"Official" Audyssey thread (FAQ in post #51779) - Page 2639 - AVS Forum | Home Theater Discussions And Reviews
Baselworld is only a few weeks away. Getting the latest news is easy, Click Here for info on how to join the Watchuseek.com newsletter list. Follow our team for updates featuring event coverage, new product unveilings, watch industry news & more!


Forum Jump: 
 3073Likes
Reply
 
Thread Tools
post #79141 of 79169 Old 02-06-2016, 06:19 PM
AVS Special Member
 
mthomas47's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,832
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 977 Post(s)
Liked: 1009
Quote:
Originally Posted by mogorf View Post
I don't remember that discussion Mike, but from the engineer's side with solid stage devices the heat build-up (aka warming) should have no effect on SQ. Its just a by-product called dissipation a design engineer needs to carefully take care of during circuit design. Propoerly sized heat-sinks and sometimes additional cooling fans come to mind.

But again, I think it would be a kinda miracle if anyone even with "golden ears" could hear a difference from minute one to an hour long (or even more) operation that could be accounted to this issue, only. Same though goes for power supplies, coz there is nothing "inside" that needs to reach "operational" temperate that would result in better performance.

Thanks, Feri. It's possible that I only imagined that discussion taking place on the thread. I'm capable of that. I did read a discussion of that, in reference to Audyssey, somewhere several years ago, and as I said the consensus was, as you and Selden are suggesting, that it wouldn't really make any difference. I do like your idea of warming-up the filters, though, for maximum efficiency.
mogorf and garygarrison like this.
mthomas47 is online now  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #79142 of 79169 Old 02-06-2016, 06:21 PM
AVS Special Member
 
mogorf's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Budapest, Hungary
Posts: 5,401
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 886 Post(s)
Liked: 413
Quote:
Originally Posted by Selden Ball View Post
Sorry, I have not the slightest idea. One way to find out would be to use a thermometer or other temperature reading device and see how long it takes for the unit to reach a steady temperature. Personally, I've never actually worried about it. My ears are old enough that I don't expect to hear much of a difference.
Let's not forget to specify the MV setting, the type of program material being played, or even a continuous sine wave played for any extended period. And there's the variation of altitude above sea level of our HT rooms, relative humidity, or the inapropriate case when using a non-calibrated thermometer.
galonzo and garygarrison like this.
mogorf is online now  
post #79143 of 79169 Old 02-06-2016, 06:22 PM
AVS Special Member
 
mogorf's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Budapest, Hungary
Posts: 5,401
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 886 Post(s)
Liked: 413
Quote:
Originally Posted by aaranddeeman View Post
I know. But by giving warmup time, we may or may not gain anything, but will certainly will not lose anything.
So true!
garygarrison likes this.
mogorf is online now  
post #79144 of 79169 Old 02-06-2016, 06:30 PM
AVS Special Member
 
mthomas47's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,832
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 977 Post(s)
Liked: 1009
Quote:
Originally Posted by mogorf View Post
So true!

If nothing else, Gary and I managed to stimulate some interesting discussion. The next time it gets slow around here, I'm going to tell everybody about the special power cords I'm planning to buy (not).

That will bring the engineers out in droves.
mogorf and garygarrison like this.
mthomas47 is online now  
post #79145 of 79169 Old 02-06-2016, 06:40 PM
AVS Special Member
 
mogorf's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Budapest, Hungary
Posts: 5,401
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 886 Post(s)
Liked: 413
Quote:
Originally Posted by mthomas47 View Post
If nothing else, Gary and I managed to stimulate some interesting discussion. The next time it gets slow around here, I'm going to tell everybody about the special power cords I'm planning to buy (not).

That will bring the engineers out in droves.
Power cords also need break-in Mike, so please watch our for your next purchase (or not)!
mthomas47 and garygarrison like this.

Last edited by mogorf; 02-06-2016 at 06:48 PM.
mogorf is online now  
post #79146 of 79169 Old 02-07-2016, 12:29 AM
AVS Special Member
 
WestCoastD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: California
Posts: 7,666
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 206 Post(s)
Liked: 80
After sitting back and going through quite a bit of the "Audyssey 101" documentation, and playing around a little, I ran another calibration. Making a little forward progress:

My set-up (5.1 speaker configuration):
Monitor Audio Gold GX100 fronts (42Hz - 60kHz, sensitivity = 88dB 1W@1m)
Monitor Audio Gold GXC350 center (40Hz - 60kHz, sensitivity = 90dB 1W@1m)
Monitor Audio GSFX Gold surrounds (60Hz - 43kHz, sensitivity = 86dB 1W@1m)

