Onkyo PR-SC5530 processor 11.4 Atmos - Hdmi 2.0 - Wifi + Bluetooth - AVS Forum
Forum Jump: 
Reply
 
Thread Tools
post #1 of 40 Old 06-24-2014, 11:16 AM - Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Hugo S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: France
Posts: 445
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13 Post(s)
Liked: 23
Onkyo PR-SC5530 processor 11.4 Atmos - Hdmi 2.0 - Wifi + Bluetooth

Hi,

The Onkyo PR-SC5530 successor to the previous PR-SC5509 processor has been announced.

This Onkyo PR-SC5530 is THX Ultra 2 certified, has a 11.4 processing capacity through RCA & RCa outputs, integrates an AccuEQ acoustic "calibration", is Dolby Atmos compatible, with 8 video inputs and 3 outputs all HDMI 2.0 HDCP 2.2 compatible, a QDEO 4K video processor, and integrated WiFi & Bluetooth.

Availbabilty Sep 2014, price 2499$.

Please see details here:

http://www.onkyousa.com/Products/mod...urce=prodClass

http://www.uk.onkyo.com/en/articles/...nd-118123.html

http://www.uk.onkyo.com/en/products/...30-117878.html

http://www.uk.onkyo.com/downloads/2/...tasheet_EN.pdf (datasheet)
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Onkyo PR-SC5530.JPG (41.8 KB, 41 views)
File Type: jpg Onkyo PR-SC5530 rear.JPG (83.5 KB, 92 views)
File Type: jpg Onkyo PR SC5530 expanded.jpg (58.3 KB, 15 views)


Last edited by Hugo S; 07-03-2014 at 07:40 AM.
Hugo S is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 40 Old 06-24-2014, 11:25 AM - Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Hugo S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: France
Posts: 445
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13 Post(s)
Liked: 23
Hi,

A competitor to the Onkyo PR-SC5530, the Marantz AV8802?

Marantz AV8802 13.2 XLR processor - HDMI 2.0 ISF - Wifi + Bluetooth details

Hugo

Hugo S is offline  
post #3 of 40 Old 06-24-2014, 11:40 AM
AVS Special Member
 
deano86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,391
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Liked: 54
AccuEQ?... and not Audyssey anymore? Be interesting to get some reports on the performance of this room correction.
deano86 is offline  
post #4 of 40 Old 06-24-2014, 11:41 AM
Bass Enabler
 
Scott Simonian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Clovis, CA
Posts: 13,193
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 135 Post(s)
Liked: 636
Looks great! Now just let dem HDMI work proper .... over time. C'mon Onkyo.

My Dual 18" LLT subs 120dB down to 10hz

 

Plan9Reloaded Co-host

Listen to the Plan9Reloaded Gaming and Technology Podcast (may contain NSFW language)

https://soundcloud.com/plan9reloaded/sets/podcast - direct pod link

http://plan9reloaded.com/site/ - main website

Scott Simonian is online now  
post #5 of 40 Old 06-24-2014, 11:59 AM
AVS Special Member
 
beastaudio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Western NC
Posts: 6,927
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 205 Post(s)
Liked: 549
Quote:
AccuEQ Calibration for Pure Audio Performance
As part of our Emotion, Delivered audio concept, which
brings together technologies that significantly improve both
stereo and multichannel sound quality, Onkyo introduces
the powerful AccuEQ room calibration system. AccuEQ
measures and corrects speaker distances, levels, crossovers,
and frequency response from one convenient listening
position to ensure clear and cohesive surround-sound while
enabling playback of 7.1-channel formats at 96 kHz (no
down-sampling). For the ultimate in pure stereo performance,
AccuEQ bypasses the front channels so the unique
characteristics of your loudspeakers can be enjoyed without
DSP correction to potentially alter the sound.
So that is what They say about that!

(European models do not accept banana plugs.)

 

"If you done it, it ain't bragging." ~ Walt Whitman

 

AE TD12x SEOS12 Build

Beast's DIY Master Measurement Thread

DIY Emminence Coaxial Surround Thread

beastaudio is online now  
post #6 of 40 Old 06-24-2014, 12:04 PM
AVS Special Member
 
beastaudio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Western NC
Posts: 6,927
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 205 Post(s)
Liked: 549
Oh, and I would love to know what the meaning of the dual XLR's for each subwoofer out are purposed for! Very cool.

