Amping speakers for 2 channel audio listening. - AVS Forum
Forum Jump: 
 
Thread Tools
post #1 of 9 Old 02-08-2013, 04:17 PM - Thread Starter
Member
 
Cigarjohn47's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
Posts: 175
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Liked: 16
Is there much difference in sound quality between bi-amping or tri-amping a speaker or is the basic configuration good enough? I would like to here from any user out there who performs this task with their speakers. Thanks. wink.gif
Cigarjohn47 is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 9 Old 02-08-2013, 04:34 PM
AVS Special Member
 
DonH50's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Monument CO
Posts: 6,089
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 160 Post(s)
Liked: 262
Gee, hard to say, never been discussed here before...

All IMO:
  • Passive bi-amping as implemented in AVRs is not worth the effort, no significant gain.
  • Adding a line-level crossover and amplifiers, then connecting the amplifiers directly to the drivers (bypassing the speakers' internal crossovers) can provide significant benefit, but how audible depends upon what you had before and how good you are at designing crossover networks.

YMMV - Don

"After silence, that which best expresses the inexpressible, is music" - Aldous Huxley
DonH50 is online now  
post #3 of 9 Old 02-08-2013, 05:02 PM
AVS Special Member
 
JHAz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 3,944
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 88 Post(s)
Liked: 154
Quote:
Originally Posted by DonH50 View Post

Gee, hard to say, never been discussed here before...

All IMO:
  • Passive bi-amping as implemented in AVRs is not worth the effort, no significant gain.
  • Adding a line-level crossover and amplifiers, then connecting the amplifiers directly to the drivers (bypassing the speakers' internal crossovers) can provide significant benefit, but how audible depends upon what you had before and how good you are at designing crossover networks.

YMMV - Don

+1 and to do what Don describes (active biamping or triamping) requires you to remove or otherwise bypass the crossovers built into your speakers or you end up with weird holes in your frequency response.

also, despite the absense of a smiley, his "never been discussed" comment is facetious and a search will reveal at least weekly discussions of the issues .. .
JHAz is online now  
post #4 of 9 Old 02-08-2013, 11:12 PM - Thread Starter
Member
 
Cigarjohn47's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
Posts: 175
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Liked: 16
I thought, say for an example. I have a speaker that is bi-amp. I just get two amps say 500 watts x 2 and connect one amp say the left amp to the left and right tweeter and the right amp to the left and right woofers. Then run just the left output from the pre-amp to the left amp and the right output of the pre-amp to the right amp. So two 500 watts should be divided into 250 watts per driver. Will that work?

Cause what you guys are telling me about crossover stuff is way over my head. LIke Wooooshhhhhh!!!!!!
Cigarjohn47 is offline  
post #5 of 9 Old 02-08-2013, 11:22 PM
AVS Special Member
 
derrickdj1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,461
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 95 Post(s)
Liked: 146
To improve your sound quality, get some room Tx's, cheaper and not as much of a learning curve and most likely yeild better results than just bi-amping.

Klipsch RF 7 based HT 7.4, Pioneer SC 35, Acurus 200 Five, Dayton 18 Ultimxa Dual Sub Cab(2), Dayton 18 Ultimax Large Vented Sub Cab (2), on Berhinger I Nuke DPS amps, Samsung BDP F 7500, Asus/My Book Live HPC 4 TB

Yaquin VK 2100 amp, McIntosh XR 5 speakers, Samsung BDP F 7500
derrickdj1 is offline  
post #6 of 9 Old 02-09-2013, 11:51 AM
AVS Special Member
 
DonH50's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Monument CO
Posts: 6,089
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 160 Post(s)
Liked: 262
If you connect the amps without some sort of crossover you'll either gain nothing if you retain the crossovers in the speakers or you'll blow up them up if you bypass the crossovers. If you do not understand crossovers (Google, Wikipedia, etc.or pick up an audio reference book) then you should not waste your time and money. Instead, look to room treatments as stated above, or just spend the money on movies and music. Or send it to me. smile.gif

"After silence, that which best expresses the inexpressible, is music" - Aldous Huxley
DonH50 is online now  
post #7 of 9 Old 02-09-2013, 12:06 PM
AVS Addicted Member
 
arnyk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Grosse Pointe Woods, MI
Posts: 14,381
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 747 Post(s)
Liked: 1161
Quote:
Originally Posted by DonH50 View Post

Gee, hard to say, never been discussed here before...

All IMO:
  • Passive bi-amping as implemented in AVRs is not worth the effort, no significant gain.
  • Adding a line-level crossover and amplifiers, then connecting the amplifiers directly to the drivers (bypassing the speakers' internal crossovers) can provide significant benefit, but how audible depends upon what you had before and how good you are at designing crossover networks.

YMMV - Don

The key point for most people is the first one - Passive bi-amping as implemented in AVRs is not worth the effort, and provides no significant gain.

There is no YMMV about it, nobody gets an audible benefit out of passive biamping.

Passive biamping only benefits people who sell amplifiers.

As applied to AVRs, it is a lame attempt to add another feature to the blurb sheet.
arnyk is offline  
post #8 of 9 Old 02-09-2013, 12:23 PM - Thread Starter
Member
 
Cigarjohn47's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
Posts: 175
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Liked: 16
Okay, I want to thank everyone for clearing this up for me. My last question is that I have two McIntosh MC275 tubed amps at 75watts x 2 channels. Would it be okay to dedicate each amp to each of my speakers and bridge each amp so I can get at least 150 watts going to each speaker.
Cigarjohn47 is offline  
post #9 of 9 Old 02-09-2013, 01:20 PM
AVS Special Member
 
DonH50's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Monument CO
Posts: 6,089
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 160 Post(s)
Liked: 262
According to the McIntosh site you cannot "bridge" but can run "mono-parallel" to attain 150 W/ch as desired.

"After silence, that which best expresses the inexpressible, is music" - Aldous Huxley
DonH50 is online now  
Reply Receivers, Amps, and Processors

User Tag List

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page


Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off