Sony Receiver???? - AVS Forum
Forum Jump: 
 
Thread Tools
post #1 of 7 Old 12-02-2010, 03:32 PM - Thread Starter
Newbie
 
Corndog131's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 8
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
I found a Sony Str-DN1010 out-of-box deal for $250. I love the look of this receiver & love the fact that it should go well with my new Sony Bravia TV & Bluray player. The reviews I've read said Pioneer, Denon & Onkyo have better sound though. My question is would I even notice a sound difference in a small 11x13 room with Energy Take Classic 5.1 speakers that'll ONLY be used to watch movies (no music)?
Corndog131 is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 7 Old 12-02-2010, 06:06 PM
ap1
AVS Special Member
 
ap1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 2,225
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 19
Quote:
Originally Posted by Corndog131 View Post

I found a Sony Str-DN1010 out-of-box deal for $250. I love the look of this receiver & love the fact that it should go well with my new Sony Bravia TV & Bluray player. The reviews I've read said Pioneer, Denon & Onkyo have better sound though. My question is would I even notice a sound difference in a small 11x13 room with Energy Take Classic 5.1 speakers that'll ONLY be used to watch movies (no music)?

Current generation SONY receivers are no good if you care about sound quality.
ap1 is online now  
post #3 of 7 Old 12-02-2010, 08:37 PM
AVS Special Member
 
DonH50's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Monument CO
Posts: 6,020
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 142 Post(s)
Liked: 254
You'll probably be OK in such a small room. I was VERY dissappointed in the midrange (~$1200) Sony I bought about 18 months ago. The amps were a bit anemic even in stereo, and running five speakers the power was only about 1/3 the stereo power. It is now serving light duty in our family room (mainly just background music) until I upgrade the media room (hopefully next year).

"After silence, that which best expresses the inexpressible, is music" - Aldous Huxley
DonH50 is offline  
post #4 of 7 Old 12-02-2010, 09:48 PM
Senior Member
 
DelJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 289
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
I read some reviews that indicated that the Sony STR-DN1010 was lacking in sound quality.

On the other hand, I can attest that the Sony STR-DH810 sound quality is very good as I have one. Amazingly good for the price, actually, and I also like the appearance (and small size!) of the Sony units. You can get a new DH810 for close to what you were quoting for the out of box DN1010.

The STR-DH810 works just fine with stereo music, as well.

DelJ



Quote:
Originally Posted by Corndog131 View Post

I found a Sony Str-DN1010 out-of-box deal for $250. I love the look of this receiver & love the fact that it should go well with my new Sony Bravia TV & Bluray player. The reviews I've read said Pioneer, Denon & Onkyo have better sound though. My question is would I even notice a sound difference in a small 11x13 room with Energy Take Classic 5.1 speakers that'll ONLY be used to watch movies (no music)?

DelJ is offline  
post #5 of 7 Old 12-03-2010, 10:26 AM
AVS Special Member
 
samsurd2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Central Coast of CA
Posts: 3,446
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
Quote:
Originally Posted by ap1 View Post

Current generation SONY receivers are no good if you care about sound quality.

IMO this horse (receiver X sounds better than receiver Y, receiver Z sounds like crap, etc.) has been beaten to death over and over and over again. SQ is primarily a function of speakers, room acoustics, acoustic treatments and EQ-ing...unless you have "golden ears".
samsurd2 is offline  
post #6 of 7 Old 12-03-2010, 11:29 AM
Member
 
SpineRep's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Greer, SC
Posts: 64
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
FWIW- I have the 1010 and love it.
SpineRep is offline  
post #7 of 7 Old 12-03-2010, 05:07 PM
Senior Member
 
DelJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 289
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
This may be true with the higher end receivers, where one would expect all of them to be pretty good. Not true for the low end receivers where cost constraints will often compromise sound quality (no surprise here). I recently compared two low cost 2010 model receivers in my home (all external variables being the same) and there was a big difference between the two receivers in terms of sound quality. The loser was so poor that I went through all the settings again just to see if I did something wrong.

DelJ



Quote:
Originally Posted by samsurd2 View Post

...SQ is primarily a function of speakers, room acoustics, acoustic treatments and EQ-ing...unless you have "golden ears".

DelJ is offline  
Reply Receivers, Amps, and Processors

User Tag List

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page


Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off