(European models do not accept banana plugs.)

 

"If you done it, it ain't bragging." ~ Walt Whitman

 

AE TD12x SEOS12 Build

Beast's DIY Master Measurement Thread

DIY Emminence Coaxial Surround Thread

beastaudio is online now  
post #7 of 40 Old 06-24-2014, 12:47 PM
Member
 
McLuvin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 82
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Liked: 13
Quote:
Originally Posted by beastaudio View Post
Oh, and I would love to know what the meaning of the dual XLR's for each subwoofer out are purposed for! Very cool.
yeah, me too but I also just noticed the rear USB port missing. I actually use that for cooling fans on my Integra 80.2
McLuvin is online now  
post #8 of 40 Old 06-24-2014, 01:14 PM
Bass Enabler
 
Scott Simonian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Clovis, CA
Posts: 13,193
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 135 Post(s)
Liked: 636
Just extra outlets to plug into. Saves some from that y-adapter.

My Dual 18" LLT subs 120dB down to 10hz

 

Plan9Reloaded Co-host

Listen to the Plan9Reloaded Gaming and Technology Podcast (may contain NSFW language)

https://soundcloud.com/plan9reloaded/sets/podcast - direct pod link

http://plan9reloaded.com/site/ - main website

Scott Simonian is online now  
post #9 of 40 Old 06-24-2014, 03:25 PM
AVS Special Member
 
Archaea's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 5,595
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quoted: 116 Post(s)
Liked: 471
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hugo S View Post
Hi,

A competitor to the Onkyo PR-SC5530, the Marantz AV8802?

Marantz AV8802 13.2 XLR processor - HDMI 2.0 ISF - Wifi + Bluetooth details

Hugo
Hugo, no Atmos on the Marantz...That's an enormous nail in the coffin when competitors Pioneer and Onkyo plan on releasing Atmos processors this year. I'd NEVER buy a processor like that with the expectation that Atmos would be enabled by a later firmware update. If you are happy with the current feature set go for it. But Atmos is a big deal. I'm not sure I'll even be an early adopter on the Atmos platform - but it'll most certainly be a criteria in my choice of a new pre-amp when the time comes to loose my Onkyo PR-SC5508.

"Without subs it's just background music - with subs it's the main event!"
Archaea's Theatre Room
2011 KC Sub Shootout
2012 KC Blind Sub Shootout

My Subwoofer Recommendations by Pricepoint

Archaea is online now  
post #10 of 40 Old 06-24-2014, 03:29 PM
Bass Enabler
 
Scott Simonian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Clovis, CA
Posts: 13,193
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 135 Post(s)
Liked: 636
Quote:
Originally Posted by Archaea View Post
Hugo, no Atmos on the Marantz...That's an enormous nail in the coffin when competitors Pioneer and Onkyo plan on releasing Atmos processors this year. I'd NEVER buy a processor like that with the expectation that Atmos would be enabled by a later firmware update. If you are happy with the current feature set go for it. But Atmos is a big deal. I'm not sure I'll even be an early adopter on the Atmos platform - but it'll most certainly be a criteria in my choice of a new pre-amp when the time comes to loose my Onkyo PR-SC5508.
Yeah, same here even though I am crazy excited about all this.

Seems like the smart play is to wait and hear what DTS intends to bring to the table. Not sure how long we will have to wait for that. Maybe a while.
audiofan1 likes this.

My Dual 18" LLT subs 120dB down to 10hz

 

Plan9Reloaded Co-host

Listen to the Plan9Reloaded Gaming and Technology Podcast (may contain NSFW language)

https://soundcloud.com/plan9reloaded/sets/podcast - direct pod link

http://plan9reloaded.com/site/ - main website

Scott Simonian is online now  
post #11 of 40 Old 06-24-2014, 03:41 PM
AVS Special Member
 
beastaudio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Western NC
Posts: 6,927
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 205 Post(s)
Liked: 549
Quote:
Originally Posted by Archaea View Post
Hugo, no Atmos on the Marantz...That's an enormous nail in the coffin when competitors Pioneer and Onkyo plan on releasing Atmos processors this year. I'd NEVER buy a processor like that with the expectation that Atmos would be enabled by a later firmware update. If you are happy with the current feature set go for it. But Atmos is a big deal. I'm not sure I'll even be an early adopter on the Atmos platform - but it'll most certainly be a criteria in my choice of a new pre-amp when the time comes to loose my Onkyo PR-SC5508.

