PSB Speakers Owners thread - Page 13 - AVS Forum
Forum Jump: 
 1Likes
Reply
 
Thread Tools
post #361 of 5671 Old 09-04-2007, 09:58 AM
Member
 
suckerforHD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: IL
Posts: 46
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
Any MSRP on the Synchrony?
suckerforHD is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #362 of 5671 Old 09-04-2007, 12:32 PM
AVS Addicted Member
 
Alimentall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Home by the sea
Posts: 14,157
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
Looks like the T7 turned into the Synchrony One. Prices and info here:

http://news.ecoustics.com/bbs/messag...81/383455.html

John
Alimentall is offline  
post #363 of 5671 Old 09-07-2007, 05:46 AM
AVS Special Member
 
RobZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 3,546
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Liked: 17
Anyone have experience listening to the newer Image line mixed in with the older Image line? I'm considering a C60 (instead of 9C) to go with my 6T's. Any suggestions or does anyone have a spare 9C to sell ?
RobZ is offline  
post #364 of 5671 Old 09-07-2007, 12:22 PM
Senior Member
 
fuzzybk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 448
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Liked: 13
I think you should be fine with a C60. Why not try and e-mail PSB speakers and ask their opinion. I love my PSB Image series HT consisting of a 9C, 5T and 10S. My HT sounds great.

Cheers from the Great White North.
fuzzybk is offline  
post #365 of 5671 Old 09-07-2007, 02:17 PM
AVS Special Member
 
RobZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 3,546
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Liked: 17
I was thinking of calling them but I'm sure they'll point me towards buying a new C60. I sold my 9C and 2B's and agree, they are sweet for the cost. I replaced them with a Klipsch THX Ultra 2 system that turned out to demand more volume than I need in order to really shine. My current setup is lower volumed most of the time. The THX U2's were great for a dedicated room though.
RobZ is offline  
post #366 of 5671 Old 09-11-2007, 03:36 PM
Newbie
 
dstg_ll's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 2
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
Just wanted to add my grain of salt in this thread by saying that I bought a complete set of PSB speakers yesterday and it just blows my mind. I LOVE those speakers...

Front: Image T45
Center: Image C40
Surround: Image B15
Amp: HK AVR 247

Playing Feist on that setup with the volume cranked up and it gave me goosebumps.

Awesome quality, awesome sound. Immensely satisfied.
dstg_ll is offline  
post #367 of 5671 Old 09-11-2007, 03:48 PM
DAB
AVS Special Member
 
DAB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: SF CA
Posts: 2,371
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
There an audio dealer in SF, CA(mostly to real musicians) has some PSB demo speakers for sale- I didn’t get to which series- older ones. Do not worry about care most likely less than 100hrs on any of them- straight shooter.
Audioimages.com
DAB is offline  
post #368 of 5671 Old 09-13-2007, 11:10 AM
Member
 
suckerforHD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: IL
Posts: 46
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
American Theatre is advertising the Synchrony Line on A'gon already...
suckerforHD is offline  
post #369 of 5671 Old 09-30-2007, 01:27 PM
Member
 
banderson317's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 15
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
Hi Everyone - newbie here. I have been reading this thread and have lots of questions. I have a 13' x 18' room with a 11' cathedral ceiling, carpet floors. I'm looking for a good 5.1 HT system in the $2,500 range (speakers).

Questions:

T55's or T45's for fronts - What's best for this size of room? Has anyone experienced a muddier sound with the T55's vs. the T45's, as commented by some? OR, overall, do the T55's sound better than the T45's. Unfortunately my local dealer doesn't have any T55's in stock.

Are the T65's a good speaker (w/ no sub) for a music only application (non HT) for a different room in the house?

Is anyone powering the Image 5.1 HT system and/or T65 towers with a Onkyo TX-SR875? If so, how is the match?

Thanks!
banderson317 is offline  
post #370 of 5671 Old 10-01-2007, 12:39 PM
Member
 
FoeHammer865's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Sioux Falls, SD
Posts: 164
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
With your size of room I would probably stick with the T55's. Unless you have worked on the acoustics of the room a lot, the 55's will have a much fuller sound. Personally I would go the T65 route if I were you with the tall ceilings in there. A lot of sound will get lost with that and you won't have the base extension going with the 45's.

"When I left you, I was but the learner, now I am the master."
FoeHammer865 is offline  
post #371 of 5671 Old 10-01-2007, 09:58 PM
Member
 
banderson317's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 15
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
Thanks for the reply, Foehammer.

