How does one measure the "goodness" of a DAC? - AVS Forum
Forum Jump: 
 
Thread Tools
Old 12-07-2012, 12:09 PM - Thread Starter
Newbie
 
PeterJThaggard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 4
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
Are there some sort of specs that indicate the "goodness" of a DAC? I will of course use the ultimate measure, my own listening experience, but before I shell out a few hundred bucks I'd like to know if there are some measures that I can use to compare DACs pre-purchase.

Thanks.
PeterJThaggard is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 12-07-2012, 01:49 PM
AVS Special Member
 
JHAz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 4,050
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 125 Post(s)
Liked: 167
AFAIK, the precision and noise performance of modern DAC chips is universally beyond the ability fo the human ear to discriminate. (Moore's law and all that). The other electronics in an outboard DAC, if poorly designed, could potentially have an audible effect but it seems unlikely to me except in cases where the DAC is implemented with intentional frequency response deviations (like the 80s era British high end rolloff).

In general with modern systems utilizing digital sources (and especially where one wants to take advantage of digital crossover settings, or room correction software, which can be a great boon, there's no reason to use an outboard DAC. You just push yourself into having to get a receiver or pre-pro that can re-digitize (via an ADC) the signal it gets from the DAC, and then perform its digital work (crossover rolloffs, room correction) and then take the result of that work and send it to the receiver's internal DAC to obtain an analog sound that the amps can amplify and the speakers can play. Unless you choose to be a purist and avoid all processing or prefer to implement crossovers and any EQ using potentially less accurate and potentially noisier analog components, you can't avoid using the receiver's DAC anyway, and you incur the (likely very slight) cost of one additional generation of digital-to-analog-to-ditgital conversion.
ccotenj and PeterJThaggard like this.
JHAz is offline  
 
Thread Tools


Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off