Incorrect bro! The new 7702 will indeed have atmos on it. Not sure if it technically is the actual replacement for the 8801, but it is a pre-pro and has seemingly all the same bells and whistles, along with the added ability to do 4k and atmos, etc....

(European models do not accept banana plugs.)

 

"If you done it, it ain't bragging." ~ Walt Whitman

 

AE TD12x SEOS12 Build

Beast's DIY Master Measurement Thread

DIY Emminence Coaxial Surround Thread

beastaudio is online now  
post #12 of 40 Old 06-24-2014, 03:44 PM
AVS Special Member
 
Archaea's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 5,595
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quoted: 116 Post(s)
Liked: 471
My bad! Last I'd read it was all 'promised' in a future update...

That said - my enthusiasm just entirely died. In the Dolby Home Atmos thread they are now noting that the version of atmos we are receiving for the home market won't be object based audio like the theater's version of Atmos.

Boooooo Hisss

The official Dolby Atmos thread (home theater version)

"Without subs it's just background music - with subs it's the main event!"
Archaea's Theatre Room
2011 KC Sub Shootout
2012 KC Blind Sub Shootout

My Subwoofer Recommendations by Pricepoint


Last edited by Archaea; 06-24-2014 at 03:49 PM.
Archaea is online now  
post #13 of 40 Old 06-24-2014, 04:03 PM
Bass Enabler
 
Scott Simonian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Clovis, CA
Posts: 13,193
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 135 Post(s)
Liked: 636
Ummm... this is still very exciting for me.

I've been wanting true overhead content for a very, very long time and now I am getting it.

It sounds like you were only interested in Atmos to put speakers anywhere. I know I want the extra vector points even if they are just overhead. So really all that is 'missing' from the Atmos@home promise (as of right now) was some form of speaker re-mapping which I really could live without and have been forever.

My Dual 18" LLT subs 120dB down to 10hz

 

Plan9Reloaded Co-host

Listen to the Plan9Reloaded Gaming and Technology Podcast (may contain NSFW language)

https://soundcloud.com/plan9reloaded/sets/podcast - direct pod link

http://plan9reloaded.com/site/ - main website

Scott Simonian is online now  
post #14 of 40 Old 06-24-2014, 04:05 PM
Advanced Member
 
TCARCIO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Massachussetts
Posts: 844
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10 Post(s)
Liked: 29
[QUOTE=Archaea;25234154]My bad! Last I'd read it was all 'promised' in a future update...

That said - my enthusiasm just entirely died. In the Dolby Home Atmos thread they are now noting that the version of atmos we are receiving for the home market won't be object based audio like the theater's version of Atmos.



Just another reason for them to make people upgrade a couple of years from now. I for one am not interested because I don't have the room for all those speakers and niether do any of my friends with a HT. Sorry but as the sharks say "I'm Out"
TCARCIO is offline  
post #15 of 40 Old 06-24-2014, 04:14 PM
Bass Enabler
 
Scott Simonian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Clovis, CA
Posts: 13,193
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 135 Post(s)
Liked: 636
Lol where are you guys seeing that 'for a fact' Dolby Atmos at release "won't be object based audio".

Lolwtf?


Maybe there will not be any speaker re-mapping function. Oh well.


This is the quote:

Quote:
Originally Posted by jdsmoothie View Post
As the Atmos focus will be on the "ceiling speakers", there will be no additional angle information at all ... rather simply that the speakers will be identified as either "top front", "top middle", or "top rear" (based on the previously posted 4 configurations) and then Audyssey will do its thing just as it does with the traditional 5.1/7.1 setup.
This does not mean the data will not be on the disc. All this says is that the AVR itself will not know beyond that. This is pretty obvious as we all have seen in these announcements that these AVR/prepro's will not go beyond 7.1.4 audio.

Don't throw the towel out yet.

