Need help selecting: Aperion, Ascend, Paradigm, Focal, Kef, Veritas 2.2i - Page 2 - AVS Forum
Forum Jump: 
Reply
 
Thread Tools
post #31 of 35 Old 10-20-2013, 01:09 PM
Senior Member
 
SyntheticShrimp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 355
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 104 Post(s)
Liked: 106
The Q100 should be a better sounding speaker than the Q300. Pocket it and enjoy the savings.

Theater room: Sony VPL HW30ES, DIY 100" screen with Seymour Centerstage XD, 5 Revel M105, 2 JBL Studio 210, 4 SVS SB12-NSD, Anthem MRX-300
Living room: Panasonic TC-P60VT60, 3 KEF LS50, Pioneer SW-8, Marantz NR1603
SyntheticShrimp is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #32 of 35 Old 10-20-2013, 02:37 PM - Thread Starter
Member
 
Porthos01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 176
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 16
Ok why is the Q100 a better sounding speaker? Also what about amp power requirements?
Porthos01 is offline  
post #33 of 35 Old 10-20-2013, 03:58 PM
Member
 
jm86wvu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: ocmd
Posts: 155
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 14
I don't think your Denon would come anywhere close to a B&K amp. Definitely would hold onto that amp. If anything I'd upgrade the sub. I almost bought KEF Q300s and PSB Image B6s before settling on my Totems. Best speaker I've heard for music. Incredible detail and imaging that always makes me say "wow."
jm86wvu is offline  
post #34 of 35 Old 10-20-2013, 04:03 PM
AVS Special Member
 
beaveav's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,883
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 85 Post(s)
Liked: 320
Quote:
Originally Posted by Porthos01 View Post

Ok why is the Q100 a better sounding speaker? Also what about amp power requirements?

The Q100 has better off-axis integration of the midwoofer with the tweeter, so it should give you better upper midrange/lower treble performance.

The Q300 should have better midbass performance.

So I wouldn't necessarily say one is better than the other. Each has a pro and a con. Final choice depends on your preferences, your room, listening levels, use of subwoofer(s), etc.

For every new thing I learn, I forget two things I used to know.
beaveav is offline  
post #35 of 35 Old 10-20-2013, 11:54 PM
AVS Special Member
 
sdg4vfx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Southern CA
Posts: 1,349
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 14 Post(s)
Liked: 96
FWIW I auditioned both the Q100 and Q300 and kept the Q100. When played with a (good, accurate) sub I heard no advantages to the Q300.

To my ears ... compared to many (also excellent) speakers in their price range the KEF Q series have stand-out off-axis response and an uncommonly wide sound stage (maybe it's the concentric driver?). My listening space is wider than it is deep so this worked for me.
sdg4vfx is offline  
Reply Speakers

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page


Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off