Official JTR speaker thread - Page 724 - AVS Forum | Home Theater Discussions And Reviews
Baselworld is only a few weeks away. Getting the latest news is easy, Click Here for info on how to join the Watchuseek.com newsletter list. Follow our team for updates featuring event coverage, new product unveilings, watch industry news & more!


Forum Jump: 
Reply
 
Thread Tools
post #21691 of 31063 Old 07-31-2014, 03:33 PM
AVS Special Member
 
carp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 6,952
Mentioned: 181 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1467 Post(s)
Liked: 1036
Quote:
Originally Posted by varneysa View Post
Hi all! I’ll be putting in an order for 212HT LCRs next month and I’m still trying to figure out what to do about surrounds, I’d really appreciate if some of the experts in this thread could chime in.

First, a little bit about the HT: The 212s are for a carpeted room that measures approx. 20’ x 12’ with 10’ ceilings (around 3000 cu ft.) with one wall open to a hallway, stairs, and the rest of the upstairs area. The HT will be used for about 60% music (all kinds) and 40% movies. The plan is to get dual PSA XV30fse subs (since the room is narrow, I need subs that are more vertical) and eventually, room treatments.

Having read through a large chunk of this thread, I know the usual advice regarding surrounds is to go with Single/Slanted-8s. The main problem is that I’m putting most of my speaker budget into the LCRs, opting for the 212s over the 228s because the compression driver is supposed to be better for music (and while the Single-8 is an outstanding speaker by all accounts, it seems like it’d be a better match to the triple-8 or T-12’s). I’m trying to keep my surrounds budget at or under $500 per speaker. Here are some of the options I’m considering, along with Pros/Cons (please correct my assumptions if any are wrong):
  • Option A: JBL-Pro 8350 ($550)
  • Pros: Uses high-quality compression driver in horn config; super high sensitivity; high power handling; very closely matched to 212s
  • Cons: Huge size for a surround speaker (18” x 18”); pricey; pro-cinema speaker might not sound good in narrow 12’ room; not sure how JBL pros sound with music?
  • Option B: Klipsch RB-81 II ($400)
  • Pros: Smaller cabinet for more versatile placement; super high sensitivity; better WAF
  • Cons: Supposedly harsh highs?; musicality?; lower extension not really needed; not the best bang for the buck
  • Option C: Chane Theater Ten ($350)
  • Pros: Successor to the SHO-10; decent price
  • Cons: Unproven performance; controversy about it being a cheap Chinese PA speaker rebranded as a pro-cinema/audio speaker?
  • Option D: Hsu Research HB-1 MK2 ($200)
  • Pros: Best price; highest WAF; better for music?
  • Cons: Sensitivity 10 DBs lower than the 212s, might not be able to keep up?; too much of mismatch?
  • Option F???

So that’s where I’m at. I’m leaning most heavily towards option A or B. Can you advise on the best option (possibly one not mentioned here)? Maybe clear up any misconceptions? Thanks!

For music are you mostly 2 channel or 5.1 music disks - or possibly PLIIx? I was a big pro logic 2x music guy before I bought the 212's. They converted me to 2 channel and I haven't gone back.

However, if you like a lot of 5.1 music disks I would recommend option A just from what I have seen posted from other members that have JTR's. I haven't heard the JBL's myself.


Option F:

My friend Archaea has Macke Pro surrounds (not sure the exact model, he will probably post a link) and got them dirt cheap. I heard them recently and they are an impressive surround speaker but they are large.

Any interest in DIY? The Volt 10's sound good and are very cheap. Beastaudio plans on making some of the same surrounds he has and will sell to people at some point so that could be a great option too because I heard his speakers and liked them every bit as much as the JTR S8's. I thought they were a step up from the Volt 10's but I have read that the Volt 10's have a better crossover now or something like that.
carp is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #21692 of 31063 Old 07-31-2014, 04:17 PM
AVS Special Member
 
lbrown105's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Posts: 1,274
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 394 Post(s)
Liked: 220
Since we are comparing oversized setups (this thread is the best btw!) And it is the JTR thread I feel compelled to throw 4 or more OS's as a good standard for bass as well! This is how I justify my bass being "sub" standard and need to get more. Haha. If the std becomes 32-18's then we all need to follow suit. This is like guerrilla marketing and it works!
carp likes this.
lbrown105 is offline  
post #21693 of 31063 Old 07-31-2014, 04:46 PM
AVS Special Member
 
Archaea's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 7,967
Mentioned: 182 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1604 Post(s)
Liked: 1431
JTR Single Eights are awesome - but like you I couldn't really consider them due to budget constraints.


Carp mentioned my Mackie C200 and at the risk of promoting something other than JTR or JBL in the JTR thread I'll just give a heads up that the Mackie C200 are stupid cheap for a nice quality, quite capable surround speaker.



