Official JTR speaker thread - Page 824 - AVS Forum
Forum Jump: 
Reply
 
Thread Tools
post #24691 of 24701 Old Yesterday, 04:23 PM
Advanced Member
 
asoofi1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: South Riding, VA
Posts: 517
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 101 Post(s)
Liked: 88
Quote:
Originally Posted by dgage View Post
Looks like I need to schedule another measuring day - 212HT-LP vs S8. See if there is a measurable difference that I think I'm hearing.

This is news to me but apparently I have more acute hearing than most, I know I can hear up to 19000Hz tones, although I'm a little less sensitive around 17000Hz than 19000Hz for some reason. Who knows, that interesting sensitivity curve in my hearing could be a major factor.

Regarding the 212s, I love the upper end and midrange so want to get them to work somehow. I really can't fit midbasses but I'll see what I can do. I'll likely see if I can get measurements from Jeff to convert my sealed speakers to ported 212s.

So I've said I really love the upper end of the 212, think the 215 needs a decent amount of EQ before it is good, and don't care for the S8 sound at all(as mains). Yep, that about sums up my JTR schizophrenia.

As far as selling the speakers, I don't want to and I don't want to lose money and I don't know of a speaker that I'd want instead. Nothing's perfect. Hopefully I can get the 212s working for me, if not, I'll live with them until I find something better...which I haven't heard yet.
Have you compared the non lp 212? Or maybe see if Jeff would let you trade in to try?

---------------------------------------------------------------
for sale/trade: BNIB LG OLED Curved TV 55EA9800 ~Best Black Levels Ever~
ht: LCR JTR 212HT~Surr. Four JTR 8LP~Hi/Wi Four Elemental Designs Cinema 6 eD6c~Subs Two JTR Orbit Shifter LFU~AV Marantz SR7008
asoofi1 is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #24692 of 24701 Old Yesterday, 04:48 PM
AVS Special Member
 
dgage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,513
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 371 Post(s)
Liked: 250
Quote:
Originally Posted by beastaudio View Post
I still think you might LOVE the sm60f's in their current config, as the top end on those is sweet. Clean to 24khz, not anywhere the same as the fiddys which roll a little earlier. Midbass is certainly not lacking either, even though they are just two 8's instead of 12's.

Dang Reef, I didn't know you weren't that big of a fan of the 50's in my HT, that's the first time I think you have mentioned that
I'd love to hear them but likely won't go out of my way to hear them.
dgage is offline  
post #24693 of 24701 Old Yesterday, 04:51 PM
AVS Special Member
 
dgage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,513
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 371 Post(s)
Liked: 250
Quote:
Originally Posted by asoofi1 View Post
Have you compared the non lp 212? Or maybe see if Jeff would let you trade in to try?
I have not heard the ported 212. I think I'm just going to turn my sealed 212 into a ported 212 if Jeff will give me the measurements. I have the woodworking ability and my 212s are bare as I bought them to veneer myself but haven't yet.
dgage is offline  
post #24694 of 24701 Old Yesterday, 05:06 PM
AVS Special Member
 
Reefdvr27's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: La Ciotat, Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur, France
Posts: 2,878
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 618 Post(s)
Liked: 461
Quote:
Originally Posted by beastaudio View Post
I still think you might LOVE the sm60f's in their current config, as the top end on those is sweet. Clean to 24khz, not anywhere the same as the fiddys which roll a little earlier. Midbass is certainly not lacking either, even though they are just two 8's instead of 12's.

Dang Reef, I didn't know you weren't that big of a fan of the 50's in my HT, that's the first time I think you have mentioned that
@beastaudio Well to be honest I was excited to hear them as it was the first shot I had at hearing them. I will use the term and hate to use it, but they seemed "laid back" than that of the SM60's.They just did not seem to have that sparkle that I had heard at the Heavyweight GTG that I liked. I know when we compared yours to the 212's inn your HT, I definitely liked the 212's better, bad polarity and all Don't get me wrong, I liked them, what's not to like, however I had found that the second time I heard them at the Mini GTG back in the summer that I really liked the fiddies allot more, but still did not have that pop that grabbed me like that of the SM60F's had?

I know someday I would like to get another pair of SM60's or the rumored SM60HT's that have been mentioned a few times and run them for a couple of months and see if I can get that magic back that I had heard. Still one of the best speaker demo's I have ever heard. Presently I am very happy with the 215's right now, it is going to be some time before I change up, I am just hoping it is not December 7th

Last edited by Reefdvr27; Yesterday at 05:09 PM.
Reefdvr27 is offline  
post #24695 of 24701 Old Yesterday, 06:09 PM
Señor Member
 
RMK!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: 95608
Posts: 5,977
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 276 Post(s)
Liked: 364
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gooddoc View Post
@Reefdvr27 .....

Oh boy, you don't want to listen to the M2's. Seriously...
Where's the damn yawn smilie when you need it? ...

Ahh there it is:
Frohlich, dgage and Gooddoc like this.

HToM

"Well, la di fricken da."!

Last edited by RMK!; Yesterday at 06:15 PM.
RMK! is offline  
post #24696 of 24701 Old Yesterday, 06:41 PM
Advanced Member
 
asoofi1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: South Riding, VA
Posts: 517
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 101 Post(s)
Liked: 88
Quote:
Originally Posted by dgage View Post
I have not heard the ported 212. I think I'm just going to turn my sealed 212 into a ported 212 if Jeff will give me the measurements. I have the woodworking ability and my 212s are bare as I bought them to veneer myself but haven't yet.

