to be the best hobby. Thanks and take care everyone.
caperguy33 is offline  
post #7 of 7 Old 03-01-2012, 09:12 PM
AVS Special Member
 
blee0120's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Merillville, IN 46410
Posts: 3,565
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 32 Post(s)
Liked: 55
There are much better projectors out there. I had a Panasonic ae4000 which is ahead of yours and when I got my JVC RS40 last year, it was a major jump. AVS has a sell going on for b stock RS40s. If you are waiting for a major upgrade, it will cost you $10k+. But if you are looking for something that will outperform your current projector, there are many
blee0120 is online now  
Reply Digital Projectors - Under $3,000 USD MSRP

User Tag List

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page


Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off