SVS MTS Family - AVS Forum
Forum Jump: 
Reply
 
Thread Tools
post #1 of 635 Old 06-22-2007, 08:25 PM - Thread Starter
Member
 
Captain Crunch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Taylors SC
Posts: 169
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
Check this out MTS SVS Speakers....Check it out here!!

What do you guys think???
I love my SCS set up and wish I had money to throw down on these bad boys!!!!
Captain Crunch is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 635 Old 06-22-2007, 08:30 PM
AVS Special Member
 
mazersteven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Florida
Posts: 2,784
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
Quote:
Originally Posted by Captain Crunch View Post

Check this out MTS SVS Speakers....Check it out here!!

What do you guys think???
I love my SCS set up and wish I had money to throw down on these bad boys!!!!


I've been speaking with Tom from SVS and that is an impressive tweeter they come with. One of the best from what I understand.

http://www.diymobileaudio.com/forum/...96&postcount=1

mazersteven is offline  
post #3 of 635 Old 06-23-2007, 06:48 AM
AVS Special Member
 
Tweakophyte's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Boulder, CO, USA
Posts: 3,361
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
mBs... glad to see a larger bookshelf speaker. From a standard x-over perspective, how will these mate with a sub (i.e. perfect slopes)? When do we get to see the FRs? Also, how loud will these play without distorting or compressing? My HT is pretty large...
Tweakophyte is offline  
post #4 of 635 Old 06-23-2007, 07:04 AM
AVS Special Member
 
mazersteven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Florida
Posts: 2,784
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tweakophyte View Post

mBs... glad to see a larger bookshelf speaker. From a standard x-over perspective, how will these mate with a sub (i.e. perfect slopes)? When do we get to see the FRs? Also, how loud will these play without distorting or compressing? My HT is pretty large...

These speakers are not out yet. Pre/orders will start soon. So I don't think anyone can answer your distortion question. I'm sure like most speakers with proper amplification they will preform well.

Any quality sub should blend well with them.
mazersteven is offline  
post #5 of 635 Old 06-23-2007, 07:54 PM
Advanced Member
 
oneeyeblind's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 637
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Liked: 101
I'm really excited to see more about these speakers. I can't wait to see more specs hopefully the sensitivity will be higher than the sbs-01s

ShaunH
oneeyeblind is offline  
post #6 of 635 Old 06-23-2007, 09:34 PM
Member
 
GoingCoastal's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 120
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
It will be interesting to see how they sell at this price point, outside of their loyal fan base, with those silly panels attached to a plain speaker. Even Ascend Acoustics, with their loyal fan base, didn't try to sell ugly at that price point.
GoingCoastal is offline  
post #7 of 635 Old 06-23-2007, 10:02 PM
Advanced Member
 
oneeyeblind's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 637
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Liked: 101
Quote:
Originally Posted by GoingCoastal View Post

It will be interesting to see how they sell at this price point, outside of their loyal fan base, with those silly panels attached to a plain speaker. Even Ascend Acoustics, with their loyal fan base, didn't try to sell ugly at that price point.

thats an interesting take I won't dissagree that there not cheap but I wouldn't call them ugly.

ShaunH
oneeyeblind is offline  
post #8 of 635 Old 06-24-2007, 07:25 AM
Advanced Member
 
stubeeef's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Winston Salem NC
Posts: 838
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
I think they look awesome.
Beauty is in the eye of the beholder, I was not happy to hear about the rear ports though. The center will either have to be placed out from the wall (not wall mounted-I admit I am assuming here) or behind the screen. Well the mains can just be pulled out a couple of inches and don't need mounting.
I still have my SCS-01's as mains in the boxes, still waiting for the cabinet people (an awful mess), but I was attracted to them because of the non-rear porting; mounting possibilities as well as the reviews and pedigree.
This looks awesome, and I would be excited to hear them, are you listening Santa?
stubeeef is offline  
post #9 of 635 Old 06-24-2007, 09:47 AM
Advanced Member
 
David Barteaux's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Canada
Posts: 887
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
Same old MTM design for the center speaker.

David Barteaux is offline  
post #10 of 635 Old 06-24-2007, 09:51 AM
AVS Special Member
 
mazersteven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Florida
Posts: 2,784
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
Quote:
Originally Posted by David Barteaux View Post

Same old MTM design for the center speaker.


Does it matter about the design? Or how they sound? Same design doesn't mean, same sound.
mazersteven is offline  
post #11 of 635 Old 06-24-2007, 12:23 PM
Advanced Member
 
dlfromcanada's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 829
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Liked: 10
very interesting, superb parts but everyone knows a speaker is more than the sum of...
dlfromcanada is offline  
post #12 of 635 Old 06-24-2007, 12:33 PM
AVS Addicted Member
 
cschang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Manhattan Beach, CA
Posts: 14,736
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Liked: 70
I like the panels. It is sort of like what ACI used to do:
http://audioc.com/gallery1/gallery.htm

-curtis

Owner of Wave Crest Audio
Volunteer Mod at the Ascend Acoustics Forum
Like all things on the Internet, do your research, as forums have a good amount of misinformation.
Help beat breast cancer!

cschang is offline  
post #13 of 635 Old 06-24-2007, 01:28 PM
AVS Special Member
 
quadriverfalls's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Indianapolis, IN.
Posts: 2,657
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 11
Quote:
Originally Posted by cschang View Post

I like the panels. It is sort of like what ACI used to do:
http://audioc.com/gallery1/gallery.htm

I quite agree Curtis. I LIKE it that they've got yet another and different choice. An interesting and unique look all their own.

