Parasound Owners Thread - Page 142 - AVS | Home Theater Discussions And Reviews
Forum Jump: 
 135Likes
Reply
Thread Tools
post #4231 of 4250 Old 03-15-2015, 05:19 PM
AVS Addicted Member
 
Kal Rubinson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: NYC + Connecticut
Posts: 28,626
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 203 Post(s)
Liked: 197
Quote:
Originally Posted by pickering.tim View Post
I am bit of a "rube" when it comes to AV technology but I do know a bit about the technology used these days to combat piracy as well as HDCP (the Intel developed "handshake" necessary to move protected content via HDMI from one source to another) .
It has become a PITA for me recently with my affinity for playing back SACD discs and desire to have digital copies of the high resolution tracks (not the stereo layer) that I can feed my JC-2 or benchmark DAC2 DX with via a digital cable or XLR. Also, I find that while HDMI is quite convenient when it comes to the average AVR + high def TV +blu ray player etc. type setup it really doesn't seem to bring anything to the table for a company like parasound IMHO. But like I mentioned, I am new to AV and could be totally wrong about that one.

I suppose the "point" here is that I just picked up one of these: http://www.essenceelectrostatic.com/product/hdacc/ and plan to use that to strip the audio from outgoing HDMI from my marantz to use with any downstream digital source. It will NOT allow you to split off the multichannel SACD layer of the disc for recording etc. but it will allow you to play the LPCM/hi res 2 channel layer of blu rays for example that may have DTS HD master audio or Dolby true HD. Plug it appears to be a pretty sweet little DAC too. the only one I have seen so far with HDMI I/O. Save for an AVR

In regards to the mention of no analog outputs on blu ray players above...do you mean all blu ray players or as a trend? I ask because my ud7007 has xlr and rca outputs and IMHO they sound better being run from my player directly into my two channel setup for anything I playback whether it be attached USB drive, NAS files, DSD (my new favorite obsession, call me a band wagon hopper if you need to ) or disc.

Not sure if that adds anything to the discussion but just my experience dealing with HDMI as of late.
That DAC seems limited to 24/96 input via HDMI. Higher formats are upsampled, not native. Not adequate, imho, for SACD or other formats. And, it is still only 2 channel.

Kal Rubinson

"Music in the Round"
Senior Contributing Editor, Stereophile
http://www.stereophile.com/category/music-round

Kal Rubinson is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #4232 of 4250 Old 03-15-2015, 05:28 PM
Senior Member
 
highfigh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 303
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 124 Post(s)
Liked: 47
Quote:
Originally Posted by pickering.tim View Post
I am bit of a "rube" when it comes to AV technology but I do know a bit about the technology used these days to combat piracy as well as HDCP (the Intel developed "handshake" necessary to move protected content via HDMI from one source to another) .
It has become a PITA for me recently with my affinity for playing back SACD discs and desire to have digital copies of the high resolution tracks (not the stereo layer) that I can feed my JC-2 or benchmark DAC2 DX with via a digital cable or XLR. Also, I find that while HDMI is quite convenient when it comes to the average AVR + high def TV +blu ray player etc. type setup it really doesn't seem to bring anything to the table for a company like parasound IMHO. But like I mentioned, I am new to AV and could be totally wrong about that one.

I suppose the "point" here is that I just picked up one of these: http://www.essenceelectrostatic.com/product/hdacc/ and plan to use that to strip the audio from outgoing HDMI from my marantz to use with any downstream digital source. It will NOT allow you to split off the multichannel SACD layer of the disc for recording etc. but it will allow you to play the LPCM/hi res 2 channel layer of blu rays for example that may have DTS HD master audio or Dolby true HD. Plug it appears to be a pretty sweet little DAC too. the only one I have seen so far with HDMI I/O. Save for an AVR

In regards to the mention of no analog outputs on blu ray players above...do you mean all blu ray players or as a trend? I ask because my ud7007 has xlr and rca outputs and IMHO they sound better being run from my player directly into my two channel setup for anything I playback whether it be attached USB drive, NAS files, DSD (my new favorite obsession, call me a band wagon hopper if you need to ) or disc.

