Home Theater Direct (HTD) Owner's Thread - Page 19 - AVS Forum | Home Theater Discussions And Reviews
Baselworld is only a few weeks away. Getting the latest news is easy, Click Here for info on how to join the Watchuseek.com newsletter list. Follow our team for updates featuring event coverage, new product unveilings, watch industry news & more!


Forum Jump: 
 8Likes
Reply
 
Thread Tools
post #541 of 563 Old 09-27-2015, 07:29 PM
Member
 
jumarapol's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Pharr, TX
Posts: 79
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 39 Post(s)
Liked: 21
Quote:
Originally Posted by bgtighe23 View Post
Nice. How do you like the HTD subs? Have you compared them to any other subs?
Never tried before. I'm happy with it. Talked to HTD few days ago. He was talking about Atmos set-up like 7.2.4 or 9.2.4 set-up.He said I can use their in-ceiling speakers.
jumarapol is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #542 of 563 Old 10-26-2015, 02:40 PM
Newbie
 
FriscoHT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 8
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7 Post(s)
Liked: 10
I'm about to to do 2 rooms. Whats you your thoughts on this set up:

Family room: 5.1
In ceiling LCR - R65AIM
In Ceiling Rear: R80
Sub SVS SB 1000

Media rm 7.2.4
2 x Level 3 Towers
1 x Level 3 Center
Surrounds: 4 X Level 3 Book Shelf
Atmos: 4 x R65
Sub 2x SVS SB 1000
AVR: Either Onkyo NR3030 or Marantz 7010 + Marantz 7025.

I do know the AVR's I like, OnKyo will be more cost effective but Marantz may give me a better sound, not sure if it's overkill here. Just comes down to speakers, just not sure if anyone has a good experience with this speaker setup.

The other route I was looking at for the media rm was JBL for the media room, 590 towers, Revel w363 surrounds and SP6cII for the atmos. NOt sure how this would compare.
Polks RT70s as the alternative for the family rm LCR+ surrounds and keeping the SVS sub.
FriscoHT is offline  
post #543 of 563 Old 11-02-2015, 09:03 PM
Senior Member
 
jumuo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 266
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 147 Post(s)
Liked: 64
Has anyone compared the HTD Level 3 bookshelves to the Chane A1rx-c bookshelves? Looks wise, the HTDs are head and shoulders better, but was curious if anyone could comment on the audio quality.

I know "Z Reviews" on YouTube really liked the HTD Level 3s, and found them better than the Chanes, but would like to get other people's input.
jumuo is offline  
post #544 of 563 Old 11-02-2015, 09:41 PM
Senior Member
 
jumuo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 266
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 147 Post(s)
Liked: 64
Quote:
Originally Posted by GusGus748s View Post
I went from a 7.2 to a 5.1. Adding more speakers won't give you better sound. If you want good sound then you need good equipment. However, this doesn't mean that you have to go all out and spend a lot of money.

There are a lot of companies who make excellent speakers at an excellent price. HTD being one of them. Another speakers I like a lot and own are the Arx. Now Chane Arx.
How do the Chanes compare to the HTDs?
jumuo is offline  
post #545 of 563 Old 11-02-2015, 09:43 PM
AVS Special Member
 
GusGus748s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Visalia, CA 93291
Posts: 7,026
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 336 Post(s)
Liked: 667
Quote:
Originally Posted by jumuo View Post
How do the Chanes compare to the HTDs?
http://www.hometheatershack.com/forums/two-channel-audio/69421-official-1-000-speaker-evaluation-home-audition-event-results.html?nocache=1446525772095
GusGus748s is offline  
post #546 of 563 Old 11-02-2015, 10:19 PM
Senior Member
 
jumuo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 266
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 147 Post(s)
Liked: 64
Quote:
Originally Posted by GusGus748s View Post
http://www.hometheatershack.com/forums/two-channel-audio/69421-official-1-000-speaker-evaluation-home-audition-event-results.html?nocache=1446525772095
Thanks! That helped a ton!
jumuo is offline  
post #547 of 563 Old 11-02-2015, 10:34 PM
AVS Special Member
 
GusGus748s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Visalia, CA 93291
Posts: 7,026
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 336 Post(s)
Liked: 667
Quote:
Originally Posted by jumuo View Post
Thanks! That helped a ton!
No problem.
GusGus748s is offline  
post #548 of 563 Old 11-27-2015, 06:14 PM
Newbie
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 1
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 0
I endlessly resarched and demo'd polks, klipsch, jbl, energy, etc in stores. I was about to take the plunge with either HSU or EMPTEK.