Parasound A51 amp
JL Audio F110 sub

Speaker Calibration Details:
Distances
Front L (10.2ft)
Front R (10.4ft)
Center (10.0ft)
Subwoofer 1 (14.7ft)
Surround L (6.4ft)
Surround R (7.4ft)

Speaker Calibration Details:
Level
Front L (-10.5dB)
Front R (-11.5dB)
Center (-9.0dB)
Subwoofer 1 (-3.5dB)
Surround L (-11.0dB)
Surround R (-10.0dB)

Crossover
Front (90Hz)
Center (60Hz)
Surround (60Hz)

Audyssey MultiEQ XT32 = ON
Audyssey Dynamic EQ = ON
audiofan1 likes this.

Last edited by WestCoastD; 02-07-2016 at 12:32 AM.
WestCoastD is offline  
post #79147 of 79169 Old 02-07-2016, 07:25 AM
AVS Special Member
 
mthomas47's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,832
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 977 Post(s)
Liked: 1009
Quote:
Originally Posted by WestCoastD View Post
After sitting back and going through quite a bit of the "Audyssey 101" documentation, and playing around a little, I ran another calibration. Making a little forward progress:

Speaker Calibration Details:
Level
Front L (-10.5dB)
Front R (-11.5dB)
Center (-9.0dB)
Subwoofer 1 (-3.5dB)
Surround L (-11.0dB)
Surround R (-10.0dB)

Crossover
Front (90Hz)
Center (60Hz)
Surround (60Hz)

Audyssey MultiEQ XT32 = ON
Audyssey Dynamic EQ = ON

That is progress! You got the front crossover to come down a little more, and all of your trim levels are within normal limits now. How do things sound after this latest calibration?
mthomas47 is online now  
post #79148 of 79169 Old 02-07-2016, 02:25 PM
AVS Special Member
 
WestCoastD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: California
Posts: 7,666
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 206 Post(s)
Liked: 80
Quote:
Originally Posted by mthomas47 View Post
That is progress! You got the front crossover to come down a little more, and all of your trim levels are within normal limits now. How do things sound after this latest calibration?
initial listening (during an HBO movie, DolbyDigital, cable TV broadcast) is very nice, surprisingly dynamic. But this is only a single random source. Will have to experiment with more of an array of sources (ie. BluRay's, music, etc.,...).

For this calibration sequence I set MLP at my normal original location, but significantly below ear-level (precisely 26in high), purposely. However all other mic positions (mic1 - mic8) were set at ear-level height (approx 47in high for my ears). This was the only way to stay within the preferred trim level limit's (especially for rear/surrounds).
mthomas47 likes this.

Last edited by WestCoastD; 02-07-2016 at 02:32 PM.
WestCoastD is offline  
post #79149 of 79169 Old 02-07-2016, 06:09 PM
AVS Special Member
 
mogorf's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Budapest, Hungary
Posts: 5,401
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 886 Post(s)
Liked: 413
Quote:
Originally Posted by WestCoastD View Post
initial listening (during an HBO movie, DolbyDigital, cable TV broadcast) is very nice, surprisingly dynamic. But this is only a single random source. Will have to experiment with more of an array of sources (ie. BluRay's, music, etc.,...).

For this calibration sequence I set MLP at my normal original location, but significantly below ear-level (precisely 26in high), purposely. However all other mic positions (mic1 - mic8) were set at ear-level height (approx 47in high for my ears). This was the only way to stay within the preferred trim level limit's (especially for rear/surrounds).
Hi WestCoastD,

Um, ...I'm not really sure that putting the mic at MLP significantly lower than ear height is the best solution even though you got trim levels within limits. Two reasons come to mind:

1. Out of the 8 mic positions the MLP position will collect data for the Audyssey filter calculation that may not be relevant for the mix.

2. MLP mic setting is a placement from where distances and trims are calculated by MultEQ for ear level listening, but such a low setting may throw off (or maybe not) these measurements.

A couple of pictures of your in-room speaker setup would surely help identify some "best practice" routines in order to get a satisfying calibration.

Just my thoughts!

Last edited by mogorf; 02-07-2016 at 06:17 PM.
mogorf is online now  
post #79150 of 79169 Old 02-07-2016, 11:12 PM
AVS Special Member
 
WestCoastD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: California
Posts: 7,666
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 206 Post(s)
Liked: 80
Quote:
Originally Posted by mogorf View Post
MLP mic setting is a placement from where distances and trims are calculated by MultEQ for ear level listening, but such a low setting may throw off (or maybe not) these measurements
I read this in the Audyssey FAQ. I'm planning to re-calibrate with MLP at ear-level.