Do you have T65's? Do you think the T55's and sub would be equivalent to a pair of T65's?
banderson317 is offline  
post #372 of 5671 Old 10-02-2007, 07:14 AM
Senior Member
 
critterjr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Utah
Posts: 296
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
I recently demo'd some T55s along with a wide range of other towers and I found the T55s to be an excellent value. You can get them online at variety of places for $949/pr which is their running rate or get some B-stock at a few locations for 30% less.

I ended up spending slightly less and getting more speaker imho with Swans but PSB is still a very solid value and I like the T55s a lot. I found they had good clarity in the midranges, were not too bright up top, and had enough bass that I could listen to music without a sub in most cases.
critterjr is offline  
post #373 of 5671 Old 10-02-2007, 10:45 AM
Advanced Member
 
Steve.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Cape Cod
Posts: 576
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 11
I'm awaiting delivery of a pair of Platinum M2s to replace my B&W CDM 1NTs, any comments on these speakers would be greatly appreciated.
Steve. is offline  
post #374 of 5671 Old 10-03-2007, 11:33 AM
Member
 
suckerforHD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: IL
Posts: 46
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
From a dealer...

"My first impression with the Synchrony 1 is that it is a very smooth sounding speaker. Image extremely well in vertical and horizontal. Bass is tight. Overall, the Platinum T8 is a better. May be not as smooth on the upper end, but it is solid in bass, mid and output level. The T8 is a more accurate sounding speaker."
suckerforHD is offline  
post #375 of 5671 Old 10-03-2007, 08:07 PM
Advanced Member
 
aboroth00's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Garden Grove, CA
Posts: 619
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Liked: 20
Well the T8 is still one line higher than the Synchrony so technically, it should be the better speaker. But the Synchronys definitely have the edge on aesthetics.
aboroth00 is offline  
post #376 of 5671 Old 10-04-2007, 04:27 AM
Senior Member
 
Luap's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 468
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
The Synchrony line is replacing the Platinum line and the line below it. However, based on price and drivers, the T6 is the comparison that should be made with the Synchrony 1. How do they compare? The bass specs are a tiny bit better on the Synchrony 1, but the tweeter specs (though not in the audible range) may be better on the platinum series.
Luap is offline  
post #377 of 5671 Old 10-04-2007, 02:32 PM
cpc
AVS Club Gold
 
cpc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Toronto,ON,Canada
Posts: 7,504
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
Although the specs of the Platinum and newer lines are very good, I still find the value of the Image line can be found not only in the frequency response, which is remarkable in the towers, but also in the efficiency/sensitivity. Although I am into energy conservation etc, the other reason I like efficient speaker is because it gives you lot's of bass and volume for your buck. The same number of watts gives you higher volume, and/or stresses your amp less for a given volume. Just something to think about. That is of course, unless you have boat loads of cash to spend on high wattage amps. Not to say less sensitive speakers won't work with lower power amps/receivers, but it is true that you do get a little more with higher efficiency speakers. Without breaking the bank, a reasonable amount o watts can produce a very satisfying level of bass with the Image towers
cpc is offline  
post #378 of 5671 Old 10-04-2007, 05:32 PM
Senior Member
 
Luap's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 468
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
I agree that efficiency is good, and with PSB and Paradigm, if you're not really picky, the Image and Monitor lines are the best bang for your buck. However, I usually find that as you go up in a company's speaker lines, the efficiency usually drops. Often there are trade-offs made to acheive the efficiency. However, the point where spending more ceases to be worth it is different for each person. I could live with the image line, but I'm trying to get into the Platinum line
Luap is offline  
post #379 of 5671 Old 10-07-2007, 10:08 AM
Newbie
 
drilla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 2
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
Paradigms Monitor series is so bad it's embarrassing.
drilla is offline  
post #380 of 5671 Old 10-07-2007, 10:52 AM
Member
 
Ryan45872's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 107
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
Quote:
Originally Posted by drilla View Post

Paradigms Monitor series is so bad it's embarrassing.


I thought the samething. I was disappointed when I heard them. I liked the Monitor 11 v.3 I had alot better! Even the dealer didn't like them.
Ryan
Ryan45872 is offline  
post #381 of 5671 Old 10-07-2007, 11:37 AM
Senior Member
 
Luap's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 468
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
I own the Monitor 11 V4 & CC370 and I like them, but I just bought the PSB Platinum M2 and C2 used and have a buyer for my Paradigms. The monitor 11s were a good value and are great for a home theatre but I prefer something more refined for music.
Luap is offline  
post #382 of 5671 Old 10-07-2007, 04:38 PM
Senior Member
 
phatnogin5877's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Edinboro, PA
Posts: 262
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
Are the century 300i speakers shielded?

