Simplified REW Setup and Use (USB Mic & HDMI Connection) Including Measurement Techniques and How To Interpret Graphs - Page 148 - AVS Forum | Home Theater Discussions And Reviews
Baselworld is only a few weeks away. Getting the latest news is easy, Click Here for info on how to join the Watchuseek.com newsletter list. Follow our team for updates featuring event coverage, new product unveilings, watch industry news & more!


Forum Jump: 
 570Likes
Reply
 
Thread Tools
post #4411 of 15305 Old 08-16-2013, 06:26 PM
AVS Club Gold
 
sdrucker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 2,461
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 309 Post(s)
Liked: 211
Quote:
Originally Posted by sdurani View Post

We're hobbyists, we can do better!

That's only partially in jest. Most calibrators walk into a room and are stuck having to work with what's already there (speaker/sub placement, seating locations, room treatments). In this thread, we've gone way beyond measuring by discussing where to move speakers & subs and where to locate seating so that some of the problems that pro calibrators have to deal with can be eliminated prior to calibration/EQ.

We're hobbyists - if we can't do better, we'd be consumers smile.gif. Who wants to be a puppet dancing at the end of someone else's string? cool.gif

Even if it's Chris K's....

Audio Gear: Trinnov Altitude 16/24, NAD M27 amp, Crown XLS 1502 stereo amps (2)
Display: Panasonic VT50, Lumagen Radiance Mini
Misc.: Oppo 103, Apple TV, JRiver ID NUC
Speakers: PSB Imagine T2, Center, and X2T Surrounds; Atlantic Tech 44-DA heights (4), HSU ULS-15 subs (2)
More gear to follow as I get going with the Altitude...
sdrucker is online now  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #4412 of 15305 Old 08-17-2013, 02:54 AM
AVS Addicted Member
 
kbarnes701's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Main Listening Positon
Posts: 22,768
Mentioned: 31 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4520 Post(s)
Liked: 3359
Quote:
Originally Posted by sdurani View Post

No, we're not stuck in an endless loop. Seems to be agreement that smooth is a better goal than flat. Seem to be agreement that ±3dB from target is fine for the "better" column (as you originally had). So that's a couple of steps in the right direction. Maybe ±6dB for the "good" column?

 

Good points.

kbarnes701 is offline  
post #4413 of 15305 Old 08-17-2013, 02:56 AM
AVS Addicted Member
 
kbarnes701's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Main Listening Positon
Posts: 22,768
Mentioned: 31 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4520 Post(s)
Liked: 3359
Quote:
Originally Posted by sdurani View Post

Quote:
Originally Posted by kbarnes701 View Post

I've been surprised (and heartened) by reading on more than one occasion that many pros consider +/-6dB to be "very good".
We're hobbyists, we can do better!

That's only partially in jest. Most calibrators walk into a room and are stuck having to work with what's already there (speaker/sub placement, seating locations, room treatments). In this thread, we've gone way beyond measuring by discussing where to move speakers & subs and where to locate seating so that some of the problems that pro calibrators have to deal with can be eliminated prior to calibration/EQ.

 

Oh yes - concurred fully. Similarly, I wouldn't want either my PQ or my AQ to be 'as good as' a typical local cinema. I want it to be better than that. And it is!

kbarnes701 is offline  
post #4414 of 15305 Old 08-17-2013, 03:02 AM
AVS Addicted Member
 
kbarnes701's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Main Listening Positon
Posts: 22,768
Mentioned: 31 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4520 Post(s)
Liked: 3359
Quote:
Originally Posted by sdrucker View Post

Quote:
Originally Posted by kbarnes701 View Post

I think the problem is that preference comes into it so much. Sanjay, for example, prefers a reflection-rich environment. I, OTOH, prefer to eliminate the lot and rely on the multichannel content for all the ambience etc that I want. Neither of us is right or wrong - it's just two different POV.  What is important is that once we know what we want, we are able to use the tools at our disposal to achieve it. 

I think, on reflection, it might be a hiding to nothing to produce the guide you described. Maybe some info on deciding what sort of model is preferred and then some advice on how to achieve it?  Hang on - that's what Jason said way, way back isn’t it: first choose your model??

I always thought a brief discussion of models wasn't a bad idea for a guide, so that even if you depart from the conventional thinking of this thread (which is LEDE, aside from Keith's preference for a Non-Environmental room, correct?), you had a basis for properly selecting the kind of room you wanted to achieve. Maybe a paragraph or so per leading model and some links for further information?
 

