Compensating for speaker distance - AVS Forum
Forum Jump: 
 
Thread Tools
Old 08-24-2014, 03:45 PM - Thread Starter
Member
 
capillariancrest's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 19
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9 Post(s)
Liked: 0
Compensating for speaker distance

I have some rear speakers in my 5.1 setup that are 10 feet from the listening position. My front two speakers are 7 feet and the centre speaker is 6 feet away. My subwoofer is about 7 feet away. In my receiver settings I have set the distances to 7 feet for all of the speakers. However, I am unable to set the rear speakers to 10 feet unless I set the front two speakers to 10 feet. I know my set up is less than ideal, but that is how it has to be because of the layout of my house. There is a setting in my STR DA2000ES that allows me to increase the loudness of my rear speakers. So are there any general rules of thumb to increase the decibel levels per foot? Should I just leave it at its neutral position? The rear speakers are B&W DM 600 S3s and the front two are DM 602 S3s and my woofer is an ASW 600. I just want to get the most out of my current setup given its limitations.
capillariancrest is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 08-24-2014, 04:53 PM
AVS Special Member
 
William's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 8,411
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 22 Post(s)
Liked: 45
Quote:
Originally Posted by capillariancrest View Post
...So are there any general rules of thumb to increase the decibel levels per foot? ....
No, distance is about timing and not attenuation.

I glanced at the manual and it looks like you are confusing the default setting with minimum adjustment which is 3'. Page 21 says:

FRONT X.X meter* (Front speaker distance)
Initial setting: 3.0 meter (10 feet)
Lets you set the distance from your listening position to the front speakers (A). You can adjust from 1.0 meter to 7.0 meters (3 to 23 feet) in 0.1 meter (1 foot) steps.
If both front speakers are not placed an equal distance from your listening position, set the distance to the closest speaker.
William is offline  
Old 08-24-2014, 05:05 PM
AVS Special Member
 
RayDunzl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Tampa, Florida
Posts: 1,397
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 476 Post(s)
Liked: 671
http://www.sengpielaudio.com/calculator-distance.htm

3.1dB for the difference from 7 to 10 feet

I'll be back later...


links::: 1.5RQ > digits > OpenDRC-DI > DEQ2496 > DAC2 > KCT > FPB 350mcx > reQuest > Sweetspot
RayDunzl is online now  
Old 08-24-2014, 06:10 PM
AVS Special Member
 
mtn-tech's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Nevada
Posts: 1,077
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 186 Post(s)
Liked: 150
William is correct, the distance settings in your AVR have nothing to do with the volume of the speakers at the Main Listening Position (MLP), they are there to time align the speakers - adding a delay to channels that are closer so the sound arrives a the MPL at same time.

The channel level settings (or channel trim settings) are there to adjust the volume levels to balance the system - you should be using a Sound Pressure Level meter (SPL) or an SPL app on your phone or tablet - the absolute calibrated volume at the MPL isn't important, only the difference between channels and most any SPL meter or app is accurate enough for determining differences.

2-Ch (HT L/R): Oppo BDP-105 BD, Adcom GFP-750 pre, Bryston 10B Sub Xover, Bryston 4BSST2 / Paradigm Signature S4 v.2 (L/R), (2) SVS SB12-NSD (Subs)
Home Theater: Bryston 4BSST2 amp / Paradigm CC-590 (C), Outlaw 7700 amp / (4) Def Tech UIW-RSSII (LS/RS/LB/RB), Samsung 46” 3D LCD
mtn-tech is offline  
Old 08-24-2014, 06:12 PM - Thread Starter
Member
 
capillariancrest's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 19
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9 Post(s)
Liked: 0
Thank you both for the the feedback.
capillariancrest is offline  
Old 08-24-2014, 06:19 PM
AVS Special Member
 
William's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 8,411
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 22 Post(s)
Liked: 45
Quote:
Originally Posted by RayDunzl View Post
http://www.sengpielaudio.com/calculator-distance.htm

3.1dB for the difference from 7 to 10 feet
That is not the problem he is asking about. He is not having trouble setting the levels. He can set his level but he can't get his distance set. The distance setting is about speaker timing and level adjustments can't correct this.
William is offline  
Old 08-24-2014, 06:45 PM
AVS Special Member
 
RayDunzl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Tampa, Florida
Posts: 1,397
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 476 Post(s)
Liked: 671
Oh, perhaps I misread this specific question:

"So are there any general rules of thumb to increase the decibel levels per foot?"