SYSTEM Specifications:
High-precision 1.4" HF titanium compression driver and 10" LF transducer

Frequency Response (–3 dB):
89Hz – 20kHz

Frequency Range (–10 dB):
59Hz – 22kHz

Maximum SPL Long-term @ 1m: 118dB

Crossover Frequency: 1800Hz


AUDIO::

Input Type: Speakon®-style 1/4-inch TS phone jack

Input Impedance: 8 ohms

Power Handling: (RMS) 200 watts, (Peak) 500 watts


I got my nine for $129 shipped each new on an overstock deal from adorama camera. I looked for months on and off, probably years for a set of speakers I could buy cheap for surrounds. I spent too many hours looking for a deal and didn't even have the Mackies in mind - but was literally just looking up smaller PA speakers by all the big PA vendors and price searching. Found the C200 deal, pm'ed a few forum long timers for their opinion, but ended up jumping on them pretty fast to make sure I didn't miss the deal. If I was only a cinema guy - - I honestly could just run all nine of them that I own and be pretty darn pleased with just the Mackies. The JTR product is better - significantly better - but these are better than they have any right to be for the price I paid - especially for surround. Normal street price is only $200 each. They are not so great for true stereo left right use. My JTR 228HT own them there. Carp says the Mackie C200 sound like they have some sort of built in DSP that he doesn't like. I'm not sure what to think of them in stereo, but in all channel stereo - with nine of them going they rock and they best full theater systems I've heard at g2g's that cost many many times more. Reviews bear out the same opinions online. Most every one seems to rate them 4-5 stars with lots of reviews. The Mackie SRM350 is the powered version.


Here is a thread where I broke one down to look inside:
Mackie C200 - under the hood


You can mount them easily with a Home Depot Shelf and some dowel rods cut to length. Here's how I mounted them. I've since painted the shelf brackets and dowel rods black. They look really nice IMO. My wife isn't too enthused with the looks - she says they make my room look like a club. (DJ speakers she says -- well yes that's exactly what they are!?!?!) (post 50)
Archaea's multi-purpose Home Theater room

Musicians Friend reviews: (they are reviewed this good everywhere)
http://www.musiciansfriend.com/pro-a...-speaker-black








_

"Without subs it's just background music - with subs it's the main event!"
Archaea's Theatre Room
2011 KC Sub Shootout
2012 KC Blind Sub Shootout
My Subwoofer Recommendations by Pricepoint

Last edited by Archaea; 07-31-2014 at 05:03 PM.
Archaea is online now  
post #21694 of 31063 Old 07-31-2014, 05:47 PM
Member
 
varneysa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 28
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 26 Post(s)
Liked: 8
Quote:
Originally Posted by carp View Post
For music are you mostly 2 channel or 5.1 music disks - or possibly PLIIx? I was a big pro logic 2x music guy before I bought the 212's. They converted me to 2 channel and I haven't gone back.

However, if you like a lot of 5.1 music disks I would recommend option A just from what I have seen posted from other members that have JTR's. I haven't heard the JBL's myself.


Option F:

My friend Archaea has Macke Pro surrounds (not sure the exact model, he will probably post a link) and got them dirt cheap. I heard them recently and they are an impressive surround speaker but they are large.

Any interest in DIY? The Volt 10's sound good and are very cheap. Beastaudio plans on making some of the same surrounds he has and will sell to people at some point so that could be a great option too because I heard his speakers and liked them every bit as much as the JTR S8's. I thought they were a step up from the Volt 10's but I have read that the Volt 10's have a better crossover now or something like that.
Carp,

Thanks for the advice! I currently listen to music with PLIIx turned on. I prefer it to two-channel, but that might be just because my current speakers aren't that great. I might end up liking just the 212s in two-channel mode for music. But if I decide to listen to music multi-channel, I wonder how the JBLs will perform, considering they're designed for cinema?

I've read differing opinions on the DYI Volt-10s. Some claim they sound as good as the S-8s, while others say "not so much." No doubt you save a ton of money going the DYI route, I didn't list it however, because I'm still undecided whether or not I'd want to tackle building my own speakers. But I'd definitely be interested in the Beastaudio surrounds.
varneysa is offline  
post #21695 of 31063 Old 07-31-2014, 05:53 PM
Member
 
varneysa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 28
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 26 Post(s)
Liked: 8
Quote:
Originally Posted by Archaea View Post
JTR Single Eights are awesome - but like you I couldn't really consider them due to budget constraints.


Carp mentioned my Mackie C200 and at the risk of promoting something other than JTR or JBL in the JTR thread I'll just give a heads up that the Mackie C200 are stupid cheap for a nice quality, quite capable surround speaker.



