Official JTR speaker thread - Page 982 - AVS | Home Theater Discussions And Reviews
Baselworld is only a few weeks away. Getting the latest news is easy, Click Here for info on how to join the Watchuseek.com newsletter list. Follow our team for updates featuring event coverage, new product unveilings, watch industry news & more!


Forum Jump: 
Reply
 
Thread Tools
post #29431 of 29444 Old Today, 02:29 AM
AVS Special Member
 
rhed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,679
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 408 Post(s)
Liked: 286
Quote:
Originally Posted by jbrown15 View Post
That would be insane, but would the Pro's need a lot of power to really push them? Because they product all that SPL higher up in the frequency range would they be more efficient?
Probably not.. But, wouldn't you want to give the product at least close to the recommend RMS the manufacturer suggest? I mean, they must know something's up since they designed it. Like the LFU's or S2's. Don't think Jeff would put a 1400 ICE amps in those. Those 2 subs are hungry animals that will take all that juice. Then hit your breakers first before it evens goes in a protection mode..

Last edited by rhed; Today at 02:35 AM.
rhed is online now  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #29432 of 29444 Old Today, 08:28 AM
AVS Special Member
 
carp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 6,566
Mentioned: 130 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1202 Post(s)
Liked: 832
Wow, that OS pro would be insane for music. No wonder Jeff said he uses the 215's and OS Pro's when listening to music. I don't have room for OS pro's now, but if and when 4K becomes the norm I could move my AT screen further from the front wall and plop a couple OS pro's down. Boom.
RMK!, rhed and asoofi1 like this.
carp is offline  
post #29433 of 29444 Old Today, 08:39 AM
Señor Member
 
RMK!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: 95608
Posts: 6,604
Mentioned: 21 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 821 Post(s)
Liked: 663
Quote:
Originally Posted by carp View Post
Are you sure? Remember in the late 90's when pro logic went to Dolby Digital 5.1? That was HUGE and by FAR the biggest difference I have heard in audio. Anyone could tell the difference, even the back then girl friends because it was so obvious. If you are saying that going to Atmos is an even bigger jump in audio... wow, just wow.
I'm sure that I feel that way ... . I had a Bose "system" in the mid 90's that was purchased based upon a well meaning friend telling me that Bose was the best. I have to admit that the Bose FFM (frequency filtration method) would produce pleasing results with poorly recorded music and it relied on the theory that you don't miss, what you can't hear . Sound actually came out of the surround speakers , and that was fun for me and others who were in the same or a lesser boat. I first made a jump into real 5.1 channel audio with a Denon AVR and Monitor Audio speakers in 2000. The Denon and whatever Dolby mode I was using at the time was good but then I found Logic7 with a Lexicon processor and that produced the best surround sound I had heard.

Of course most if not all of the single (base) layer surround formats sound good in my room. Adding 4 ceiling speakers and 3D audio processing/upmixing has given me the most immersive surround sound that I have heard and it easily bests commercial Atmos Theaters. Having 9' ceilings helps as you need some, but not too much space to make this audio magic work. Having all of your surrounds at approximately the same distance from the LP creates a sound bubble that is like headphones but without the claustrophobic effect they create. Obviously this is hard for me to put into words as I am rambling but I honestly feel that there is something there there with 3D audio. It's not just another audio gimmick to sell more hardware. IMHO

HToM

Opinions are not facts.
RMK! is offline  
post #29434 of 29444 Old Today, 08:43 AM
AVS Special Member
 
carp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 6,566
Mentioned: 130 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1202 Post(s)
Liked: 832
Quote:
Originally Posted by RMK! View Post
I'm sure that I feel that way ... . I had a Bose "system" in the mid 90's that was purchased based upon a well meaning friend telling me that Bose was the best. I have to admit that the Bose FFM (frequency filtration method) would produce pleasing results with poorly recorded music and it relied on the theory that you don't miss, what you can't hear . Sound actually came out of the surround speakers , and that was fun for me and others who were in the same or a lesser boat. I first made a jump into real 5.1 channel audio with a Denon AVR and Monitor Audio speakers in 2000. The Denon and whatever Dolby mode I was using at the time was good but then I found Logic7 with a Lexicon processor and that produced the best surround sound I had heard.

Of course most if not all of the single (base) layer surround formats sound good in my room. Adding 4 ceiling speakers and 3D audio processing/upmixing has given me the most immersive surround sound that I have heard and it easily bests commercial Atmos Theaters. Having 9' ceilings helps as you need some, but not too much space to make this audio magic work. Having all of your surrounds at approximately the same distance from the LP creates a sound bubble that is like headphones but without the claustrophobic effect they create. Obviously this is hard for me to put into words as I am rambling but I honestly feel that there is something there there with 3D audio. It's not just another audio gimmick to sell more hardware. IMHO

Cool!! Haha, sounds like it's time to lower my floor somehow...

