DAC help - AVS Forum
Forum Jump: 
 
Thread Tools
post #1 of 14 Old 11-02-2011, 06:59 AM - Thread Starter
Newbie
 
mikem999's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 3
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
Hi guys,

I'm looking for some advice. I'm newb to audio and i'm trying to upgrade my current computer audio system to a budget "hifi" system. Don't have much money to spend but I'm trying to do the best i can.

My current setup is:

-computer sound card: HT Claro Plus
-headphones: Audio-Technica ATH AD700
-receiver (just purchased): Onkyo TX-8255
-speakers (just purchased): Pioneer SP-BS41-LR


My questions are:
- does the Onkyo TX-8255 have a built in DAC? I am currently connecting my soundcard to the receiver via an analog cable. The receiver only has analog connections. Is the receiver doing any processing or is it all in the soundcard?

-i am thinking of buying a separate DAC, the HRT Music Streamer II, $149 on Amazon. Will this considerably improve the sound from my system? Some of my music is FLAC , but lots are mp3. Would the DAC also improve sound from the MP3's? Are there any other recommendations for a DAC (or other component) that would improve with my setup for around $200?

Thanks in advance for your input guys!
mikem999 is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 14 Old 11-02-2011, 09:14 AM
AVS Addicted Member
 
Kal Rubinson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: NYC + Connecticut
Posts: 28,416
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 52 Post(s)
Liked: 122
Quote:
Originally Posted by mikem999 View Post

My questions are:
- does the Onkyo TX-8255 have a built in DAC? I am currently connecting my soundcard to the receiver via an analog cable. The receiver only has analog connections. Is the receiver doing any processing or is it all in the soundcard?

It is an analog receiver. It does no processing except for tone controls.

Quote:


-i am thinking of buying a separate DAC, the HRT Music Streamer II, $149 on Amazon. Will this considerably improve the sound from my system?

Hard to say but it is possible.

Quote:


Some of my music is FLAC , but lots are mp3. Would the DAC also improve sound from the MP3's? Are there any other recommendations for a DAC (or other component) that would improve with my setup for around $200?

It would have been better to put that $200 into the receiver purchase but the HRT is a worthwhile try.

Thanks in advance for your input guys![/quote]

Kal Rubinson

"Music in the Round"
Senior Contributing Editor, Stereophile
http://www.stereophile.com/category/music-round

Kal Rubinson is online now  
post #3 of 14 Old 11-02-2011, 08:03 PM - Thread Starter
Newbie
 
mikem999's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 3
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
It would have been better to put that $200 into the receiver purchase but the HRT is a worthwhile try.

So you mean that it would be better to buy a more expensive receiver than to buy a DAC for $200?

The onkyo i bought costs around $160. Is there anything recommended for around $350-400?
mikem999 is offline  
post #4 of 14 Old 11-02-2011, 09:13 PM
AVS Addicted Member
 
MichaelJHuman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Colorado Springs, CO
Posts: 18,744
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 161 Post(s)
Liked: 99
Many receivers have built in DACs, but seeing how you already bought a receiver, unless you want to return it, you can just use the audio outputs from the sound card.

If the sound was problematical, as sometimes seems to be the case with sound card analog audio outputs, you could get an affordable USB audio interface for cheaper than $200.

IMO, many DACs seem ridiculously expensive given the potential for improvement. Of course some people feel DACs make a big difference, but some people also think we never landed men on the moon - you can't assume people are rational, IMO

"But this one goes up to 11"
MichaelJHuman is online now  
post #5 of 14 Old 11-02-2011, 10:16 PM
Member
 
Jeckler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Mesa, AZ
Posts: 17
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
Is the 8255 a recent purchase? I'd return it if you can and get something with digital coaxial and/or optical inputs to let the receiver handle the processing. It looks like that card you have will do both (and looks like a nice card too). If you'd like to stay with Onkyo, the TX8050 has digital in, and offers a LOT more than the 8255, including networking. And it's not any more than a separate DAC would cost you.
Jeckler is offline  
post #6 of 14 Old 11-02-2011, 11:11 PM
AVS Special Member
 
Kilian.ca's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Ex-50Hz, now 60Hz
Posts: 1,901
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 36
I'd get better speakers that go lower than 55Hz or a sub. A DAC is redundant in the chain when there is something else more important to see to and a DAC that costs as much as the bookshelves seems not quite right to me. It's a matter of making the most of what you have to spend.