 

I don't think I actually have a NE room but I am much closer to wanting that than I am any of the other models. The kind of room I like is the kind I currently have, so I am pretty happy ATM.  But remember that I use the HT solely for movies with multichannel soundtracks where all the ambience, environment, spaciousness etc etc is already 'built-in' to the soundtrack. If I listened to music in there I may well want something else. HST, I do use music in there to evaluate the bass subjectively and I am not in any way disappointed with the sound. But it's jazz or jazz fusion not orchestral so, again, that probably makes a difference. 

kbarnes701 is offline  
post #4415 of 15305 Old 08-17-2013, 12:53 PM
QuadMersed in bass!
 
giomania's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Chicago, Illinois
Posts: 2,948
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 14 Post(s)
Liked: 32
I will throw in my opinion here. I think we should at minimum point people to where they can research the various "model" types (not sure if that is an accurate description), but it would be better to summarize them somehow. I will probably do that for my own edification, when I get to researching them in the future. Then we can offer the "Summary of Acoustical Standards" from the Mellor / Hedback paper as one example of how to analyze the measurements to achieve a certain goal. You note they may be happy with what we have provided, or they may prefer a different sound model, and more research may be required to achieve their ideal sound preference.

To use an analogy from school: I think if you give everyone the cliff notes to read, then some still may want to read the novel, and some may just take the test. To each his own.

Mark
giomania is offline  
post #4416 of 15305 Old 08-19-2013, 08:47 AM
AVS Club Gold
 
sdrucker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 2,461
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 309 Post(s)
Liked: 211
Quick follow-up to the 'science experiment':
Oppo 103 and and R-972 are ordered, but thanks to something that ss9001 (Steve, to those of you that know him from the old Pioneer threads) said in a PM, it got me motivated to do a three-way comparison, since I still have that old Pioneer SC-27 on the island of abandoned electronics. All would have REW connected via Oppo 103 as the HDMI input source to forward the test signal for measurement - remember, the 103 has HDMI inputs - and all would use the Denon 4311 as my amp, either digital (XT32) or on MULTI CH IN (MCACC and Trinnov). I'd have to be careful about level matching analog vs. digital, but since nobody's ever done this to my knowledge, we could do a "real" A/B/C/X test. I would be one of the few people to have experience sooner or later with all three RCs, let alone be able to measure them.

Anybody up for plots of MCACC, XT32 and Trinnov? I even have that old AS-EQ1 that I haven't quite sold on the Classifieds (but I've gotten inquires this month), so this could be a unique REW comparison. WIth the baby likelly coming around the week after Labor Day, it's probably "now or never". At least for measurements.

Even if the results are generalizable to a sample of 1 (me), it might be worth the trouble simply to know what the tradeoffs might be in more quantifiable terms between RCs.

This is what happens when you do research for a living....eek.gif

Audio Gear: Trinnov Altitude 16/24, NAD M27 amp, Crown XLS 1502 stereo amps (2)
Display: Panasonic VT50, Lumagen Radiance Mini
Misc.: Oppo 103, Apple TV, JRiver ID NUC
Speakers: PSB Imagine T2, Center, and X2T Surrounds; Atlantic Tech 44-DA heights (4), HSU ULS-15 subs (2)
More gear to follow as I get going with the Altitude...
sdrucker is online now  
post #4417 of 15305 Old 08-19-2013, 08:51 AM
AVS Special Member
 
LastButNotLeast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: 08077
Posts: 5,868
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 691 Post(s)
Liked: 501
Quote:
Originally Posted by sdrucker View Post

Anybody up for plots of MCACC, XT32 and Audyssey?

Absolutely! Now would be good. wink.gif


Did you really need to quote that entire post in your reply?
Downloadable FREE demo discs: Demonstration Blu-Ray Discs (Independently Authored)
Welcome to AVS - Get out while you still can!
LastButNotLeast is offline  
post #4418 of 15305 Old 08-19-2013, 09:00 AM
AVS Club Gold
 
sdrucker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 2,461
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 309 Post(s)
Liked: 211
Quote:
Originally Posted by LastButNotLeast View Post

Absolutely! Now would be good. wink.gif

This falls into the "do it because you can" level....I'm really just Trinnov curious compared to Audyssey, but AFAIK there aren't too many people that have used MCACC and XT32 within the last 18 months, and still have the equipment to make it a "fair fight", as well have a way to test three RCs on the same platform, so to speak.