I decided on Level 3 bookshelfs (L/R) and level 3 center. I got to demo both the 2s and 3s at HTD and ended up prefering the clarity of the 3s.

I am coming from Micca MB42Xs so it was a night and day difference. Sound stage is much more full.

Rounding out the 5.1 are onkyo HTIB surrounds, a Denon avr-e300 and a BIC F12.
Wdubose05 is offline  
post #549 of 563 Old 11-28-2015, 08:38 AM
AVS Special Member
 
AllenA07's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 1,126
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 406 Post(s)
Liked: 340
I'm giving the HTD HD-R65 speakers a real long look as potential Atmos speakers. I'm curious if anyone here has used them for that purpose and thoughts on if they'll do a good job at it.
AllenA07 is online now  
post #550 of 563 Old 12-07-2015, 12:45 PM
Member
 
rfb6435's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Phoenix, AZ area
Posts: 179
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 81 Post(s)
Liked: 30
Quote:
Originally Posted by AllenA07 View Post
I'm giving the HTD HD-R65 speakers a real long look as potential Atmos speakers. I'm curious if anyone here has used them for that purpose and thoughts on if they'll do a good job at it.
I have the AIM speakers as side surrounds which is a more demanding use case IMO and they work well.

I also have them as front heights in a Audyssey DSX configuration (but that has less impact).

I am about to install some HD-R80s as my top middle atmos speakers. I just bought an Marantz SR-7009 to upgrade my onkyo 929. I am mainly putting the HD-R80s in because their grille size is the same as the AIMs which I already have in the ceiling so they will match better than the R65s will.

I will have to post back with how it works.

-Rich

Marantz SR7009 Atmos 9.2.2 or 7.2.4 with 11 Channels of external amplification.
Adcom GFA-7500 150W/ch (WL/L/C/R/WR), Adcom GFA-7607 125W/ch (TMR/SR/SBR/SBL/SL/TML)
HTD L3 Tower L/R/C, HTD L2 Tower WL/WR, HTD Dual 12" Subs
HTD L2 Bookshelf SBL/SBR, HTD 6.5" Angled Ceiling FHL/FHR/SL/SR, HTD 8" Ceiling TML/TMR
Acer H9500BD 1080p 3D Projector with Monoprice 106" Multi-Format Screen.

Last edited by rfb6435; 01-26-2016 at 11:17 PM.
rfb6435 is offline  
post #551 of 563 Old 12-08-2015, 07:43 AM
Newbie
 
forpar70's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 1
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 0
Quote:
Originally Posted by hopper810 View Post
has anyone tried htd's inceiling/onwall speakers yet?
I have purchased the in ceiling speakers for a covered porch in front of my house; and am VERY hapy with the general quality and sound quality is Great!
forpar70 is offline  
post #552 of 563 Old 12-25-2015, 01:08 PM
Advanced Member
 
joeyvaz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Staten Island, NY
Posts: 582
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 46 Post(s)
Liked: 18
Just sold my CM9 CM Center 2 setup (First Series) I really love them, but I'm moving across the country and didn't want to risk damaging them during shipment. So I am no in the hunt for my new speakers. I was considering the SVS Ultra Towers and Ultra Center. I already have a set of their Ultra surrounds. But I am REALLY intrigued by the reviews and looks of the HTD Level Three Towers and Center plus surrounds in their MAcassar finish.

My buddy is willing to buy the SVS Ultra surrounds if I decide to go that route. But I want my speakers to both look and perform great in the new house. Decision decisions.
joeyvaz is offline  
post #553 of 563 Old 12-25-2015, 01:08 PM
Advanced Member
 
joeyvaz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Staten Island, NY
Posts: 582
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 46 Post(s)
Liked: 18
Just sold my CM9 CM Center 2 setup (First Series) I really love them, but I'm moving across the country and didn't want to risk damaging them during shipment. So I am no in the hunt for my new speakers. I was considering the SVS Ultra Towers and Ultra Center. I already have a set of their Ultra surrounds. But I am REALLY intrigued by the reviews and looks of the HTD Level Three Towers and Center plus surrounds in their MAcassar finish.