Not sure if that adds anything to the discussion but just my experience dealing with HDMI as of late.
It's not that analog outputs need to go away, they had to stop outputting video at higher than 480p resolution.
highfigh is online now  
post #4233 of 4250 Old 03-15-2015, 05:39 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: gaithersburg, md
Posts: 230
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 132 Post(s)
Liked: 14
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kal Rubinson View Post
That DAC seems limited to 24/96 input via HDMI. Higher formats are upsampled, not native. Not adequate, imho, for SACD or other formats. And, it is still only 2 channel.
seems like he has a typo or error as this: HDMI v1.3 Input enables you to hear the original unprocessed, uncompressed LPCM 24 bit/192K 2 Channel soundtracks on Blu-ray. Listen to over 1000 concerts by the world’s greatest artists, new classics from audiophile labels, and catalog classics of the most famous albums in history, all bit-for-bit identical to the original master recordings. seems to denote otherwise.

here is a snippet from the getting started tips: . Every Blu-ray disc has a title page with a menu of options, including Audio Set-up. Using your remote control, navigate to that page and select the “Surround” output, either Dolby TruHD or DTS MasterHD, not the LPCM 2.0 version. The HDACC will automatically de-embed the original, uncompressed LPCM 24/96-192K 2.0 soundtrack from the uncompressed bitstream; the Evolve will de-embed up to 7.1 channels. Allow 15-45 seconds for HDCP authentication to confirm a secure connection. You will know if you set it up right when the display reads HDMI In 192K or 96K depending on the content. Caution; the full dynamic range can be damaging to both the system and your hearing, be careful.

In addition if you want to decode all 7 channels of a blu ray another product might do the trick by the same company...http://www.essenceelectrostatic.com/...i-channel-dac/

maybe I am interpreting this wrong but using a digital output you cannot get anything more than the lower res 2 channel output no matter what device you use. (maybe an old ps3 but I may not be familiar with newer tech that makes this possible so correct me if i am wrong)

It only upsamples the lower resolution formats but using HDMI from the blu ray and keeping the format selected as dolby true hd or dts hd ma you should be able to get the full hi resolution 192k signal output via analog to your preamp/etc. unless the disc has 96k stereo in which case you would obviously not get 192. maybe I am understanding this wrong and I will double check with Bob Rappaport to be sure.

My Current 5.2 Setup - for now....
B&W CM10s (FLR), CMC2, CM5 x2 (SLR)
Dual SVS SB2000s

Rack and Display:
Marantz SR7009, Marantz UD7007, T-PC50st60
[/COLOR]
pickering.tim is online now  
post #4234 of 4250 Old 03-15-2015, 05:40 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: gaithersburg, md
Posts: 230
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 132 Post(s)
Liked: 14
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kal Rubinson View Post
That DAC seems limited to 24/96 input via HDMI. Higher formats are upsampled, not native. Not adequate, imho, for SACD or other formats. And, it is still only 2 channel.
Also for me, all I want is the 2 channel output anyway as if I wanted to multichannel I would use my AVR.

My Current 5.2 Setup - for now....
B&W CM10s (FLR), CMC2, CM5 x2 (SLR)
Dual SVS SB2000s

Rack and Display:
Marantz SR7009, Marantz UD7007, T-PC50st60
[/COLOR]
pickering.tim is online now  
post #4235 of 4250 Old 03-15-2015, 07:30 PM
AVS Addicted Member
 
Kal Rubinson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: NYC + Connecticut
Posts: 28,626
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 203 Post(s)
Liked: 197
Quote:
Originally Posted by pickering.tim View Post
seems like he has a typo or error as this: HDMI v1.3 Input enables you to hear the original unprocessed, uncompressed LPCM 24 bit/192K 2 Channel soundtracks on Blu-ray. Listen to over 1000 concerts by the world’s greatest artists, new classics from audiophile labels, and catalog classics of the most famous albums in history, all bit-for-bit identical to the original master recordings. seems to denote otherwise.
OK. He should correct this. He should also fix the specs to show more than "Fs = 44.1 to 96 kHz, 20 to 20 kHz BW, 1 kHz test tone, 0 dBFS = +24 dBu (unless noted)."

