Originally Posted by DanFrancis
Jeff, what do you feel is the major difference in experience between what you had in the MC you used for a bit in comparison to the Altitude.
I know what my feelings are having used the Teq, Reference, and now the Altitude. I'm curious to see if your observations are similar.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
So many variables compared to then:
With MC: Horns, older QSC DSPs, 7.1 channels, different SSP, remote (basic) calibration
With Altitude: 23 speakers, ribbons and AMTs, LCRs run actively, digital inputs to LCRs, Q-SYS, a full calibration, 11 bed channels...
The Altitude updates were just a confluence of better equipment, professional calibration and more than double the speakers.
Things are more effortless, the immersion factor is off the charts and dialog is so much improved. Also, remapping improved things with the MC, currently I have remapping off with a much greater effect.
Hard to pin down but compared to my 7.1.4 Atmos Datasat, the increased channel count seems to be the largest factor followed by the calibration (and actively running my LCRs).