B&W Owner's Thread - Page 686 - AVS | Home Theater Discussions And Reviews

AVS | Home Theater Discussions And Reviews > Audio > Speakers > B&W Owner's Thread

Speakers

LowTech1's Avatar LowTech1
01:07 PM Liked: 76
post #20551 of 20558
Yesterday | Posts: 1,089
Joined: Jul 2007
I'm good with the ML ESL's for now. It sucks they don't put the tweeter on top of the new center channel to match the 10's. I know they do on one of the centers but its way too expensive. Plus,I think the 10's are a little bright,but it could probably be toned down with Audyssey XT32.
adrummingdude's Avatar adrummingdude
01:27 PM Liked: 23
post #20552 of 20558
Yesterday | Posts: 140
Joined: Feb 2013
Quote:
Originally Posted by LowTech1 View Post
I just never see anyone talk about them. Its either the 600 series or Diamonds. When I was searching for speakers,they had the CM9's,I didn't really care for them,ended up with Martin Logan Esl's. I heard the CM10 S2's,the mid bass punch that had was awesome! Just not sure I like the sparkle they have in the tweeter,that's what turned me off from the CM9. Listened to the Sonus Faber Venere 2.5's also,they are nice also,didn't have the midbass punch the 10's had,but the treble was smoother.


The CM9 and ESL were the two speakers I was between as well. Ultimately, the CM9 won out due to it being a little bit more friendly for my environment. It's a little easier to place, I wont have to worry sunlight from the windows they are right in front of or from the skylight overhead degrading panels, and there isn't a box on the back of the CM9 like the ESL to tempt my young daughter to climb on.


I thought the ESL sounded incredible with everything over 500hz or so, but a bit thin (though musical) in the bass regions, where the CM9 and CM10 really shine.


Its important to put into perspective that at the $2500-$3500 per pair price point, there are no bad options.


Enjoy your ESL's, they sound terrific!
CHASLS2's Avatar CHASLS2
02:05 PM Liked: 29
post #20553 of 20558
Yesterday | Posts: 1,354
Joined: Feb 2009
Quote:
Originally Posted by LowTech1 View Post
This thread is weird. Either guys on here own low end or high end. Doesn't anyone own CM 9 s2 or CM 10 s2?
I have the CM9 S2'S. Love them so far.
LowTech1's Avatar LowTech1
03:39 PM Liked: 76
post #20554 of 20558
Yesterday | Posts: 1,089
Joined: Jul 2007
adrummingdude, I have 2 subs for the bass. Even tho the ESL's have an 8" woofer,it does not pound like other speakers like the Motion 40's with 6 1/2 " woofers,which is weird. But,it doesn't matter,I use a sub with 2 channel music.
Rod#S's Avatar Rod#S
07:43 PM Liked: 31
post #20555 of 20558
Yesterday | Posts: 1,814
Joined: Jun 2003
Quote:
Originally Posted by JimSatala777 View Post
802d's fed by a Krell 402e will rattle your teeth and make you feel like you part of the music. ....800d's fed by a pair of 900e will literally kill you

High wattage amps like the 900e you mention for the speakers do keep a nice tight hold of the speakers and produce incredibly solid bass but the beauty I find is that they do equally well at lower volumes. I have Bryston 28B-SST2's for my 800D2's while my 802D2's are powered by Bryston as well, a 6B-SST but I do plan on switching that for 7B-SST2's in the future. My particular 28's are spec'd at just shy of 1250 watts each, 1246 and 1247 I think so not to shabby.
Rich0449's Avatar Rich0449
10:29 PM Liked: 10
post #20556 of 20558
Yesterday | Posts: 26
Joined: Feb 2013
Quote:
Originally Posted by CHASLS2 View Post
I have the CM9 S2'S. Love them so far.

Has anyone paired the htm61 s2 with either the CM9 or CM10 (either S1 or S2)?
adrummingdude's Avatar adrummingdude
09:46 AM Liked: 23
post #20557 of 20558
Today | Posts: 140
Joined: Feb 2013
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rich0449 View Post
Has anyone paired the htm61 s2 with either the CM9 or CM10 (either S1 or S2)?
As the htm61 s2 and cmc2 s2 are the same size, IMO the only reason you would do this is cost. A quick look at the specs shows the HTM61's -3db point at 22k, and the CMC2's -3db at 28k, which should voice better with the CM towers (except maybe the old cm9).

When I upgraded my front stage, I bought the cm9 s2 first, and was using it with a htm62 s1. It sounded awful. In fact, the cmc2 s2 was hands down a bigger upgrade from the htm62 than was the cm9 from the 683 I had been using.

If you already own the htm61 s2, which is a good speaker, give it a listen with your CMs before you decide to upgrade. If you don't already own it, pony up and buy all CMs. Youll thank yourself later.
Rich0449's Avatar Rich0449
10:29 AM Liked: 10
post #20558 of 20558
Today | Posts: 26
Joined: Feb 2013
Quote:
Originally Posted by adrummingdude View Post
As the htm61 s2 and cmc2 s2 are the same size, IMO the only reason you would do this is cost. A quick look at the specs shows the HTM61's -3db point at 22k, and the CMC2's -3db at 28k, which should voice better with the CM towers (except maybe the old cm9).

When I upgraded my front stage, I bought the cm9 s2 first, and was using it with a htm62 s1. It sounded awful. In fact, the cmc2 s2 was hands down a bigger upgrade from the htm62 than was the cm9 from the 683 I had been using.

If you already own the htm61 s2, which is a good speaker, give it a listen with your CMs before you decide to upgrade. If you don't already own it, pony up and buy all CMs. Youll thank yourself later.

Hi..thanks for your reply....I have a couple of questions so I private messaged you. thanks!
Tags: B W , Bowers And Wilkings 685 Speakers , carver cm-1090

Gear in this thread - cm-1090 by PriceGrabber.com
Reply Speakers

Subscribe to this Thread

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3