Revel Owners Thread - Page 241 - AVS Forum
Forum Jump: 
 8Likes
Reply
 
Thread Tools
post #7201 of 7213 Old 07-20-2014, 02:21 PM
Member
 
denydog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 46
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Liked: 14
Quote:
Originally Posted by zuluwalker View Post
Go for it. What could go wrong.
Good answer! I know I generally prefer to have others do the experimentation.

BTW, tweeter "protection" measures and their effect on sound is something I have wondered about in the past. I recall a few speaker reviews (of other brands) that showed measurable differences in level and response with protection removed, but these were, more or less, with screen type tweeter covers.

My own opinion is that removing the "wires" from the Studio2 tweeter would likely change the sound in some small way, but not to a degree that I would be able to hear. The F208's tweeter has a lot of hardware in front of the dome. I doubt it is there as a sound enhancer, but who knows.





Maybe revelman (Mark Glazer) is still reading this thread and will comment. On the other hand, it might be difficult for a Revel employee to endorse owner modifications to product.

Last edited by denydog; 07-20-2014 at 02:32 PM. Reason: Photo error
denydog is online now  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #7202 of 7213 Old 07-20-2014, 05:50 PM
Advanced Member
 
Thxtheater's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 774
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18 Post(s)
Liked: 74
Quote:
Originally Posted by neutralguy View Post
Source? I am almost certain they do no such function. The waveguide is the curved faceplate, as it is in various JBL and Revel tweeter designs.
I'm very open to being wrong. However you will note that different Revel models have distinctively different "bars" in front of the tweeters. The Revel F32 and F52 as well as the C32 and C52 have completely different "bars" in front of them. The Ultima2 and Performa 3s had likewise different bars.

I'd suggest calling Revel or emailing Revel support directly for a definitive answer. Id tend to think that if it made a significant/audible difference then the "tweeter cover" would have been removeable.
Thxtheater is offline  
post #7203 of 7213 Old 07-20-2014, 06:51 PM
Just add water and stir
 
zuluwalker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Alberta, Canada
Posts: 1,617
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18 Post(s)
Liked: 461
Quote:
Originally Posted by Thxtheater View Post
I'm very open to being wrong. However you will note that different Revel models have distinctively different "bars" in front of the tweeters. The Revel F32 and F52 as well as the C32 and C52 have completely different "bars" in front of them. The Ultima2 and Performa 3s had likewise different bars.

I'd suggest calling Revel or emailing Revel support directly for a definitive answer. Id tend to think that if it made a significant/audible difference then the "tweeter cover" would have been removeable.
I am with you.

But the question is not whether it would make a difference to remove it or keep it. The question is would it make a positive change to remove it. And I say try it if you want to know. But just like Thxtheater, I highly doubt that Revel stuck them their for anything but a positive effect. Kinda naive for anyone to believe they could better modify the speaker by removing such a portion of the wave guide. Then again, give it a shot. Why not? It is a free country and Salon speakers clearly must be a disposable item.

Last edited by zuluwalker; 07-20-2014 at 07:14 PM.
zuluwalker is offline  
post #7204 of 7213 Old 07-20-2014, 07:30 PM
AVS Special Member
 
Milt99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: West Of California
Posts: 5,083
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 11 Post(s)
Liked: 65
Quote:
Originally Posted by neutralguy View Post
Question for Revel: Would removing those 2 wires in front of a Studio2/Salon2 speaker's tweeter make a noticeable or at least measurable improvement? I have no need for the protection offered by those wires, and I would imagine that they at least cause some diffraction which could hurt imaging.
Yeah why not?
I'm sure that Revel put those "wires" there for no good reason and you, being an acoustic engineer, have wisely concluded that they serve no purpose and in fact inhibit accurate imaging.
Hell it's only a teeny beryllium tweeter back there, it needs room to breathe.
Personally, I'd choose my 12" ChannelLocks and give em a good yank.
Good luck, Gomer and let us know how your before and after measurements stack up.