Quote:
here is a snippet from the getting started tips: . Every Blu-ray disc has a title page with a menu of options, including Audio Set-up. Using your remote control, navigate to that page and select the “Surround” output, either Dolby TruHD or DTS MasterHD, not the LPCM 2.0 version. The HDACC will automatically de-embed the original, uncompressed LPCM 24/96-192K 2.0 soundtrack from the uncompressed bitstream; the Evolve will de-embed up to 7.1 channels. Allow 15-45 seconds for HDCP authentication to confirm a secure connection. You will know if you set it up right when the display reads HDMI In 192K or 96K depending on the content. Caution; the full dynamic range can be damaging to both the system and your hearing, be careful.
That's pretty strange. Where are those tips? Also how does it deal with SACD? Still, if it does what it says, it is unique.

Quote:
In addition if you want to decode all 7 channels of a blu ray another product might do the trick by the same company...http://www.essenceelectrostatic.com/...i-channel-dac/
Seen those before under a number of labels as they have been around for years but it does not decode Dolby TruHD and DTS MasterHD but only passes it from HDMI in to HDMI out. It is limited to "Converts uncompressed LPCM 7.1, 5.1 or 2 channel input through multi-channel analog output ports. Supports Dolby Digital 5.1, 2.0 and LPCM 2 channel output through optical output at 48K."

Quote:
maybe I am interpreting this wrong but using a digital output you cannot get anything more than the lower res 2 channel output no matter what device you use. (maybe an old ps3 but I may not be familiar with newer tech that makes this possible so correct me if i am wrong)
Generally true,

Quote:
It only upsamples the lower resolution formats but using HDMI from the blu ray and keeping the format selected as dolby true hd or dts hd ma you should be able to get the full hi resolution 192k signal output via analog to your preamp/etc. unless the disc has 96k stereo in which case you would obviously not get 192. maybe I am understanding this wrong and I will double check with Bob Rappaport to be sure.
Great. I hope it works for you.

Kal Rubinson

"Music in the Round"
Senior Contributing Editor, Stereophile
http://www.stereophile.com/category/music-round


Last edited by Kal Rubinson; 03-15-2015 at 07:35 PM.
Kal Rubinson is offline  
post #4236 of 4250 Old 03-16-2015, 05:37 PM
Member
 
upsetter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: SF Bay Area, CA
Posts: 73
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 23 Post(s)
Liked: 14
Do not see why people have problem with HDMI. Component video is going away for sure but RCA not. I have OPPO-105 which plays every imaginable format and has 2 HDMI inputs if you need your cable box and some aux device (like mobile) go through Sabre DAC on OPPO. I do not really need any more HDMI inputs. OPPO-105 DAC and analogue multichannel output sounds better than any AVR you can come up with without mortgaging your house. Can use HDMI switch also if 2 inputs are not enough.
upsetter is offline  
post #4237 of 4250 Old 03-16-2015, 05:39 PM
Member
 
upsetter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: SF Bay Area, CA
Posts: 73
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 23 Post(s)
Liked: 14
I want to say that I do not want to spend thousands on Parasound just to process image and even sound. OPPO-105 costs only $1000+ does it extremely well.
upsetter is offline  
post #4238 of 4250 Old 03-16-2015, 06:04 PM
Senior Member
 
highfigh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 303
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 124 Post(s)
Liked: 47
Quote:
Originally Posted by upsetter View Post
Do not see why people have problem with HDMI. Component video is going away for sure but RCA not. I have OPPO-105 which plays every imaginable format and has 2 HDMI inputs if you need your cable box and some aux device (like mobile) go through Sabre DAC on OPPO. I do not really need any more HDMI inputs. OPPO-105 DAC and analogue multichannel output sounds better than any AVR you can come up with without mortgaging your house. Can use HDMI switch also if 2 inputs are not enough.
Try dealing with it for a living and you'll understand.
highfigh is online now  
post #4239 of 4250 Old 03-17-2015, 03:47 PM
Senior Member
 