John W.
Indy
quadriverfalls is offline  
post #14 of 635 Old 06-24-2007, 01:47 PM
Advanced Member
 
dftkell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 787
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20 Post(s)
Liked: 52
Quote:
Originally Posted by mazersteven View Post

Does it matter about the design? Or how they sound? Same design doesn't mean, same sound.

It does matter. An MTM design has inherent problems that cannot be overcome by crossover design or driver selection.

It's too bad, the other speakers in the lineup look interesting.

Little Loft Home Theater
dftkell is offline  
post #15 of 635 Old 06-24-2007, 01:58 PM
AVS Special Member
 
Kpt_Krunch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,788
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Liked: 17
I only have one question on this - who the hell is this guy????

Captain Crunch


"it's better to have it and not need it than to need it and not have it"
Kpt_Krunch is offline  
post #16 of 635 Old 06-24-2007, 02:00 PM
AVS Addicted Member
 
sivadselim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: CO
Posts: 16,081
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 51 Post(s)
Liked: 68
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kpt_Krunch View Post

I only have one question on this - who the hell is this guy????

What guy?

"All men are frauds. The only difference between them is that some admit it. I myself deny it."
sivadselim is offline  
post #17 of 635 Old 06-24-2007, 02:28 PM
AVS Special Member
 
mazersteven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Florida
Posts: 2,784
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kpt_Krunch View Post

I only have one question on this - who the hell is this guy????

Captain Crunch


He is Captain Crunch. Who the hell are you?

mazersteven is offline  
post #18 of 635 Old 06-24-2007, 03:06 PM
AVS Special Member
 
Warpdrv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 7,350
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Liked: 15
I have to agree with the MTM statement, I have followed enough threads and read enough articles to know that there are problems with that type of setup...

Lets also state that this is a Mid level speaker, not a High End speaker... and they are still yet to release info about their up and coming LTS line, and Im sure/hope they will be incorporating a WMTW design.

I don't think they are ugly, but not to sure that panel design would win my approval, but you can't say they didn't reach for incorporating some good drivers 'n tweeters into the speakers....
Warpdrv is offline  
post #19 of 635 Old 06-24-2007, 04:35 PM
AVS Special Member
 
Ron Temple's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: San Jose CA
Posts: 8,473
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Liked: 32
GR Research AV-2s are MTM and they are a hell of a speaker. Jury's out for me. I do think the center is just too tall for most racks though.

I don't lurk as much as I used to and I NEVER listen. Comes from being old and cynical.

Ron Temple is offline  
post #20 of 635 Old 06-24-2007, 05:31 PM
AVS Special Member
 
DS-21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 3,374
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 63 Post(s)
Liked: 166
Quote:
Originally Posted by mazersteven View Post

Does it matter about the design? Or how they sound? Same design doesn't mean, same sound.

But a toppled MTM guarantees crappy sound.

A better investment than that flashy tweeter would've been a competent center channel design.

--
"In many cases there aren’t two sides unless one side is 'reality' and the other is 'nonsense.'" - Phil Plait
Serious Audio Blog 
Multichannel music (and video) urban loft living room system 
DS-21 is offline  
post #21 of 635 Old 06-24-2007, 06:06 PM
Advanced Member
 
dftkell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 787
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20 Post(s)
Liked: 52
Quote:
Originally Posted by Warpdrv View Post

I have to agree with the MTM statement, I have followed enough threads and read enough articles to know that there are problems with that type of setup...

Lets also state that this is a Mid level speaker, not a High End speaker... and they are still yet to release info about their up and coming LTS line, and Im sure/hope they will be incorporating a WMTW design.

Being a mid-level speaker isn't an excuse for producing a horizontal MTM design.

Revel Concerta C-12, Infinity Beta 360, Kef Q-Series and Aperion Audio (5 and 6 series) are all examples of intelligently designed center channel speakers that sell for the same (or less) price.

Little Loft Home Theater
dftkell is offline  
post #22 of 635 Old 06-24-2007, 06:15 PM
Advanced Member
 
Tarpon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 508
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
A lot of people lumping all MTM centers into bad as a whole. A properly designed MTM center is not an issue.

The off center tweeter on the other hand leaves me wondering.
Tarpon is offline  
post #23 of 635 Old 06-24-2007, 06:42 PM
AVS Special Member
 
DS-21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 3,374
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 63 Post(s)
Liked: 166
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tarpon View Post

A lot of people lumping all MTM centers into bad as a whole. A properly designed MTM center is not an issue.