I got the pistol so I get the pesos
phatnogin5877 is offline  
post #383 of 5671 Old 10-07-2007, 05:22 PM
Advanced Member
 
Steve.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Cape Cod
Posts: 576
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 11
Quote:
Originally Posted by Luap View Post

I own the Monitor 11 V4 & CC370 and I like them, but I just bought the PSB Platinum M2 and C2 used and have a buyer for my Paradigms. The monitor 11s were a good value and are great for a home theatre but I prefer something more refined for music.

Luap,

How do you like the M2s ? I have a pair arriving this week, any feedback would be great.
Steve. is offline  
post #384 of 5671 Old 10-07-2007, 06:16 PM
Senior Member
 
Luap's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 468
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
Quote:


How do you like the M2s ? I have a pair arriving this week, any feedback would be great.

I am very impressed with them. What sold me on them was the sound of voices. They sounded very natural, and the sound was very coherent, not like it was coming from 2 separate drivers. You will want to use a subwoofer, crossed at about 80 hz, but they produce a great image and a wide soundstage. They are precise sounding without being harsh, quite neutral.
Luap is offline  
post #385 of 5671 Old 10-08-2007, 03:25 PM
Member
 
Joe Pick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Novi, MI
Posts: 81
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
Hello. I have a question on impedance. I have the following PSB Image speakers. 5T (2), C40, 2B (2).

I have an Onkyo AVR (TX-SR703), and I can choose either 4 or 6 ohms for the impedance setting, and I'm confused as to which one to choose.

From my Onkyo owner's manual: "4 ohms: Select if the impedance of any speaker is 4 ohms or more but less than 6. 6 ohms: Select if the impedances of all speakers are between 6 and 16 ohms."

Should I select 4 or 6 on my AVR? Thanks.
Joe Pick is offline  
post #386 of 5671 Old 10-08-2007, 06:21 PM
Senior Member
 
Luap's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 468
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
I've heard it recommended that people leave the impedance setting at 8 ohms, because the lower settings artificially limit the power supply current and this can hamper performance. The issue is mainly whether you come close to the limits of the receiver. If you crank it loud, you're more likely to reach the limits and either blow a fuse or activate the protection circuit or blow a tweeter or transistor. If you use a subwoofer, that will take a lot of the load off the receiver and will make problems less likely. Also, PSB rate their nominal impedance conservatively (near the minimum). If you find a review they may have produced a trace of the impedance curve. If it never drops below 4 ohms, you should be fine.
Luap is offline  
post #387 of 5671 Old 10-08-2007, 06:25 PM
Member
 
Joe Pick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Novi, MI
Posts: 81
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
That's great info - thanks. What should my setting be then, 6ohms?
Joe Pick is offline  
post #388 of 5671 Old 10-08-2007, 07:35 PM
Senior Member
 
Luap's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 468
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
I'd leave it at 6 ohms but you have to be aware that it's riskier. If you're not comfortable doing that, use the 4 ohm setting.
Luap is offline  
post #389 of 5671 Old 10-08-2007, 08:13 PM
Member
 
Joe Pick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Novi, MI
Posts: 81
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
Quote:
Originally Posted by Luap View Post

I'd leave it at 6 ohms but you have to be aware that it's riskier. If you're not comfortable doing that, use the 4 ohm setting.

What am I risking at 4 ohms? Is there a benefit at 6 if there's a risk at 4? Thanks for helping me.
Joe Pick is offline  
post #390 of 5671 Old 10-08-2007, 08:21 PM
Senior Member
 
Luap's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 468
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
With it set to 6 ohms you're more likely to draw too much current and blow something (fuse, transistor, tweeter) or activate the receiver's protection circuit if it has one. However, with it set to 4 ohms the current available from the power supply is limited and so the headroom of the receiver will be reduced, so the performance will be lower on dynamic parts. It's a trade off... some performance for more safety.
Luap is offline  
Reply Speakers

Tags
Psb , Psb Speakers Image T5 Tower , Psb Speakers Image C5 Centre , Psb Speakers Subseries 200 Subwoofer , Psb Speakers Image B5 Bookshelf , Psb Image T6 Tower Floorstanding Speaker , Nad , Psb Synchrony One , Rythmik Audio , Audyssey , Svs Pb12 Nsd Black Vinyl 12 Inch Powered Subwoofer

User Tag List

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page


Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off