Energy RC-Micro 5.1 vs Energy Take Classic 5.1 - AVS Forum
Forum Jump: 
 
Thread Tools
post #1 of 17 Old 12-22-2011, 10:43 AM - Thread Starter
Newbie
 
kailas123's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 12
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
Hi,

I understand this question has been asked few times in the past. Sorry for the repeat. I guess when this question came up in the past, price was a major factor and most of the discussions were based on the price point.

Now that both are available at the same price ($399) and we can set aside the price factor. Now my question is, which one is better in terms of the sound quality? My living room is 15x10.

Thanks
Kailas
kailas123 is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 17 Old 12-22-2011, 12:51 PM
Advanced Member
 
jaeelarr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 574
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8 Post(s)
Liked: 34
It looks like the RC setup is a bit better if only looking at specs. The SW goes down a tad lower, as so the sats. The RC is also slightly larger in terms of drivers.
jaeelarr is offline  
post #3 of 17 Old 12-22-2011, 01:12 PM
AVS Special Member
 
crazyrob425's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 6,212
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 95 Post(s)
Liked: 157
Quote:
Originally Posted by jaeelarr View Post

It looks like the RC setup is a bit better if only looking at specs. The SW goes down a tad lower, as so the sats. The RC is also slightly larger in terms of drivers.

Your looking at the wrong specs.... The RC-micros have smaller drivers and don't go as low as the takes
Take classic
http://www.energy-speakers.com/na-en...-5-1-overview/
RC-Micro
http://www.energy-speakers.com/na-en...icro-overview/
crazyrob425 is offline  
post #4 of 17 Old 12-22-2011, 01:23 PM
Member
 
tarzan1234's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 35
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
Quote:
Originally Posted by jaeelarr View Post

It looks like the RC setup is a bit better if only looking at specs. The SW goes down a tad lower, as so the sats. The RC is also slightly larger in terms of drivers.


What do you mean by saying the RC has "better" specs?

Let me make a quick comparison of the frequency response:

Center channel: RC - 150Hz to 23KHz Take Classic- 110Hz to 20KHz
Satellite: RC - 150Hz to 23KHz Take Classic- 115Hz to 20KHz
Sub: RC - 36Hz to 180Hz Take Classic-33Hz-150Hz


I can't say which one is better because I have never listened and compared them directly. But if the specs are the only indicator, the Take Classic looks better to me. The Take Classic satellite and center speakers cover lower range, so does the Take Classic sub-woofer. They are also little bigger in size too, so they may have an advantage at higher volumes.

tarzan1234 is offline  
post #5 of 17 Old 12-22-2011, 01:36 PM
AVS Addicted Member
 
cel4145's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Posts: 11,275
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 68 Post(s)
Liked: 648
I haven't heard them, but I've ready good things about both the Take and Micro packages in the Energy Owners Thread (I own Energy RC-10s). I'd recommend the Energy Take Classic 5.0 package so that you can get a better sub, such as the Energy S10.3.

cel4145 is online now  
post #6 of 17 Old 12-22-2011, 03:11 PM
AVS Addicted Member
 
afrogt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 22,773
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 65 Post(s)
Liked: 351
I recommend skipping both speakers systems and get two or three pair of CB-5's for $99/pr. If you buy 3 pair, use one CB-5 as a center.
http://www.crutchfield.com/p_732CB5/...Brand%7cEnergy

And add the Energy s10.3 for $199
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16882269026

This will blow away the Take Classic or RC Micros due their larger size and ability to play down to 80hz. It'll also blend better with the subwoofer.

If you'd rather have the CC-5 as a center you can get it from Vanns. I'm pretty confident they will come down off their $219 price quite a bit.

http://www.vanns.com/shop/servlet/it..._c=site_search

Afro GT
afrogt is offline  
post #7 of 17 Old 12-22-2011, 03:36 PM - Thread Starter
Newbie
 
kailas123's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 12
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
I am inclined to go with @cel4145's suggestion - Take Classic 5.0 and S10.3. It's just $50 more for better sub.

Any suggestions for receiver that goes very well with these speakers? I am inclined towards Denon-1912. Appreciate your input.

-Kailas
kailas123 is offline  
post #8 of 17 Old 12-22-2011, 07:34 PM
AVS Addicted Member
 
cel4145's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Posts: 11,275
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 68 Post(s)
Liked: 648
afrogt is right though. If you can make the jump to the CB-5s, they are a better speaker than the micros and the take fives.

