B&W Owner's Thread - Page 665 - AVS Forum
Forum Jump: 
Reply
 
Thread Tools
post #19921 of 19922 Old Yesterday, 02:21 PM
Senior Member
 
leo2498's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 259
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Liked: 13
Quote:
Originally Posted by Seegs108 View Post
I just bought a pair of 804 Diamonds and an HTM-4 Diamond center. I currently have an Emotiva XPA-3 Generation 2 amplifier. Will I be doing these speakers a disservice by using this amp? I'm sure there better amps out there, but if I was looking to keep my budget under $2000 is there anything out there was will give me a noticeable improvement over the XPA-3?
With a Parasound you will not missing nothing, it's the best amp under its budget to me and better than rotel.
postrokfan likes this.

Leo,
Saludos
My HT: B&W 804D fronts, HTM4D center, 805D rears, Classe CA-2300 Main amp, Preamp Stereo CLASSE CP800, Preamp Multi Channel Denon AVR 3310, A31 parasound center and Surround Amp, Source Oppo BDP-95 screen Samsung 55" UE55d8000 SVS SB12-NSD
Stereo: B&W 804S fronts, Pre: Yamaha AVR663 amp, Rotel RB1582.
leo2498 is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #19922 of 19922 Old Today, 10:43 AM
Senior Member
 
Patrick Butler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 280
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 47 Post(s)
Liked: 22
Hi Richard,

FYI, the ports on new Series 2 CM and 600 products are identical.

Regarding the "button" (we refer to as an anti-resonance plug) we use them in both new series because it is very effective, as we found when developing the PM1. You can read more about the technology here. There are advantages and disadvantages to putting a port on the rear or front of a speaker. No free lunches.

Every room is a unique acoustical space, and how a speaker is maximally used in that space is as unique a solution as the room itself.

Cheers,

Patrick
B&W Group North America


Quote:
Originally Posted by Richard Cranium View Post
Hello - I'm just a stereo-tot by modern standards. But I once owned some pretty good gear back in the 80s and still use some vintage equipment in the basement.

I recently purchased last year's 685s as well as 686s. I'm using a pair of 686's as a center channel - mostly because they probably sound as good as BWs traditional center channel - and can be re-used in a future configuration differently. I figure a pair of 686's laying "top-to-top" works as well as a HTM62. (maybe better)

Before I deployed these speakers - I gave them a good listen. Now that I realize the even B&W can't figure out where and how to port their various speakers - some to the front -some to the back - I have to conclude that it's up to each speaker owner to engineer the best sound they can from their own acoustical environs.

While it can be fun and entertaining to wax on about the qualities of each forum members sound machines and listening experiences, I find it amusing that the engineers of an award winning speaker company resort to changing the "button" on a driver - or the direction of an enclosure port to "improve" their products. (as in the new S2 series)

I guess the point of my comment is this - if professional engineers, that have studied problems relating sound reproduction, can make radical changes to their products from year to year - don't carry too many preconceived notions into your attempts to configure your own sound space.

Let your grin be your guide...........
Patrick Butler is offline  
Reply Speakers

Tags
B W , Bowers And Wilkings 685 Speakers , carver cm-1090
Gear in this thread - cm-1090 by PriceGrabber.com

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page


Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off