Official JTR speaker thread - Page 892 - AVS Forum | Home Theater Discussions And Reviews
Baselworld is only a few weeks away. Getting the latest news is easy, Click Here for info on how to join the Watchuseek.com newsletter list. Follow our team for updates featuring event coverage, new product unveilings, watch industry news & more!


Forum Jump: 
Reply
 
Thread Tools
post #26731 of 30542 Old 12-25-2014, 02:58 PM
AVS Special Member
 
rhed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,723
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 433 Post(s)
Liked: 307
Quote:
Originally Posted by carp View Post
That will definitely get things shaking carp.. Nice!
rhed is online now  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #26732 of 30542 Old 12-25-2014, 03:05 PM
AVS Special Member
 
Nabs17's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Wesley Chapel, FL
Posts: 1,006
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 402 Post(s)
Liked: 192
Quote:
Originally Posted by carp View Post
Hey Sheldon...how much space is there between the 4 18's you have in each front corner and your 215RT's? Was wondering if subwoofers need a certain amount of space to perform optimally. I only have about 20" from the back of my 215's to the front corner.

Nabs17
Nabs17 is online now  
post #26733 of 30542 Old 12-25-2014, 03:06 PM
AVS Special Member
 
asoofi1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: South Riding, VA
Posts: 1,455
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 743 Post(s)
Liked: 295
Quote:
Originally Posted by carp View Post
Woah, woah, woah!!

I'm very interested in this since I'm about to pull the trigger on a Falcon screen. Can you see the weave at ALL from the seats? How far away can you see it? MOAR PICS!!! How is the brighness? as bright as the XD material? Wow, you went with a huge screen!

Where did you get the screen material looks like Amazon only has one size.
No man, you cannot see the weave from your seat at all.

Save your money! Skip Falcon, Seymour, etc. The difference is so little, you would never know what you're watching unless I told you the brand. Even a 15% increase in claimed brightness is realistically very minor...the number 15 sounds bigger than the practical application...if anything, for me black levels are more important, and black backing is helping with contrast on the Elite 1080P2...this is a shot taken within one foot comparing the XD with the P2...if I was going to nit pick, the black color seems to 'suffer' as a result on the XD since it's a little brighter...black gets creeps into dark gray:


Practically speaking, here's what it looks from my seat 16' away...can you see the xd sample and is the difference worth over triple the price:


Ignore the image not filling the screen...I still have to move the pj back a bit.

And another...hint...xd sample is still in the same spot close to the tripod:


You cannot see the weave until you're within 3-4 feet and I have to try to focus-squint to see it. And that's only with a solid bright color and you're standing within a few feet watching a blue sky...which is not practical day to day. Normal viewing is what really counts, so from 8' or more feet...you're just immersed in the image. The XD has a tighter weave, but the benefit is minor to me...especially in normal dark ht environments.

As far as different sizes, click on this link and theres a drop down to select various sizing: http://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/d/B00B2G...=AC_SX200_QL40

I went with the biggest size possible in my room because it's more immersive. It's awesome. Your eyes never take in an entire image even with smaller screens down to tvs...you're always focused on one subject or object at a time on spanning a few square inches or feet...and we see with a peripheral view anyway, so this feels even more realistic with more to fill my peripheral sides.

Let me know if you want any specific pics.
carp and dgage like this.

---------------------------------------------------------------
current gear: lcr JTR 212HT ~ quad JTR 8LP ~ dual JTR Orbit Shifters LFU ~ Elemental Designs eD6c ~ Marantz SR7008 ~ PT-AE8000U ~ Elite 176" 2.35 ATS
asoofi1 is online now  
post #26734 of 30542 Old 12-25-2014, 03:07 PM
AVS Special Member
 
Reefdvr27's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Cape May, NJ (South Jersey)
Posts: 3,898
Mentioned: 42 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1270 Post(s)
Liked: 794
Quote:
Originally Posted by carp View Post
Thanks!! Merry Christmas to you too, tis the season for upgrades!!

I'm supposed to get it Monday, same day I might get my nearfield sub - 2 possibly huge upgrades for crazy cheap!!
Merry Christmas Carp. Hope you and your family are having a great day.

Anyway, you are going to hide your 215's?? I thought you liked looking at them? I know I love looking at mine, I would hate to put them behind an AT screen., but that may be next down the line for me.

