Help With Surround/Rear Speakers for Terrible Room - AVS Forum
Forum Jump: 
 
Thread Tools
post #1 of 11 Old 01-15-2013, 07:55 AM - Thread Starter
Member
 
rrich999's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 18
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
Hi Everyone. I have been upgrading my living room the last couple of months. Up front have Energy CF-30's and CC-5 (CC-10 would not fit and wife not approved for size) with a BIC PL-200. After research I bought Atlantic Technology dipole/bipole for rears. I cannot hang anything from the sides with the open plan below and cannot hang them any lower. The couch is about 8 feet from back wall. I am not happy with the bipole/dipole sound, I think there is too much open space and they are echoing I have switched them left and right, dipole and bipole and either they make a big echo chamber sound or I have to turn them way up and can barely tell they are there. Not really getting very good immersion and I understand with this room that is an issue no matter what. I cannot add room treatments or anything like that. I have a pair of Polk TSI100 that I have also tried and they sound much better but wife hates how far they stick out from the wall.

I'm looking for recommendations for replacing the AT's. So far I have come down to these: Need to stay under $200.

Polk OWM3- Mainly for aesthetics
Polk OWM5
Polk T15
Energy Take Sat (can still be found)
Energy CR-10 (expensive and still Bipole but different config)

I'm just looking for a recommendation or any other help. You guys are always great and I trust what you tell me.

Thanks,
Randy

Created with GIMP
rrich999 is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 11 Old 01-15-2013, 08:59 AM
AVS Special Member
 
commsysman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Southern California
Posts: 5,191
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 79 Post(s)
Liked: 243
I think that bipolar speakers are a mistake in your room.

They seldom work well for most people; very tricky to place for good acoustic results (as you seem to have discovered...lol).

I suggest you get a pair of white Cambridge MIN-11 speakers and tilt them downward somewhat.

They are very small and should do the job unless you are trying to blow the doors off.
commsysman is offline  
post #3 of 11 Old 01-15-2013, 09:04 AM
AVS Special Member
 
flickhtguru's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Lebanon, PA
Posts: 2,458
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 105
I would suggest a pair of direct ratiating in-wall speakers. Should be wife approved and sound better than bi/dipole. Your sound will be comming from behind you rather than beside, BUT we all have to make compromises and this is your compromise.

Shawn
flickhtguru is offline  
post #4 of 11 Old 01-15-2013, 09:13 AM - Thread Starter
Member
 
rrich999's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 18
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
Quote:
Originally Posted by commsysman View Post

I think that bipolar speakers are a mistake in your room.

They seldom work well for most people; very tricky to place for good acoustic results.

That's why I posted this. Originally they were recommended as surrounds when they had to placed on a back wall ran as bipolar. I think I am not getting enough reflection and the sound is just floating off. Then I found a post that said for larger rooms with the speakers high and far back they should be direct radiating. Which would you suggest of those listed?
rrich999 is offline  
post #5 of 11 Old 01-15-2013, 09:15 AM - Thread Starter
Member
 
rrich999's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 18
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
Thanks, she actually likes the black speakers and does not want in-wall. Weird she is.
rrich999 is offline  
post #6 of 11 Old 01-15-2013, 10:27 AM
AVS Special Member
 
commsysman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Southern California
Posts: 5,191
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 79 Post(s)
Liked: 243
Actually, what usually happens is that you get all sorts of reflections and cancellations with bipolar radiators which cause nulls in some places.

Better to have the speaker directly aimed directly at the listening area, I think.
commsysman is offline  
post #7 of 11 Old 01-15-2013, 10:44 AM - Thread Starter
Member
 
rrich999's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 18
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
Quote:
Originally Posted by commsysman View Post

Actually, what usually happens is that you get all sorts of reflections and cancellations with bipolar radiators which cause nulls in some places.

Better to have the speaker directly aimed directly at the listening area, I think.


Yes, that's what I have found out.
rrich999 is offline  
post #8 of 11 Old 01-15-2013, 05:32 PM - Thread Starter
Member
 
rrich999's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 18
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
Bumpity
rrich999 is offline  
post #9 of 11 Old 01-15-2013, 05:46 PM
Member
 
BentZero's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 76
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
I have bi/di poles too. I liked them when they were to the left and right of my seating position in my first house. I hated them when they were behind me in my second house. just didn't sound right. in my next house I'll have them to my side again and will ultimately end up with a 7.1 setup. My next room will be a bit odd due to 4' knee walls, so I may end up not liking the poles again and opt for direct radiating. I hope I do like them though. I don't want to be able to locate the speakers which is what I worry about with direct radiators.
BentZero is offline  
post #10 of 11 Old 01-15-2013, 05:56 PM - Thread Starter
Member
 
rrich999's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 18
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
Quote:
Quote:
Originally Posted by BentZero View Post

I have bi/di poles too. I liked them when they were to the left and right of my seating position in my first house. I hated them when they were behind me in my second house. just didn't sound right. in my next house I'll have them to my side again and will ultimately end up with a 7.1 setup. My next room will be a bit odd due to 4' knee walls, so I may end up not liking the poles again and opt for direct radiating. I hope I do like them though. I don't want to be able to locate the speakers which is what I worry about with direct radiators.

Completely know what you mean. I have a room downstairs that some day I want to make a dedicated theater and my dipoles will be great in there. But for now they just don't sound right.
rrich999 is offline  
post #11 of 11 Old 01-16-2013, 06:07 AM
AVS Special Member
 
flickhtguru's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Lebanon, PA
Posts: 2,458
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 105
^^^ Everybody likes something different which is why most of this is subjective. So if you like bi/dipoles then great go for it. But bi/dipoles were better suited for the DD/DTS 5.1 days, now with Blu-ray and HD 7.1 sound there are discrete sounds put in each channel which are intended to be localizable. But if you like a more ambient or diffuse sound field there is nothing wrong with bi/dipoles. But I would only recommend to use them beside you and put direct radiators behind you for a 7.1 setup.

Shawn
flickhtguru is offline  
Reply Speakers

User Tag List

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page


Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off