 

It ain't ignorance causes so much trouble; it's folks knowing so much that ain't so


Last edited by Milt99; 07-20-2014 at 07:43 PM.
Milt99 is offline  
post #7205 of 7213 Old Yesterday, 07:55 AM
Member
 
neutralguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 26
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Liked: 13
Quote:
Originally Posted by Milt99 View Post
Yeah why not?
I'm sure that Revel put those "wires" there for no good reason and you, being an acoustic engineer, have wisely concluded that they serve no purpose and in fact inhibit accurate imaging.
Hell it's only a teeny beryllium tweeter back there, it needs room to breathe.
Personally, I'd choose my 12" ChannelLocks and give em a good yank.
Good luck, Gomer and let us know how your before and after measurements stack up.
Being satirical and calling the poster names won't contribute to a discussion, at least not after middle school. You have made no argument, but have only regurgitated a previously stated opinion, also without source.

On the other hand, Sound and Vision calls those wires "a two-wire guard" and likewise for this Perfoma model. They may not speak for Revel, but at least Revel has not disputed this magazine's claim.

So far this is not strong evidence for them being merely protective, but it is still more than the amount of evidence (zero) you have provided to the contrary.
neutralguy is offline  
post #7206 of 7213 Old Yesterday, 08:44 AM
AVS Special Member
 
duc135's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,674
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10 Post(s)
Liked: 148
If they were simply guards I would think it would be simpler to make all the guards the same instead of making distinct looking guards for each tweeter model. I'm just guessing though.
duc135 is online now  
post #7207 of 7213 Old Yesterday, 08:54 AM
Member
 
VinhT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 19
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Liked: 10
I would leave the protection in place, as they (hopefully) were factored into the design and overall performance of the speaker.
VinhT is offline  
post #7208 of 7213 Old Yesterday, 11:29 AM
Advanced Member
 
Thxtheater's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 774
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18 Post(s)
Liked: 74
metal guards

Someone want to contact Revel directly and just ask?

Thxtheater is offline  
post #7209 of 7213 Old Yesterday, 12:47 PM
Advanced Member
 
lsdec's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 700
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7 Post(s)
Liked: 51
LOL..you guys are crazy .
lsdec is offline  
post #7210 of 7213 Old Yesterday, 12:51 PM
AVS Special Member
 
duc135's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,674
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10 Post(s)
Liked: 148
Quote:
Originally Posted by Thxtheater View Post
Someone want to contact Revel directly and just ask?
That would be too easy. Besides, what fun is there in that?
duc135 is online now  
post #7211 of 7213 Old Yesterday, 02:45 PM
Advanced Member
 
Thxtheater's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 774
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18 Post(s)
Liked: 74
Well guys I reached out to Revel. They told me that they had received 15 inquiries into what the bars were for. Okay, just kidding they haven't really received 15 inquiries. But, I was able to confirm that the speakers are designed as a complete system with the bar in place. Removing the bars will simply void your warranty and not give you any good acoustical benefit. So there you have it.
Thxtheater is offline  
post #7212 of 7213 Old Yesterday, 03:55 PM
AVS Special Member
 
losservatore's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Ohio
Posts: 2,945
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 93 Post(s)
Liked: 227
IMO the two wires on those revel tweeters are there to protect the tweeter or just for Aesthetic , but the ones on the revel performa 3 look that they are to enhance the high frequencies.if you remove those on the revel Performa 3 probably the top high frequencies roll off and could affect sound details.


This info may help you.


http://forum.audiogon.com/cgi-bin/fr...ansen+speakers

Panasonic 65VT60 / Marantz SR7005 / Marantz UD7007 /PSA XS30 /Revel Performa3 F206 / Revel Performa3 C205 / Sonos Connect/ Roku 3 / Amazon Fire tv / Xbox One / HTPC / Darbee 5000 /Sonos system for rooms/

Last edited by losservatore; Yesterday at 10:48 PM.
losservatore is offline  
post #7213 of 7213 Old Yesterday, 05:48 PM
Member
 
neutralguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 26
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Liked: 13
Quote:
Originally Posted by losservatore View Post
Thanks for the link. Hansen's statement does explain why those structures appears in front of metal domes and not soft domes. I agree with you that those 2 wires do not appear to be such a structure.

Thxtheater, thanks for checking with Revel.
neutralguy is offline  
Reply Speakers

Tags
Revel

User Tag List

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page


Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off