Superman07's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Virginia
Posts: 390
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9 Post(s)
Liked: 13
Do you all tend to pick up your Parasound equipment from local dealers or online vendors? Any luck with discounts? I'm happy supporting local carriers, but when they rub you the wrong way or are an inconvenience to reach then I'm equally okay turing to online vendors.
Superman07 is offline  
post #4240 of 4250 Old 03-17-2015, 05:37 PM
Senior Member
 
highfigh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 303
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 124 Post(s)
Liked: 47
Quote:
Originally Posted by Superman07 View Post
Do you all tend to pick up your Parasound equipment from local dealers or online vendors? Any luck with discounts? I'm happy supporting local carriers, but when they rub you the wrong way or are an inconvenience to reach then I'm equally okay turing to online vendors.
Who are you asking?
highfigh is online now  
post #4241 of 4250 Old 03-17-2015, 06:44 PM
AVS Addicted Member
 
BillP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: PA
Posts: 13,858
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 89 Post(s)
Liked: 75
Quote:
Originally Posted by Superman07 View Post
Do you all tend to pick up your Parasound equipment from local dealers or online vendors? Any luck with discounts? I'm happy supporting local carriers, but when they rub you the wrong way or are an inconvenience to reach then I'm equally okay turing to online vendors.
I went with local dealer since a good discount for a lot of equipment (Parasound amp and preamp, plus new speakers and toroidal power conditioner), plus help with set-up (that you wouldn't get with online purchase). The Parasound equipment was very heavy to lift!
STIGUY2014 likes this.
BillP is offline  
post #4242 of 4250 Old 03-20-2015, 05:23 PM
Senior Member
 
mikejedi123's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 254
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 39 Post(s)
Liked: 46
Hi guys, just a curious question.. i remember back when i bought my Parasound A52 (GREAT AMP still!!) that i was considering the New Classic 5250 250 x 5 45 amp peek per channel as opposed to my a52 with 125 x 5 but with the HALO circuitry and 30 amp peek per channel.. and a much higher damping factor.. but i learned of course, through my research most said that the raw sound quality of the A52 even having less power would sound better than the 5250 even with less peek amps, becasue of the halo design etc ( they were right, it does sound awesome!), even though the 5250 has more grunt and power, but that it wouldn't always sound superior,.. FWIW i of course ended up buying the A52 and am very happy,! but i always wondered...., i read that the 5250 actually put out a few watts in class A, because even though it was newClassic and not halo, it was still heavily biased into class A for the first few watts, but without the Halo circuits.. anyone have any information on this? just curious.... I got to thinking about it today when i saw someone post a 5250 on Audiogon for a good price.. ahh maybe a second system for me down the road.... ( i would think it would sound good but not a good as my A52 )
mikejedi123 is offline  
post #4243 of 4250 Unread Yesterday, 07:56 AM
AVS Special Member
 
gene9p's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: New York
Posts: 1,311
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Liked: 24
Quote:
Originally Posted by mikejedi123 View Post
Hi guys, just a curious question.. i remember back when i bought my Parasound A52 (GREAT AMP still!!) that i was considering the New Classic 5250 250 x 5 45 amp peek per channel as opposed to my a52 with 125 x 5 but with the HALO circuitry and 30 amp peek per channel.. and a much higher damping factor.. but i learned of course, through my research most said that the raw sound quality of the A52 even having less power would sound better than the 5250 even with less peek amps, becasue of the halo design etc ( they were right, it does sound awesome!), even though the 5250 has more grunt and power, but that it wouldn't always sound superior,.. FWIW i of course ended up buying the A52 and am very happy,! but i always wondered...., i read that the 5250 actually put out a few watts in class A, because even though it was newClassic and not halo, it was still heavily biased into class A for the first few watts, but without the Halo circuits.. anyone have any information on this? just curious.... I got to thinking about it today when i saw someone post a 5250 on Audiogon for a good price.. ahh maybe a second system for me down the road.... ( i would think it would sound good but not a good as my A52 )
I also have the A52 and it is a great amp. I use it for my HT obviously and it is great for 2 channel sound also. The Halo line is Parasound's best so I would not worry about replacing it with the 5250. That is unless you are building a 2nd system and want to use it for that. I use a Marantz 8003 pre amp for my HT surrounds and center and sub. The front two channels are going directly through my JC2 with no HT bypass to the A52. I asked Parasound if there was any way to replace covers with black faceplates, alas, it cannot be done
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	008.jpg
Views:	24
Size:	124.0 KB
ID:	624417  