However I was determined to experiment with this lower than ear-level MLP mic setting.

My room, combined with speaker placement, plus gain of Parasound A51 amp, pose's quite a challenge landing within trim limits. It's part theater/office. Rear surrounds are mounted on rear wall, up high. Viewing position (or MLP) is crunched right in front of a desk with PC's. Consequently it's a challenge getting within proper levels. MLP proximity to rear surrounds pose a problem
WestCoastD is offline  
post #79151 of 79169 Old 02-08-2016, 04:08 PM
AVS Special Member
 
D Bone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: SoCal, USA
Posts: 1,317
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 71 Post(s)
Liked: 229
In a last ditch effort to use XT I have been playing with the L/R Bypass setting and am pleasantly surprised with the results. I just ASSumed that XT would "turn off" the processing for the L/R speakers and still use the same filters for the surrounds as it does for the Reference setting, but that doesn't seem to be the case as my surrounds don't sound near as bright in L/R BP mode.

I then did some online learnin' and it seems that XT applies a different filter set to the surrounds in L/R BP mode..... "The average measured response from the front left and right speakers is used as the target curve for the remaining speakers in the system. The subwoofer in this case is equalized to flat".

In my case, XT doesn't go crazy with my Bi-Pole surrounds upper frequency response in L/R BP mode, compared to the Reference mode. I will use the L/R BP setting for a while and see what shakes out................
mthomas47 and garygarrison like this.

Samsung UN60D6420 ~ DirecTV HR-44 ~ Sony S5100 ~ Roku 3 ~ Denon AVR-X3200W ~ HTD Level TWO Towers ~ HTD Level TWO Surrounds ~ Anti-Mode 8033 Cinema ~ Power Sound Audio XV15

Last edited by D Bone; 02-08-2016 at 04:12 PM.
D Bone is offline  
post #79152 of 79169 Old 02-08-2016, 04:37 PM
AVS Special Member
 
mthomas47's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,832
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 977 Post(s)
Liked: 1009
Quote:
Originally Posted by D Bone View Post
In a last ditch effort to use XT I have been playing with the L/R Bypass setting and am pleasantly surprised with the results. I just ASSumed that XT would "turn off" the processing for the L/R speakers and still use the same filters for the surrounds as it does for the Reference setting, but that doesn't seem to be the case as my surrounds don't sound near as bright in L/R BP mode.

I then did some online learnin' and it seems that XT applies a different filter set to the surrounds in L/R BP mode..... "The average measured response from the front left and right speakers is used as the target curve for the remaining speakers in the system. The subwoofer in this case is equalized to flat".

In my case, XT doesn't go crazy with my Bi-Pole surrounds upper frequency response in L/R BP mode, compared to the Reference mode. I will use the L/R BP setting for a while and see what shakes out................

And the saga continues!
D Bone likes this.
mthomas47 is online now  
post #79153 of 79169 Old 02-08-2016, 05:05 PM
AVS Special Member
 
D Bone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: SoCal, USA
Posts: 1,317
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 71 Post(s)
Liked: 229
Quote:
Originally Posted by mthomas47 View Post
And the saga continues!
HA!! No one can say I didn't try
mthomas47 likes this.

Samsung UN60D6420 ~ DirecTV HR-44 ~ Sony S5100 ~ Roku 3 ~ Denon AVR-X3200W ~ HTD Level TWO Towers ~ HTD Level TWO Surrounds ~ Anti-Mode 8033 Cinema ~ Power Sound Audio XV15
D Bone is offline  
post #79154 of 79169 Old 02-09-2016, 08:58 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Calgary, Canada
Posts: 453
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 380 Post(s)
Liked: 42
Hi

How to save Audyssey calibration results? I saw it before but I just cannot find it now after going through the FAQ and setup guide few times already. Can somebody point it to me? Thanks.
Roudan is online now  
post #79155 of 79169 Old 02-09-2016, 09:53 PM
AVS Special Member
 
Selden Ball's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: upstate NY
Posts: 9,874
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1977 Post(s)
Liked: 956
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roudan View Post
Hi

How to save Audyssey calibration results? I saw it before but I just cannot find it now after going through the FAQ and setup guide few times already. Can somebody point it to me? Thanks.
If you want to save the calibration to your computer, that feature is only available if you have a Denon or Marantz receiver or pre/pro. It's not an Audyssey feature. It saves the receiver's entire configuration. The "Save" and "Load" options are at the bottom of the receiver's main Web page. See your owner's manual for details.
Roudan likes this.