My Dual 18" LLT subs 120dB down to 10hz

 

Plan9Reloaded Co-host

Listen to the Plan9Reloaded Gaming and Technology Podcast (may contain NSFW language)

https://soundcloud.com/plan9reloaded/sets/podcast - direct pod link

http://plan9reloaded.com/site/ - main website

Scott Simonian is online now  
post #16 of 40 Old 06-24-2014, 04:19 PM
AVS Special Member
 
COACH2369's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Knoxville, TN
Posts: 1,647
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 67 Post(s)
Liked: 64
This might be a solid choice....but my bad luck with the 5508 and 5509 have left a bad taste in my mouth.

The lack of Audyssey is no biggie, IMO, since I am going another route on EQ side of things.
COACH2369 is online now  
post #17 of 40 Old 06-24-2014, 04:31 PM
AVS Special Member
 
Archaea's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 5,595
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quoted: 116 Post(s)
Liked: 471
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scott Simonian View Post
Ummm... this is still very exciting for me.

I've been wanting true overhead content for a very, very long time and now I am getting it.

It sounds like you were only interested in Atmos to put speakers anywhere. I know I want the extra vector points even if they are just overhead. So really all that is 'missing' from the Atmos@home promise (as of right now) was some form of speaker re-mapping which I really could live without and have been forever.

HOLD UP....
I am interested in extra discrete channels (matrixed channels are pretty wortheless IMO) - but that's not why I'm disappointed.
The touted line about why Atmos was the most amazing upgrade since the release of the original 5.1 dolby digital functionality was because it was OBJECT ORIENTED AUDIO. The object based audio allowed you to hear audio as the mixers intended with less regard to exact channel placement (read optimal channel placement) or exact number of channels. They hype was that the sound was precisely mapped to your room. That Atmos would help everyone from those with a sound bar to those with speakers all over the room.

Here's to hoping we aren't dissapointed once more info comes out.

"Without subs it's just background music - with subs it's the main event!"
Archaea's Theatre Room
2011 KC Sub Shootout
2012 KC Blind Sub Shootout

My Subwoofer Recommendations by Pricepoint

Archaea is online now  
post #18 of 40 Old 06-24-2014, 04:37 PM
Bass Enabler
 
Scott Simonian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Clovis, CA
Posts: 13,193
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 135 Post(s)
Liked: 636
Ah. Okay I hear ya on that.

Still.... it's pprrreeeettttyyyy early to just give up now.

Or you can wait. We all have to wait anyway.


Really all this means is that we have to stick to a proposed surround sound layout. Just exactly what we have been doing for decades now.

I'm happy we are getting overhead surrounds now. This is like moving up to 12ch discrete audio pretty much (all we have now is 8ch plus processed extra channels). And that's just for the time being. There could be much more in the future. That's pretty cool!

My Dual 18" LLT subs 120dB down to 10hz

 

Plan9Reloaded Co-host

Listen to the Plan9Reloaded Gaming and Technology Podcast (may contain NSFW language)

https://soundcloud.com/plan9reloaded/sets/podcast - direct pod link

http://plan9reloaded.com/site/ - main website

Scott Simonian is online now  
post #19 of 40 Old 06-24-2014, 05:12 PM
AVS Special Member
 
beastaudio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Western NC
Posts: 6,927
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 205 Post(s)
Liked: 549
Man, I just love the times when new major tech is on the horizon and there is rampant speculation that accompanies it by S.O.I.'s the likes of most of us around here (Seriously Obsessed Individuals). It just makes me smile to see arguments sometimes where both people literally end up being completely wrong in their stances when the actual Units actually come out....Not saying anyone here is, but I have seen it more than once and it always gives me a chuckle
esappy likes this.

(European models do not accept banana plugs.)

 

"If you done it, it ain't bragging." ~ Walt Whitman

 

AE TD12x SEOS12 Build

Beast's DIY Master Measurement Thread

DIY Emminence Coaxial Surround Thread

beastaudio is online now  
post #20 of 40 Old 06-24-2014, 05:19 PM
AVS Special Member
 
audiovideoholic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Murray KY
Posts: 2,297
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 37 Post(s)
Liked: 50
I think it's going to be great but eventually will be even greater.