Audiosceptics accept audio trials using 25 people. A recent Oxford study with over 353,000 patient records from 639 separate clinical trials shows for every 1,000 people taking diclofenac or ibuprofen there would be 3 additional heart attacks, 4 more cases of heart failure and 1 death every year.

Kilian.ca is offline  
post #7 of 14 Old 11-03-2011, 02:03 AM
AVS Special Member
 
Warpdrv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 7,350
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Liked: 15
Save up for a nice sub if you want to see a huge upgrade in performance.
Warpdrv is offline  
post #8 of 14 Old 11-03-2011, 07:12 AM - Thread Starter
Newbie
 
mikem999's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 3
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kilian.ca View Post

I'd get better speakers that go lower than 55Hz or a sub. A DAC is redundant in the chain when there is something else more important to see to and a DAC that costs as much as the bookshelves seems not quite right to me. It's a matter of making the most of what you have to spend.

Quote:
Originally Posted by MichaelJHuman View Post

Many receivers have built in DACs, but seeing how you already bought a receiver, unless you want to return it, you can just use the audio outputs from the sound card.

If the sound was problematical, as sometimes seems to be the case with sound card analog audio outputs, you could get an affordable USB audio interface for cheaper than $200.

IMO, many DACs seem ridiculously expensive given the potential for improvement. Of course some people feel DACs make a big difference, but some people also think we never landed men on the moon - you can't assume people are rational, IMO

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeckler View Post

Is the 8255 a recent purchase? I'd return it if you can and get something with digital coaxial and/or optical inputs to let the receiver handle the processing. It looks like that card you have will do both (and looks like a nice card too). If you'd like to stay with Onkyo, the TX8050 has digital in, and offers a LOT more than the 8255, including networking. And it's not any more than a separate DAC would cost you.


i appreciate the input guys. i'm learning more from the comments.

What i gather from above is that :
1) a better receiver (such as onkyo 8050) with a DAC inside will process sound better than my computer soundcard.
2) getting a DAC for my system will not be the best upgrade and may even not make much of a difference.

Am I getting this right?

Subwoofers were also mentioned. Would the main benefit of getting a DAC be in the lower frequencies? What benefits do DACs give to the sound? What sub would be recommended for my speakers?

If i get a receiver such as the onkyo 8050 or similar, would the bass from my speakers benefit too? What benefits to the sound other than bass would i get? I do enjoy good bass, but overall sound is the most important for me.

thanks again!
mikem999 is offline  
post #9 of 14 Old 11-03-2011, 02:31 PM
AVS Addicted Member
 
MichaelJHuman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Colorado Springs, CO
Posts: 18,744
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 161 Post(s)
Liked: 99
I will tell you what I know and think...(other people will have differing ideas

What I know...
* Any DAC chip I have ever seen used in a modern AVR has amazing specs
* Some people claim that the specs don't tell the whole story
* One person, who seemed rational and educated says the SNR of some DACs is questionable (which leads into a technical discussion of what the minium should be)

What I think...
* People in audio regularly make crazy claims that have never been backed up with any solid evidence
* DACs should not require $200 worth of parts/labor to sound correct - the concept that they would is silly to me!
* A DAC may be a small part of the total analog audio path; consider a guitar being played on some song...how many electronic circuits did that go through before it hits your speakers...do you think one chip along with associated circuitry is making a big difference in that chain?