I think (hope?) that with very wide dispersion speakers (120 degrees) I'll still be ok with the lower ceilings?
carp is offline  
post #29435 of 29444 Old Today, 09:06 AM
AVS Special Member
 
asoofi1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: South Riding, VA
Posts: 1,334
Mentioned: 27 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 661 Post(s)
Liked: 256
Quote:
Originally Posted by rhed View Post
And I really don't know why I have one for the CC. I think the RM's will do fine sharing with the RT's. So I was thinking of getting a Inuke 3000dsp for my RM. Then use my 6000dsp that was for the RM's for the RT's. Then use my 12000dsp that was for the RT's for the Pro's. Especially since the Pro's does 2 ohm loads. The 12000dsp is capable of 2 ohms. So really I just need another 3000dsp for my CC.
But who's on first?? I had to read that twice

Practically speaking...ehem...I think my next step will be a 7702/or denon equivalent and an inuke for 4 or 6 overheads. I gotz too many speakerz me thinkz.
rhed likes this.

---------------------------------------------------------------
gear: 3x JTR 212HT ~ 4x JTR 8LP ~ 2x JTR Orbit Shifter LFU ~ 11x Elemental Designs eD6c ~ Marantz SR7008 ~ Panasonic PT-AE8000U ~ Elite 176" 2.35 ATS
asoofi1 is online now  
post #29436 of 29444 Old Today, 09:09 AM
Señor Member
 
RMK!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: 95608
Posts: 6,604
Mentioned: 21 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 821 Post(s)
Liked: 663
Quote:
Originally Posted by carp View Post
Cool!! Haha, sounds like it's time to lower my floor somehow...

I think (hope?) that with very wide dispersion speakers (120 degrees) I'll still be ok with the lower ceilings?
Looking at your room pics again (BTW, is that a Jack Russell in the room pics?), your current surrounds are already very high on the walls. In order for 3D audio to work, you'll need to drop those down to seated ear level and then ceiling mount the heights. You could place them in the wall ceiling corners which would give you some extra LF gain and would place them a wide as possible. The Single 8LP's would be good for the surrounds and either Slanted 8's or the RA knock-offs should do the trick for the top/height speakers.

There you go ... $10K and you're home!

HToM

Opinions are not facts.
RMK! is offline  
post #29437 of 29444 Old Today, 09:38 AM
Newbie
 
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 2
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 0
Hello, is anybody here ?
ako93 is offline  
post #29438 of 29444 Old Today, 09:39 AM
AVS Special Member
 
rhed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,679
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 408 Post(s)
Liked: 286
Quote:
Originally Posted by asoofi1 View Post
But who's on first?? I had to read that twice

Practically speaking...ehem...I think my next step will be a 7702/or denon equivalent and an inuke for 4 or 6 overheads. I gotz too many speakerz me thinkz.
Nice pre pro.. Good choice on the amp. Don't forget 2 more Inukes for the L/C/R..
rhed is online now  
post #29439 of 29444 Old Today, 09:42 AM
AVS Special Member
 
asoofi1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: South Riding, VA
Posts: 1,334
Mentioned: 27 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 661 Post(s)
Liked: 256
Quote:
Originally Posted by rhed View Post
Nice pre pro.. Good choice on the amp. Don't forget 2 more Inukes for the L/C/R..
Ha...that's the beauty of the 212HTs...no need for amps....but always tempted if the numbers made sense for volume I listen at....of course, I do need to eq them, if anything.

---------------------------------------------------------------
gear: 3x JTR 212HT ~ 4x JTR 8LP ~ 2x JTR Orbit Shifter LFU ~ 11x Elemental Designs eD6c ~ Marantz SR7008 ~ Panasonic PT-AE8000U ~ Elite 176" 2.35 ATS
asoofi1 is online now  
post #29440 of 29444 Old Today, 09:47 AM
AVS Special Member
 
Reefdvr27's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Cape May, NJ (South Jersey)
Posts: 3,689
Mentioned: 38 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1116 Post(s)
Liked: 704
Quote:
Originally Posted by RMK! View Post
I'm sure that I feel that way ... . I had a Bose "system" in the mid 90's that was purchased based upon a well meaning friend telling me that Bose was the best. I have to admit that the Bose FFM (frequency filtration method) would produce pleasing results with poorly recorded music and it relied on the theory that you don't miss, what you can't hear . Sound actually came out of the surround speakers , and that was fun for me and others who were in the same or a lesser boat. I first made a jump into real 5.1 channel audio with a Denon AVR and Monitor Audio speakers in 2000. The Denon and whatever Dolby mode I was using at the time was good but then I found Logic7 with a Lexicon processor and that produced the best surround sound I had heard.