I have been tossing up going to an AT screen for along time, but I have not be able to do one in my room anyway. I have a guy coming to do my hardwood floors and when he is here I am going to talk with him about possible ripping down my sheetrock and putting in clips and doing double drywall and removing the last two windows in my theater. I have got to get those windows out first. I still cannot believe that I left those 2 windows in, I am still kicking myself over that one. Be awhile before any of this happens, maybe around the end of summer. I have to be honest that I am pretty happy with my fixed screen as I have mounted higher and my 228 is placed pretty well under the screen. I have been very happy with my front stage, to add I also love my Carada screen, it seems to pair well with my Panny 8000. I don't have much to compare it to, but looks very nice.
Reefdvr27 is offline  
post #26735 of 30542 Old 12-25-2014, 03:19 PM
AVS Special Member
 
carp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 6,844
Mentioned: 161 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1394 Post(s)
Liked: 969
Quote:
Originally Posted by rhed View Post
That will definitely get things shaking carp.. Nice!

Ahh, I get your comment now about feeling old. Do you have thoughts of getting the new 215's or trading out the CD (if trading it out is possible, I can't picture how that would be done without cutting wood)?
carp is online now  
post #26736 of 30542 Old 12-25-2014, 03:20 PM
AVS Special Member
 
carp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 6,844
Mentioned: 161 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1394 Post(s)
Liked: 969
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nabs17 View Post
Hey Sheldon...how much space is there between the 4 18's you have in each front corner and your 215RT's? Was wondering if subwoofers need a certain amount of space to perform optimally. I only have about 20" from the back of my 215's to the front corner.
My 215's are toed in pretty sharply since I sit pretty close to them. At the corners of the 215's they are 2 inches from the drivers, I haven't had any problems.
carp is online now  
post #26737 of 30542 Old 12-25-2014, 03:23 PM
AVS Special Member
 
carp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 6,844
Mentioned: 161 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1394 Post(s)
Liked: 969
Quote:
Originally Posted by asoofi1 View Post
No man, you cannot see the weave from your seat at all.

Save your money! Skip Falcon, Seymour, etc. The difference is so little, you would never know what you're watching unless I told you the brand. Even a 15% increase in claimed brightness is realistically very minor...the number 15 sounds bigger than the practical application...if anything, for me black levels are more important, and black backing is helping with contrast on the Elite 1080P2...this is a shot taken within one foot comparing the XD with the P2...if I was going to nit pick, the black color seems to 'suffer' as a result on the XD since it's a little brighter...black gets creeps into dark gray:


Practically speaking, here's what it looks from my seat 16' away...can you see the xd sample and is the difference worth over triple the price:


Ignore the image not filling the screen...I still have to move the pj back a bit.

And another...hint...xd sample is still in the same spot close to the tripod:


You cannot see the weave until you're within 3-4 feet and I have to try to focus-squint to see it. And that's only with a solid bright color and you're standing within a few feet watching a blue sky...which is not practical day to day. Normal viewing is what really counts, so from 8' or more feet...you're just immersed in the image. The XD has a tighter weave, but the benefit is minor to me...especially in normal dark ht environments.

As far as different sizes, click on this link and theres a drop down to select various sizing: http://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/d/B00B2G...=AC_SX200_QL40

I went with the biggest size possible in my room because it's more immersive. It's awesome. Your eyes never take in an entire image even with smaller screens down to tvs...you're always focused on one subject or object at a time on spanning a few square inches or feet...and we see with a peripheral view anyway, so this feels even more realistic with more to fill my peripheral sides.

Let me know if you want any specific pics.
Great, great post Asim. Love the pictures. I can't tell where the XD material is! I'll be really close now, so not seeing the weave at all is important. I can see the XD weave at about 9 feet away when mrsmithers first got his screen.

My eyes are 11 feet from the screen right now, so I'll be about 9' 4" from the AT screen.
carp is online now  
post #26738 of 30542 Old 12-25-2014, 03:25 PM
AVS Special Member
 
carp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 6,844
Mentioned: 161 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1394 Post(s)
Liked: 969
Asim, can you take pics with the lights on full close up of the side/corner of the screen and frame? I'm wondering if my masking panels will fit in there. The ledge doesn't have to be very big my panels are about 1/3rd of an inch thick.
carp is online now  
post #26739 of 30542 Old 12-25-2014, 03:28 PM
AVS Special Member
 
carp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 6,844
Mentioned: 161 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1394 Post(s)
Liked: 969
Quote:
Originally Posted by Reefdvr27 View Post
Merry Christmas Carp. Hope you and your family are having a great day.