SYSTEM Specifications:
High-precision 1.4" HF titanium compression driver and 10" LF transducer

Frequency Response (–3 dB):
89Hz – 20kHz

Frequency Range (–10 dB):
59Hz – 22kHz

Maximum SPL Long-term @ 1m: 118dB

Crossover Frequency: 1800Hz


AUDIO::

Input Type: Speakon®-style 1/4-inch TS phone jack

Input Impedance: 8 ohms

Power Handling: (RMS) 200 watts, (Peak) 500 watts


I got my nine for $129 shipped each new on an overstock deal from adorama camera. I looked for months on and off, probably years for a set of speakers I could buy cheap for surrounds. I spent too many hours looking for a deal and didn't even have the Mackies in mind - but was literally just looking up smaller PA speakers by all the big PA vendors and price searching. Found the C200 deal, pm'ed a few forum long timers for their opinion, but ended up jumping on them pretty fast to make sure I didn't miss the deal. If I was only a cinema guy - - I honestly could just run all nine of them that I own and be pretty darn pleased with just the Mackies. The JTR product is better - significantly better - but these are better than they have any right to be for the price I paid - especially for surround. Normal street price is only $200 each. They are not so great for true stereo left right use. My JTR 228HT own them there. Carp says the Mackie C200 sound like they have some sort of built in DSP that he doesn't like. I'm not sure what to think of them in stereo, but in all channel stereo - with nine of them going they rock and they best full theater systems I've heard at g2g's that cost many many times more. Reviews bear out the same opinions online. Most every one seems to rate them 4-5 stars with lots of reviews. The Mackie SRM350 is the powered version.


Here is a thread where I broke one down to look inside:
Mackie C200 - under the hood


You can mount them easily with a Home Depot Shelf and some dowel rods cut to length. Here's how I mounted them. I've since painted the shelf brackets and dowel rods black. They look really nice IMO. My wife isn't too enthused with the looks - she says they make my room look like a club. (DJ speakers she says -- well yes that's exactly what they are!?!?!) (post 50)
Archaea's multi-purpose Home Theater room

Musicians Friend reviews: (they are reviewed this good everywhere)
http://www.musiciansfriend.com/pro-a...-speaker-black








_

Archaea,

Thanks for the recommendation. I'd never even heard of the Mackies. I'll definitely do some reading up on them. You say they're not the best for L-R music, what about surround duty for multi-channel music? How would they stack up against the JBLs or Klipschs for music?

BTW, I read your sub recommendations by price awhile back... awesome resource! Thanks for putting that list together.
varneysa is offline  
post #21696 of 31063 Old 07-31-2014, 08:28 PM
AVS Special Member
 
COACH2369's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Knoxville, TN
Posts: 1,947
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 248 Post(s)
Liked: 186
Quote:
Originally Posted by varneysa View Post
Hi all! I’ll be putting in an order for 212HT LCRs next month and I’m still trying to figure out what to do about surrounds, I’d really appreciate if some of the experts in this thread could chime in.

First, a little bit about the HT: The 212s are for a carpeted room that measures approx. 20’ x 12’ with 10’ ceilings (around 3000 cu ft.) with one wall open to a hallway, stairs, and the rest of the upstairs area. The HT will be used for about 60% music (all kinds) and 40% movies. The plan is to get dual PSA XV30fse subs (since the room is narrow, I need subs that are more vertical) and eventually, room treatments.

Having read through a large chunk of this thread, I know the usual advice regarding surrounds is to go with Single/Slanted-8s. The main problem is that I’m putting most of my speaker budget into the LCRs, opting for the 212s over the 228s because the compression driver is supposed to be better for music (and while the Single-8 is an outstanding speaker by all accounts, it seems like it’d be a better match to the triple-8 or T-12’s). I’m trying to keep my surrounds budget at or under $500 per speaker. Here are some of the options I’m considering, along with Pros/Cons (please correct my assumptions if any are wrong):
  • Option A: JBL-Pro 8350 ($550)
  • Pros: Uses high-quality compression driver in horn config; super high sensitivity; high power handling; very closely matched to 212s
  • Cons: Huge size for a surround speaker (18” x 18”); pricey; pro-cinema speaker might not sound good in narrow 12’ room; not sure how JBL pros sound with music?
  • Option B: Klipsch RB-81 II ($400)
  • Pros: Smaller cabinet for more versatile placement; super high sensitivity; better WAF
  • Cons: Supposedly harsh highs?; musicality?; lower extension not really needed; not the best bang for the buck
  • Option C: Chane Theater Ten ($350)
  • Pros: Successor to the SHO-10; decent price
  • Cons: Unproven performance; controversy about it being a cheap Chinese PA speaker rebranded as a pro-cinema/audio speaker?
  • Option D: Hsu Research HB-1 MK2 ($200)
  • Pros: Best price; highest WAF; better for music?
  • Cons: Sensitivity 10 DBs lower than the 212s, might not be able to keep up?; too much of mismatch?
  • Option F???

