AVS Special Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Southern California
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 139 Post(s)
Find me another AVR that actually GIVES a power rating for all channels with all 7 driven. There aren't any. If they are really good units, why do they DUCK this very basic issue and refuse to give meaningful power ratings for 5 or 7 channels? Do you have an answer for that?
Most of them don't put out anywhere near as much, because their crappy power supplies are less than half the size of the Cambridge.
An honest 60 watts per channel to all 7 channels with low distortion is far more than most 7-channel AVRs can supply.
The amplifiers can't deliver what the power supply can't supply!
Home Theater magazine RAVES about how good the Cambridge receivers sound every time they test them. They never say anything as positive about any other brand. Read the reviews.
Your 4311 is a very good unit; one of the few that competes at all with Cambridge, but it still doesn't SOUND as good IMO (and it is not cheaper). Denon is certainly better than Yamaha and Pioneer etc., with their cheap Class D amplifiers and puny power supplies. Actually, if you look at the specs, Cambridge receivers do have an impressive list of capabilities and features.
And by the way; Cambridge is of the opinion that all of the digital signal processing that goes on in most room correction software seriously degrades the sound QUALITY, and most knowledgeable reviewers and engineers agree.
That is why Cambridge refuses to play the "bells and whistles" game and sticks to sound engineering practices. If you prefer the longest list of "features" to the best sound quality, stick with the Japanese manufacturers and they will stick it to you.
Cambridge has their own proprietary room/speaker setup system (CAMCAS) with a calibrated microphone included. They consider it superior to other systems. You are completely wrong when you allege that they do not have one.