I am still really curious as to why Onkyo is the only manufacturer stating that 9.1.2 is an option though. I'd rather have Denon or Marantz just for my own reasons but if can use widths while I wait for a more diverse version to come out I'd settle for the Onkyo most likely.
audiovideoholic is online now  
post #21 of 40 Old 06-24-2014, 06:05 PM
Member
 
esappy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Poulsbo, Washington
Posts: 185
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 52 Post(s)
Liked: 41
Quote:
Originally Posted by beastaudio View Post
Man, I just love the times when new major tech is on the horizon and there is rampant speculation that accompanies it by S.O.I.'s the likes of most of us around here (Seriously Obsessed Individuals). It just makes me smile to see arguments sometimes where both people literally end up being completely wrong in their stances when the actual Units actually come out....Not saying anyone here is, but I have seen it more than once and it always gives me a chuckle
+1. I too am excited about this, but yeah, I think we are WAAAYYY over thinking this at this point. Let the product info come out then attack it.

I have never been a big Onkyo fan, but I'm not opposed either, but a couple things that I don't like about this unit is 1) The height 2 and wide channels share the same preout, so this will limit options for those who may want to be able to bounce back and forth between ATMOS and DTS NEO:X, and 2) AccuEq, we now have another proprietary unproven measurement method that appears to only take one measurement and done. And it bypasses the FL & FR speakers. I know in my room, my Audyssey calibration does actually make my front speakers sound better, especially with music. But I will admit that I eventually need to do some room treatments. I guess we will have to wait for it to come out to see if AccuEq works well and if it will Eq two subs just like SubEq HT.

"Harry feels guilt pangs, but Ronnie The Bear could give a @#$!."

esappy is offline  
post #22 of 40 Old 06-24-2014, 06:15 PM
Member
 
esappy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Poulsbo, Washington
Posts: 185
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 52 Post(s)
Liked: 41
Quote:
Originally Posted by audiovideoholic View Post
I think it's going to be great but eventually will be even greater.

I am still really curious as to why Onkyo is the only manufacturer stating that 9.1.2 is an option though. I'd rather have Denon or Marantz just for my own reasons but if can use widths while I wait for a more diverse version to come out I'd settle for the Onkyo most likely.
There is this quote from TWICE: "Presumably, the Denon AVR and Marantz preamp processor will also drive the 9.1.2 configuration supported by Dolby Atmos, but D+M was verifying compatibility at post time.

See more at: http://www.twice.com/news/components...mponents/45756

So you may get what you wish for.

"Harry feels guilt pangs, but Ronnie The Bear could give a @#$!."

esappy is offline  
post #23 of 40 Old 06-24-2014, 06:20 PM
Newbie
 
dman2306's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 10
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hugo S View Post
Hi,

The Onkyo PR-SC5530 successor to the previous PR-SC5509 processor has been announced.

The Onkyo PR-SC5530 has a 11.4 processing capacity through RCA & RCa outputs, integrates an AccuEQ acoustic "calibration", is Dolby Atmos compatible, with 8 inputs and 3 outputs all HDMI 2.0 HDCP 2.2 compatible, with a QDEO 4K video processor, with integrated WiFi & Bluetooth.

Availbabilty Sep 2014, price unknown.

Please see details here:

http://www.uk.onkyo.com/en/articles/...nd-118123.html

http://www.uk.onkyo.com/en/products/...30-117878.html

http://www.uk.onkyo.com/downloads/2/...tasheet_EN.pdf (datasheet)
Only hdmi input 3 is hdcp 2.2. Look at the data sheet.
dman2306 is offline  
post #24 of 40 Old 06-24-2014, 08:56 PM
AVS Special Member
 
audiovideoholic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Murray KY
Posts: 2,297
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 37 Post(s)
Liked: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by esappy View Post
There is this quote from TWICE: "Presumably, the Denon AVR and Marantz preamp processor will also drive the 9.1.2 configuration supported by Dolby Atmos, but D+M was verifying compatibility at post time.

See more at: http://www.twice.com/news/components...mponents/45756

So you may get what you wish for.
Yea, time will tell I guess as JD here says no neither device can do it all at once but can switch between formats.