Audio Gear: Trinnov Altitude 16/24, NAD M27 amp, Crown XLS 1502 stereo amps (2)
Display: Panasonic VT50, Lumagen Radiance Mini
Misc.: Oppo 103, Apple TV, JRiver ID NUC
Speakers: PSB Imagine T2, Center, and X2T Surrounds; Atlantic Tech 44-DA heights (4), HSU ULS-15 subs (2)
More gear to follow as I get going with the Altitude...
sdrucker is online now  
post #4419 of 15305 Old 08-19-2013, 09:13 AM
AVS Special Member
 
cuzed2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Chicago Area
Posts: 4,526
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 51 Post(s)
Liked: 88
Sorry to resurrect this previous discussion; Some of you may recall that I have just gotten back into analyzing my set-up with REW. This quest has gotten so much easier thanks to the excellent guide (and the new USB mics)! Last month I used REW to help analyze and recalibrate my 3 cylinder subs, I used REW to optimize the phase relationship between these subs. They are all playing nice together now, as per the following comparison:

Before


After - analyzing and adjusting the phase for the fronts (against the back sub)


However; I still have some issues with my mains rolling off too high? Audyssey likes to set my mains at 150Hz.

Sdurani and others suggested I check my mains and verify what they are capable of?
The following is a close mic'd measurement 1" from the woofer on my SEOS mains.


I think I can conclude that the reason for the 150Hz roll-off is not a limitation with the mains, but probably an issue with the room, placement of the mains, or possibly the need for additional rm treatments.

Here is the LF, Center, and RF (all set to large) response when measured from the MLP


Next - I varied the position of the RF main, by:
#1) Moving it forward, Violet = closer to my seating - 40" from front wall,
#2) RED =pushed back into the RF corner, 12" from the RF bass trap,
#3) Blue was the original mid-point positon




So; I decided to move the mains to position #1, what looked to me like the best of the 3 positions, and re-run Audssey
Despite the re-positionining of the mains; Audyssey still set my mains at the same 150Hz XO setting.

Center w-wo subs


LF w-wo subs


RF w-wo subs


The following are the final results, after bumping sub levels 5db hot :-)

RF


LF


This is where I will leave it until I decide what to try next (perhaps some more sweeps while moving around some temporary absorption to see if I have floor-ceiling bounce). I guess it also possible this is just a null, as per my room dimensions? If so I will leave it as-is.

Having the 3 subs in separate locations & picking up everything below 150Hz sounds fine to my ears (I close my eyes and can't seem to localize the subs). However; I may also only be half-way down this rabbit hole, Suggestions anyone?

Cuzed2
CuznEddy Cinema
Officially Hanesamatized on 8/1/09
cuzed2 is offline  
post #4420 of 15305 Old 08-19-2013, 10:21 AM
AVS Special Member
 
LastButNotLeast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: 08077
Posts: 5,868
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 691 Post(s)
Liked: 501

Another sub, obviously.

 

wink.gif biggrin.gif

 

It looks like those are smoothed. Can we see a sub graph not smoothed and the full graph 1/6?


Did you really need to quote that entire post in your reply?
Downloadable FREE demo discs: Demonstration Blu-Ray Discs (Independently Authored)
Welcome to AVS - Get out while you still can!
LastButNotLeast is offline  
post #4421 of 15305 Old 08-19-2013, 10:30 AM
AVS Special Member
 
cuzed2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Chicago Area
Posts: 4,526
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 51 Post(s)
Liked: 88
Yep - everything was done with 1/6 smoothing.
I'll revisit / re-post the lower end stuff with no smoothing

Cuzed2
CuznEddy Cinema
Officially Hanesamatized on 8/1/09
cuzed2 is offline  
post #4422 of 15305 Old 08-19-2013, 11:32 AM
AVS Special Member
 
jkasanic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,394
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 187 Post(s)
Liked: 90

@cuzed2:  Could you also restrict your frequency range on the bass region plots (i.e. 0-300Hz instead of full range)?  These should also be posted unsmoothed.

jkasanic is offline  
post #4423 of 15305 Old 08-19-2013, 11:39 AM
AVS Special Member
 
AustinJerry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 9,964
Mentioned: 25 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2768 Post(s)
Liked: 1410
And finally, since you will be posting more graphs, can we see bass response to 300Hz, unsmoothed, with left+right+subs? I don't see any reasons to be concerned with the response in the graphs you showed.
AustinJerry is online now  
post #4424 of 15305 Old 08-19-2013, 03:24 PM
Advanced Member
 
