B&W 805D to N805 - AVS Forum | Home Theater Discussions And Reviews
Baselworld is only a few weeks away. Getting the latest news is easy, Click Here for info on how to join the Watchuseek.com newsletter list. Follow our team for updates featuring event coverage, new product unveilings, watch industry news & more!


Forum Jump: 
 
Thread Tools
post #1 of 5 Old 05-28-2013, 04:24 PM - Thread Starter
Advanced Member
 
michaelkingdom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 514
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 40 Post(s)
Liked: 24
I would like to preface this by saying that I have had quite a few speakers and amplifiers in the past couple years. Dynaudio C1 Sig / Merlin TSM MMI / Harbeth SH5 / Usher Tiny Dancer / Focal Utopia Micro BE / PSB Imagine B / Magnepan MMG, 1.6, 1.7 / Amphion Argon / Selah as well as a few others. Amplifiers have been Arcam, Ayre, Exposure, Outlaw, McIntosh, Luxman, Musical Fidelity, Behringer, Naim, HK... I am just putting this out there to point to the fact that I have been seeking a sound that I truly love. So far, the speaker that does the most correct and the least wrong is the B&W N805.

I use the N805 for two years as the speaker that I simply could not let go of, hoping someday that I would take the plunge on the 805D. That day came about four months ago. I have put about 500 hours on the 805D hoping for an aha moment but it really did not come. Very much had been made of the diamond tweeter so I was curious to see what an improvement there could be over the 805N which I know very intimately. Oddly I found there to be a decrease in resolution - I understand that this is completely against common knowledge but this is what my ears have told me. Sitting next to the 805D I have a set of Focal Utopia Micro BE which have a beryllium tweeter. This tweeter is immeasurably more accurate, precise and resolving then the diamond tweeter. When listening to dialogue, the crispness and understandability of words and intonation completely gets lost in the swampy 805D tweeter as opposed to the Focal BE.

So, this brought me to thinking that Focal just has a better tweeter. Then I put my 805N back on their stands and I was floored by the increase in resolution over the diamonds. I really don't know how to explain this phenomenon but I really have been amazed by my experience. Hearing is subjective but my ears hear a fundamental rightness in the old 805N that the 805D does not approach. Magic is something that I never heard from the 805D and I actually stopped listening to music on impulse and for enjoyment. Now I am back to 805N as my daily driver and music is sounding very good again.

I must point out that this is only my subjective opinion but it is definitely something that I feel very strongly about as we all do in this hobby. In this case newer is not better. There were other soft spots in the 805 D's but also bothered me that I will leave aside for now. All I'm saying for now is that the 805N is an incredible speaker.
michaelkingdom is online now  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 5 Old 05-28-2013, 05:18 PM
AVS Special Member
 
astrallite's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,286
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 15
The problem with diamond is it's very heavy, whereas you generally want a very light transducer.

Diamond has a density of 91% higher than Beryllium and 30% higher than Aluminum, although 22% lighter than Titanium.
astrallite is offline  
post #3 of 5 Old 05-28-2013, 05:45 PM
AVS Special Member
 
LaoChe's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1,245
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8 Post(s)
Liked: 20
Michael, have you tried Salk's SILK speakers? I heard they are amazing sounding and should compare very favorably to your N805's.
LaoChe is offline  
post #4 of 5 Old 05-28-2013, 05:52 PM
AVS Special Member
 
AcuDefTechGuy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 4,349
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 140 Post(s)
Liked: 239
I recently said in the Revel thread that I believe a great speaker is great regardless of age, material, or technology. biggrin.gif

So I don't think your impression is a big surprise at all. wink.gif

Some people believe that newer must be better.

I believe great sound is great sound regardless.

Every system is different. We just have to find the speakers and processors that fix our systems the best.

AUTHORIZED . RBH . ATI . DENON . MARANTZ . EPSON . MONITOR AUDIO . PHASE TECHNOLOGY . BOSTON ACOUSTICS
RBH SX-T2/R (5) . ATI 3005/3002/2004/6012 . DENON AVP-A1HD
AcuDefTechGuy is online now  
post #5 of 5 Old 06-23-2014, 07:43 AM
Newbie
 
4thChoice's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 8
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Liked: 10
Question 805N compared to Dynaudio C1

michaelkingdom - How do they compare? From what you remember, how does the 805N compare to the Dynaudio C1?

My one and only local dealer (other than Best Buy and similar types) has a pair of C1 that I listened to and loved. Also listened to a few others in the Dynaudio line and a pair of 805D. After hearing the C1, the other Dynaudio and the 805D didn't interest me at all. But there is a used pair of 805N available locally for about $2000 which is a lot more attractive than the new C1 at $6000. Listen to everything (except rap), mostly classic rock and all types of jazz, some country/bluegrass and some classical (tho' admittedly not a lot of that.)

Thanks for your input.

Last edited by 4thChoice; 06-23-2014 at 07:46 AM.
4thChoice is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply Speakers



Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off