My buddy is willing to buy the SVS Ultra surrounds if I decide to go that route. But I want my speakers to both look and perform great in the new house. Decision decisions.
joeyvaz is offline  
post #554 of 563 Old 12-28-2015, 06:40 PM
Member
 
mlgreen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 26
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13 Post(s)
Liked: 12
Seeing how the level 3s are front ported design, does it make a difference how far they are from the wall?
mlgreen is offline  
post #555 of 563 Old 12-28-2015, 06:45 PM
AVS Special Member
 
GusGus748s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Visalia, CA 93291
Posts: 7,026
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 336 Post(s)
Liked: 667
Quote:
Originally Posted by mlgreen View Post
Seeing how the level 3s are front ported design, does it make a difference how far they are from the wall?
It shouldn't since the are front ported. Unless you put them facing the wall and super close to the wall.
GusGus748s is offline  
post #556 of 563 Old 12-29-2015, 09:15 AM
AVS Special Member
 
bgtighe23's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 1,773
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 869 Post(s)
Liked: 377
Quote:
Originally Posted by GusGus748s View Post
It shouldn't since the are front ported. Unless you put them facing the wall and super close to the wall.
ugh, now you're going to confuse people

_____ _____ _____ _____ _____ _____ _____ _____ _____ _____ _____
HTD Level 3 Review
Receiver : Denon x4100
Speakers : Martin Logan Motion 40s/Motion 15 (center)/HTD Level 2 (surrounds)
Subwoofer : Dual UM-18s
Born in 1995 and still continuing my HT journey
bgtighe23 is online now  
post #557 of 563 Old 12-29-2015, 10:00 AM
AVS Special Member
 
GusGus748s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Visalia, CA 93291
Posts: 7,026
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 336 Post(s)
Liked: 667
Quote:
Originally Posted by bgtighe23 View Post
ugh, now you're going to confuse people
lol
GusGus748s is offline  
post #558 of 563 Old 01-06-2016, 02:45 PM
Advanced Member
 
joeyvaz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Staten Island, NY
Posts: 582
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 46 Post(s)
Liked: 18
I just ordered the Level 3 Towers and Center, plus the bipole/dipole surrounds. For those of you with this setup, what avr are you running? I'll be using stricty as a processor connected to my Outlaw Audio Modell 7500, so the AVR will need pre-outs. I was thinking of another Denon (5200) or one of the newer Marantz units.

Any other recommendations?
joeyvaz is offline  
post #559 of 563 Old 01-06-2016, 03:00 PM
AVS Special Member
 
bgtighe23's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 1,773
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 869 Post(s)
Liked: 377
Quote:
Originally Posted by joeyvaz View Post
I just ordered the Level 3 Towers and Center, plus the bipole/dipole surrounds. For those of you with this setup, what avr are you running? I'll be using stricty as a processor connected to my Outlaw Audio Modell 7500, so the AVR will need pre-outs. I was thinking of another Denon (5200) or one of the newer Marantz units.

Any other recommendations?
I currently have a Denon X4100. If you want to get a nice pre/pro, I would agree that a newer Marantz unit would be nice.

I really think you will enjoy your HTD Level 3 speakers. I enjoyed my Level 3 bookshelves, I didn't get the towers.

_____ _____ _____ _____ _____ _____ _____ _____ _____ _____ _____
HTD Level 3 Review
Receiver : Denon x4100
Speakers : Martin Logan Motion 40s/Motion 15 (center)/HTD Level 2 (surrounds)
Subwoofer : Dual UM-18s
Born in 1995 and still continuing my HT journey
bgtighe23 is online now  
post #560 of 563 Old 01-07-2016, 07:25 AM
Advanced Member
 
joeyvaz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Staten Island, NY
Posts: 582
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 46 Post(s)
Liked: 18
I'm ordering the AVR-X4200 today. I'll use it as a processor to my Outlaw Amp for my 5.1 setup and use the internal amps for zone 2 on the patio. Pretty much how I had it set up on my AVR-X4000. I'll have everything this weekend. Looks like I'll be staying home setting up my new toys.
D Bone likes this.
joeyvaz is offline  
post #561 of 563 Old 01-19-2016, 02:34 PM
Advanced Member
 
joeyvaz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Staten Island, NY
Posts: 582
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 46 Post(s)
Liked: 18
I received my speakers already. I received an email 2 days later that they were having their Anniversary Sale. I called Customer Service and they refunded me 10%, no questions asked. Great customer service in my opinion. I decided to order a set of their outdoor speakers since I'm basically getting them for free now.

Denon AVR-X4200 will be here tomorrow. I can't wait to get everything set up and tested.

BTW, I went with their 12" ported sub in the same Ebony finish. It looks beautiful as well. I hope it sounds good in my small room (13'x19' w/10' ceilings) because I love the look. If not, I'll move it into the Loft and purchase an HSU, SVS, or PSA sub for this room. We'll see.