IgorZep's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 912
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 322 Post(s)
Liked: 164
From the graphs posted it looks like Audyssey is doing everything right. But... it is really interesting, and I've never seen that, in room response of speaker does not have peaks boosted by the room modes, it looks like there are only dips... The dip between 120 and 300 Hz is quite common in many rooms, and often unavoidable, but usually it is accompanied by a number of the heavy peaks below 100 Hz. Rooms usually help to boost bass, not the opposite. It really worth to look at the reasons why such a thing happens and what is cancelling the bass from mains.
IgorZep is offline  
post #4425 of 15305 Old 08-19-2013, 04:01 PM
AVS Special Member
 
cuzed2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Chicago Area
Posts: 4,526
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 51 Post(s)
Liked: 88
Quote:
Originally Posted by AustinJerry View Post

And finally, since you will be posting more graphs, can we see bass response to 300Hz, unsmoothed, with left+right+subs? I don't see any reasons to be concerned with the response in the graphs you showed.

How about these:
.
That 60 Hz dip on the sub is either a 60Hz line artifact, OR perhaps more phasing tweaks are needed between these 3 subs (sweeping them one at a time and then combined). The mains are SEOS12's on stands about 40" forward of the front wall, about 9' from the MLP


And LR + Subs

The 160 and 280 Hz dips are certainly troublesome, floor-bounce, or...??



Center

Interesting how the center is smoother (it is on the floor under the screen, against the wall and tilted up directly towards MLP, about 12' from the MLP)
I gotta wonder if the dip at 85Hz (crossover area) could be improved by tweaking the sub distances? Audyssey nailed the sub distances to tape measure accurate (probably not optimized)

Cuzed2
CuznEddy Cinema
Officially Hanesamatized on 8/1/09
cuzed2 is offline  
post #4426 of 15305 Old 08-19-2013, 04:30 PM
AVS Special Member
 
jkasanic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,394
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 187 Post(s)
Liked: 90
Seems pretty clear from the first graph why Audyssey is setting your XO to 150Hz! I'll take a deeper look when I get home with respect to those dips and your room layout (is this info posted elsewhere?) but with no smoothing applied it's likely the one at 280 Hz won't be noticeable during playback of normal content.
jkasanic is offline  
post #4427 of 15305 Old 08-19-2013, 04:53 PM
AVS Special Member
 
cuzed2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Chicago Area
Posts: 4,526
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 51 Post(s)
Liked: 88
Jkasanic,

Thanks!

Several pages back I put a diagram up.
And I just realized DUH - I made these last graphs with the 150 hz XO in place. Forgot again to set mains to large for those sweeps
:-(

Cuzed2
CuznEddy Cinema
Officially Hanesamatized on 8/1/09
cuzed2 is offline  
post #4428 of 15305 Old 08-19-2013, 09:03 PM
AVS Special Member
 
jkasanic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,394
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 187 Post(s)
Liked: 90
Ok, I had a look back at some posts you made about a month ago. Seems you got some good advice from Sanjay (sdurani) during that time and your response looked pretty good. Since most of what I know about room modes comes from him, I won't profess to be able to offer more insight on your room (plus I saw where he even read your build thread!). Does the bass response above represent what you showed in post 4247 "After" plot (sorry no link...iPad + editor = no play nice)? That response "appears" (I say appears because I'm trying to compare a full range plot to the one above so it could just be the graph axes or smoothing you applied) to be flatter above 60 Hz and below 200 Hz. If not, do you know what is different or has changed?
jkasanic is offline  
post #4429 of 15305 Old 08-20-2013, 03:51 AM
AVS Special Member
 
cuzed2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Chicago Area
Posts: 4,526
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 51 Post(s)
Liked: 88
Actually my earlier graphs had smoothing and these most recent ones do not.
The only other thing that has changed is that I pulled the mains about 18"' closer to the seating.

Cuzed2
CuznEddy Cinema
Officially Hanesamatized on 8/1/09
cuzed2 is offline  
post #4430 of 15305 Old 08-20-2013, 05:49 AM
AVS Special Member
 
jkasanic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,394
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 187 Post(s)
Liked: 90
Do you still have the mdat file for those measurements? I'm just curious how the unsmoothed response looks with similar axes?
jkasanic is offline  
post #4431 of 15305 Old 08-20-2013, 12:43 PM
AVS Special Member
 
pdxrealtor's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 2,573
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 136 Post(s)
Liked: 148
Question-

When running sub graphs only there is a difference, aside from output, between timing reference set to

'HDMI Audio Out' 1 and 2.