Actually, in this case it's the basic design that's (irrepairably) flawed rather than any execution issue.

A toppled MTM will have narrow horizontal directivity, limiting the size of the listening area. It will also have wide-open veritcal directivity, smearing dialogue and other center images with floor and ceiling bounce signals that are similar in amplitude and arrival time to the main signal. See here for some data on how worthless toppled MTM centers as a class are.

The bottom line is that the toppled MTM is a grossly inferior design to any other alternative. Any system that employs one does not have high-fidelity as one of its goals. No matter how expensive the tweeter is. Speaking of which, note how they're using the tweeter? Any attempt to control its directivity at the bottom of its passband in evidence? Nope, just a good ol' 180deg horn, i.e. flush-mounted on the baffle. Again, spending less on the parts and more on the design seems like an appropriate recommendation...

I do like the KEF RDM-series knockoff cheekpanels, though.

--
"In many cases there aren’t two sides unless one side is 'reality' and the other is 'nonsense.'" - Phil Plait
Serious Audio Blog 
Multichannel music (and video) urban loft living room system 
DS-21 is offline  
post #24 of 635 Old 06-24-2007, 10:06 PM
Senior Member
 
vinyl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Toronto
Posts: 434
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 15
Doesn't The Sound Authority know that a horizontal center is vastly inferior?

Most people don't know what they want...but, they're pretty sure they haven't got it. ©

vinyl is offline  
post #25 of 635 Old 06-25-2007, 08:30 AM
AVS Special Member
 
swgiust's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 1,096
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 12
Let's look at real world speaker design. In my set up, as well as most of yours a horizontal center is the only option. I happen to have a very large (70") tv. So a vertical center under it is not workable, and putting one on top of it would make it
7 feet tall!!

Anytime somebody comes out with a new speaker/sub/cd player/amp, there is going to be chatter about how good/bad it is. The good news is that most of the players are trying to build a better product. Thats how competition works.

The beauty of a company like SVS (and others) is that their product is available to a much larger market than some others. I live in a small town. I would have to drive at least 100 miles to hear anything decent at all.

The bad news is that in a market as old as speakers, the odds of a truly revolutionary product are slim. We can hope for a product as good as others, but for less money. That's about it.

I will be more interested in the larger models. I hope they go over the top on those!
swgiust is offline  
post #26 of 635 Old 06-25-2007, 09:02 AM
Advanced Member
 
dftkell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 787
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20 Post(s)
Liked: 52
Quote:
Originally Posted by swgiust View Post

Let's look at real world speaker design. In my set up, as well as most of yours a horizontal center is the only option. I happen to have a very large (70") tv. So a vertical center under it is not workable, and putting one on top of it would make it
7 feet tall!!

We have been talking about real world speaker design.

The problem isn't horizontal center speakers as a whole. There are several good ones available at this price point.

The problem is when you design one using a horizontal, MTM design.

Little Loft Home Theater
dftkell is offline  
post #27 of 635 Old 06-25-2007, 10:12 AM
AVS Addicted Member
 
cschang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Manhattan Beach, CA
Posts: 14,736
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Liked: 70
The issue is lobing.

In "good" MTM designs, the center lobe will easily cover the listening area, which presumably would be between the left and right mains.

If you get outside of that...you have other problems to deal with.

-curtis

Owner of Wave Crest Audio
Volunteer Mod at the Ascend Acoustics Forum
Like all things on the Internet, do your research, as forums have a good amount of misinformation.
Help beat breast cancer!

cschang is offline  
post #28 of 635 Old 06-25-2007, 10:48 AM
AVS Special Member
 
swgiust's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 1,096
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 12
Can you explain MTM?

Isn't it WTW (woofer, tweeter, woofer?)
swgiust is offline  
post #29 of 635 Old 06-25-2007, 11:38 AM
AVS Addicted Member
 
sivadselim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: CO
Posts: 16,081
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 51 Post(s)
Liked: 68
Quote:
Originally Posted by DS-21 View Post

I do like the KEF RDM-series knockoff cheekpanels, though.

Oh, come on. A lot of speakers have this design. And I don't think the RDMs were the first to "sport" it, either.

"All men are frauds. The only difference between them is that some admit it. I myself deny it."
sivadselim is offline  
post #30 of 635 Old 06-25-2007, 11:53 AM
AVS Special Member
 
merrymaid520's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Milwaukee WI
Posts: 1,446
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Liked: 20
I think MTM refers to "mid woofer- tweeter - mid woofer".

These new SVS's look kinda cool! Very original, and almost contemporary look to them. I will be very curious to see more specs and etc. The competion for high end but affordable small bookshelf speakers is growing fast, now with both ascend and SVS taking a stab at it. I have the sierras from ascend on order and these look intruguing too. Of course they will be paired with an SVS ultra that I have had for a while By the end of the year, a comparison between the 2 bookshelf lines will be very interesting & dangerous for those who conduct it.

I wish both companies good luck!

Thanks,
Brandon
merrymaid520 is offline  
Reply Speakers

User Tag List

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page


Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off