It's a big deal but not really a big deal at the same time. A setup with 4 tops would probably be preferred over the 9.1.2 anyway and would also get the process of mounting the Atmos speakers on ceiling done and then just add the sides/rears etc.. Whenever an upgrade rolls out. Widths matrixed won't provide nearly as much as the atmos speakers so if the two speakers that one was going to use in the 9.1.2 could be used on the ceiling properly then might as well have the extra panning ability overhead IMO. The more I think about the limited 4 top choice we are given with this first installment it makes the most sense to go with the 7.1.4 as long as the placement of the said tops will stay the same when newer versions add more locations. Maybe there will be a center top so that would work just right for those with three row+ theaters mostly likely.
esappy likes this.
audiovideoholic is online now  
post #25 of 40 Old 06-24-2014, 10:05 PM
Member
 
esappy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Poulsbo, Washington
Posts: 185
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 52 Post(s)
Liked: 41
Quote:
Originally Posted by audiovideoholic View Post
Yea, time will tell I guess as JD here says no neither device can do it all at once but can switch between formats.

It's a big deal but not really a big deal at the same time. A setup with 4 tops would probably be preferred over the 9.1.2 anyway and would also get the process of mounting the Atmos speakers on ceiling done and then just add the sides/rears etc.. Whenever an upgrade rolls out. Widths matrixed won't provide nearly as much as the atmos speakers so if the two speakers that one was going to use in the 9.1.2 could be used on the ceiling properly then might as well have the extra panning ability overhead IMO. The more I think about the limited 4 top choice we are given with this first installment it makes the most sense to go with the 7.1.4 as long as the placement of the said tops will stay the same when newer versions add more locations. Maybe there will be a center top so that would work just right for those with three row+ theaters mostly likely.
I too think the 7.1.4 or preferably 7.2.4 for me is the way to go but 5.2.4 could be about as impressive. The design of the soundtrack itself will play the biggest role in how well Atmos shines in home. Atmos still probably wont make a mediocre soundtrack amazing but take an amazing soundtrack like Master & Commander, especially the opening battle sequence that already has some great overhead effects with only a 5.1 soundtrack, and that could become a whole new experience. It's those possibilities that has me excited about Atmos and I am completely OK with purchasing more speakers if it is beneficial.

"Harry feels guilt pangs, but Ronnie The Bear could give a @#$!."

esappy is offline  
post #26 of 40 Old 06-25-2014, 02:19 AM - Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Hugo S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: France
Posts: 445
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13 Post(s)
Liked: 23
Hi,

Quote:
Originally Posted by Archaea View Post
Hugo, no Atmos on the Marantz...That's an enormous nail in the coffin when competitors Pioneer and Onkyo plan on releasing Atmos processors this year. I'd NEVER buy a processor like that with the expectation that Atmos would be enabled by a later firmware update. If you are happy with the current feature set go for it. But Atmos is a big deal. I'm not sure I'll even be an early adopter on the Atmos platform - but it'll most certainly be a criteria in my choice of a new pre-amp when the time comes to loose my Onkyo PR-SC5508.
Even if it's slitghly out of topic here... , the Marantz AV8802 is indeed Dolby Atmos compatible. See here :

Marantz AV8802 13.2 XLR processor - HDMI 2.0 ISF - Wifi + Bluetooth details

Hugo

Hugo S is offline  
post #27 of 40 Old 06-25-2014, 04:10 AM - Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Hugo S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: France
Posts: 445
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13 Post(s)
Liked: 23
Hi again,

An interesting direct comparision of Marantz AV8802's 13.2 outputs and Onkyo PR-SC5530's 11.2 (4) outputs shows that the Onkyo 5530 is in fact an Heights 2 OR Wides processor, when the Marantz 8802 is a Heights 2 AND Wides processor.

This already happened a few years ago when the Denon 4810 and later the 4311 had a full 11.2 capability and the 5007/5008 & 5507/5508 that only had a 9.2 capability, so with these Onkyos' in DSX mode, one had to choose between Back Surrounds OR Wides.

