Panasonic XR55 alternative? - AVS Forum
Forum Jump: 
 
Thread Tools
post #1 of 4 Old 01-07-2012, 01:01 AM - Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
KnightRT's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 230
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
On the suggestion of this forum some years ago, I bought a Panasonic XR55. Paired with my Dana speakers, it sounds extraordinary. Unfortunately, it's started to emit an occasional squealing sound and may not be long for this world.

Is there a new favorite among economically-priced amps/receivers?

Some background: my sole audio device is a digital feed from an HTPC. My sole display device is a projector that's wired only to the HTPC. I have a 5.1 setup with Dana bookshelf speakers and a subwoofer with no particular desire for more speakers. The Dana's are around 87 w/db/m. Theater volume is about -17db on the receiver. The playback material is only ever PCM, DTS, or AC-3. Probably 75% of the time, I have it in two-channel stereo.

So I don't seem to need more power, HDMI inputs, or advanced features of any sort. The only thing I'd have liked to have seen on the XR55 are proper 5-channel surround and a crossover option under 80hz. If I could find another one, I'd buy it. All I really care about is an amp of equal quality. What would you recommend instead?
KnightRT is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 4 Old 01-07-2012, 03:58 AM
Advanced Member
 
Slare's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Detroit, MI
Posts: 548
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
The XR units were popular because they offered the class D amplifiers in a compact chassis at a reasonable price. People also loved that they had pre-ins which allowed you to effectively use them as multi-channel amplifiers. There was nothing like them at the time.

However in reality the amplifiers weren't exceptionally powerful or clean, it was just an excellent value in a compact chassis that was amazing at the time.

Given your relatively simple requirements for a basic, clean sounding AVR, I'd recommend an H/K. This would be my choice if I had no desire for the room correction features like Audyssey.

However it may be worth your time to try a box with Audyssey normal or XT first, as it can be a huge benefit. Maybe pick a Denon up from Best Buy or somewhere you can return it should it no impress you.

If you need the compact size, there is a slimline Marantz. Hell, you could probably be happy with one of the current Panasonic HTIB receivers as the amp section is still the same.
Slare is offline  
post #3 of 4 Old 01-07-2012, 04:44 AM
Member
 
mjcmt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 52
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
I don't know about Harman Kardon, but I think a Denon is nothing like your Panny in sound. I had a recent Denon 2 channel receiver, plus have heard their AVRs and while they sound 'musical' they sound muffled and too polite. I just picked up an '06 Yamaha AVR and I'm amazed at the clear, peppy and sweet presentation.

mjcmt is offline  
post #4 of 4 Old 01-07-2012, 10:21 AM - Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
KnightRT's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 230
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
When the Panasonic arrived, there were various favorable comparisons to more expensive amplifiers. Were these debunked?

I'm not totally adverse to using a receiver with pre-outs to power a separate amp, if indeed that would offer similar or better sound quality. Any suggestions on that front under $500?
KnightRT is offline  
Reply Receivers, Amps, and Processors

User Tag List

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page


Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off