Last edited by gene9p; Yesterday at 08:04 AM.
gene9p is offline  
post #4244 of 4250 Unread Yesterday, 08:05 AM
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 32
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 30 Post(s)
Liked: 7
Hi,

I thought I would also post this in this thread from the Monoblocks vs Stereo tread. I am using 2 A21's in bridged mode as mono blocks.

So this weekend I did some listening to 2 bridged Parasound A21 amps used as mono blocks for each channel. I used an Oppo HA-1 in playing wav files from a pc (ASIO & upconverted to DSD 11.2mhz) and BDP-105 for high res discs. I also used the HA-1 as the preamp/dac. I turned down the gain on both A21's using the trim pot. I'm using silver plated copper XLR interconnects and regular oxygen free copper 12 gauge speaker wire. I ended up using some custom 3 way tower speakers in my living room that each consist of 2 10" aluminum woofers, 4" midrange, 1 1/8" silk dome tweeter. I originally was thinking about using this system for the bedroom, but have decided on using a tube based system for it.

My thoughts are: (1) Clarity across the entire range that did not sound thin but also did not sound bloated. The weight of the sound was balanced. In many systems, clarity comes at a price of having a thin sound, but this was not the case. Bass was very deep and extremely tight. (2) Stereo separation - this is the first time where I felt that each speaker was actually playing its own separate track! (3) Sound stage - For the 2 speaker sound stage, I still want to listen some more and move things around a bit before I make final judgement, but it sounds as if it had slightly narrowed opposed to using one A21 in stereo mode but could just be my selection of tracks and speaker placement. For surround sound - I tested the sound stage using a 4.1 setup. I have rear speakers powered by an Onkyo A9070 (known for extremely low distortion but thin sound) directly being fed from the rca rear L&R speakers of the BDP-105. I watched Legends of the Guardians 3D and in the scenes where the owls are flying around sounding just pristine. It was very natural sound placed where it needs to be without any grain or exaggerations.

The A21s have much more breaking in to do and I have to place my speakers better with a more solid footing. With this trial, I am sold on using mono blocks amps in comparison to a single stereo amp. I am also sold on higher biased class A/AB over typical AB amps. Specs and measurements only tell a small part of the audio story. My next steps are some basic room treatments and upgrade my speakers. I can't ever pay full price for speakers - a relative worked at an electronics store and the profit margin for speakers is 60-80%.
STIGUY2014 is online now  
post #4245 of 4250 Unread Yesterday, 11:44 AM
Member
 
WAFWarrior's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Berkeley, CA
Posts: 97
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 25 Post(s)
Liked: 28
Quote:
Originally Posted by mikejedi123 View Post
Hi guys, just a curious question.. i remember back when i bought my Parasound A52 (GREAT AMP still!!) that i was considering the New Classic 5250 250 x 5 45 amp peek per channel as opposed to my a52 with 125 x 5 but with the HALO circuitry and 30 amp peek per channel.. and a much higher damping factor.. but i learned of course, through my research most said that the raw sound quality of the A52 even having less power would sound better than the 5250 even with less peek amps, becasue of the halo design etc ( they were right, it does sound awesome!), even though the 5250 has more grunt and power, but that it wouldn't always sound superior,.. FWIW i of course ended up buying the A52 and am very happy,! but i always wondered...., i read that the 5250 actually put out a few watts in class A, because even though it was newClassic and not halo, it was still heavily biased into class A for the first few watts, but without the Halo circuits.. anyone have any information on this? just curious.... I got to thinking about it today when i saw someone post a 5250 on Audiogon for a good price.. ahh maybe a second system for me down the road.... ( i would think it would sound good but not a good as my A52 )
The 5250 is a monster of an amp with lots of power but it does not not operate in class A. None of the New Classic amps do. Stick with the A52 its a great amp . Let me know if you have any more questions.