So that’s where I’m at. I’m leaning most heavily towards option A or B. Can you advise on the best option (possibly one not mentioned here)? Maybe clear up any misconceptions? Thanks!
First of all, welcome to AVS and welcome to the JTR thread. I highly recommend you tread lightly in here because we will help you spend your money and money you don't have.

Let's just say when I first visited this forum less than two years ago, I was in love with Klipsch setup and my two HSU VTF-15H subs. Now I am on my third set of JTR speakers and own 8 - 18" subs, with another sub possibly on the way...

Anyways..back to your question.

Originally I had some Klipsch surrounds when I made the jump to JTR speakers. They quickly proved to be not the best choice for the JTR's so I started looking around. Ended up with a great deal on four of the 8340a's and they have been a great speaker. Yes, they are a big large. IMO, they do a darn good job when matched with the JTR's. Now, I am looking to change into something like the JTR Slanted 8 or something similar. Only reason being, I am a bit OCD and like my speakers to all match. Plus a smaller profile surround would be a better fit in my room.

If you don't have the budget for 2 or 4 of the slanted 8's, the JBL's could be the ticket. Check the used market out on those and you can find some GREAT deals. That is what I did and I scored four of them for under 1K.

Good luck!
COACH2369 is offline  
post #21697 of 31063 Old 08-01-2014, 06:52 AM
Ace of Bass
 
beastaudio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Western NC
Posts: 9,624
Mentioned: 117 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1969 Post(s)
Liked: 1523
@varneysa The design I have been working on should be available shortly. The crossover parts are figured out and once I do some preliminary measurements at my house, I should be able to figure something out. Putting them head to head with the volt10's and the s8's, they were surprising, just with the stock crossover, but could get a little harsh. I had a video of them rocking full range as a stereo pair and it was crazy how good they sounded. padding the upper end a shade more and they will be a real winner.

(European models do not accept banana plugs.)


Beast's DIY Master Measurement Thread
beastaudio is offline  
post #21698 of 31063 Old 08-01-2014, 06:52 AM
Ace of Bass
 
beastaudio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Western NC
Posts: 9,624
Mentioned: 117 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1969 Post(s)
Liked: 1523
double

(European models do not accept banana plugs.)


Beast's DIY Master Measurement Thread
beastaudio is offline  
post #21699 of 31063 Old 08-01-2014, 07:40 AM
Señor Member
 
RMK!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: 95608
Posts: 6,842
Mentioned: 23 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1010 Post(s)
Liked: 828
Quote:
Originally Posted by beastaudio View Post
@varneysa The design I have been working on should be available shortly. The crossover parts are figured out and once I do some preliminary measurements at my house, I should be able to figure something out. Putting them head to head with the volt10's and the s8's, they were surprising, just with the stock crossover, but could get a little harsh. I had a video of them rocking full range as a stereo pair and it was crazy how good they sounded. padding the upper end a shade more and they will be a real winner.
Sounds like a young Craig Chase in the making. You even have a catchy company name. Have you incorporated yet?

HToM Extraordinary Evolution

Opinions are not facts.
RMK! is online now  
post #21700 of 31063 Old 08-01-2014, 09:24 AM
AVS Special Member
 
Archaea's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 7,967
Mentioned: 182 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1604 Post(s)
Liked: 1431
Quote:
Originally Posted by varneysa View Post
Archaea,

Thanks for the recommendation. I'd never even heard of the Mackies. I'll definitely do some reading up on them. You say they're not the best for L-R music, what about surround duty for multi-channel music? How would they stack up against the JBLs or Klipschs for music?

BTW, I read your sub recommendations by price awhile back... awesome resource! Thanks for putting that list together.
varneysa,

I spent most of the day yesterday afternoon listening to the 228HT (home sick), then after some discussion in the JTR thread about the Mackie C200 - I hooked up all the Mackies again last night and listened to some two channel and movie clips, then went back to the JTR 228HT for some direct comparison. I hate to admit it but I think I must have had the Mackies wired up out of phase in the L/R when I originally was demoing them for stitch1 and carp. There was no longer any of the weird DSP effect on L/R stereo listening. All channel stereo listening was always fun on the nine Mackies, but two channel was a bit weird. No more. They still aren't as good as the 228HT, but I wouldn't define them as weird or off somehow for two channel. I'm surprised I didn't recognize them being out of phase, but I didn't. carp and stitch1 will have to give them another listen. All of us liked them for all channel stereo, but not too much for traditional stereo. Now that makes sense. They use speakon connectors and unfortunately I must have wired one of the fronts in reverse initially. Last night I rewired. Honestly, I'd say the Mackies are 75% of the JTR 228HT for 20% of the price. (street to street price) Their fault is a sibalance on the treble. It's not quite a clean, more sssss, more blurred treble at loud volumes - but not as bad as a previous set of speaker I owned - the eD Cinema 12. (The Mackies are better than the eD Cinema 12 as I recall by playing some of the tracks I found distasteful on the eD - specifically some of the dubstep music on Art of Flight was obnoxious on the eD because of the heavy treble)). Obviously this comparison to the eD Cinema 12 is by memory since I don't have the eD anymore, but I'm pretty confident the Mackie C200 is a better speaker than the eD Cinema12.