As for your receivers, it would be best to allocate more money towards speakers and sub than a receiver. That's where you will get the most sound benefit. What budget did you have in mind for the receiver? Any requirements?

cel4145 is online now  
post #9 of 17 Old 12-22-2011, 07:49 PM - Thread Starter
Newbie
 
kailas123's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 12
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
@cel4145: I am going with CB-5x4, CC-5, and S10.3 options as suggested by @afrogt in another thread. As far as the receiver goes, my budget is around $500-$600. I am leaning towards Denon-AVR-1912. I like the AirPlay option. Another friend of mine also suggested Marantz NR1602 for its slim size but it pumps only 50W per channel. With my speaker options Denon-1912 seems to be a good choice. Again, I am not an expert and welcome any suggestions including other brands and models.

Thanks
Kailas
kailas123 is offline  
post #10 of 17 Old 12-22-2011, 09:23 PM
AVS Addicted Member
 
cel4145's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Posts: 11,275
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 68 Post(s)
Liked: 648
If Airplay is important, that sort of limits your options; I think it's a fairly new features. One of the best ways to get a good value with a Denon receiver is to look at the previous year's model lines.

cel4145 is online now  
post #11 of 17 Old 12-22-2011, 09:54 PM
AVS Special Member
 
postrokfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Ft. Collins, CO
Posts: 2,409
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 19 Post(s)
Liked: 291
Most of Denon's previous year's models don't have airplay (can upgrade 3311). The 1912 or 2112 should work for you. That Marantz 1602 is a nice receiver. I wouldn't be concerned about the 50W/channel plus it has pre-outs for front L/R speakers (and of course the subwoofer).

"Guns for show, knives for a pro..."
postrokfan is offline  
post #12 of 17 Old 12-22-2011, 09:59 PM
Advanced Member
 
Saints's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: New Orleans
Posts: 505
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Liked: 22
I wouldn't worry about AirPlay as a deciding factor in an AVR. That is easily remedied with a $99 apple tv2 which would give you much better options than AirPlay alone.

Life is hard, be harder.
Saints is offline  
post #13 of 17 Old 12-23-2011, 11:02 AM - Thread Starter
Newbie
 
kailas123's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 12
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
I am getting a following package for $1000. Please let me know if it's worth.

CF-30 - two (front L&R)
CC-5 - one (C)
CB-5 - two (surround)
EW-100 sub
Denon AVR-1712

For AirPlay support, yes I have Apple TV2. What I am little worried is EW-100 sub compared to S10.3 sub.

Please share your thoughts.

Thanks
Kailas
kailas123 is offline  
post #14 of 17 Old 12-23-2011, 12:52 PM
AVS Addicted Member
 
cel4145's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Posts: 11,275
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 68 Post(s)
Liked: 648
The EW-100 is not a very good sub and there are much better for its price (the S10.3 is much better). Where are you buying your package?

cel4145 is online now  
post #15 of 17 Old 12-23-2011, 06:59 PM - Thread Starter
Newbie
 
kailas123's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 12
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
@cel4145: I dropped EW-100 and upgraded AVR to Denon-1912 (mainly for component up-conversion) in the package. I got it for $1015 from Electronics-Expo. I also got S10.3 separately for $200 from newegg. The total is ~$1200.

Thanks
Kailas
kailas123 is offline  
post #16 of 17 Old 12-23-2011, 10:03 PM
AVS Addicted Member
 
cel4145's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Posts: 11,275
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 68 Post(s)
Liked: 648
Congratulations. That's a nice setup

Since I'm guessing this might be your first Denon and sub setup, read through AVS member batpig's guide and other resources (I, II, & III). It will help you to figure out how to use Audyssey to get the most out of your system.

cel4145 is online now  
post #17 of 17 Old 08-12-2012, 05:51 PM
Newbie
 
YamahaEnergycla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 10
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
I think the classics are the way to go bud. Love mine on my Yamaha RX-V373 5.1 av reciever!

Yamaha RX-V373 5.1 AV reciever,PS3 Gunmeatal gray MGS special edition,Pioneer Elite DV-37 progressive scan DVD/CD player,Energy take 5 classic 5.0 speakers,Pioneer Elite TZ-SW05 150W 10" Subwoofer,Monster M series component, HDMI,Subwoofer cables,Radio Shack 14 AWG flat copper speaker cable,Radio...
YamahaEnergycla is offline  
Reply Speakers

User Tag List

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page


Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off