I didn't want you passing on a really uninformed report on Class D and what it means cuz you wrote -I don't think the Panny has class D because the Panny is digital right and I don't think class D is digital.-
Unimformed? Class D in car audio is NOT digital. Where's the problem?
Instead of calling me a jerk over and over and pretty much totally over-reacting... you might want to actually take my advice I gave to you and RESEARCH the subjects of switching amps.
My assumption' that you had moved off of car audio and back on the thread's topic was because your comments could relate to either and you're SUPPOSE to stay on topic.
So your excuse is to shout that you were still off-topic? Smart.
Also you talking about multichannel amps' implied you were back on topic of HOME audio recs too.
Well sir, then you need to search more because in car audio you either have a mono sub or a 'multichannel' amp for fronts and rears both left and right. Off topic? I was replying to a post about car audio. I mean come now, you read the post, you assumed home audio, I cleared it up that is was car audio in response to a car audio post and I'm off topic? I'm not sure how to keep explaining that you 'assumed' incorrectly and I never 'implied' anything.
I asked if you were still interested because I'd JUST informed you in the same post that the Pannys are Class D -which you'd just talked down but wrongly thought the Pannys aren't Class D.
You asked in a smart aleck manner before I could even have a chance to respond to your first post? I can JUST inform you something and quickly hit reply that you didn't follow my suggestion also. I NEVER talked down the Panny and I can't for the life of me understand where you are arriving at this completely opposite conclusion!! I am in this darn thread to absolutely learn more about the Panny because Iw ant to buy it!!! I didn't search because I'm interested in info on the Panny and didn't have time to learn about the technology at that time!
Oh man. You lay it on thick Kid.
Kid... the TOPIC is about HOME audio Recs.
YOU asked for news about the Panny HOME audio Recs.
The topic on MY post was in response to a car audio question about Class D amps and that the D might mean digital. I say no, D isn't for digital at least not in car audio.
You have the nerve to call me a jerk over and over and claim you're talking about CAR audio while asking about the HOME audio Panny??
Yea, because your tone and mannerism were that of a jerk. And the class D statement not meaning digital and in car audio is mostly for subs, has zero to do with the Panny questions I asked separately. I can't understand why you are still confused about this as I've tried to clear up your confusion. It's mostly likely because the post I replied to was comparing car audio tech to home audio tech and while in some cases they may be similar I know class D in car audio the D does not stand for digital and the Panny home amp is digital so I assume that to mean the Panny is not a class D amp. It very well may be, I don't know, which is why I'm in this thread. So yes, I spoke about car audio because it was relevant to the Panny being digital and then I asked about any more news on the Panny. What's the issue that you have with that?
Like SiriuslyCold explained before you wrote this... your comments on amps relate to home audio just the same as car audio.
You didn't know it but you were commenting on both car and home audio.
This relates to my saying you should leard about what you're talking about before you decide you're the one to answer someone else's questions.
The question was car audio based, my answer was car audio based so I know what I'm talking about. THere may be similarities between home and car audio amps but that doesn't mean I 'need to learn what I'm talking about' because my car audio information was accurate.
You didn't get attacked. You're exaggerating. You were passing out bad info and I wanted you to stop. That's as civil as bad info deserves and it's not an attack.
Sorry but this is an attack-
Yeah... Kid Red doesn't really know about the things he's posting about but does anyway.
Sorry but if you are going to post about something to inform other people you should probably have more than some very loose understanding of the subject.
That's an attack on my character, my intentions to purposely mislead and my intelligence. Definition, attack.
See... I was thinking that people passing on uninformed information to others was the problem.
No the problem is your assuming one thing and being rude about calling them out as uninformed. Simply say whatever info I stated is wrong and this is right. Rather then try and uncover the spreader of disinformation as some virus post or something. Or ask me to clarify my point as you were obviously confused as to my comments.
How many times can you call me a jerk and reword that I ATTACKED you?
As many times as you continue to speak down to someone when you disagree with their post.
In my first post to you I told you several things to RESEARCH like 'switching amps' and specifically the 'Equibit chips' in the Pannys -which would then teach you something NEW to you about them.
Then SiriuslyCold told you to do the same type of research. You STILL didn't.
And? I haven't had a chance to and I fail to see how that will offer any new information on the release of the Panny, cost, specs/inputs, etc? I will research it when I have free time to take it all in.