Anyway, you are going to hide your 215's?? I thought you liked looking at them? I know I love looking at mine, I would hate to put them behind an AT screen., but that may be next down the line for me.

I have been tossing up going to an AT screen for along time, but I have not be able to do one in my room anyway. I have a guy coming to do my hardwood floors and when he is here I am going to talk with him about possible ripping down my sheetrock and putting in clips and doing double drywall and removing the last two windows in my theater. I have got to get those windows out first. I still cannot believe that I left those 2 windows in, I am still kicking myself over that one. Be awhile before any of this happens, maybe around the end of summer. I have to be honest that I am pretty happy with my fixed screen as I have mounted higher and my 228 is placed pretty well under the screen. I have been very happy with my front stage, to add I also love my Carada screen, it seems to pair well with my Panny 8000. I don't have much to compare it to, but looks very nice.
Merry Christmas Dave!

Oh no, I'm not hiding the 215's. Those HAVE to be seen. The AT screen is the exact same size as my current screen so I'll still just have the screen in between the speakers. My front baffles of my 215's are 4 feet from the screen right now, so they will be 2 feet 4 inches in front of the new AT screen.
carp is online now  
post #26740 of 30542 Old 12-25-2014, 03:31 PM
AVS Special Member
 
rhed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,723
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 433 Post(s)
Liked: 307
Quote:
Originally Posted by carp View Post
Ahh, I get your comment now about feeling old. Do you have thoughts of getting the new 215's or trading out the CD (if trading it out is possible, I can't picture how that would be done without cutting wood)?
Nah! If there's any improvement with the new CD. Then it must be a big one. Because I'm very happy with what's on 215's that I have now. But I do wonder because how could it get any better.. I'd rather add other things to the mix instead of spending more just for " curiosity replacement" of the same thing..
carp likes this.
rhed is online now  
post #26741 of 30542 Old 12-25-2014, 04:04 PM
AVS Special Member
 
asoofi1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: South Riding, VA
Posts: 1,455
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 743 Post(s)
Liked: 295
Quote:
Originally Posted by carp View Post
I found on Amazon where you bought it. I went ahead and bought a 158" diagonal size 2:35:1 which is exactly the size of my current screen. I figure it's worth a shot and if I don't like it I'll send it back and go back to the original plan of getting the Falcon screen. Does the frame look like you could fit masking panels in? I'd love to be able to use mine.
The frame is about 2.5" and very sturdy, even though the longest horizontal pieces are joined together to cut costs on shipping a longer box. If you were to affix some strong magnets on the frame and also on the masks, you could definitely do that.

My ideal plan is to find some black acoustic drapery for curtains that can trigger electronically to change from 2.35:1 to 2:1 to 1.78:1.

The spray on black velvety finish on elite's frame does a great job when zoomed in for 2.35.

When you get the screen and are assembling, keep these important hindsight notes in mind...after you read instructions fully:

-when joining two frames, adjust L corner brackets a bit to/from other frame to line up screw holes...one side of the L bracket might go a few mm more in one frame piece than the other.

-not in directions for some reason, but very important...for both long sides, there are 4 support rods...you have to insert one long plastic support rod thru one side of the screen and pass thru a slit half way thru into second half....Then insert another long rod from opposite end of screen to meet first rod.

-once all rods are in, do your best to insert rods into all 4 sides' channels before starting the clip process...doesnt have stay in entirely yet though

-this note helps keep screen tight and even..the even torqueing as i call it...there were 16 total sections for the clips on my size...8 steps as labeled in directions with each step covering 2 sections of screen frame. For example, section 1 is middle top and middle bottom...so 2 sections right there. What I did was counted the number of clips each frame side gets, indicated easily by red arrow marks on the frame, and just divide clips evenly for each section.

-And velco on the tabs will hurt a little after 20 or so of clip pushing

---------------------------------------------------------------
current gear: lcr JTR 212HT ~ quad JTR 8LP ~ dual JTR Orbit Shifters LFU ~ Elemental Designs eD6c ~ Marantz SR7008 ~ PT-AE8000U ~ Elite 176" 2.35 ATS
asoofi1 is online now  
post #26742 of 30542 Old 12-25-2014, 04:25 PM
AVS Special Member
 
carp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 6,844
Mentioned: 161 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1394 Post(s)
Liked: 969
Quote:
Originally Posted by asoofi1 View Post
The frame is about 2.5" and very sturdy, even though the longest horizontal pieces are joined together to cut costs on shipping a longer box. If you were to affix some strong magnets on the frame and also on the masks, you could definitely do that.

