What do you think of the Beats by Dr. Dre Bluetooth Wireless Speaker /Beatbox? - AVS Forum
Forum Jump: 
 
Thread Tools
post #1 of 18 Old 12-10-2012, 04:46 PM - Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
blackrain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 320
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Liked: 10
I will preface this question with the fact that I got it for $120 on clearance. Also, I bought the previous generation. Model: MSP BTS BX-DK (MSP BTS BK-DX EFS 132715-00) (UPC: 050644574580)

While the model # points to the bluetooth version on Amazon, I think Amazon got it wrong. This is more like what it looks like:
http://www.amazon.com/Beatbox-30-Pin-iPhone-Speaker-MODEL/dp/B0046ZRR3S/ref=cm_cr_pr_product_top

Not sure whether to keep it because of mixed reviews. Seems like some people say that its is way overpriced and nothing special while others absolutely love it (and spend the $400-$500 on it).

Is it like a personal taste type of thing? Or do most audiophiles think it is garbage?
blackrain is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 18 Old 12-10-2012, 08:15 PM
AVS Special Member
 
lovinthehd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: OROR
Posts: 6,323
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 82 Post(s)
Liked: 723
Some audiophools think power cords make a difference, some interconnects, some speaker wire, some champion one similar amp vs another, etc. Why worry about what "they" think? smile.gif

OTOH I wouldn't even consider something with that much marketing on principle alone....or a battery powered active speaker, just wouldn't occur to me to get one at all. Did they ever get bluetooth up to a high audio standard?

lovinthehd is offline  
post #3 of 18 Old 12-11-2012, 06:36 AM
AVS Special Member
 
Bill Fitzmaurice's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 9,296
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Liked: 1200
Quote:
Originally Posted by blackrain View Post

Is it like a personal taste type of thing? Or do most audiophiles think it is garbage?
That last thing you want to do is trust the opinion of a self-proclaimed audiophile. This is why:



From an engineering standpoint the Dre's are mediocre products sold at exorbitant prices.

Bill Fitzmaurice Loudspeaker Design

The Laws of Physics aren't swayed by opinion.
Bill Fitzmaurice is offline  
post #4 of 18 Old 12-12-2012, 01:40 AM
Senior Member
 
Todd68's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 379
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 21
Yea audiophiles are strange, I should know I am one. I would think that most top quality gear is designed by audiophiles or people passionate about audio!
Todd68 is offline  
post #5 of 18 Old 12-12-2012, 06:15 AM
AVS Special Member
 
Bill Fitzmaurice's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 9,296
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Liked: 1200
Quote:
Originally Posted by Todd68 View Post

Yea audiophiles are strange, I should know I am one. I would think that most top quality gear is designed by audiophiles or people passionate about audio!
Most top quality gear is designed by people passionate about audio. That used to be the definition of an audiophile. But now the term means less about a passion for good sound than it does a curious mixture of hubris and gullibility, as often as not equating price and hype with quality, even though there's no correlation. And that cuts to the crux of the OPs question.

Bill Fitzmaurice Loudspeaker Design

The Laws of Physics aren't swayed by opinion.
Bill Fitzmaurice is offline  
post #6 of 18 Old 12-12-2012, 11:49 AM
Senior Member
 
Todd68's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 379
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 21
Well thats the definition of some audiophiles not all, a lot of us are not stupid and gullible. Although most of us know there is more to sound quality than a spec sheet.

I made my own cables that I think sound better than the cheap stuff that you get at Radio Shack: You need to keep an open mind, that's all.
Todd68 is offline  
post #7 of 18 Old 12-12-2012, 12:04 PM
Advanced Member
 
GrooveRite's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: New York City
Posts: 933
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
Its all about marketing and branding now a days rather than quality of product.

Gamertag: BaneAssassin
PSN: BaneAssassin
GrooveRite is offline  
post #8 of 18 Old 12-12-2012, 12:11 PM
AVS Special Member
 
Bill Fitzmaurice's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 9,296
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Liked: 1200
Quote:
Originally Posted by Todd68 View Post

I made my own cables that I think sound better than the cheap stuff that you get at Radio Shack: You need to keep an open mind, that's all.
If you mean that you made cables that have lower DCR or capacitance or inductance or a combination of those three than a Radio Shack cable then it very well may sound better. But being an engineer I never accept subjective opinion at face value, not even my own. Especially my own, as I'm no more immune than anyone else from letting my expectations color my judgement. If you think it has to sound better, it will.

Bill Fitzmaurice Loudspeaker Design

The Laws of Physics aren't swayed by opinion.
Bill Fitzmaurice is offline  
post #9 of 18 Old 12-12-2012, 12:22 PM
Senior Member
 
Todd68's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 379
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 21
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill Fitzmaurice View Post

If you mean that you made cables that have lower DCR or capacitance or inductance or a combination of those three than a Radio Shack cable then it very well may sound better. But being an engineer I never accept subjective opinion at face value, not even my own. Especially my own, as I'm no more immune than anyone else from letting my expectations color my judgement. If you think it has to sound better, it will.

My IC cable are super low capacitance with solid core silver conductors and decent quality connectors, made from copper or silver instead of brass. If you can't hear any differnce than thats great but I can. smile.gif
Todd68 is offline  
post #10 of 18 Old 12-12-2012, 01:13 PM
AVS Special Member
 
Bill Fitzmaurice's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 9,296
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Liked: 1200
As far as silver goes it has 5% better conductivity than copper. To duplicate it with copper you can either go with 5% larger gauge or 5% less length. Brass is a relatively poor conductor, but the amount of it used in a typical connector is so small that it's not an issue, the difference being barely measurable and certainly not audible. Very low capacitance is useful with very long cables and/or high source impedances, but very seldom is it of consequence with interconnects. If you're happy that's all well and good. But I never recommend to anyone anything that isn't 100% positively both audible and worth the price. IME no cable costing more than a dollar a foot and no connector costing more than five dollars is.