Of course most if not all of the single (base) layer surround formats sound good in my room. Adding 4 ceiling speakers and 3D audio processing/upmixing has given me the most immersive surround sound that I have heard and it easily bests commercial Atmos Theaters. Having 9' ceilings helps as you need some, but not too much space to make this audio magic work. Having all of your surrounds at approximately the same distance from the LP creates a sound bubble that is like headphones but without the claustrophobic effect they create. Obviously this is hard for me to put into words as I am rambling but I honestly feel that there is something there there with 3D audio. It's not just another audio gimmick to sell more hardware. IMHO
Speaking of Bose, I have a 2015 Tahoe and it has a Bose system and I have to admit it sounds great for stock. Good Highs and Good Lows cannot possibly be Blows. Kidding aside, it really sounds good.
rhed likes this.
Reefdvr27 is offline  
post #29441 of 29444 Old Today, 10:03 AM
AVS Special Member
 
rhed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,679
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 408 Post(s)
Liked: 286
Quote:
Originally Posted by asoofi1 View Post
Ha...that's the beauty of the 212HTs...no need for amps....but always tempted if the numbers made sense for volume I listen at....of course, I do need to eq them, if anything.
Yea those 212's are one heck of a speaker. But wouldn't you need separate amps for them if you're gonna go with a 7702? I'd really want to upgrade my old Pio SC-09tx. But the thing just keeps going. Never had one problem with it. I'm just waiting on dtsX and Atmos to be implemented in one pre pro. Then I probably make the move then..
rhed is online now  
post #29442 of 29444 Old Today, 10:11 AM
AVS Special Member
 
rhed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,679
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 408 Post(s)
Liked: 286
Quote:
Originally Posted by Reefdvr27 View Post
Speaking of Bose, I have a 2015 Tahoe and it has a Bose system and I have to admit it sounds great for stock. Good Highs and Good Lows cannot possibly be Blows. Kidding aside, it really sounds good.
Nice ride Reef.. I also have to admit, I have a 2008 gmc with a Bose system in it. Yes they sound really good. Probably cause it's in a smaller space? I also have a 15 yr old Bose Acoustic Wave (cd version). And absolutely love it for its size. I always get compliments from beach goers when I bring it to the beach and turn it up..
rhed is online now  
post #29443 of 29444 Old Today, 10:57 AM
AVS Special Member
 
asoofi1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: South Riding, VA
Posts: 1,334
Mentioned: 27 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 661 Post(s)
Liked: 256
Quote:
Originally Posted by rhed View Post
Yea those 212's are one heck of a speaker. But wouldn't you need separate amps for them if you're gonna go with a 7702? I'd really want to upgrade my old Pio SC-09tx. But the thing just keeps going. Never had one problem with it. I'm just waiting on dtsX and Atmos to be implemented in one pre pro. Then I probably make the move then..
My bad...yes, ur right...my brain though 8802 pre pro and 7702 as avr...brain fart...I meant to sat 7009 or 7010 when all 3d codecs are hopefully included. I may go pre pro with amps to try something diff...but I can't justify the separates expense if I can help it. We hooked up a dsonic to the lcr at my gtg and we couldn't tell a diff.

---------------------------------------------------------------
gear: 3x JTR 212HT ~ 4x JTR 8LP ~ 2x JTR Orbit Shifter LFU ~ 11x Elemental Designs eD6c ~ Marantz SR7008 ~ Panasonic PT-AE8000U ~ Elite 176" 2.35 ATS
asoofi1 is online now  
post #29444 of 29444 Old Today, 11:16 AM
AVS Special Member
 
N8DOGG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Canada
Posts: 6,198
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 456 Post(s)
Liked: 472
Quote:
Originally Posted by asoofi1 View Post
My bad...yes, ur right...my brain though 8802 pre pro and 7702 as avr...brain fart...I meant to sat 7009 or 7010 when all 3d codecs are hopefully included. I may go pre pro with amps to try something diff...but I can't justify the separates expense if I can help it. We hooked up a dsonic to the lcr at my gtg and we couldn't tell a diff.
Thats my plan as well. Unless someone comes out with something better in those price ranges.

Blasting brown notes for 10 years and counting!

N8DOGG is online now  
Reply Speakers

Tags
215RT , 228ht , captivator , Jtr , Jtr Noesis 212ht 212ht Lp
Gear in this thread - 215RT by PriceGrabber.com



Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off