My ideal plan is to find some black acoustic drapery for curtains that can trigger electronically to change from 2.35:1 to 2:1 to 1.78:1.

The spray on black velvety finish on elite's frame does a great job when zoomed in for 2.35.

When you get the screen and are assembling, keep these important hindsight notes in mind...after you read instructions fully:

-when joining two frames, adjust L corner brackets a bit to/from other frame to line up screw holes...one side of the L bracket might go a few mm more in one frame piece than the other.

-not in directions for some reason, but very important...for both long sides, there are 4 support rods...you have to insert one long plastic support rod thru one side of the screen and pass thru a slit half way thru into second half....Then insert another long rod from opposite end of screen to meet first rod.

-once all rods are in, do your best to insert rods into all 4 sides' channels before starting the clip process...doesnt have stay in entirely yet though

-this note helps keep screen tight and even..the even torqueing as i call it...there were 16 total sections for the clips on my size...8 steps as labeled in directions with each step covering 2 sections of screen frame. For example, section 1 is middle top and middle bottom...so 2 sections right there. What I did was counted the number of clips each frame side gets, indicated easily by red arrow marks on the frame, and just divide clips evenly for each section.

-And velco on the tabs will hurt a little after 20 or so of clip pushing

Great, thanks for the tips I'll refer back to this post when I get the screen - good chance you'll be getting some PM's early next week.
carp is online now  
post #26743 of 30542 Old 12-25-2014, 05:19 PM
AVS Special Member
 
Archaea's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 7,903
Mentioned: 155 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1560 Post(s)
Liked: 1389
176"


carp likes this.

"Without subs it's just background music - with subs it's the main event!"
Archaea's Theatre Room
2011 KC Sub Shootout
2012 KC Blind Sub Shootout
My Subwoofer Recommendations by Pricepoint
Archaea is online now  
post #26744 of 30542 Old 12-25-2014, 06:36 PM
AVS Special Member
 
NWCgrad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Frederick, MD
Posts: 2,024
Mentioned: 23 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 609 Post(s)
Liked: 510
Quote:
Originally Posted by carp View Post
I found on Amazon where you bought it. I went ahead and bought a 158" diagonal size 2:35:1 which is exactly the size of my current screen. I figure it's worth a shot and if I don't like it I'll send it back and go back to the original plan of getting the Falcon screen. Does the frame look like you could fit masking panels in? I'd love to be able to use mine.
Quote:
Originally Posted by carp View Post
Thanks!! Merry Christmas to you too, tis the season for upgrades!!

I'm supposed to get it Monday, same day I might get my nearfield sub - 2 possibly huge upgrades for crazy cheap!!
Looks like you will be busy!

___________________________________________
NWCgrad's Mostly DIY Basement HT - http://www.avsforum.com/forum/15-gen...sement-ht.html
NWCgrad's 10” coaxial collaborative design - http://www.avsforum.com/forum/155-di...ve-design.html
NWCgrad is online now  
post #26745 of 30542 Old 12-25-2014, 06:41 PM
AVS Special Member
 
carp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 6,844
Mentioned: 161 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1394 Post(s)
Liked: 969
Quote:
Originally Posted by NWCgrad View Post
Looks like you will be busy!
If all the planets align you can see the new stuff on Tuesday!!
carp is online now  
post #26746 of 30542 Old 12-25-2014, 06:50 PM
AVS Special Member
 
coolgeek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 2,174
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 489 Post(s)
Liked: 244
Quote:
Originally Posted by asoofi1 View Post
No man, you cannot see the weave from your seat at all.

Save your money! Skip Falcon, Seymour, etc. The difference is so little, you would never know what you're watching unless I told you the brand. Even a 15% increase in claimed brightness is realistically very minor...the number 15 sounds bigger than the practical application...if anything, for me black levels are more important, and black backing is helping with contrast on the Elite 1080P2...this is a shot taken within one foot comparing the XD with the P2...if I was going to nit pick, the black color seems to 'suffer' as a result on the XD since it's a little brighter...black gets creeps into dark gray:


Practically speaking, here's what it looks from my seat 16' away...can you see the xd sample and is the difference worth over triple the price:


Ignore the image not filling the screen...I still have to move the pj back a bit.