Chris
Parasound Products Inc.
2250 Mckinnon Ave.
San Francisco CA 94124
415-397-7100
WAFWarrior is offline  
post #4246 of 4250 Unread Yesterday, 05:05 PM
AVS Special Member
 
RichB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 9,024
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 413 Post(s)
Liked: 296
Quote:
Originally Posted by STIGUY2014 View Post
Hi,

I thought I would also post this in this thread from the Monoblocks vs Stereo tread. I am using 2 A21's in bridged mode as mono blocks.

So this weekend I did some listening to 2 bridged Parasound A21 amps used as mono blocks for each channel. I used an Oppo HA-1 in playing wav files from a pc (ASIO & upconverted to DSD 11.2mhz) and BDP-105 for high res discs. I also used the HA-1 as the preamp/dac. I turned down the gain on both A21's using the trim pot. I'm using silver plated copper XLR interconnects and regular oxygen free copper 12 gauge speaker wire. I ended up using some custom 3 way tower speakers in my living room that each consist of 2 10" aluminum woofers, 4" midrange, 1 1/8" silk dome tweeter. I originally was thinking about using this system for the bedroom, but have decided on using a tube based system for it.

My thoughts are: (1) Clarity across the entire range that did not sound thin but also did not sound bloated. The weight of the sound was balanced. In many systems, clarity comes at a price of having a thin sound, but this was not the case. Bass was very deep and extremely tight. (2) Stereo separation - this is the first time where I felt that each speaker was actually playing its own separate track! (3) Sound stage - For the 2 speaker sound stage, I still want to listen some more and move things around a bit before I make final judgement, but it sounds as if it had slightly narrowed opposed to using one A21 in stereo mode but could just be my selection of tracks and speaker placement. For surround sound - I tested the sound stage using a 4.1 setup. I have rear speakers powered by an Onkyo A9070 (known for extremely low distortion but thin sound) directly being fed from the rca rear L&R speakers of the BDP-105. I watched Legends of the Guardians 3D and in the scenes where the owls are flying around sounding just pristine. It was very natural sound placed where it needs to be without any grain or exaggerations.

The A21s have much more breaking in to do and I have to place my speakers better with a more solid footing. With this trial, I am sold on using mono blocks amps in comparison to a single stereo amp. I am also sold on higher biased class A/AB over typical AB amps. Specs and measurements only tell a small part of the audio story. My next steps are some basic room treatments and upgrade my speakers. I can't ever pay full price for speakers - a relative worked at an electronics store and the profit margin for speakers is 60-80%.
We have a lot in common

I am using two A21's, one for each Salon but to bi-amp not bridged. Poor mans mono-blocks.
Prior to buying the second A21, I did a SBT (Single Blind Test) with a friend he picked the bi-amped setting every time. I played just a single speaker.
I also did the same test on the other speaker with an A31 with the same results. Bi-amped was cleaner and clearer and the bass was a bit tighter as well.

When I got the second A21, I did not like the sound and discovered that I had the amp in bridged mode. It sounded flat.
My speakers dip into the 3 ohm territory so that is to be expected. If your speakers are bi-ampable. I listening to one channel of a stereo source and compare the two.
If you can get a friend to switch the wires, that is even better.

I also have the HA-1 used as a Preamp/DAC and have found that it is particular about which ports I use, cables, and driver configuration.
Leaving cables out of it. I find that the USB2 ports sound better on my PC.

I have played with driver software configuration as well with J River and prefer Kernel Streaming (24 bits in a 32-bit package).
I set the Oppo Driver to the "Relaxed" setting.

I suspect much of this is system specific so YMMV.

- Rich
STIGUY2014 likes this.