I'd still say the Mackie are excellent for movies, and now I can say they are enjoyable for two channel too. (not the last word in refinement, but not disappointing either). The JTR 228HT compression driver costs alone costs more than the whole street shipped price of the Mackie C200 speaker - so you'd expect it be better. But the C200 is good. If looks aren't a problem I don't see how anyone could be disappointed with them for surround -- they fit my budget surround needs perfectly.

All channel stereo with nine of those mackies is a lot of fun!

"Without subs it's just background music - with subs it's the main event!"
Archaea's Theatre Room
2011 KC Sub Shootout
2012 KC Blind Sub Shootout
My Subwoofer Recommendations by Pricepoint

Last edited by Archaea; 08-01-2014 at 09:43 AM.
Archaea is online now  
post #21701 of 31063 Old 08-01-2014, 09:44 AM
Ace of Bass
 
beastaudio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Western NC
Posts: 9,624
Mentioned: 117 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1969 Post(s)
Liked: 1523
Quote:
Originally Posted by RMK! View Post
Sounds like a young Craig Chase in the making. You even have a catchy company name. Have you incorporated yet?
I have an LLC setup at this point as a backup plan we started for a different business venture, but I will see the demand and work from there

(European models do not accept banana plugs.)


Beast's DIY Master Measurement Thread
beastaudio is offline  
post #21702 of 31063 Old 08-01-2014, 10:07 AM
AVS Special Member
 
Reefdvr27's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Cape May, NJ (South Jersey)
Posts: 3,915
Mentioned: 43 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1283 Post(s)
Liked: 801
Quote:
Originally Posted by carp View Post
Quote:Originally Posted by coolgeek 

Can anyone tell me which of these speaker mounts is suitable for the Slanted 8s?
http://www.amazon.com/s/ref=nb_sb_noss?url=search-alias%3Daps&field-keywords=speaker+mount
I have to start thinking of getting everything together.


I like these Axiom brackets, very sturdy and adjustable but also expensive.






http://www.axiomaudio.com/full-metal-bracket.html
Carp, how much do your surrounds weigh? I am on the hunt again for speakers mounts. I really don't like the ones I bought. I am going to mount the backs to the wall and the sides to a bracket. I like the way these pivot and yet keep the speaker close to the wall.
Reefdvr27 is offline  
post #21703 of 31063 Old 08-01-2014, 10:08 AM
AVS Special Member
 
Reefdvr27's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Cape May, NJ (South Jersey)
Posts: 3,915
Mentioned: 43 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1283 Post(s)
Liked: 801
Quote:
Originally Posted by carp View Post
Quote:Originally Posted by coolgeek 

Can anyone tell me which of these speaker mounts is suitable for the Slanted 8s?
http://www.amazon.com/s/ref=nb_sb_noss?url=search-alias%3Daps&field-keywords=speaker+mount
I have to start thinking of getting everything together.


I like these Axiom brackets, very sturdy and adjustable but also expensive.






http://www.axiomaudio.com/full-metal-bracket.html
Carp, how much do your surrounds weigh? I am on the hunt again for speakers mounts. I really don't like the ones I bought. I am going to mount the backs to the wall and the sides to a bracket. I like the way these pivot and yet keep the speaker close to the wall. This was sometime ago huh? Look at that front stage.
Reefdvr27 is offline  
post #21704 of 31063 Old 08-01-2014, 11:05 AM
Señor Member
 
RMK!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: 95608
Posts: 6,842
Mentioned: 23 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1010 Post(s)
Liked: 828
Quote:
Originally Posted by beastaudio View Post
I have an LLC setup at this point as a backup plan we started for a different business venture, but I will see the demand and work from there
I wish you great success in the venture Beast.
NWCgrad, beastaudio and countryWV like this.