Hugo
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Marantz AV8802 XLR 13.2.JPG (42.8 KB, 14 views)
File Type: jpg Onkyo PR-SC5530 outputs.JPG (121.5 KB, 13 views)

Hugo S is offline  
post #28 of 40 Old 06-25-2014, 06:54 AM
AVS Special Member
 
audiovideoholic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Murray KY
Posts: 2,297
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 37 Post(s)
Liked: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hugo S View Post
Hi again,

An interesting direct comparision of Marantz AV8802's 13.2 outputs and Onkyo PR-SC5530's 11.2 (4) outputs shows that the Onkyo 5530 is in fact an Heights 2 OR Wides processor, when the Marantz 8802 is a Heights 2 AND Wides processor.

This already happened a few years ago when the Denon 4810 and later the 4311 had a full 11.2 capability and the 5007/5008 & 5507/5508 that only had a 9.2 capability, so with these Onkyos' in DSX mode, one had to choose between Back Surrounds OR Wides.

Hugo
Yes but the Marantz isn't a 9.1.2 while the Onkyo is. Or at least according to the info trickling down right now. The Marantz would offer more flexibility and to actually have more speakers wired for atmos OR "x" for max usage of amount of speakers used in either format though. Just something some will need to think about. I like the options of the Onkyo but like more features on the Marantz lol. That made little sense.
audiovideoholic is online now  
post #29 of 40 Old 06-25-2014, 07:15 AM
Member
 
esappy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Poulsbo, Washington
Posts: 185
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 52 Post(s)
Liked: 41
Quote:
Originally Posted by audiovideoholic View Post
Yes but the Marantz isn't a 9.1.2 while the Onkyo is. Or at least according to the info trickling down right now. The Marantz would offer more flexibility and to actually have more speakers wired for atmos OR "x" for max usage of amount of speakers used in either format though. Just something some will need to think about. I like the options of the Onkyo but like more features on the Marantz lol. That made little sense.
Even if the Marantz doesn't do 9.1.2, is it that big of a deal if Atmos doesn't use wides anyway (assuming that is the configuration you are talking about)? The article from TWICE hints that the Marantz may in fact be able to do 9.1.2 but they are still working on verifying compatibility. If you are already set up for 9.1, then you could add the 4 ceiling speakers and get the full 7.1.4 Atmos treatment and still have the option of switching over to 9.1 or even 11.1 for DSX or NEO:X or PLIIz. If you are talking about a 9.1 configuration that is already using heights not wides, then you may be able to possibly support a 7.1.2 configuration already (assuming you can logistically use the front heights as ceiling speakers for Atmos). Lots of possibilities being rumored, we now just need the specs for these products to be released.

"Harry feels guilt pangs, but Ronnie The Bear could give a @#$!."

esappy is offline  
post #30 of 40 Old 06-25-2014, 08:16 AM
AVS Special Member
 
audiovideoholic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Murray KY
Posts: 2,297
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 37 Post(s)
Liked: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by esappy View Post
Even if the Marantz doesn't do 9.1.2, is it that big of a deal if Atmos doesn't use wides anyway (assuming that is the configuration you are talking about)? The article from TWICE hints that the Marantz may in fact be able to do 9.1.2 but they are still working on verifying compatibility. If you are already set up for 9.1, then you could add the 4 ceiling speakers and get the full 7.1.4 Atmos treatment and still have the option of switching over to 9.1 or even 11.1 for DSX or NEO:X or PLIIz. If you are talking about a 9.1 configuration that is already using heights not wides, then you may be able to possibly support a 7.1.2 configuration already (assuming you can logistically use the front heights as ceiling speakers for Atmos). Lots of possibilities being rumored, we now just need the specs for these products to be released.

Nope. Not a BIG deal but could be a huge deal if the cicumstances presented themselves. It's not to me that's why I said something to think about.

Yep I agree with everything else you posted. Pretty much exactly what I said in fewer words. Time will tell for sure on the possibilities.
audiovideoholic is online now  
Reply Receivers, Amps, and Processors
Gear in this thread

    Thread Tools
    Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
    Email this Page Email this Page


    Forum Jump: 

    Posting Rules  
    You may not post new threads
    You may not post replies
    You may not post attachments
    You may not edit your posts

    BB code is On
    Smilies are On
    [IMG] code is On
    HTML code is Off
    Trackbacks are Off
    Pingbacks are Off
    Refbacks are Off