Selden

Marantz SR7009 avr + MM9000 amp --> Atmos 7.1.4
Fronts=NHT 2.9+AC2, FH+TM=DefTech PM1000, LCR+TM amped
Selden Ball is online now  
post #79156 of 79169 Old 02-10-2016, 06:12 AM
Wireless member
 
pepar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: On the beach in Quintana Roo
Posts: 26,592
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 554 Post(s)
Liked: 283
Quote:
Originally Posted by WestCoastD View Post
My room, combined with speaker placement, plus gain of Parasound A51 amp, pose's quite a challenge landing within trim limits. It's part theater/office. Rear surrounds are mounted on rear wall, up high. Viewing position (or MLP) is crunched right in front of a desk with PC's. Consequently it's a challenge getting within proper levels. MLP proximity to rear surrounds pose a problem
Too much gain?

http://www.amazon.com/Harrison-Labs-.../dp/B0006N41B0
mogorf likes this.
pepar is online now  
post #79157 of 79169 Old 02-10-2016, 07:54 PM
Advanced Member
 
garygarrison's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: The Milky Way
Posts: 574
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 341 Post(s)
Liked: 280
Quote:
Originally Posted by WestCoastD View Post
...
My room, combined with speaker placement, plus gain of Parasound A51 amp, pose's quite a challenge landing within trim limits ...
If you have separate power amps (rather than using an AVR's amps for some channels), and you are a purist, you can TEMPORARILY reduce gain by using equal value (e.g., all 12 dB) attenuators on EVERY channel like the ones in the link pepar gave you. Then, after all the trim levels have been set by Audyssey, you can REMOVE all the attenuators, so they won't be in the line. Always have all equipment off when you insert or remove attenuators (or anything). The spelling monitor told me I misspelled "attenuators" three times (four, counting this sentence), but you know what I mean.

Last edited by garygarrison; 02-10-2016 at 07:59 PM.
garygarrison is offline  
post #79158 of 79169 Old 02-10-2016, 08:07 PM
AVS Addicted Member
 
NorthSky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Vancouver Island, British Columbia, Canada
Posts: 15,655
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6395 Post(s)
Liked: 3101
Quote:
Originally Posted by pepar View Post
Hi Jeff,

...Or http://www.parts-express.com/harriso...-pair--266-242

Cheers,

~ Bob
"And it stoned me to my soul"
- Van Morrison
NorthSky is offline  
post #79159 of 79169 Old 02-11-2016, 12:42 PM
AVS Special Member
 
mogorf's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Budapest, Hungary
Posts: 5,401
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 886 Post(s)
Liked: 413
Quote:
Originally Posted by garygarrison View Post
If you have separate power amps (rather than using an AVR's amps for some channels), and you are a purist, you can TEMPORARILY reduce gain by using equal value (e.g., all 12 dB) attenuators on EVERY channel like the ones in the link pepar gave you. Then, after all the trim levels have been set by Audyssey, you can REMOVE all the attenuators, so they won't be in the line. Always have all equipment off when you insert or remove attenuators (or anything). The spelling monitor told me I misspelled "attenuators" three times (four, counting this sentence), but you know what I mean.
Just a quick note Gary, if I may.

Leaving attenuators in the line will preserve calibrated Reference Volume at 0 dB MV (Master Volume) setting, while removing them after calibration will yield a new MV setting for reference which with 12 dB attenuators will be at -12 dB on the MV knob.

This means on one hand that the filter curves calculated by MultEQ will remain intact, no problem, yet, on the other hand for those who like to have DEQ (Dynamic EQ) "ON" will result in overboosted bass (and treble) coz at the new -12 dB ref. level DEQ will surely kick-in, or in other words DEQ will start to compensate 12 dBs earlier.
pepar and garygarrison like this.

Last edited by mogorf; 02-11-2016 at 12:57 PM.
mogorf is online now  
post #79160 of 79169 Old 02-11-2016, 01:28 PM
AVS Special Member
 
WestCoastD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: California
Posts: 7,666
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 206 Post(s)
Liked: 80
Quote:
Originally Posted by pepar View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by garygarrison View Post
If you have separate power amps (rather than using an AVR's amps for some channels), and you are a purist, you can TEMPORARILY reduce gain by using equal value (e.g., all 12 dB) attenuators on EVERY channel like the ones in the link pepar gave you. Then, after all the trim levels have been set by Audyssey, you can REMOVE all the attenuators, so they won't be in the line. Always have all equipment off when you insert or remove attenuators (or anything). The spelling monitor told me I misspelled "attenuators" three times (four, counting this sentence), but you know what I mean.
Quote:
Originally Posted by mogorf View Post
Just a quick note Gary, if I may.