Oppo Beta Group

Oppo BDP-105D | Oppo HA-1 | Oppo PM-1 | Parasound A21 + A21 + A51 | Revel Salon, Voice, Studio | Velodyne HGS-15
RichB is online now  
post #4247 of 4250 Unread Yesterday, 06:28 PM
Senior Member
 
highfigh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 303
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 124 Post(s)
Liked: 47
Quote:
Originally Posted by STIGUY2014 View Post
My next steps are some basic room treatments and upgrade my speakers.
You're introducing a lot of variables in a short time, considering you're trying to find the best way to amplify your system. Now, you're not even using the same speakers and will need to move them & break in the amps, as well as treat the room. It's best to make one change at a time and make the determination before moving to the next change.

Re: " I can't ever pay full price for speakers - a relative worked at an electronics store and the profit margin for speakers is 60-80%."

I don't know where your relative worked, but that's not the profit margin for any brand I have ever heard of and I have sold a lot of brands of speakers. If they were a house brand, that could explain the huge margin. Been selling for almost 40 years and that margin is wrong. I'd like to know where they worked and what brand(s) they were referring to.
STIGUY2014 likes this.
highfigh is online now  
post #4248 of 4250 Unread Today, 08:53 AM
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 32
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 30 Post(s)
Liked: 7
Quote:
Originally Posted by RichB View Post
We have a lot in common

I am using two A21's, one for each Salon but to bi-amp not bridged. Poor mans mono-blocks.
Prior to buying the second A21, I did a SBT (Single Blind Test) with a friend he picked the bi-amped setting every time. I played just a single speaker.
I also did the same test on the other speaker with an A31 with the same results. Bi-amped was cleaner and clearer and the bass was a bit tighter as well.

When I got the second A21, I did not like the sound and discovered that I had the amp in bridged mode. It sounded flat.
My speakers dip into the 3 ohm territory so that is to be expected. If your speakers are bi-ampable. I listening to one channel of a stereo source and compare the two.
If you can get a friend to switch the wires, that is even better.

I also have the HA-1 used as a Preamp/DAC and have found that it is particular about which ports I use, cables, and driver configuration.
Leaving cables out of it. I find that the USB2 ports sound better on my PC.

I have played with driver software configuration as well with J River and prefer Kernel Streaming (24 bits in a 32-bit package).
I set the Oppo Driver to the "Relaxed" setting.

I suspect much of this is system specific so YMMV.

- Rich
Cool!! My speakers are not capable of being bi-amped, however I do wish at some time soon to modify them so that they are. I think I may be having the same problem that you had about the A21 sounding a bit flat in bridged mode because the sound stage has gotten smaller than the normal stereo operation. I may have to use a single channel of the A21 until I convert the speakers. I am using Foobar with ASIO out and the DSD plugin to up convert to 11.2Mhz.
STIGUY2014 is online now  
post #4249 of 4250 Unread Today, 09:06 AM
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 32
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 30 Post(s)
Liked: 7
Quote:
Originally Posted by highfigh View Post
You're introducing a lot of variables in a short time, considering you're trying to find the best way to amplify your system. Now, you're not even using the same speakers and will need to move them & break in the amps, as well as treat the room. It's best to make one change at a time and make the determination before moving to the next change.

Re: " I can't ever pay full price for speakers - a relative worked at an electronics store and the profit margin for speakers is 60-80%."

I don't know where your relative worked, but that's not the profit margin for any brand I have ever heard of and I have sold a lot of brands of speakers. If they were a house brand, that could explain the huge margin. Been selling for almost 40 years and that margin is wrong. I'd like to know where they worked and what brand(s) they were referring to.
You are correct, I have made many changes in a short period of time. I am slowing down now because I have spent too much money in the last 2 months. I also have a big interest in portable systems and my buying mode has ended. It will be small changes over time from now on. You know how it is sometimes. One goes out and spends a lot of money on equipment and then are set for many years before the next big purchase.

The store was a big box retailer and the speakers were common mass produced brands that included Klipsch and Velodyne. Through the family member, I had access to what the company paid for the speakers and it was disgusting to see the markup. That is why on many speakers especially when a new model comes out you will see clearance sales 40% to 60% off msrp but these are usually the mass produced ones. I understand the need for the markup to sustain the store. Items such as laptops and tv's have very little or no markup or even sold at a loss but the store makes up by selling accessories and extended warranties.

