Do "Slim" receivers make big compromises in quality? - AVS Forum
Forum Jump: 
 
Thread Tools
post #1 of 5 Old 08-20-2013, 03:48 PM - Thread Starter
Member
 
OrangeFanta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 15
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 11
I am in the market for a new AVR and have seen quite a few "slim line" receivers lately which do look pretty nice and seem to be on par feature wise as their larger counterparts.

My question is do these slimmer models lose a lot in quality or sound clarity in order to make them fit into the smaller form factor, or are they basically identical but just in a smaller shell?

Thanks.
OrangeFanta is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 5 Old 08-20-2013, 04:02 PM
585-645-1006
 
jdsmoothie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 48,058
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2643 Post(s)
Liked: 1900
Speaking of the Marantz slim line ... other than reduced power (which shouldn't matter at average volume levels), the quality is the same.

---------------------------------
"JD" – jd@avscience.com ; Call me --> 585-645-1006, AVScience - AVSForum sponsor and dealer for AVRs and Speakers 

Daily 8am – 8pm EST
Call for info on Denon, Marantz, Yamaha, Pioneer, Onkyo, Def Tech, Atlantic Tech, Oppo
** Think the AVR is defective?  Reset the microprocessor 4-5 times. 
jdsmoothie is offline  
post #3 of 5 Old 08-20-2013, 04:06 PM - Thread Starter
Member
 
OrangeFanta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 15
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 11
wow jdsmoothie thank you for the fast response.

I have heard from some friends who are really into AV as a hobby that the rated watts shown on most receivers are highly exaggerated. Is this true? And if so, does this mean that the rated power on the slimline Marantz models is even more exaggerated than the full size counterpart?

Thanks for putting up with my noob questions.
OrangeFanta is offline  
post #4 of 5 Old 08-20-2013, 04:06 PM
AVS Special Member
 
Jon S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Sunny Hawaii
Posts: 2,892
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 176 Post(s)
Liked: 80
Basically, the slim models will usually have reduced power ratings because the primary reason is that the power supply is the largest components in the unit. If the power supply is reduced, then the power ratings will suffer... You will also probably have a reduction in the dynamic power output.

If it's not a BIG screen, it's not a theater...
Jon S is offline  
post #5 of 5 Old 08-20-2013, 04:16 PM
585-645-1006
 
jdsmoothie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 48,058
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2643 Post(s)
Liked: 1900
If you're going to be driving 8-ohm speakers with at least 87db+ efficiency ratings, the slim line Marantz will be more than sufficient in a small/med sized room.

---------------------------------
"JD" – jd@avscience.com ; Call me --> 585-645-1006, AVScience - AVSForum sponsor and dealer for AVRs and Speakers 

Daily 8am – 8pm EST
Call for info on Denon, Marantz, Yamaha, Pioneer, Onkyo, Def Tech, Atlantic Tech, Oppo
** Think the AVR is defective?  Reset the microprocessor 4-5 times. 
jdsmoothie is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply Receivers, Amps, and Processors

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page


Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off