Question for surrounds - AVS Forum
Forum Jump: 
 
Thread Tools
post #1 of 5 Old 02-28-2013, 11:18 AM - Thread Starter
 
Goat1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Eagan,Mn
Posts: 326
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Liked: 26
I'm running Martin Logan EM ESL's for mains,the matching C2 for center and Motion 4's for height speakers. The heights are nice for filling up the whole area with dialog,it really makes a big difference. I have Def Tech SR 8040 surrounds. I want to get the matching Martin Logan FX surrounds. My room is about 10 w X 25 L. So the side surrounds are probably 4' from my listening position. I probably have 10' behind me to the rear wall. I was thinking I should put monopoles back there. Maybe another pair of Motion 4's..

Thoughts?
Goat1 is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 5 Old 02-28-2013, 11:46 AM
AVS Addicted Member
 
sdurani's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Monterey Park, CA
Posts: 19,503
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1119 Post(s)
Liked: 913
Motion 4 speakers will be fine as rear speakers behind you. For the side speakers, my first choice would be another pair of Motion 4s, just to have consistency between heights, rears and sides. IF you find them too distracting at your sides, only then would I resort to a more diffuse speaker like the FX surround.

Sanjay
sdurani is offline  
post #3 of 5 Old 02-28-2013, 11:48 AM - Thread Starter
 
Goat1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Eagan,Mn
Posts: 326
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Liked: 26
I was thinking that also,but a lot of guys say to do dipoles. I almost wonder if the electrostats up front are going to break anything up being the rest are motion's with ribbon tweeters.. Maybe it doesn't matter..
Goat1 is offline  
post #4 of 5 Old 02-28-2013, 08:01 PM
AVS Addicted Member
 
sdurani's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Monterey Park, CA
Posts: 19,503
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1119 Post(s)
Liked: 913
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goat1 View Post

I was thinking that also,but a lot of guys say to do dipoles.
FX surrounds are bipoles, not dipoles.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goat1 View Post

I almost wonder if the electrostats up front are going to break anything up being the rest are motion's with ribbon tweeters.
For the relatively few times that sounds in the front soundstage pan to the surround field, the character of those sounds will be different. The alternative is to buy 4 more ESLs to use as sides and rears. Up to you (and your wallet) to decide whether consistent sound is worth spending that much.

Sanjay
sdurani is offline  
post #5 of 5 Old 03-01-2013, 08:15 AM - Thread Starter
 
Goat1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Eagan,Mn
Posts: 326
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Liked: 26
I know the FX's are not dipole. That wasn't the question.
Its probably true,being stuff is panning is probably isn't much of an issue..
Goat1 is offline  
Reply Audio theory, Setup and Chat

User Tag List

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page


Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off