I work in manufacturing and there is a huge manufacturing cost with amplifiers and a much lower cost for speakers. This includes both labor and materials.
STIGUY2014 is online now  
post #4250 of 4250 Unread Today, 09:39 AM
Senior Member
 
highfigh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 303
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 124 Post(s)
Liked: 47
Quote:
Originally Posted by STIGUY2014 View Post
You are correct, I have made many changes in a short period of time. I am slowing down now because I have spent too much money in the last 2 months. I also have a big interest in portable systems and my buying mode has ended. It will be small changes over time from now on. You know how it is sometimes. One goes out and spends a lot of money on equipment and then are set for many years before the next big purchase.

The store was a big box retailer and the speakers were common mass produced brands that included Klipsch and Velodyne. Through the family member, I had access to what the company paid for the speakers and it was disgusting to see the markup. That is why on many speakers especially when a new model comes out you will see clearance sales 40% to 60% off msrp but these are usually the mass produced ones. I understand the need for the markup to sustain the store. Items such as laptops and tv's have very little or no markup or even sold at a loss but the store makes up by selling accessories and extended warranties.

I work in manufacturing and there is a huge manufacturing cost with amplifiers and a much lower cost for speakers. This includes both labor and materials.
The development of a speaker takes far longer than for an amplifier. Also, again, the manufacturing cost has nothing to do with the dealer cost or retail price. The manufacturer decides on a rough price point, then tries to make something that can retail for that price. Then, they select components and try to come in at a cost that allows them to make money when they sell to distributors or dealers. Then, there are times when a driver was tested and they base the design on it and when it comes to the order date, they find out it was discontinued, so they need to re-design it. This can happen to a line that's already in production, too. Phillips was making some very nice drivers and then, they left the speaker component market. All of the speaker system manufacturers had to come out with new models and speaker lines. You're also ignoring the need to keep stock on hand of old drivers fro warranty replacement- that can be expensive and there's no way to know how many will be needed once the last ones of that model/line have been sold.

There are some very expensive drivers out there- don't kid yourself into thinking there's no reason for a tweeter to cost more than $9 or a woofer more than $30.

Ever looked inside of an old Klipsch speaker? Nothing special going on. EV or Motorola horn tweeters, Eminence woofers, electrolytic caps and industrial-looking screw-down inductors that were likely used as chokes for other applications, or wound for them. Walnut/Oak veneered plywood, minimal damping (if any), a grill and a name plate.

Again, those brands may have had those margins, but I assure you by being able to buy as a dealer, those days are long gone. Online resellers and online-only availability has made it hard to justify prices, for some manufacturers. Those in the truly high-end, don't care because they have their market but now that the old, standard Klipsch speakers are special-order only, that pricing is dead.

I looked at buying the assets of a store and continuing operations at the same location with the same staff, recently. I passed. Knowing the rent, insurance, payroll, utilities and all of the other overhead made it a bad idea. I would have had to make $146K in profit, just to break even, and that was without paying myself.

I don't know how old you are, but before the internet and all of the "I want the best price, I don't care if it's not the best" attitude, we used to take quite a bit of time for demonstrating equipment, in order to make sure the buyer would be happy with their purchase. We demo'd turntables, cartridges, cassette decks, speakers- everything. If you don't think there's a cost associated with that, you're dead wrong. If you think a dealer's need to make a profit is disgusting, that's up to you but being able to listen in a shop prevents a lot of what you have done in the last few months- flail around, trying to find something that satisfies you. Having a showroom and demo space is a service, that is dying out because people want the best price and the cost of the space can no longer be justified when mass-merchandised crap is troweled out. $99/pair speakers? Go to Walmart, not someone who cares about selling good equipment. $600/pair speakers? We'll get them if the customer wants, but the time involved in making $100-$150 isn't worth the aggravation. Do we do it? Yes, because the customer wants them and if we send them to someone else, it would be idiotic.
highfigh is online now  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply Receivers, Amps, and Processors

Tags
Parasound , Parasound Products Inc , Parasound Classic 2100 Stereo Pre Amp

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page


Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off