AVS Forum Special Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Northern, VA - Washington, DC
Mentioned: 21 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quoted: 973 Post(s)
The Sony should have better native contrast, but seems comparable to the 5030. It also is better for gaming with the lower input lag, is quieter, and is typically a bit brighter. In my case, I'm using a 161" screen, so something like this is far more in line with my actual needs.
It's the overall performance which seems to be a bit better in most areas that I like.
The comparison for lamp life seems silly given Epson's track record on this.
I'm also not sure they really gave it a fair shake on the 3D comparison considering most projectors operate 3D at 144hz in the DLP world with 24hz source material. It seemed like a 'paper' comparison instead of a real world head-to-head. That may be rectified at some point.
I'm glad they did the comparison, and as typical for PC, they were pretty non-committal on which is better. That's fine, they have a business to run and they've always been a go to source for many, for good reason.
If I were to buy a projector right now to replace my W1070, it would be the Sony I think.
AV Integrated - Theater, whole house audio, and technology installation in the Washington DC metro area.