"But this one goes up to 11"
MichaelJHuman is online now  
post #10 of 14 Old 11-03-2011, 04:06 PM
AVS Addicted Member
 
Kal Rubinson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: NYC + Connecticut
Posts: 28,416
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 52 Post(s)
Liked: 122
Of course, the OP has not said what he wants to correct/improve about his system. What component to add/replace/improve will depend on this.

Kal Rubinson

"Music in the Round"
Senior Contributing Editor, Stereophile
http://www.stereophile.com/category/music-round

Kal Rubinson is online now  
post #11 of 14 Old 11-03-2011, 04:49 PM
AVS Addicted Member
 
MichaelJHuman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Colorado Springs, CO
Posts: 18,744
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 161 Post(s)
Liked: 99
People rarely state what their actual reason for waning an improvement is

"But this one goes up to 11"
MichaelJHuman is online now  
post #12 of 14 Old 11-03-2011, 06:03 PM
AVS Special Member
 
Kilian.ca's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Ex-50Hz, now 60Hz
Posts: 1,901
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 36
Sometimes until you try something better, you think what you have is good enough and just aren't aware something better exists. Not only in audio. Food, cars, people...

The DAC sceptics (skeptics) usually would say a modern DAC decodes the signal from 20-20kHz perfectly, which implies a ruler-flat FR. How about when some tapers off top and bottom end? Very rarely if ever I've seen mentioned here is the filter characteristics. Some DACs let you choose the filter settings and sampling frequencies.

I know what some of you are going to say: these differences are inaudible...This isn't the right place to have yet another DAC discussion or flame war so that's all I'll say.

To get back to the OP: there is no definitive correct answers to your questions. All are opinions of people here and we aren't necessarily representative of the whole audio community. Some people have preferences and priorities to what their equipment sounds. A DAC covers 20-20kHz and does not particularly benefit the bass. Some (and a vocal few) people here don't believe in using external DACs at all. If you hang around here long enough you get the impression that all DACs, all cables, all CD/DVD players, all AVRs and amps have no audible differences. Go to other sections (2CH, CD players and audio theory) and you'll see heated debates (and worse) on these topics. If your have time read the long USB DAC thread (relevant for computers) in the 2CH forum - but be warned.

You have to read around and listen to some equipment yourself and decide. For a sub recommendation you should go to the sub forum.

Audiosceptics accept audio trials using 25 people. A recent Oxford study with over 353,000 patient records from 639 separate clinical trials shows for every 1,000 people taking diclofenac or ibuprofen there would be 3 additional heart attacks, 4 more cases of heart failure and 1 death every year.

Kilian.ca is offline  
post #13 of 14 Old 11-03-2011, 06:07 PM
AVS Addicted Member
 
Kal Rubinson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: NYC + Connecticut
Posts: 28,416
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 52 Post(s)
Liked: 122
Quote:
Originally Posted by MichaelJHuman View Post

People rarely state what their actual reason for waning an improvement is

True. OTOH, he asked us to make that improvement.

Kal Rubinson

"Music in the Round"
Senior Contributing Editor, Stereophile
http://www.stereophile.com/category/music-round

Kal Rubinson is online now  
post #14 of 14 Old 11-03-2011, 06:16 PM
AVS Special Member
 
Knucklehead90's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: State of Confusion - 98823
Posts: 7,354
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 25 Post(s)
Liked: 101
I have the same sound card in my HTPC as the OP. It has very good sound quality IMO. I doubt a separate DAC will net you much better sound - probably none. I use that card for movies and music. I use analog outputs to an HK 3390 for music and to an Integra DHC 40.1 for 5.1 movies. DVDs on the Oppo BDP-80 sound very much like they do from hard drive and through the HT Claro card.

I also have an 8255 in the bedroom 2 channel setup. Sound is good but it doesn't have the power to push high volume.

When all else fails - RTFM!

♫♫♫ Two Channel Rules! ♫♫♫

GO SEAHAWKS!!!
Knucklehead90 is offline  
Reply Receivers, Amps, and Processors

User Tag List

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page


Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off