Big difference going from a emotiva umc 1 to parasound c2 ! - AVS Forum
Forum Jump: 
 
Thread Tools
post #1 of 7 Old 07-26-2012, 03:22 PM - Thread Starter
Advanced Member
 
panzer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Baltimore, Maryland
Posts: 596
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Liked: 16
I recently bought a emotiva umc 1, a sub12 and a xp 5 amp, I was having trouble with the auto mode on the sub, emotiva sent me a replacement sub, but it had the same problem, after some research on the umc I found that it had bass managment issues. also, it did not sound any better sonicly then the receiver that it replaced, so I took a loss and sold it, I bought a used parasound c2 prepro and after hooking it up, I found a huge jump in quality of sound in both music and ht, I had planned on buying the new prepro that emotiva has comming out, but not anymore, I hooked all my video sources up direct to my tv and will forgo hdmi and stay with the parasound. the sub auto feature works with the parasound. on a positive note, emotiva xp 5 5 channel amp is excellent, and the sub sounds great through the c2 .
panzer is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 7 Old 07-26-2012, 03:32 PM
AVS Special Member
 
ClarkeBar's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Tea Party Central
Posts: 3,749
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 17 Post(s)
Liked: 22
Excellent! Enjoy the SQ.

On a personal note, I have never had a bad experience with any Parasound product and consider them great quality and value for money spent. Same with the Emotiva amps.



Have all that you want ... just want what you have.
ClarkeBar is offline  
post #3 of 7 Old 07-26-2012, 04:35 PM
AVS Special Member
 
DonoMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 3,670
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 11
A huge increase in SQ, huh? Well, that's positively wrong, but enjoy your zero-to-slight quality increase.

Not trying to be a douche, but greatly exaggerating your claims like this doesn't really help the community. Not knocking your purchase though as I like Parasound just as much as the next guy here...

Anyway, enjoy...

"Vintage" is good for wine, not for A/V equipment.

-Dan D.
DonoMan is offline  
post #4 of 7 Old 07-26-2012, 07:35 PM - Thread Starter
Advanced Member
 
panzer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Baltimore, Maryland
Posts: 596
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Liked: 16
Quote:
Originally Posted by DonoMan View Post

A huge increase in SQ, huh? Well, that's positively wrong, but enjoy your zero-to-slight quality increase.
Not trying to be a douche, but greatly exaggerating your claims like this doesn't really help the community. Not knocking your purchase though as I like Parasound just as much as the next guy here...
Anyway, enjoy...
Sorry, but I stand by my original post, the difference in sound quality was not suttle, bass had much better definition, highs were much smother and seperation was much better, as I said in my original post, the umc replaced a onkyo receiver that I was using as a prepro, and there was no improvement in sound quality from the onkyo to the umc, compared to the difference from the umc to the parasound.
panzer is offline  
post #5 of 7 Old 07-26-2012, 07:45 PM
AVS Addicted Member
 
Bill Mac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 11,512
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 119 Post(s)
Liked: 461
Quote:
Originally Posted by DonoMan View Post

A huge increase in SQ, huh? Well, that's positively wrong, but enjoy your zero-to-slight quality increase.
Not trying to be a douche, but greatly exaggerating your claims like this doesn't really help the community. Not knocking your purchase though as I like Parasound just as much as the next guy here...
Anyway, enjoy...

I had no problem with the OP's thoughts on the SQ improvements from the UMC-1 to the C2. Your post on the other hand is rude and condescending. It amazes me that you say the OP's post "doesn't really help the community" but yours is just fine rolleyes.gif. I think you got it backwards wink.gif.

Bill


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
, watch it grow and my wallet shrink ;-).

 

Denon 4311 (in preamp mode), Parasound 2100, Boston Acoustics A7200 amp, Oppo BDP-103, Consonance CD120, Panasonic TC-P60GT50 plasma, Panamax 5100EX, Salk Song Towers, Song Center, ADS 300C (surrounds) and two Rythmik F12SEs.
Bill Mac is offline  
post #6 of 7 Old 07-26-2012, 07:47 PM
AVS Club Gold
 
joerod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: MIDWEST (just outside Chicago)
Posts: 22,100
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 75 Post(s)
Liked: 111
I was planning to do a Review of Emotiva's new "high end" amp (and compare it to Parasound's latest) but they pretty much didn't want any part of it. I guess I could always just buy one outright then sell it. Parasound had no issue and gladly sent me theirs for Review. Go figure. Hmmmmm.

For my latest Reviews and Stuff google -> Joe Rod Home Theater .Com
Check out my Dolby Atmos/Surround first take:

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
joerod is offline  
post #7 of 7 Old 07-27-2012, 05:39 AM
AVS Special Member
 
ClarkeBar's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Tea Party Central
Posts: 3,749
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 17 Post(s)
Liked: 22
Quote:
Originally Posted by panzer View Post

Sorry, but I stand by my original post, the difference in sound quality was not suttle, bass had much better definition, highs were much smother and seperation was much better, as I said in my original post, the umc replaced a onkyo receiver that I was using as a prepro, and there was no improvement in sound quality from the onkyo to the umc, compared to the difference from the umc to the parasound.

Good for you. While I understand the need for caution when dealing with hyperbole in descriptives, the 'there is only one sound' crowd always shows up when anyone finds a significant difference between components. You know ... was everything level matched and double blinded? I guess the high end market is just based on taking stupid peoples money. rolleyes.gif Glad you like the C2.



Have all that you want ... just want what you have.
ClarkeBar is offline  
Reply Receivers, Amps, and Processors

User Tag List

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page


Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off