HToM Extraordinary Evolution

Opinions are not facts.
RMK! is online now  
post #21705 of 31063 Old 08-02-2014, 07:51 PM
Senior Member
 
rjh65@verizon.ne's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 212
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 105 Post(s)
Liked: 18
Hello all, moved my Orbit shifter from the front stage area near my LS9's to the left rear side wall where my SubMersive HP used to reside to see how it sounds so i could potentially re-locate my gear to the front stage area, the problem is it's now shaking my ceiling mounted front projector. I am wondering if any of you have had this problem and what your solution may have been. I am looking at trying an Auralex Subdude HT or Herbies audio lab giant fat gliders to see if one of them may make a difference otherwise I will have to move the OS back to the fronstage area, any experiences anyone has had would be great thank you!
rjh65@verizon.ne is offline  
post #21706 of 31063 Old 08-02-2014, 11:12 PM
AVS Special Member
 
jbrown15's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Vancouver B.C.
Posts: 8,089
Mentioned: 21 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2242 Post(s)
Liked: 1700
Quote:
Originally Posted by Reefdvr27 View Post
Carp, how much do your surrounds weigh? I am on the hunt again for speakers mounts. I really don't like the ones I bought. I am going to mount the backs to the wall and the sides to a bracket. I like the way these pivot and yet keep the speaker close to the wall. This was sometime ago huh? Look at that front stage.
Dave the Axiom brackets are good for up to 40lbs.
http://axiomaudio.com/full-metal-bracket
jbrown15 is online now  
post #21707 of 31063 Old 08-03-2014, 06:05 AM
AVS Special Member
 
lbrown105's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Posts: 1,274
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 394 Post(s)
Liked: 220
Quote:
Originally Posted by rjh65@verizon.ne View Post
Hello all, moved my Orbit shifter from the front stage area near my LS9's to the left rear side wall where my SubMersive HP used to reside to see how it sounds so i could potentially re-locate my gear to the front stage area, the problem is it's now shaking my ceiling mounted front projector. I am wondering if any of you have had this problem and what your solution may have been. I am looking at trying an Auralex Subdude HT or Herbies audio lab giant fat gliders to see if one of them may make a difference otherwise I will have to move the OS back to the fronstage area, any experiences anyone has had would be great thank you!
rj, I had the same problem when I added additional OS. The problem in my set up was solved once I went to a ceiling suspended on hat channel and whisper clips. I am not suggesting you go to that length to solve the problem but the whisper clips themselves are a quality piece of suspension hardware that could be used to attach the projector to the ceiling. There are probably a variety of solutions that could bring some dampening into the equation. Do you have enough ceiling height that if you lower the projector with some form of dampening it still ok?

Pre-Pro: Emotiva XMC-1, DSP: Mini DSP 2x4 balanced
Amplifier: Sunfire TGA7400, Lab Gruppen FP10000Q
Speakers: JTR Noesis 212HT (LCR), JTR Slant 8's (surrounds), 3 Orbit Shifter LFU's
Sources: PS3, HTPC, Dish Network
Projector: Epson 8350
Screen: Seymour XD AT 138" diagonal 16:9
lbrown105 is offline  
post #21708 of 31063 Old 08-03-2014, 07:42 AM
Señor Member
 
RMK!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: 95608
Posts: 6,842
Mentioned: 23 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1010 Post(s)
Liked: 828
Quote:
Originally Posted by rjh65@verizon.ne View Post
Hello all, moved my Orbit shifter from the front stage area near my LS9's to the left rear side wall where my SubMersive HP used to reside to see how it sounds so i could potentially re-locate my gear to the front stage area, the problem is it's now shaking my ceiling mounted front projector. I am wondering if any of you have had this problem and what your solution may have been. I am looking at trying an Auralex Subdude HT or Herbies audio lab giant fat gliders to see if one of them may make a difference otherwise I will have to move the OS back to the fronstage area, any experiences anyone has had would be great thank you!
I have my FP Chief Mounted with an 18" extension pipe (9'ceilings) and have 2" X12" blocking between the joists at the projector mounting point. Very secure but that didn't prevent the dual OS's from causing the projector image to shift a bit during very spirited listening sessions.

I got used to repositioning the image and that continues to this day post Orbit Shifters. Just the cost of that much bass energy in a relatively small sealed space. Now if I were OCD about locking the image then I might try and come up with something preventative, but for me the answer has been to not listen at over reference except occasionally when showing off.

BTW, went to the theater ( ) yesterday to hear an Atmos film. Saw Guardians of the Galaxy and it was a really fun movie. The Atmos demos were great but I didn't notice it much during the actual movie. Still, I'm planning on adding 4 in-ceiling speakers to get the Atmos effect at home.

HToM Extraordinary Evolution

Opinions are not facts.