I also sent the drawings of my room to GIK Acoustics for room treatment recommendations. I have some funds set aside to treat the room and get the best out of my system.
joeyvaz is offline  
post #562 of 563 Old 01-19-2016, 03:05 PM
AVS Special Member
 
D Bone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: SoCal, USA
Posts: 1,308
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 63 Post(s)
Liked: 224
Right on........ Keep us updated once everything is hooked up!

Samsung UN60D6420 ~ DirecTV HR-44 ~ Sony S5100 ~ Roku 3 ~ Denon AVR-X3200W ~ HTD Level TWO Towers ~ HTD Level TWO Surrounds ~ Anti-Mode 8033 Cinema ~ Power Sound Audio XV15
D Bone is online now  
post #563 of 563 Old 01-26-2016, 11:45 PM
Member
 
rfb6435's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Phoenix, AZ area
Posts: 179
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 81 Post(s)
Liked: 30
Quote:
Originally Posted by rfb6435 View Post
I have the AIM speakers as side surrounds which is a more demanding use case IMO and they work well.

I also have them as front heights in a Neo:X/AudysseyDSX configuration (but that has less impact).

I am about to install some HD-R80s as my top middle atmos speakers. I just bought an Marantz SR-7009 to upgrade my onkyo 929. I am mainly putting the HD-R80s in because their grille size is the same as the AIMs which I already have in the ceiling so they will match better than the R65s will.

I will have to post back with how it works.

-Rich
I now have the HD-R80s installed as Top Middle atmos speakers. The HD-R80s were chosen over the HD-R65s both for a little more bass and because the grilles are actually the same size as the HD-R65AIM speakers which gives a better overall look where I don't have two different sized grilles in the same ceiling.

I was surprised that both my wife and I noticed a real difference when running 7.2.4 atmos with Top Middle and Front Height speakers enabled. I was shocked that the FH speakers made a big impact with atmos because they were almost insignificant and add very little IMO with Neo:X and DSX...

I expected to strongly prefer 9.2.2 with the front wides but there was a definite difference in immersion when both the FH and TM were used together that didn't exist with 9.2.2(FH) or 9.2.2(TM). More interestingly I don't think that a TF+TM configuration would sound as good in my 1 row setup as the FH+TM does! It turns out that some engineers from THX also came to the same conclusion where sounds behind the seating position were covered well enough with the Rear srrounds. I think TF+TR makes more sense when there is more than one row of seating.

Right now I still prefer DTS Neo:X (FW+FH) over the Dolby DSU (new dolby upscaller) which supports (FH+TM) for non atmos content. The TM ceiling speakers just don't seem right to me when they are formed from 5.1 content (too many overhead sounds are injected that shouldn't be) but perhaps it will grow on me... We have been using 7.2.4 for atmos movies and 11.1 for non atmos where FW speakers work better than TM when upscaled IMO..

I do wish that I could run 9.2.4 because the FWs also make a difference with the transition from Front to Side surrounds. 9.2.2 does have a more seamless surround sound on the floor but 7.2.4 has more of a wow factor.

I am actually considering moving my Level 2 towers that are currently the FW speakers to be side surrounds. The HD-R65AIM speakers work well there but with the atmos configuration side surrounds should be lower than with the normal 7.1 setup because the height is already there from the TM speakers. I have a pair of HTD middy speakers that I can use for wides if I can get my wife to approve the towers as side surrounds...

Perhaps someday there will be a $2000 or less AVR/Prepro that will support 9.2.4 so I can enable all of my speakers at the same time!

-Rich
joeyvaz and D Bone like this.

Marantz SR7009 Atmos 9.2.2 or 7.2.4 with 11 Channels of external amplification.
Adcom GFA-7500 150W/ch (WL/L/C/R/WR), Adcom GFA-7607 125W/ch (TMR/SR/SBR/SBL/SL/TML)
HTD L3 Tower L/R/C, HTD L2 Tower WL/WR, HTD Dual 12" Subs
HTD L2 Bookshelf SBL/SBR, HTD 6.5" Angled Ceiling FHL/FHR/SL/SR, HTD 8" Ceiling TML/TMR
Acer H9500BD 1080p 3D Projector with Monoprice 106" Multi-Format Screen.
rfb6435 is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply Speakers

Tags
Denon Avr 789 630 Watt 7 1 Channel Home Theater Receiver



Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off