LG PA75U -Anybody else own one of LG's Abandoned Children? - Page 15 - AVS Forum
Forum Jump: 
Reply
 
Thread Tools
post #421 of 424 Old Yesterday, 07:54 PM
Newbie
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 1
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Liked: 0
1080p

I'm getting what the LG pa75u 's info panel is telling me is 1080p, 60Hz from my hdmi PC feed...is that right? I thought i needed the other lg projector to get 1080p...
Mel Brennan 2 is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #422 of 424 Old Yesterday, 10:18 PM
Advanced Member
 
Ftoast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 774
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 150 Post(s)
Liked: 110
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mel Brennan 2 View Post
I'm getting what the LG pa75u 's info panel is telling me is 1080p, 60Hz from my hdmi PC feed...is that right? I thought i needed the other lg projector to get 1080p...
The pa75 will still recognize and play a 1080p signal, it just needs to down-scale it to the projector's native resolution.
The "other" LG (pf80/85/87) uses 1080p as its native resolution so it needs to upscale lower resolutions, but can display 1080 content at a perfectly un-scaled, 1:1 ratio.

This is the difference between a projector that is native-1080 and one that "supports 1080p"..technically they BOTH support 1080/fullHD, but the one that isn't native 1080 has to display 1080 content using less pixels so some information get lost.

Simple <$250 dedicated black-fabric theater room, build in a day, takedown in an hour.
Ftoast is online now  
post #423 of 424 Old Yesterday, 11:48 PM
Member
 
displaylou's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: USA
Posts: 111
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Liked: 12
[QUOTE=Ftoast;24720622]The w1070 finally arrived, so I've taken a few side by side pictures of it next to the PA75u. Besides the brightness and contrast difference being a little less dramatic than I'd hoped, I also noticed a strange advantage of the LG's pixel structure..When dealing with resolution lower than 1080, and/or when using 1080 coupled with digital keystone correction (which should be avoided if possible) the LG appears to have smoother yet sharper edges and less image noise despite having noise-reduction set OFF. The w1070 is still the sharper projector for 1080 material (as long as digital keystone adjustment isn't used), but for everything that uses re-mapping the LG seems to have a visible advantage.


It seems that you have booth PA 75U & W1070, may I ask your thoughts which projector you preferred? & why? Thanks!
displaylou is online now  
post #424 of 424 Old Today, 06:52 AM
Advanced Member
 
Ftoast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 774
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 150 Post(s)
Liked: 110
Quote:
Originally Posted by displaylou View Post
It seems that you have booth PA 75U & W1070, may I ask your thoughts which projector you preferred? & why? Thanks!
Of course, though I'm afraid the main reasons might be somewhat disappointing because it's a little hard to relate to.

For one, I already owned both the pa75u and the p300 before getting the w1070 so it was essentially competing against not one but two very different LED projectors that each have very strong merits. It also wasn't available except from one store near me (I'm a sucker for physical stores) and it was way more expensive than normal (around $900+)...All while competing to replace one of my two beloved devices in either a dedicated dark room OR as a traveling brightroom companion.


They are both fantastic projectors.
First, the main advantages of the w1070 are brightness, contrast, resolution, color accuracy, and placement flexibility for mounting (zoom and lens-shift).

-In my situation, I didn't really value the w1070's placement flexibility nearly as much as the pa75u's ability to be put on a simple tripot. If I ever ceiling-mount, I'd just have to take a little more time with the LG, which wouldn't be a problem as I'm very good at spacing and squaring the image without shift or zoom. One advantage down for me.

-The difference in resolution between the two also turned out to be a non-issue to me. The amount of content that looked visibly clearer at 1080 was surprisingly slim during movies and text is still easily readable on the LG. On top of that, side-by-side comparison showed the LG and its odd diamond pixels (common to most/all 800x1280 LED models) have such a pleasant way of scaling lower than 1080 content that lower res stuff actually looked clearer and less pixelated on the LG! Two advantages down for me.

-The difference in brightness was startlingly small where it mattered. In a darkroom or in a brightroom playing bright/high-APL content, the LG is already completely capable, so the only thing that needed help is darker content in a bright room. Both projectors have plenty of gamma control to help, the LG also has a contrast stretcher feature where the w1070 has brute lumens..and it turned out to be a tie! I already should've figured as much when the LG beat an even brighter LCD (with 2000+ actual lumens but no gamma options) for the same darker scenes. Three advantages down for me.

-The difference in color-accuracy can still be seen, but tweaking the LG's settings (and CMS) have allowed me to get it decently close to accurate colors AND the pa75u still has better color-balance than all the non-rgb DLPs so only the w1070 is a real threat to it anyway. Both projectors can beat anything else under $1500. The LG just requires some love to make it happen.
The w1070 is STILL more accurate, but the LG is set close enough for it to matter very little. Fourth advantage...MOSTLY down for me.

-The difference in contrast can be seen in a dark room. Though the LG has high enough contrast to match or beat any non-RGB DLP and anything Epson makes for under $2500, the w1070 is even better. The little p300 is nearly a tie for the w1070, but both beat the LG. The thing is, in a bright room the difference is small enough to not be seen..and in a dark room the LG is still a very solid performer that has contrast roughly neck-and-neck with the Epson 8350/8345. So, last advantage...MOSTLY down for me.

I think that's all of them. The LG also has many of its own advantages:
-In eco-mode it's one of the quietest projectors, period.
-it's built-in speakers are better than most and useable during travel.
-wireless streaming and full flash-support browser are neat.
-LED instant and SAFE for frequent on/off cycles.
-less moving parts makes it hardy and it's survived a major fall.
-small-ish size and weight is easily portable and fits universal tripods.
-plays many video and picture codecs right from a USB memory-stick.
-built-in coaxial tuner is great if you don't have an hdmi cablebox.
-the best and smoothest 3D I've ever seen..using $12 universal glasses.


The main issue was the LG is such an impressive brightroom performer and the Aaxa P300 is such an impressive darkroom performer that the slightly more expensive and slightly more travel-finicky w1070 just seemed redundant.
The only thing that could dethrone the LG/p300 combo for me would be an LED model with 2000:1+ actual contrast and/or a portable LED model with both contrast expansion software AND 1000+ color-accurate lumens. Hopefully costing under $1000.
Either one seems very far away realistically.

Simple <$250 dedicated black-fabric theater room, build in a day, takedown in an hour.

Last edited by Ftoast; Today at 07:13 AM.
Ftoast is online now  
Reply Digital Projectors - Under $3,000 USD MSRP

Tags
Lg Pa75u Dlp Home Theater Projector

User Tag List

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page


Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off