Selecting 2 ups the output, that's obvious, but does REW intend for you to set timing reference to 1 or 2 when testing subs only?

I'm sure it wouldn't matter I have two subs since they are a mono out from my receiver, but none the less FYI I do have 2 subs and use 2 sub outs on my receiver.
pdxrealtor is offline  
post #4432 of 15305 Old 08-20-2013, 12:46 PM
AVS Special Member
 
pdxrealtor's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 2,573
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 136 Post(s)
Liked: 148
FYI-

A while back in this thread I was having noise floor issues with my UMIK-1.

Just thought I would let everyone know that I believe that it was the Redmere HDMI cable I was using.

I've not had one issue since using a standard cable.
pdxrealtor is offline  
post #4433 of 15305 Old 08-20-2013, 02:12 PM
AVS Special Member
 
AustinJerry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 9,964
Mentioned: 25 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2768 Post(s)
Liked: 1410
Quote:
Originally Posted by pdxrealtor View Post

Question-

When running sub graphs only there is a difference, aside from output, between timing reference set to

'HDMI Audio Out' 1 and 2.

Selecting 2 ups the output, that's obvious, but does REW intend for you to set timing reference to 1 or 2 when testing subs only?

I'm sure it wouldn't matter I have two subs since they are a mono out from my receiver, but none the less FYI I do have 2 subs and use 2 sub outs on my receiver.

 

When testing subs only, set the REW output to HDMI Out 1, and set HDMI Out 2 on the timing reference channel.  This sends a mono signal to both the left and right inputs.  On the AVR, select either Stereo or PLII Cinema (doesn't matter which).  Turn off the mains and run your frequency sweep, which will measure the subs you have connected, assuming of course that your mains are set to "small" and you are using bass management.  If you are using both sub out connections from the AVR, you can measure sub1, sub2 or sub1+sub2 by selectively powering off the subs.

AustinJerry is online now  
post #4434 of 15305 Old 08-20-2013, 02:31 PM
AVS Special Member
 
pdxrealtor's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 2,573
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 136 Post(s)
Liked: 148
OK....

It's odd how that works. I'm pretty sure when timing ref. is on two, that I actually get a higher bump from ~18-30hz vs. if timing ref. one is selected. The rest of the graph appears the same, just at lower SPL.

Appreciate the answer.
pdxrealtor is offline  
post #4435 of 15305 Old 08-20-2013, 02:55 PM
AVS Special Member
 
AustinJerry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 9,964
Mentioned: 25 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2768 Post(s)
Liked: 1410

If you are sending only the left or right signal to the subs (instead of the combined signal as per my example), then check in the AVR to see if the trim level for one channel is higher.  this would cause a difference in the sub measured output, depending on which channel you configured.

AustinJerry is online now  
post #4436 of 15305 Old 08-20-2013, 02:56 PM
Senior Member
 
jamsys's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 238
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 11
Quote:
Originally Posted by AustinJerry View Post

I don't think I have seen this message.  Can you post a screen shot?  Please also provide the name of the mic you are using, and are you using Java or ASIO?

Sorry for the long delay, but here are the screen shots of the two errors. Also plots of the best I was able to get. It seems with Audessey on and the AntiMode at Lift 25 was the best. I am still not happy... Thoughts?

Scott


jamsys is offline  
post #4437 of 15305 Old 08-20-2013, 03:33 PM
AVS Special Member
 
AustinJerry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 9,964
Mentioned: 25 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2768 Post(s)
Liked: 1410

The lighter green measurement is not great.  It shows a 55dB drop (95dB@30Hz to 40dB@70Hz).

 

The darker line shows a somewhat better response, although there is still a 20-25dB variation.

 

The level is also quite low.  It looks like the output from REW is only in the 40-60dB range, when it should be at least 80dB.  I personally use 90dB to give the measurements a 5odB headroom above the 40dB noise floor. 

 

Regarding the error message--unfortunately, I cannot read the screen shots because they are too small.  If you are using a Windows system, please use the "Snipping Tool", which can be found in the Start Menu under Accessories. 

 

What make/model mic are you using, and did you calibrate it?