Bill Fitzmaurice Loudspeaker Design

The Laws of Physics aren't swayed by opinion.
Bill Fitzmaurice is offline  
post #11 of 18 Old 12-12-2012, 01:57 PM
Senior Member
 
Todd68's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 379
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 21
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill Fitzmaurice View Post

As far as silver goes it has 5% better conductivity than copper. To duplicate it with copper you can either go with 5% larger gauge or 5% less length. Brass is a relatively poor conductor, but the amount of it used in a typical connector is so small that it's not an issue, the difference being barely measurable and certainly not audible. Very low capacitance is useful with very long cables and/or high source impedances, but very seldom is it of consequence with interconnects. If you're happy that's all well and good. But I never recommend to anyone anything that isn't 100% positively both audible and worth the price. IME no cable costing more than a dollar a foot and no connector costing more than five dollars is.

Thats a fine opinion, but not everyone thinks that way. Especially us gullible audiophools. tongue.gif
Todd68 is offline  
post #12 of 18 Old 12-12-2012, 03:00 PM
AVS Special Member
 
Bill Fitzmaurice's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 9,296
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Liked: 1200
Quote:
Originally Posted by Todd68 View Post

Thats a fine opinion, but not everyone thinks that way. Especially us gullible audiophools. tongue.gif
I'm an engineer, I don't post my opinions without identifying them as such. I post engineering facts. As for not everyone thinking that way, the snake oil merchants depend on that for their existence, and they're doing very well. Pixie dust sells.

Bill Fitzmaurice Loudspeaker Design

The Laws of Physics aren't swayed by opinion.
Bill Fitzmaurice is offline  
post #13 of 18 Old 12-12-2012, 03:45 PM
Senior Member
 
Big Whitey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Posts: 354
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
So you own it? If so make your own decision. The problem with audio is it is so subjective that what sounds great to me might sound like **** to you, vice versa. $120 for a powered bluetooth system is not a bad deal I would say. Im sure if you searched and listened to a ton of comparable systems you might find something better. But if it does the job and your happy with it then what others think doesnt really matter.

Going Deaf.... And Lovin' It
Big Whitey is offline  
post #14 of 18 Old 12-12-2012, 10:14 PM
Senior Member
 
Todd68's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 379
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 21
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill Fitzmaurice View Post

I'm an engineer, I don't post my opinions without identifying them as such. I post engineering facts. As for not everyone thinking that way, the snake oil merchants depend on that for their existence, and they're doing very well. Pixie dust sells.

Some people spend money on tweaks, it is their money so what?

Cheers!
Todd68 is offline  
post #15 of 18 Old 12-13-2012, 12:09 AM
AVS Special Member
 
fatuglyguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Mars
Posts: 1,328
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18 Post(s)
Liked: 86
I have listened to one at work (not really sure which version), $120 is probably what one of these is worth. Still, I don't think it sounded very good. If you just want something that gets loud and overemphasizes bass then these are great. Sadly, many people regard this as "good sound." Even more puzzling to me is that many people will use these types of docking systems as a stationary stereo system when they could just as well be using real speakers for the same price or less than some of these "premium" docks.

In any case, I have found that beats products that I have used (docks, the beats pill, and various editions of their headphones) rely more on their obnoxious looks and "cool factor" than anything. These products usually sound disappointing, or as good as something that can be had for 1/3 the price. The puzzling thing is that when try I help a customer at work who is looking to spend $300+ on a pair of beats, they are rarely even willing to look at something we carry in the same price range from Sennheiser, AKG, Audio-Technica, etc. it's a tragedy, really.

ht Panasonic TC-P60ZT60, Monitor Audio: Silver RX6, RX Centre, Radius 90HD; Martinlogan Dynamo 700, Marantz SR5006, PS3, Oppo BDP-103D
2ch Marantz PM8004, Sony BDP-S1000ES, JVC T-X3 tuner, Monitor Audio Silver RX1, REL T3, Apple TV, Peachtree Audio DAC•iT
lr Panasonic 50ST60, Sony BDP-S5100
fatuglyguy is offline  
post #16 of 18 Old 12-13-2012, 08:13 AM
Senior Member
 
Big Whitey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Posts: 354
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
Yea I could never understand why people would buy Beats headphones over Sennheiser. But this is the old Bose discussion all over again.

Going Deaf.... And Lovin' It
Big Whitey is offline  
post #17 of 18 Old 12-13-2012, 05:32 PM
AVS Special Member
 
smudge981's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Nevada
Posts: 1,839
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 163
Dr. Dre isn't the first celebrity to push a product and he won't be the last. As an audiophile, I feel his products are fair at best. As someone in the media, I can unequivocally say you are paying through the nose for the name and not the product itself. True, it is your money and can spend your hard-earned cash anyway you want. It's also our perrogative to point out the obvious in the hopes you'll find something of better quality and less expensive.

"I am NOT suffering from insanity... I happen to be enjoying myself!"

smudge981 is offline  
post #18 of 18 Old 12-13-2012, 05:44 PM
AVS Special Member
 
Elihawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Iowa City, Iowa
Posts: 2,410
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 31 Post(s)
Liked: 147
Yep...you are buying a combo if "fashion" and audio utility!

Set up #1: EMP e5ti, e5Ci, and SLS Q line Audio surrounds, EMP 10i10i sub
Set up #2: Def Tech SM450, CLR2002, SLS Qline surrounds and Klipsch 12wD sub
Set up #3: JBL130, JBL120C and Klipsch synergy sub
Elihawk is offline  
Reply Speakers

User Tag List

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page


Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off