Calling all Polkies:Official Polk thread - Page 1432 - AVS Forum | Home Theater Discussions And Reviews
Baselworld is only a few weeks away. Getting the latest news is easy, Click Here for info on how to join the newsletter list. Follow our team for updates featuring event coverage, new product unveilings, watch industry news & more!

Forum Jump: 
Thread Tools
post #42931 of 42932 Old Today, 01:00 PM
AVS Special Member
enricoclaudio's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 2,428
Mentioned: 29 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 941 Post(s)
Liked: 923
I'm running 703s as surrounds and they are awesome. Never liked dipole/bipole speakers for surrounds, though.

Enrico Castagnetti @ Rythmik Audio
Media Room: Polk LSiM705s, LSiM706C, LSiM703s | Rythmik F12SE (x2) | Marantz SR7008 | Parasound Halo P5 | Emotiva XPA-3 & XPA-200 | Oppo 105D | Sony HW40ES |
Desktop: Dynaudio BM5 mkIII | Rythmik L22 | Apogee Quartet + Duet | 27" iMac|
Bedroom: B&W 685 S2 | Rythmik LVX12 | Marantz NR1606 | Emotiva XPA-200 Gen 2 | Samsung UN50JU6500 |
enricoclaudio is offline  
Sponsored Links
post #42932 of 42932 Old Today, 03:25 PM
AVS Special Member
chi_guy50's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 2,131
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1160 Post(s)
Liked: 557
Originally Posted by bmack500 View Post
What do you all think about the 703's for the rear surrounds? I have 2 pairs of 703's; I was going to use one pair for another room, but I don't think I can swing a pair of 702/fx's for the rear.

Will the rear surround be as good, compared to the 702/fx's?
The rear surrounds do not get as much action as the side surrounds and therefore are not as critical. IMHO, unless money is no object or your OCD rules the day, I would not utilize LSiM703's for RS duty just to match the side-surround speakers. There are other, much more affordable options (e.g., OWM5, TL3, RTiA3, et alia). And, as has been already noted, the wide dispersion of the LSiM702/FX is not the best option in this speaker position.

I am not minimizing the value of RS speakers; I greatly value what mine add to the overall surround-sound effect. In fact, I experimented with configuring my Atmos 7.1.4 setup with FW in place of the RS and found that I could not give up the latter just for the sake of a broader front sound stage. Of course, YMMV. And, in the best of all possible worlds, I still get to hear my FW in addition to the RS when playing back in DTS Neo:X 11.1.

Sony XBR-55HX929 LCD HDTV w/FALD, DarbeeVision DVP 5000S
Denon AVR-X5200W (Video: Dolby Atmos/DSU 7.1.4; Music: DTS Neo:X 11.1); Dayton Audio MA1260 12-Channel Amplifier (60wpc)
Polk Audio RTiA7 (F/LR), CSiA6 (C), RTiA5 (FW), OWM5 (Sr, SB), 80F/X-RT (FH, TR); SVS SB-2000 (SW); Polk Audio OWM5/BIC America MSR-PRO6 (Zones 2 & 3)
chi_guy50 is online now  
Sponsored Links
Reply Speakers

Polk Audio , Polk Audio Rti8 High Output Floorstanding Loudspeaker Single Black , Polk Audio Rti4 High Performance Bookshelf On Wall Speakers , Polk Audio Csi5 High Performance Center Channel Speaker , Polk Audio Rti6 High Performance Bookshelf Speakers Pair Black , Polk Audio Three Way Vanishing Rt Series In Ceiling Speaker 70 Rt , Polk Audio Monitor70 Series Ii Floorstanding Loudspeaker , Polk Audio Monitor 30 Bookshelf Speakers Cherry , Polk Audio Monitor Series Cs1 Center Channel Speaker Single Cherry , Polk Psw108 10 100w Psw Series Powered Subwoofer , Polk Audio R50 Floorstanding Speakers Each , Polk Audio Surroundbar 4000 Iht Virtual Surround Speaker Bar With Wireless Su
Gear in this thread

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page

Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off