Ultra Short Throws to replace a TV? - AVS Forum | Home Theater Discussions And Reviews
Forum Jump: 
 
Thread Tools
post #1 of 4 Old 12-12-2016, 01:54 PM - Thread Starter
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Posts: 42
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 17 Post(s)
Liked: 5
Ultra Short Throws to replace a TV?

Hi I'm considering my first projector and the ultra short throws appear to make the most sense, I can just place the projector on my TV stand where my TV was and get a 100in image,

However the question surely is if it was that easy why isn't everyone using ultra short throw projectors?
For me it would mean no wiring changes (this is a big plus for me as I don't want to rip open the ceiling) and also means a much cleaner looking space even cleaner looking than a TV.

I've seen a few ultra short throw projectors which appear to be great value , some are for educational use but they have high lumens and okay contrast.

At the moment I'm leaning towards
ViewSonic LS820 Full HD 3500-Lumen Ultra-Short Throw Laser Projector

However my other options is to go with a "normal" short throw projector either the Epson 5040ub or the Sony VPLHW45ES.

I know both of these have their fans , but ultra short throw just seem easier and less messy for my room which is a "normal" front/living room with a large window and white blinds so not a cave or dedicated theater space.


So if ultra short throws were out when you brought your projector why did you go for a standard projector and not an ultra short throw one?

thanks for replies in advance
zoro25 is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 4 Old 12-12-2016, 02:37 PM
AVS Forum Special Member
 
Dave in Green's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 4,634
Mentioned: 35 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1968 Post(s)
Liked: 1288
The answer is really quite simple. For home theater use UST projectors have historically been unable to compete with standard throw projectors for image quality. UST projectors are primarily designed for classroom and business use where video image quality isn't critical. If you're just casually watching TV or low-rez streaming and you aren't picky about image quality the compact setup of a UST model can be an attractive option. If you seriously watch Blu-ray movies and want a truly cinematic experience an Epson 5040UB or Sony HW45ES just destroys typical UST models.

ViewSonic is trying to change that equation with the LS820. ProjectorCentral.com gave it a pretty good review. But they cautioned that its black levels aren't great so it's not at its best in a dark theater environment. Not many people are willing to pay $3,000 for a projector without great black levels when, for the same price, the 5040UB offers so much more. So the LS820 looks to be a niche product for those who want to casually view non-critical content in ambient light but have a $3,000 projector budget, i.e. not many.

If you can live with the projector being on a small table 5' from the screen the BenQ HT2150ST will produce a 100" image with quality comparable to the LS820 for a third of the cost.

By the way, if you've never seen UST projectors perform and are basing your opinion of their contrast and image quality on advertising copy, be aware that some projector specs are grossly exaggerated. If you want to know how they really perform either go find one to watch in action or read professional reviews written by people who've viewed hundreds of projectors and can put their performance in perspective.
Dave in Green is offline  
post #3 of 4 Old 02-06-2017, 09:12 AM
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Texas
Posts: 54
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 27 Post(s)
Liked: 32
Did you ever decided anything? Im in the same predicament. Im leaning towards the LS820 with the BCP100 screen. But skeptical because I have seen neither in action. Or just mounting a 65" Tv, then get a drop down screen and the Epson 1440.

Choices, choices, choices.....
MoviePerson is offline  
 
post #4 of 4 Old 08-18-2017, 10:58 PM
Newbie
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Posts: 7
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Liked: 0
The LS820 is designed to be used with an ultra short throw screen. Ultra short throw screens run from 0.6 to 0.35 gain; making the excessive lumens and lower black levels suddenly right about where they should be. You can read the LS820 owners thread to get an idea of what that actually looks like vs. a review being used on a "normal" screen. The reason for the higher price tag on the LS820 is because it is laser driven; has little to do with be ultra short throw.

A closer comparison to the BenQ HT2150ST would be the PX800HD which is far less expensive than the LS820 and isn't as bright. Not surprisingly it does great in light controlled environments. However it doesn't have quite enough lumens to push past the punishing gain on an ultra short throw screen at larger dimensions so you your whites will look a little on the grey side etc.

The biggest penalty of ultra short throw vs. short throw and normal throw projectors is that ultra short throw is absolutely dependent on having a good quality screen/surface. Any imperfections will warp and skew the displayed image notably due to the high incoming light angle. Normal projectors by comparison are pretty forgiving in this regard. Beyond that, ultra short throw units tend to have weaker light uniformity, but obviously the higher end units and even the relatively cheap PX800HD seem to be bucking this trend.

The 3 big advantages of ultra short throw are:
1) Easy setup - using an ultra short throw wall mount or just plopping it on top of your entertainment center or table is a pretty simple task.
2) People can stand up near the screen - if you are doing more than just movies there is a higher chance of people getting their heads in the line of fire of a normal projector, ultra short throw lets people get up and dance right next to the screen without issue; in business cases it allows white boarding use, in sales it allows interactive displays among other creative uses
3) Vastly superior ambient light rejection options- normal ALR screens sacrifice color or view angle to provide light rejection; ultra short throw screens turn the potential difficulties of the severe angle of incoming light into a strength by filtering out any light that is not coming in from such an extreme angle. The result is that you can retain your viewing angle while having near to better than 90% ambient light rejection in many cases. The penalty however is a lower gain thus requiring higher lumens if using a larger screen.


It will be interesting to see how this progresses, because advantage 1 and 3 could see projectors competing for living rooms beyond niche so long as people are educated to pair them with correct screens and budget for it. That's where normal throw projectors are "cheaper", you can get a $200 silver ticket screen with a UHD65 and unless you need the cusp of perfection odds are you will be very happy with things in a light controlled environment. For ultra short throw you really need a good screen/perfectly flat surface or you will likely be dissatisfied. That and cheaper ultra short throw units tend to have poor uniformity.


On the flip side...if no one is watching TV/movies or playing games together anymore then i guess we might as well continue towards strapping our phones to our heads for cheap VR and projectors will fade to obscurity... c'est la vie.

Separate of this, I'd like to slap upside the head whomever in the entertainment industry decided that 3D is dead for home users...somehow none of the new TVs have it, nor does TI's new UHD DLP chip...passive 3D and 4k is such a perfect combo... /sigh
solmyre is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply Digital Projectors - Under $3,000 USD MSRP

Tags
ultra short throw

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page


Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off