Very bold.

Click image for larger version

Name:	ImageUploadedByTapatalk1413855681.147243.jpg
Views:	11
Size:	31.3 KB
ID:	322337

---------------------------------------------------------------
for sale/trade: BNIB LG OLED Curved TV 55EA9800 ~Best Black Levels Ever~
ht: LCR JTR 212HT~Surr. Four JTR 8LP~Hi/Wi Four Elemental Designs Cinema 6 eD6c~Subs Two JTR Orbit Shifter LFU~AV Marantz SR7008
asoofi1 is offline  
post #24697 of 24701 Old Yesterday, 06:46 PM
Advanced Member
 
NWCgrad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Frederick, MD
Posts: 963
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 136 Post(s)
Liked: 110
Quote:
Originally Posted by Reefdvr27 View Post
@beastaudio Well to be honest I was excited to hear them as it was the first shot I had at hearing them. I will use the term and hate to use it, but they seemed "laid back" than that of the SM60's.They just did not seem to have that sparkle that I had heard at the Heavyweight GTG that I liked. I know when we compared yours to the 212's inn your HT, I definitely liked the 212's better, bad polarity and all Don't get me wrong, I liked them, what's not to like, however I had found that the second time I heard them at the Mini GTG back in the summer that I really liked the fiddies allot more, but still did not have that pop that grabbed me like that of the SM60F's had?

I know someday I would like to get another pair of SM60's or the rumored SM60HT's that have been mentioned a few times and run them for a couple of months and see if I can get that magic back that I had heard. Still one of the best speaker demo's I have ever heard. Presently I am very happy with the 215's right now, it is going to be some time before I change up, I am just hoping it is not December 7th
Perhaps the 7th will be your day of bank account infamy and you want to order a set of M2's. It is the 73rd anniversary of Pearl Harbor.

Varibus Mari Victoria
NWCgrad is offline  
post #24698 of 24701 Old Yesterday, 08:20 PM
AVS Special Member
 
Gooddoc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 3,930
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 394 Post(s)
Liked: 315
Quote:
Originally Posted by NWCgrad View Post
Perhaps the 7th will be your day of bank account infamy and you want to order a set of M2's. It is the 73rd anniversary of Pearl Harbor.
Doubtful. It's a blinded GTG and without expectation bias the M2 will lose its advantage.
Gooddoc is online now  
post #24699 of 24701 Old Yesterday, 10:33 PM
Señor Member
 
RMK!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: 95608
Posts: 5,977
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 276 Post(s)
Liked: 364
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gooddoc View Post
Doubtful. It's a blinded GTG and without expectation bias the M2 will lose its advantage.
That, was a remarkably candid statement ...

HToM

"Well, la di fricken da."!
RMK! is offline  
post #24700 of 24701 Old Today, 01:35 AM
AVS Special Member
 
coolgeek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,648
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 126 Post(s)
Liked: 88
Quote:
Originally Posted by dgage View Post
Then we'll just put this one down as agree to disagree. Listen, I own both the S8s and the 212s and have no plans to get rid of either...well maybe my 212s due to midbass but that is not in play here.

After reading all of the praise the S8 received on here and at one of the GTGs, I felt I had to pull a couple off the wall and try as mains and I did because I wanted to listen to them and so did Coach. If the S8s were as good as everyone was saying, I could see myself getting a few more for the bedroom as 5.1s to use as "movie" speakers and with music. So I don't understand where the bias comes in, at least with me. After hearing them as mains, even with subs, quite simply, I did not like the S8 as a main...at all...it wasn't even close. I just didn't like the tonal quality of the speaker at all. ****, I'd use my NHT IC4 in-ceiling speakers (in enclosures) as mains before the S8, even with the huge difference in dynamics. And if I had heard the S8 before the 212, I would have thought you guys full of **** and would have never ordered the 212 and wouldn't have driven anywhere for an audition. Good thing that didn't happen as I would have been missing out on some really good speakers in the 212s. To each their own.

David
I agree with you David,

I had the same experience as you did with the S8s. I ordered it from the rave reviews it got. In fact, i have heard a couple ppl say they couldn't tell much difference between the S8s and the 212s.

Here's a very logical question. If you can't really tell the difference between the S8 and the 212s, then why not just buy the S8s and be done with it? Why spend 3 times the amount for a 212??

In fact, the psychological argument is the exact opposite for me. I got the S8 fully expecting it to sound if not exactly, very close to the 212s, and when i switched out the 212s with the S8s as LCR, it was truly a shocking difference. If i was biased to begin with, i would have been expecting it to sound 'as good'... There is absolutely no way i would be happy with the S8s as LCR under any circumstances. However ,as surround duty, they excel for that job. They are dynamic and can almost follow with the 212s.

Anyways, I hate to get into these kind of arguments. You either can hear a difference or you can't. No one's lying here.
coolgeek is online now  
Reply Speakers

Tags
228ht , captivator , Jtr , Jtr Noesis 212ht 212ht Lp
Gear in this thread - 228ht by PriceGrabber.com

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page


Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off