Leaving attenuators in the line will preserve calibrated Reference Volume at 0 dB MV (Master Volume) setting, while removing them after calibration will yield a new MV setting for reference which with 12 dB attenuators will be at -12 dB on the MV knob.

This means on one hand that the filter curves calculated by MultEQ will remain intact, no problem, yet, on the other hand for those who like to have DEQ (Dynamic EQ) "ON" will result in overboosted bass (and treble) coz at the new -12 dB ref. level DEQ will surely kick-in, or in other words DEQ will start to compensate 12 dBs earlier.
thanks for the comments. I'm hoping to avoid going the attenuator route, mostly because of the physical hassle involved. I would have to move equipment rack out from wall (quite a task- believe me), a full day's work. But I will probably have to in the end.

Yes, I am employing all separate amp's, and using AudioQuest XLR interconnects for all processor-to-amp runs. Apparently gain is greater through XLR path than RCA route (for Parasound A51 amp). Consequently switching back to RCA interconnects would solve problem. Frustrating having already spent $300.00 on XLR cables. Been doing some 2ch listening, pure analog, sure sounds beautiful.

I've completed multiple Audyssey calibrations (approx. 21 runs- as of Feb. 07, 2016). Experimenting with various positioning. I seem to come very close to achieving proper trim tab limits, however Audyssey selects high crossover for fronts, also left surround measures -12dB. When I set MLP much below ear-level all levels are good, crossover's near perfect (80Hz). So I may just swap out XLR for RCA interconnects and be done with it.

My latest Audyssey calibration run (Feb. 09, 2016):
My set-up (5.1 speaker configuration):
Monitor Audio Gold GX100 fronts (42Hz - 60kHz, sensitivity = 88dB 1W@1m)
Monitor Audio Gold GXC350 center (40Hz - 60kHz, sensitivity = 90dB 1W@1m)
Monitor Audio GSFX Gold surrounds (60Hz - 43kHz, sensitivity = 86dB 1W@1m)

Parasound A51 amp
JL Audio F110 sub

Speaker Calibration Details:
Distances
Front L (10.7ft)
Front R (10.4ft)
Center (10.4ft)
Subwoofer 1 (15.0ft)
Surround L (5.6ft)
Surround R (6.1ft)

Speaker Calibration Details:
Level
Front L (-11.5B)
Front R (-11.5dB)
Center (-11.0dB)
Subwoofer 1 (-3.5dB)
Surround L (-12.0dB)
Surround R (-11.0dB)

Crossover
Front (200Hz)
Center (40Hz)
Surround (60Hz)

Audyssey MultiEQ XT32 = ON
Audyssey Dynamic EQ = ON
mogorf and garygarrison like this.
WestCoastD is offline  
post #79161 of 79169 Old 02-11-2016, 01:42 PM
AVS Special Member
 
mogorf's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Budapest, Hungary
Posts: 5,401
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 886 Post(s)
Liked: 413
Quote:
Originally Posted by WestCoastD View Post
thanks for the comments. I'm hoping to avoid going the attenuator route, mostly because of the physical hassle involved. I would have to move equipment rack out from wall (quite a task- believe me), a full day's work. But I will probably have to in the end.

Yes, I am employing all separate amp's, and using AudioQuest XLR interconnects for all processor-to-amp runs. Apparently gain is greater through XLR path than RCA route (for Parasound A51 amp). Consequently switching back to RCA interconnects would solve problem. Frustrating having already spent $300.00 on XLR cables. Been doing some 2ch listening, pure analog, sure sounds beautiful.

I've completed multiple Audyssey calibrations (approx. 21 runs- as of Feb. 07, 2016). Experimenting with various positioning. I seem to come very close to achieving proper trim tab limits, however Audyssey selects high crossover for fronts, also left surround measures -12dB. When I set MLP much below ear-level all levels are good, crossover's near perfect (80Hz). So I may just swap out XLR for RCA interconnects and be done with it.