Last edited by RMK!; 08-03-2014 at 08:14 AM.
RMK! is online now  
post #21709 of 31063 Old 08-03-2014, 09:15 AM
AVS Special Member
 
lbrown105's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Posts: 1,274
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 394 Post(s)
Liked: 220
Quote:
Originally Posted by RMK! View Post
Now if I were OCD about locking the image then I might try and come up with something preventative, but for me the answer has been to not listen at over reference except occasionally when showing off.

Rob, this is a very disturbing answer coming from you. Just turn it down??? What is this thread coming to when one of its most influential contributors is now the "turn it down" guy. Of this course this is coming from someone who may just be jealous not having found the cure for EBD (excessive bass addiction) yet.

Pre-Pro: Emotiva XMC-1, DSP: Mini DSP 2x4 balanced
Amplifier: Sunfire TGA7400, Lab Gruppen FP10000Q
Speakers: JTR Noesis 212HT (LCR), JTR Slant 8's (surrounds), 3 Orbit Shifter LFU's
Sources: PS3, HTPC, Dish Network
Projector: Epson 8350
Screen: Seymour XD AT 138" diagonal 16:9
lbrown105 is offline  
post #21710 of 31063 Old 08-03-2014, 10:21 AM
Señor Member
 
RMK!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: 95608
Posts: 6,842
Mentioned: 23 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1010 Post(s)
Liked: 828
Quote:
Originally Posted by lbrown105 View Post
Rob, this is a very disturbing answer coming from you. Just turn it down??? What is this thread coming to when one of its most influential contributors is now the "turn it down" guy. Of this course this is coming from someone who may just be jealous not having found the cure for EBD (excessive bass addiction) yet.
Good, I like being an outlier...

HToM Extraordinary Evolution

Opinions are not facts.
RMK! is online now  
post #21711 of 31063 Old 08-03-2014, 11:01 AM
Senior Member
 
rjh65@verizon.ne's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 212
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 105 Post(s)
Liked: 18
Quote:
Originally Posted by lbrown105 View Post
rj, I had the same problem when I added additional OS. The problem in my set up was solved once I went to a ceiling suspended on hat channel and whisper clips. I am not suggesting you go to that length to solve the problem but the whisper clips themselves are a quality piece of suspension hardware that could be used to attach the projector to the ceiling. There are probably a variety of solutions that could bring some dampening into the equation. Do you have enough ceiling height that if you lower the projector with some form of dampening it still ok?
Unfortunately I don't think i can lower it too much more, I found this company that makes these isolators specifically for projectors but I may not have the room and they are a little pricey so I believe I will have to try a different method.
http://www.nigelbdesign.com/pdfs/Ant...in%20mount.pdf
rjh65@verizon.ne is offline  
post #21712 of 31063 Old 08-03-2014, 11:11 AM
Senior Member
 
rjh65@verizon.ne's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 212
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 105 Post(s)
Liked: 18
Quote:
Originally Posted by RMK! View Post
I have my FP Chief Mounted with an 18" extension pipe (9'ceilings) and have 2" X12" blocking between the joists at the projector mounting point. Very secure but that didn't prevent the dual OS's from causing the projector image to shift a bit during very spirited listening sessions.

I got used to repositioning the image and that continues to this day post Orbit Shifters. Just the cost of that much bass energy in a relatively small sealed space. Now if I were OCD about locking the image then I might try and come up with something preventative, but for me the answer has been to not listen at over reference except occasionally when showing off.

BTW, went to the theater ( ) yesterday to hear an Atmos film. Saw Guardians of the Galaxy and it was a really fun movie. The Atmos demos were great but I didn't notice it much during the actual movie. Still, I'm planning on adding 4 in-ceiling speakers to get the Atmos effect at home.
I had a couple of friends of mine who are A/V installers do the job originally, I think I may call him to ask how he blocked it out originally, my guess is he probably has run into this. I hear you RMK about listening above reference. My HT room isn't sealed and it doesn't shift the image but the image vibrates to the bass notes!
rjh65@verizon.ne is offline  
post #21713 of 31063 Old 08-03-2014, 01:29 PM
AVS Special Member
 
carp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 6,952
Mentioned: 181 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1467 Post(s)
Liked: 1036
Quote:
Originally Posted by Reefdvr27 View Post
Carp, how much do your surrounds weigh? I am on the hunt again for speakers mounts. I really don't like the ones I bought. I am going to mount the backs to the wall and the sides to a bracket. I like the way these pivot and yet keep the speaker close to the wall. This was sometime ago huh? Look at that front stage.