AustinJerry is online now  
post #4438 of 15305 Old 08-20-2013, 03:44 PM
AVS Special Member
 
Roger Dressler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Oregon
Posts: 9,519
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1325 Post(s)
Liked: 589
Quote:
Originally Posted by jamsys View Post

Sorry for the long delay, but here are the screen shots of the two errors. Also plots of the best I was able to get. It seems with Audessey on and the AntiMode at Lift 25 was the best. I am still not happy... Thoughts?
Regarding the response plots, did you apply the ~10 dB gain change for clarity, or is there such a gain difference in the room between Antimode on/off?

The notches appearing at ~70 and 95 Hz in the Antimode plot suggest to me that the latency of the antimode is not being compensated. The 8033 manual does not say if the Bypass mode still goes through the DSP or not (my guess is not -- that it is hardwire bypass), and it does not say what the latency is. I wonder if you added several feet of "distance" to the subwoofer output (10-20), would it kill the notches.

Was Audyssey run with Antimode active or bypass?

Deadwood Atmos theater [HTOM]
AV7702 Atmos 7.4.4, SSP-800 PLIIx 7.4
Aerial Acoustics 7B/CC3B fronts, B&W CWM8180 surrounds, Tannoy Di6 DC heights, Hsu ULS-15 subs
Roger Dressler is offline  
post #4439 of 15305 Old 08-20-2013, 04:27 PM
Advanced Member
 
ggsantafe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Solar Powered in the Land of Enchantment
Posts: 841
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 106 Post(s)
Liked: 115
Quote:
Originally Posted by pdxrealtor View Post

Question-

When running sub graphs only there is a difference, aside from output, between timing reference set to

'HDMI Audio Out' 1 and 2.

Selecting 2 ups the output, that's obvious, but does REW intend for you to set timing reference to 1 or 2 when testing subs only?

I'm sure it wouldn't matter I have two subs since they are a mono out from my receiver, but none the less FYI I do have 2 subs and use 2 sub outs on my receiver.
Quote:
Originally Posted by AustinJerry View Post


When testing subs only, set the REW output to HDMI Out 1, and set HDMI Out 2 on the timing reference channel.  This sends a mono signal to both the left and right inputs.  On the AVR, select either Stereo or PLII Cinema (doesn't matter which).  Turn off the mains and run your frequency sweep, which will measure the subs you have connected, assuming of course that your mains are set to "small" and you are using bass management.  If you are using both sub out connections from the AVR, you can measure sub1, sub2 or sub1+sub2 by selectively powering off the subs.

Jerry - just to confirm my understanding - if your laptop/netbook provides 8 channel capability, you can select HDMI Out 4 to measure SUB only, and HDMI Out 4 on the timing reference channel for a dual sub configuration.

ggsantafe is offline  
post #4440 of 15305 Old 08-20-2013, 04:29 PM
Senior Member
 
jamsys's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 238
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 11
Quote:
Originally Posted by AustinJerry View Post

The lighter green measurement is not great.  It shows a 55dB drop ([URL=mailto:95dB@30Hz]95dB@30Hz[/URL] to [URL=mailto:40dB@70Hz]40dB@70Hz[/URL]).

The darker line shows a somewhat better response, although there is still a 20-25dB variation.

The level is also quite low.  It looks like the output from REW is only in the 40-60dB range, when it should be at least 80dB.  I personally use 90dB to give the measurements a 5odB headroom above the 40dB noise floor. 

Regarding the error message--unfortunately, I cannot read the screen shots because they are too small.  If you are using a Windows system, please use the "Snipping Tool", which can be found in the Start Menu under Accessories. 

What make/model mic are you using, and did you calibrate it?

The first is the error message

Excessive variation in measurement
The sound card measurement varies by 91db between 20hz and 20khz, that is much higher than it should be
The measurement may not be valid and should not be used to make a calibration file





The second is the error message when doing a sweep
Clipping was detected in the measured input, the frequency response may be distorted as a result
Try repeating at a lower volume setting on your processor or try reducing the sweep level


I like to be in the 80db range too, but it clips immediately and REW freaks out.

Here is a bunch of the different runs. The top is with Audessey on and bottom with Audessey off, both with various settings on the AntiMode. Mains are set at 60hz.


I beleive the mic is a AudioTek USB Mic from RadioShack.... Yes I know garbage, but I didnt want to blow $$ on a good one till I saw where I was at. My cross roads is to borrow the Audessey Pro Kit and spend $160 on a lisc or beg Mark Seaton to come back out.... (or the mini DSP)

Thx in advance!
tanknz likes this.
jamsys is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply Audio Theory, Setup, and Chat

Tags
Dayton , Dayton Audio , Room Equilizer Wizard Rew

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page


Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off