My latest Audyssey calibration run (Feb. 09, 2016):
My set-up (5.1 speaker configuration):
Monitor Audio Gold GX100 fronts (42Hz - 60kHz, sensitivity = 88dB 1W@1m)
Monitor Audio Gold GXC350 center (40Hz - 60kHz, sensitivity = 90dB 1W@1m)
Monitor Audio GSFX Gold surrounds (60Hz - 43kHz, sensitivity = 86dB 1W@1m)

Parasound A51 amp
JL Audio F110 sub

Speaker Calibration Details:
Distances
Front L (10.7ft)
Front R (10.4ft)
Center (10.4ft)
Subwoofer 1 (15.0ft)
Surround L (5.6ft)
Surround R (6.1ft)

Speaker Calibration Details:
Level
Front L (-11.5B)
Front R (-11.5dB)
Center (-11.0dB)
Subwoofer 1 (-3.5dB)
Surround L (-12.0dB)
Surround R (-11.0dB)

Crossover
Front (200Hz)
Center (40Hz)
Surround (60Hz)

Audyssey MultiEQ XT32 = ON
Audyssey Dynamic EQ = ON
Hi WestCoastD,

Your calibration results look pretty good to me, I wouldn't really worry too much about the -12 dB trim for the Surround Left, its kinda in the ballpark with the rest of the speakers. Although, I'm puzzled with the extremely high crossover result @200 Hz for the Fronts. That seems a bit odd. Can you try to put the Front L&Rs as close to the front wall as possible? In this case you can make use of so-called "boundary gain" that would probalby result in lowering the -3 dB roll-off point of your Fronts.

A couple of in-room photos of your setup would also help the helpers help you out with proper speaker placement. Just a thought.
Alan P and garygarrison like this.
mogorf is online now  
post #79162 of 79169 Old 02-11-2016, 02:38 PM
AVS Special Member
 
mthomas47's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,832
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 977 Post(s)
Liked: 1009
Quote:
Originally Posted by mogorf View Post
Hi WestCoastD,

Your calibration results look pretty good to me, I wouldn't really worry too much about the -12 dB trim for the Surround Left, its kinda in the ballpark with the rest of the speakers. Although, I'm puzzled with the extremely high crossover result @200 Hz for the Fronts. That seems a bit odd. Can you try to put the Front L&Rs as close to the front wall as possible? In this case you can make use of so-called "boundary gain" that would probalby result in lowering the -3 dB roll-off point of your Fronts.

A couple of in-room photos of your setup would also help the helpers help you out with proper speaker placement. Just a thought.
Hi Feri,

People come and go on the thread, so it is sometimes hard to keep track. The OP posted photos of his room several pages back, and although his trim levels are okay now, those front crossovers are back about where they were when he started this exercise. As I recall, at our suggestion, he did experiment with front speaker positioning, as well. Although positioning his first mic. below ear level is unconventional, it did help him to get his front crossover all the way down to 90. And he said that things sound quite good. It's a bit of an unexpected result, but I would generally be in favor of whatever actually works best after extensive experimentation.

Regards,
Mike
mogorf and garygarrison like this.
mthomas47 is online now  
post #79163 of 79169 Old 02-11-2016, 03:21 PM
AVS Special Member
 
mogorf's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Budapest, Hungary
Posts: 5,401
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 886 Post(s)
Liked: 413
Quote:
Originally Posted by mthomas47 View Post
Hi Feri,

People come and go on the thread, so it is sometimes hard to keep track. The OP posted photos of his room several pages back, and although his trim levels are okay now, those front crossovers are back about where they were when he started this exercise. As I recall, at our suggestion, he did experiment with front speaker positioning, as well. Although positioning his first mic. below ear level is unconventional, it did help him to get his front crossover all the way down to 90. And he said that things sound quite good. It's a bit of an unexpected result, but I would generally be in favor of whatever actually works best after extensive experimentation.

Regards,
Mike
You are right Mike, my bad for not being able to keep track, but now I found the OP's pictures posted a while back. Hmm. Something seems to be really out of whack with those Front crossovers at 200 Hz despite the placement of the speakers that are accually quite pulled back to the front wall. Nothing else comes to mind first than a broken woofer in one of the speakers, yet would need further experimenting and testing.
mthomas47 and garygarrison like this.
mogorf is online now  
post #79164 of 79169 Old 02-11-2016, 04:34 PM
AVS Special Member
 
mthomas47's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,832
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 977 Post(s)
Liked: 1009
Quote:
Originally Posted by mogorf View Post
You are right Mike, my bad for not being able to keep track, but now I found the OP's pictures posted a while back. Hmm. Something seems to be really out of whack with those Front crossovers at 200 Hz despite the placement of the speakers that are accually quite pulled back to the front wall. Nothing else comes to mind first than a broken woofer in one of the speakers, yet would need further experimenting and testing.