And another...hint...xd sample is still in the same spot close to the tripod:


You cannot see the weave until you're within 3-4 feet and I have to try to focus-squint to see it. And that's only with a solid bright color and you're standing within a few feet watching a blue sky...which is not practical day to day. Normal viewing is what really counts, so from 8' or more feet...you're just immersed in the image. The XD has a tighter weave, but the benefit is minor to me...especially in normal dark ht environments.

As far as different sizes, click on this link and theres a drop down to select various sizing: http://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/d/B00B2G...=AC_SX200_QL40

I went with the biggest size possible in my room because it's more immersive. It's awesome. Your eyes never take in an entire image even with smaller screens down to tvs...you're always focused on one subject or object at a time on spanning a few square inches or feet...and we see with a peripheral view anyway, so this feels even more realistic with more to fill my peripheral sides.

Let me know if you want any specific pics.
Asim,

Awesome photo comparison... I have personally compared the XD vs EN4K vs Falcon vs ScreenResearch Clearpix 2 and Clearpix 4K... the best by far is the Screen Research Clearpix 4K.. the colors were extremely accurate (comparing to Black Diamond which the projector was calibrated to)... and it was really white... The other brands have some 'yellow tinge' to it, sort of like looking through a yellow filter... I suppose it can be calibrated away. And the Clearpix had the smallest weave I have seen. However, the price is several times higher than the XD so it's out of the question.

As for the XD vs the rest, I actually liked the 'pop' factor of it... it's hard to tell when you have a small sample and in some scenes it'll look identical, but when you have bright and dark scenes, the pop really shows because the bright will be so much brighter than the dark. And this will also come in useful when watching 3D.
coolgeek is offline  
post #26747 of 30542 Old 12-25-2014, 06:53 PM
AVS Special Member
 
carp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 6,844
Mentioned: 161 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1394 Post(s)
Liked: 969
Quote:
Originally Posted by coolgeek View Post
Asim,

Awesome photo comparison... I have personally compared the XD vs EN4K vs Falcon vs ScreenResearch Clearpix 2 and Clearpix 4K... the best by far is the Screen Research Clearpix 4K.. the colors were extremely accurate (comparing to Black Diamond which the projector was calibrated to)... and it was really white... The other brands have some 'yellow tinge' to it, sort of like looking through a yellow filter... I suppose it can be calibrated away. And the Clearpix had the smallest weave I have seen. However, the price is several times higher than the XD so it's out of the question.

As for the XD vs the rest, I actually liked the 'pop' factor of it... it's hard to tell when you have a small sample and in some scenes it'll look identical, but when you have bright and dark scenes, the pop really shows because the bright will be so much brighter than the dark. And this will also come in useful when watching 3D.
The pop and clarity is what I'm worried about. I really think my painted wall screen is something special but I hope to be proven wrong as I attempt to go AT. Text is so razor sharp, I haven't seen that in other rooms.
carp is online now  
post #26748 of 30542 Old 12-25-2014, 06:58 PM
AVS Special Member
 
coolgeek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 2,174
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 489 Post(s)
Liked: 244
Quote:
Originally Posted by carp View Post
The pop and clarity is what I'm worried about. I really think my painted wall screen is something special but I hope to be proven wrong as I attempt to go AT. Text is so razor sharp, I haven't seen that in other rooms.

Pop was what I was looking for so i went with the XD... the Falcon were inbetween the XD and Black Diamond, both were 'muted'.. but both had more 'dark contrast'.. i guess it's always about whether you want more 'dark contrast' vs pop..... I went with the 'pop' factor as that was more important to me.. it's akin to having 'more dynamic range' in speakers... and I really love 3D so any extra brightness is always a plus.

Also, the XD looks better for skin tones (this one is very subjective, but both my buddy and i prefered the skin tones of the XD vs falson vs Black Diamond, but the Clearpix 4K beats everyone by a mile both in quality and price.. heh).
coolgeek is offline  
post #26749 of 30542 Old 12-25-2014, 07:03 PM
AVS Special Member
 
carp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 6,844
Mentioned: 161 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1394 Post(s)
Liked: 969
Quote:
Originally Posted by coolgeek View Post
Pop was what I was looking for so i went with the XD... the Falcon were inbetween the XD and Black Diamond, both were 'muted'.. but both had more 'dark contrast'.. i guess it's always about whether you want more 'dark contrast' vs pop..... I went with the 'pop' factor as that was more important to me.. it's akin to having 'more dynamic range' in speakers... and I really love 3D so any extra brightness is always a plus.