I'm not sure exactly how much they weight, I'm guessing around 30 pounds? I do know that when mounting them I felt like the brackets could have held a much heavier speaker they are heavy duty for sure. I think they are only rated for 40 pounds but I think they are being conservative.
carp is offline  
post #21714 of 31063 Old 08-03-2014, 02:22 PM
Señor Member
 
RMK!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: 95608
Posts: 6,842
Mentioned: 23 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1010 Post(s)
Liked: 828
Quote:
Originally Posted by carp View Post
I'm not sure exactly how much they weight, I'm guessing around 30 pounds? I do know that when mounting them I felt like the brackets could have held a much heavier speaker they are heavy duty for sure. I think they are only rated for 40 pounds but I think they are being conservative.
I'm sure they will hold much more. I suggest you test them with your 215's ... Wall mounted 215RT's surrounds would be cool.
NWCgrad likes this.

HToM Extraordinary Evolution

Opinions are not facts.
RMK! is online now  
post #21715 of 31063 Old 08-03-2014, 05:07 PM
AVS Special Member
 
rhed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,738
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 445 Post(s)
Liked: 314
Quote:
Originally Posted by RMK! View Post
I'm sure they will hold much more. I suggest you test them with your 215's ... Wall mounted 215RT's surrounds would be cool.
I don't think there would be enough height to be mounted on a bracket.. Mine as well stack the the 215RT on a couple of dictionary's just to get a little more height..lol
rhed is online now  
post #21716 of 31063 Old 08-03-2014, 08:07 PM
AVS Special Member
 
Reefdvr27's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Cape May, NJ (South Jersey)
Posts: 3,915
Mentioned: 43 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1283 Post(s)
Liked: 801
Quote:
Originally Posted by RMK! View Post
I'm sure they will hold much more. I suggest you test them with your 215's ... Wall mounted 215RT's surrounds would be cool.
Quote:
Originally Posted by rhed View Post
I don't think there would be enough height to be mounted on a bracket.. Mine as well stack the the 215RT on a couple of dictionary's just to get a little more height..lol
Haha, your right, they are pretty much wall mounted.
Reefdvr27 is offline  
post #21717 of 31063 Old 08-03-2014, 09:33 PM
AVS Special Member
 
rhed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,738
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 445 Post(s)
Liked: 314
Quote:
Originally Posted by Reefdvr27 View Post
Haha, your right, they are pretty much wall mounted.
Hey Reef.. Did you get your 215's yet?
rhed is online now  
post #21718 of 31063 Old 08-04-2014, 04:49 AM
AVS Special Member
 
Reefdvr27's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Cape May, NJ (South Jersey)
Posts: 3,915
Mentioned: 43 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1283 Post(s)
Liked: 801
Quote:
Originally Posted by rhed View Post
Hey Reef.. Did you get your 215's yet?
No, I heard this week, we will see.
Reefdvr27 is offline  
post #21719 of 31063 Old 08-04-2014, 07:31 AM
Señor Member
 
RMK!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: 95608
Posts: 6,842
Mentioned: 23 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1010 Post(s)
Liked: 828
Surround Sound Experiment

I do not go out to the movies other than an occasional visit to IMAX. All the Dolby Atmos chatter has made me very curious so as reported earlier, we (with our 15 year old son) went to a new Atmos theater in the area to see Guardians of the Galaxy (3D-Atmos). The Atmos demos were impressive especially the rain on the roof sequence and I was feeling positive about the possibilities for Atmos at home.

The movie (while very entertaining) was another story. I can't recall one moment where I noticed the Atmos "experience" and my wife/son were of the same opinion. Being a teen he loves going out to movies to hang with friends but we all agreed that movies sound much better at home. The wife is a person who doesn't pay attention to things like this but will indulge me in my hobby. She enjoyed GOTG and so last night we decided to drag out an old action bluray to test the theory. I chose Hell Boy as she hadn't seen it.

It wasn't long into the film before she turned to me and said "see how much better our HT sounds?". There are a lot of rain scenes in Hell Boy and the rain/thunder thing was just as real sounding as the Atmos theater. I'm thinking my surround backs firing up at the ceiling helped with that effect. Hell Boy also has good LFE and great surround effects and they were all better than the Atmos experience. The rest of the sound from dialog clarity to dynamics were also a step up.

This experiment may have postponed if not cancelled my Atmos speaker quest. If 7.1 in my room with the speakers I have is better than a good commercial Atmos theater and, as good as any IMAX I have been to, why bother?

Turns out, going out to the movies may be the most effective upgradeitis cure ...
Archaea, poolratt, asoofi1 and 1 others like this.

HToM Extraordinary Evolution

Opinions are not facts.
RMK! is online now  
post #21720 of 31063 Old 08-04-2014, 09:25 AM
AVS Special Member
 
SOWK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Wauwatosa, WI
Posts: 4,169
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 254 Post(s)
Liked: 161
SOWK is offline  
Reply Speakers

Tags
215RT , 228ht , captivator , Jtr , Jtr Noesis 212ht 212ht Lp
Gear in this thread - 215RT by PriceGrabber.com



Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off