I can't quite figure it out either--something about the room, I guess. But that's why I had applauded his getting the crossover down to 90Hz. That's a number he can work with. At 150 to 200Hz, I would think there would be all kinds of issues.
mogorf and garygarrison like this.
mthomas47 is online now  
post #79165 of 79169 Old Yesterday, 02:06 PM
AVS Special Member
 
WestCoastD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: California
Posts: 7,666
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 206 Post(s)
Liked: 80
Quote:
Originally Posted by mthomas47 View Post
Hi Feri,
People come and go on the thread, so it is sometimes hard to keep track. The OP posted photos of his room several pages back, and although his trim levels are okay now, those front crossovers are back about where they were when he started this exercise. As I recall, at our suggestion, he did experiment with front speaker positioning, as well. Although positioning his first mic. below ear level is unconventional, it did help him to get his front crossover all the way down to 90. And he said that things sound quite good. It's a bit of an unexpected result, but I would generally be in favor of whatever actually works best after extensive experimentation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by mogorf View Post
You are right Mike, my bad for not being able to keep track, but now I found the OP's pictures posted a while back. Hmm. Something seems to be really out of whack with those Front crossovers at 200 Hz despite the placement of the speakers that are accually quite pulled back to the front wall. Nothing else comes to mind first than a broken woofer in one of the speakers, yet would need further experimenting and testing.
I have done extensive listening in pure analog mode, no Audyssey EQ, speakers sound beautiful, decent bass response for monitor size form-factor.

Quote:
Originally Posted by mthomas47 View Post
I can't quite figure it out either--something about the room, I guess. But that's why I had applauded his getting the crossover down to 90Hz. That's a number he can work with. At 150 to 200Hz, I would think there would be all kinds of issues.
thanks guys. My Elite brand (VMAX92H) retractable projection screen, which is extended 1ft outward from the front wall, is positioned just behind the front L&R speakers when fully lowered for viewing. Consequently the front L&R speakers can not be re-positioned back towards the front wall to attain additional bass (reflex) response needed. I purposely designed things this way such that the screen would clear the wall mounted plasma monitor. This concept has worked great, I can raise or lower screen when needed, or watch plasma monitor with a flick of a switch (my wife love's it ).

The projection screen barely drops below the rear of the top surface of the Monitor Audio Gold GX100 front monitors (approx. 1.5in.), just enough to prevent positioning closer towards front wall. The screen must be lowered completely to be properly indexed to projector position, I can't just limit screen position to provide clearance (for re-positioning) of front L&R speakers. Consequently the front's have to remain in their current position. A lot of thought went into all this before construction. I had no idea I would run into these issues- ie. low F&L bass response, excess gain at MLP, etc.,...

I've used the same Parasound A51 amp in another set-up prior to this, sitting at same (or less) distance, using a different processor (NAD T175), with RCA interconnects, perfectly calibrated. Although I did have Monitor Audio Gold GS60 front towers then (significant difference in bass output).

I would just manually overide Audyssey's crossover settings, however the FAQ explains to [not] re-adjust "downward" in frequency, only "upward" in Hertz. That a "hole" would be created .

The near future goal is to move desk with PC out from the rear wall area and replace with new recliner chairs, permanently. This will yield extended viewing distance for MLP (approx. 1 to 2 ft) and, I believe, provide more balanced level's. Also new recliners will provide lower MLP height, which should yield improved bass and crossover response.
mthomas47, mogorf and garygarrison like this.

Last edited by WestCoastD; Yesterday at 02:43 PM.
WestCoastD is offline  
post #79166 of 79169 Old Yesterday, 04:37 PM
Advanced Member
 
garygarrison's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: The Milky Way
Posts: 574
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 341 Post(s)
Liked: 280
he
Quote:
Originally Posted by WestCoastD View Post
The near future goal is to move desk with PC out from the rear wall area and replace with new recliner chairs, permanently. This will yield extended viewing distance for MLP (approx. 1 to 2 ft) and, I believe, provide more balanced level's. Also new recliners will provide lower MLP height, which should yield improved bass and crossover response.
Some people would urge you to get cloth covered recliners, and to avoid leather or other reflective chair backs. There is a possibility that midrange and high frequency sound reflected from leather chair backs will have a negative effect. We have an assemble-it- yourself Home Reserve 5 cushion couch, with soft suede-like covering. The backs support our backs, yet our ears are above the top of the backs so that the surrounds have a clear shot.