Also, the XD looks better for skin tones (this one is very subjective, but both my buddy and i prefered the skin tones of the XD vs falson vs Black Diamond, but the Clearpix 4K beats everyone by a mile both in quality and price.. heh).
Which Falcon? Was it the new Horizon material? That's what I was thinking about getting.
carp is online now  
post #26750 of 30542 Old 12-25-2014, 07:06 PM
AVS Special Member
 
coolgeek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 2,174
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 489 Post(s)
Liked: 244
Quote:
Originally Posted by carp View Post
Which Falcon? Was it the new Horizon material? That's what I was thinking about getting.
I am reposting this here so you can see for yourself. It was previously posted on another thread (note: this was quite a while back so i don't think it's their new screen if they have any):

I am almost ready to buy my screen now and I have decided to go with the XD as it's the brightest AT screen I could find and after spending hours viewing lots of materials both still images and BluRay movies, both me and my friends that that XD looks the best. BTW: This is my own and my friend's opinions. You should always get your own sample and make your own decision on what screens best fit your home theater.

Please note that I have not tested any of their Acoustic Properties. We know the specs for the XD pretty well as it's published on the Seymour website (assuming it's accurate). The falcon still needed to be tested. With a tighter weave, I would assume it's going to lose out at least in a small bit in terms of acoustic transparency.. but that's just conjecture at this point.

My review of the screens are as follows:


Falcon:

- Weave is visible to about 8 feet. People with very sharp eyesight might be able to see them at about 10 feet (Note: weave is only visible with bright white scenes and not very visible for regular movie scenes).
- Contrast a bit better than XD (black is slightly blacker, some colors are deeper)
- Brightness level loses to XD but beats EN4K. I would say, from the photos below as you can see yourself, the gain level of the Falcon is right in the middle of the XD and the EN4K. From what we know, it's published by Seymour that their XD is 20% brighter than their EN4K, so I would say the Falson is 10% dimmer than the XD.

Centerstage XD:

- Weave visible to about 10 feet and disappears at about 11-12 feet depending on your eyesight. And this only applies to very bright/white scenes. For amost all movie scenes, I could not see it even at 6-8 feet (or rather would not notice it if i wasn't squinting my eyes and purposely looking for it).
- Contrast slightly less than either the Falcon or EN4K, but it's hardly noticeable in moving pictures. For still images it's noticeable.
- Gain - This has the most gain. And it looks the best to me in terms of the 'pop' factor. Skin tones are the most natural and translucent, compared to the 'duller' EN4K or Falcon.

Summary:

If you're going to be sitting beyond 10 feet, I would really suggest the XD. If you're sitting really close, then the Falson,.. I really couldn't recommend the EN4K because it's just so darn dark... You'll need a light canon of a projector... or, if your screen is really small...

Photos below are shown in such a way:

Left: Falcon
Middle: XD
Right : EN4K

Note: Seymour have published that the EN4K material is 20% dimmer than the XD, and as you can see the Left looks almost exactly in the middle in terms of brightness between the XD and the EN4K, so my initial statement that the Falcon is about 10% dimmer is just about right. Without a proper measurement, I'll say it'll be around that ball-park, give or take a few percentage.

See for yourself:





In these last two scenes, the differences not as much but still visible there. When watching a full movie, the XD will have more pop overall and colors are more vibrant.


dgage likes this.
coolgeek is offline  
post #26751 of 30542 Old 12-25-2014, 07:14 PM
AVS Special Member
 
carp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 6,844
Mentioned: 161 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1394 Post(s)
Liked: 969
Thanks for posting that, love looking at comparisons like that. To me the biggest issue is being able to "see the screen" and I know this new Falcon material is awesome for not being able to see it. Still, it's worth a risk at 500 bucks to see if this screen will do it for me. The XD looks great at Jonathan's so if this cheap Elite stuff looks as good as that I'll probably be fine - but - I'm still worried that my painted wall might be better than all the above - still - I'm an audio first guy and hearing the 212 vertical and on a stand this week was so much better than having it horizontal and below the screen.
carp is online now  
post #26752 of 30542 Old 12-25-2014, 07:15 PM
AVS Special Member
 
NWCgrad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Frederick, MD
Posts: 2,024
Mentioned: 23 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 609 Post(s)
Liked: 510
Quote:
Originally Posted by carp View Post
If all the planets align you can see the new stuff on Tuesday!!

___________________________________________
NWCgrad's Mostly DIY Basement HT - http://www.avsforum.com/forum/15-gen...sement-ht.html
NWCgrad's 10” coaxial collaborative design - http://www.avsforum.com/forum/155-di...ve-design.html
NWCgrad is online now  
post #26753 of 30542 Old 12-25-2014, 07:21 PM
Deep Sea Sound
 
dgage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Knoxville, TN
Posts: 2,542
Mentioned: 47 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1037 Post(s)
Liked: 643
Quote:
Originally Posted by carp View Post
Thanks for posting that, love looking at comparisons like that. To me the biggest issue is being able to "see the screen" and I know this new Falcon material is awesome for not being able to see it. Still, it's worth a risk at 500 bucks to see if this screen will do it for me. The XD looks great at Jonathan's so if this cheap Elite stuff looks as good as that I'll probably be fine - but - I'm still worried that my painted wall might be better than all the above - still - I'm an audio first guy and hearing the 212 vertical and on a stand this week was so much better than having it horizontal and below the screen.
Blasphemy...oh wait, me too. +1

Merry Christmas to the JTR family!
dgage is offline  
post #26754 of 30542 Old 12-25-2014, 08:20 PM
AVS Special Member
 
N8DOGG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Canada
Posts: 6,272
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 503 Post(s)
Liked: 492
Quote:
Originally Posted by carp View Post
Thanks for posting that, love looking at comparisons like that. To me the biggest issue is being able to "see the screen" and I know this new Falcon material is awesome for not being able to see it. Still, it's worth a risk at 500 bucks to see if this screen will do it for me. The XD looks great at Jonathan's so if this cheap Elite stuff looks as good as that I'll probably be fine - but - I'm still worried that my painted wall might be better than all the above - still - I'm an audio first guy and hearing the 212 vertical and on a stand this week was so much better than having it horizontal and below the screen.
I've yet to see any AT screens that look as good as traditional or painted. I watch quite a bit of 3D and my buddy has the XD material, it's pretty dark for 3D on his 120 inch. He's got a Sony 55ES and ended up taking it out. I personally haven't seen any falcon stuff, so no comment on that but I can see his weave at his 11 foot seating position... needless to say it dove him/me bonkers to see it. my OCD for stuff like that is really bad lol

Blasting brown notes for 10 years and counting!

N8DOGG is offline  
post #26755 of 30542 Old 12-25-2014, 10:01 PM
AVS Special Member
 
coolgeek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 2,174
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 489 Post(s)
Liked: 244
Quote:
Originally Posted by N8DOGG View Post
I've yet to see any AT screens that look as good as traditional or painted. I watch quite a bit of 3D and my buddy has the XD material, it's pretty dark for 3D on his 120 inch. He's got a Sony 55ES and ended up taking it out. I personally haven't seen any falcon stuff, so no comment on that but I can see his weave at his 11 foot seating position... needless to say it dove him/me bonkers to see it. my OCD for stuff like that is really bad lol
You have pretty sharp eyesight for sure...

On another note, I tested the XD on both the Sony 55es and the sony 500es (4K) and for some reason, on the 4K the weave is not as noticeable... it could be a combination of pixel size / weave that creates that overall effect... on the 500ES, it was really smooth even at 8 feet...

3D is dark on ANY screen I have seen. I heard it can suck up 80% of the light, ie, you're only seeing about 20% of total light... Although the 500ES looks decent enough as it's a light canon compared to the 55ES... In fact, it's the best 3D i have ever seen so far.

I can't wait for Laser projectors to debut in Cinemas and Home Theaters... I heard they can make it as bright as viewing 2D..... with much better contrast and dynamic range.

Last edited by coolgeek; 12-25-2014 at 10:05 PM.
coolgeek is offline  
post #26756 of 30542 Old 12-26-2014, 01:10 AM
AVS Special Member
 
jbrown15's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Vancouver B.C.
Posts: 8,021
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2197 Post(s)
Liked: 1663
I sit 11ft from my screen, with the large 2'x2' XD sample that I had I could tell fairly quickly that it wasn't going to work for me, I could easily see the screen weave from my seat. I could actually see it close to 9ft away. With the original Falcon material I could see the weave at 5-6ft so that was a big improvement.