Some of the Home Reserve couches don't have very wide seats/sections (but they're comfortable), so more of the viewers can sit nearer the center of the sound array, for better imaging. And, H. Reserve, and others like them, are comparatively inexpensive.

Another advantage of avoiding recliners, especially for people who have big screens, is that if someone wears bi-focals (or worse, tri-focals) and tilts the recliner back, they may end up looking through the reading part of their glasses, which throws part of the image out of focus.

Just my 2 cents.
mthomas47 and mogorf like this.
garygarrison is offline  
post #79167 of 79169 Old Today, 02:51 PM
Member
 
Strife21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 35
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7 Post(s)
Liked: 13
Need some guidance here. I have a Denon S710W I run the Audyssey Calibration. Have done several times and reset the amp several times all with the same results. If I measure the SPL of the recievers internal pink noise tests after I run Audyssey the speakers are always below 75db. The sub is at roughly 63db I imagine this is because the SPL meter may not be able to read the low frequency well but my concern is the 70-71db of the speakers during the tones. This seems to low shouldnt they be 75db?

Content doesn't seems loud at 0db on the amp when when watching programming but not insanely loud like one would expect. I feel like something isn't right.
Strife21 is online now  
post #79168 of 79169 Old Today, 03:07 PM
AVS Special Member
 
mogorf's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Budapest, Hungary
Posts: 5,401
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 886 Post(s)
Liked: 413
Quote:
Originally Posted by Strife21 View Post
Need some guidance here. I have a Denon S710W I run the Audyssey Calibration. Have done several times and reset the amp several times all with the same results. If I measure the SPL of the recievers internal pink noise tests after I run Audyssey the speakers are always below 75db. The sub is at roughly 63db I imagine this is because the SPL meter may not be able to read the low frequency well but my concern is the 70-71db of the speakers during the tones. This seems to low shouldnt they be 75db?

Content doesn't seems loud at 0db on the amp when when watching programming but not insanely loud like one would expect. I feel like something isn't right.
You are right that an SPL meter is not accure when measuring bass, yet we don't know the accuracy of your SPL meter either. The Audyssey mic has a tolerance of +/- 2dB, same goes for typical SPL meters. This may add up to result in a 4 dB difference between Audyssey mic and your SPL meter. Wouldn't worry much, just trust the Audyssey mic and call it a day.

As to why you are not hearing insanely loud volumes at 0 dB is another question. It should be insanely loud when you crank up the Master Volume to 0 dB provided you have a properly calibrated system.

Can you share the Audyssey settings:

Trim leves in dB per channel:

Distance settings in ft./meters per channel:

Do you have DynamicEQ "on" or "off" and Dynamic Volume "on" or "off"?
mogorf is online now  
post #79169 of 79169 Old Today, 03:14 PM
Member
 
Strife21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 35
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7 Post(s)
Liked: 13
Quote:
Originally Posted by mogorf View Post
You are right that an SPL meter is not accure when measuring bass, yet we don't know the accuracy of your SPL meter either. The Audyssey mic has a tolerance of +/- 2dB, same goes for typical SPL meters. This may add up to result in a 4 dB difference between Audyssey mic and your SPL meter. Wouldn't worry much, just trust the Audyssey mic and call it a day.

As to why you are not hearing insanely loud volumes at 0 dB is another question. It should be insanely loud when you crank up the Master Volume to 0 dB provided you have a properly calibrated system.

Can you share the Audyssey settings:

Trim leves in dB per channel:

Distance settings in ft./meters per channel:

Do you have DynamicEQ "on" or "off" and Dynamic Volume "on" or "off"?
I have a front and left speaker and sub.

Front L: -2.0db
Front R: -0.5db
Subwoofer: -7.5db

Distances
Front L: 10.1ft
Front R: 10.1ft
Subwoofer: 10.7ft

Dynamic EQ off and Dynamic Volume off.


Is there some kind of external test tone I can burn to a disk to test if at 0db its playing the correct level?

If i turn the TV watch a TV program from the cable box and put to 0db on the calibrated receiver after running Audyssey I am getting like 77-80db watching the Matrix Reloaded its on cable right now. Does that sound okay?

Last edited by Strife21; Today at 03:22 PM.
Strife21 is online now  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply Receivers, Amps, and Processors

Tags
Audyssey , Receivers Amplifiers , Kef Kht1005 2se 5 1 Subwoofer Satellite System With C4 Subwoofer Gloss White , 5 6 7 1 7 2 Or 8 1 8 2 One Or Two Subwoofer Compatible 16 Banana Post 2 Rca Speaker Wall Plate For H

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page


Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off