With the new Falcon Horizan material there is virtually not weave at all, plus I don't feel that I've lost any image pop. I couldn't be happier with my screen and the masking panels work great too.
jbrown15 is online now  
post #26757 of 30542 Old 12-26-2014, 04:49 AM
Advanced Member
 
rx-8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Mermaid, PE, Canada
Posts: 522
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Liked: 22
Quote:
Originally Posted by Reefdvr27 View Post
A little off the subject, but there is a guy that comes to Andrews GTG's by the name of Bill (RX-8), some of you have met him. He has Seaton Cat 12's all the way around, I believe 7 in all. I have to bet that it sounds amazing. I believe I had read that @Jim Wilson heard it?
Hey everyone. Just a quick note to say that I'm using four Cat8's as my surrounds. IMHO they do sound amazing.

Cheers!
-- Bill --
rx-8 is offline  
post #26758 of 30542 Old 12-26-2014, 05:11 AM
AVS Special Member
 
Frohlich's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 2,622
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 596 Post(s)
Liked: 492
Quote:
Originally Posted by jbrown15 View Post
I sit 11ft from my screen, with the large 2'x2' XD sample that I had I could tell fairly quickly that it wasn't going to work for me, I could easily see the screen weave from my seat. I could actually see it close to 9ft away. With the original Falcon material I could see the weave at 5-6ft so that was a big improvement.

With the new Falcon Horizon material there is virtually not weave at all, plus I don't feel that I've lost any image pop. I couldn't be happier with my screen and the masking panels work great too.
Jbrown15, Beast and I all have the new Falcon Horizon AT material for our screen. This is my first AT screen so I can't compare it to the Seymour XD or other AT material but I can say three things:

1)I can not see the weave from my 12 ft seating position at all...you can't see it until you get really close

2)compared to my previous Stewart Cima screen (non-AT), it holds up very well. The Stewart had a lower gain an probably slightly better blacks but the trade off is that the Falcon actually throws a brighter picture.

3)being able to place speakers behind the screen does add to the impact for movies/HT. The center channel, especially, being in the middle of the screen helps with the HT experience
carp likes this.
Frohlich is offline  
post #26759 of 30542 Old 12-26-2014, 06:03 AM
Member
 
Daveys's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 77
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 40 Post(s)
Liked: 16
In a year our new house will be finished. We would really love to have 2 pieces of the Noesis 215RT. This will be the total setup so no surround setup but a stereo setup.

I'm hoping someone can help me with a sanity check if this will be possible in our new room.

One of the speakers will be placed in the corner of the room and one in the middle of the long wall. My feeling says that the one in the middle can be a problem and very hard to correct with a dsp.

I will do some measurement when the house is finished but I'm hoping somebody can tell me by experience or same kind of room if this will be a mission impossible on forehand.

Hope the pictures will help. The red dots will be the spot for the 215's.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	6 Doorsnede_1.jpg
Views:	50
Size:	86.8 KB
ID:	442258   Click image for larger version

Name:	Image1.jpg
Views:	43
Size:	80.6 KB
ID:	442266  

LG 60PM6700 - Klipsch THX Ultra2 - Onkyo TX-NR5010 - Mogami W3103 LS - Monster M1000 SW en HD - PS3 Slim 250GB
Daveys is offline  
post #26760 of 30542 Old 12-26-2014, 06:16 AM
AVS Special Member
 
carp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 6,844
Mentioned: 161 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1394 Post(s)
Liked: 969
Quote:
Originally Posted by N8DOGG View Post
I've yet to see any AT screens that look as good as traditional or painted. I watch quite a bit of 3D and my buddy has the XD material, it's pretty dark for 3D on his 120 inch. He's got a Sony 55ES and ended up taking it out. I personally haven't seen any falcon stuff, so no comment on that but I can see his weave at his 11 foot seating position... needless to say it dove him/me bonkers to see it. my OCD for stuff like that is really bad lol
This is what I'm afraid of. However if it comes down to audio vs video I know what will win for me. I think my audio issue is worse than most because my center is only about 6 inches off the ground. I have a massive null from 400 to 600 hz if I remember right. Also since it's so low to the ground the second row is really bad, the center sounds like its 6 dbs low or something like that.
carp is online now  
Reply Speakers

Tags
215RT , 228ht , captivator , Jtr , Jtr Noesis 212ht 212ht Lp
Gear in this thread - 215RT by PriceGrabber.com

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page


Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off