I'll be back later...


links::: 1.5RQ > digits > OpenDRC-DI > DEQ2496 > DAC2 > KCT > FPB 350mcx > reQuest > Sweetspot
RayDunzl is online now  
Old 08-24-2014, 06:55 PM
AVS Special Member
 
Ivan Beaver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,647
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Liked: 44
Quote:
Originally Posted by capillariancrest View Post
I have some rear speakers in my 5.1 setup that are 10 feet from the listening position. My front two speakers are 7 feet and the centre speaker is 6 feet away. My subwoofer is about 7 feet away. In my receiver settings I have set the distances to 7 feet for all of the speakers. However, I am unable to set the rear speakers to 10 feet unless I set the front two speakers to 10 feet. I know my set up is less than ideal, but that is how it has to be because of the layout of my house. There is a setting in my STR DA2000ES that allows me to increase the loudness of my rear speakers. So are there any general rules of thumb to increase the decibel levels per foot? Should I just leave it at its neutral position? The rear speakers are B&W DM 600 S3s and the front two are DM 602 S3s and my woofer is an ASW 600. I just want to get the most out of my current setup given its limitations.
There is no "dB per foot" attenuation. Rather it is known as "inverse square law" and is the distance between the ratio of 2 distances.

Basically this states that when you double the distance-you lose 6dB in level.

It is all relative.

The difference between 1' and 2' is 6dB. The difference between 100' and 200' is 6dB.

The formula for figuring the distance between 2 distances is D1/D2 logx20=dB.

Danley Sound Labs

Physics-not fads
Ivan Beaver is offline  
Old 08-24-2014, 08:30 PM
AVS Special Member
 
DonH50's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Monument CO
Posts: 6,342
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 257 Post(s)
Liked: 295
I think 6 dB is for free-space? I think I have measured a bit less in a room where reflections get added to the direct sound. And line sources a bit less attenuation on-axis. In any event the OP may have been confused about the way the AVR distance calculation works, and as others noted amplitude won't compensate phase anyway.

"After silence, that which best expresses the inexpressible, is music" - Aldous Huxley
DonH50 is online now  
Old 08-24-2014, 08:39 PM - Thread Starter
Member
 
capillariancrest's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 19
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9 Post(s)
Liked: 0
I am aware of inputting the speakers distances into the receiver. I suppose what I meant to say was that there is an option to balance the speaker volume accordingly. https://docs.sony.com/release/STRDA2000ES.pdf Scroll down to page 38. I've set my speakers to "small" I've disabled the equalizer. Disabled the phase linearlizing and the cross over frequecy is set to 100hz however the only options I am allowed to select are 60hz, 100hz, and 150hz. My subwoofer low pass filter is set to "out" and according to the manual, that should hand over the processing to the receiver. http://www.bowers-wilkins.com/Downlo...650_manual.pdf
capillariancrest is offline  
Old 08-25-2014, 03:38 AM
AVS Addicted Member
 
arnyk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Grosse Pointe Woods, MI
Posts: 14,387
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 763 Post(s)
Liked: 1178
Quote:
Originally Posted by DonH50 View Post
I think 6 dB is for free-space? I think I have measured a bit less in a room where reflections get added to the direct sound. And line sources a bit less attenuation on-axis. In any event the OP may have been confused about the way the AVR distance calculation works, and as others noted amplitude won't compensate phase anyway.
Room correction systems that include a mic have no reason to calculate attenuation by means of estimates and approximations when they can simply measure it.
arnyk is offline  
Old 08-25-2014, 12:11 PM
AVS Special Member
 
DonH50's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Monument CO
Posts: 6,342
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 257 Post(s)
Liked: 295
I know that, and I know you know I know that, but a good reminder. I was really double-checking the attenuation number since it's been a few decades since that class...

"After silence, that which best expresses the inexpressible, is music" - Aldous Huxley
DonH50 is online now  
Old 08-26-2014, 11:06 AM
AVS Special Member
 
Ivan Beaver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,647
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Liked: 44
Quote:
Originally Posted by DonH50 View Post
I think 6 dB is for free-space? I think I have measured a bit less in a room where reflections get added to the direct sound. And line sources a bit less attenuation on-axis. In any event the OP may have been confused about the way the AVR distance calculation works, and as others noted amplitude won't compensate phase anyway.
Reflections do all sorts of weird things. Depending on the freq and the distance between the reflection path and the direct sound path, you can get addition (just a few dB) or complete cancellation.

This is of course distance and freq dependent.

Line sources ONLY has less attenuation WHEN they are LONG as compared to the wavelengths involved. Short "lines" are nothing but a marketing scheme.

And when you have a short line (even 8' tall considered kinda short), the "effect" of the line attenuation will vary with freq. The lower freq will fall off at 6dB while the upper freq will fall off at 3dB-making for different tonal balance at different seats. This is mainly a problem for larger seating areas than HT, but the same theory applies and people often don't realize how line arrays "work".

But marketing depts just tell what they "wish" the cabinets would act like. Let's forget all about those nasty lobes that are shooting out all over the place-let's just draw pretty pictures----------

Danley Sound Labs

Physics-not fads
Ivan Beaver is offline  
Old 08-26-2014, 11:24 AM
AVS Addicted Member
 
Ratman's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Collingswood, N.J.
Posts: 14,661
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 235 Post(s)
Liked: 315
Quote:
Originally Posted by capillariancrest View Post
I have some rear speakers in my 5.1 setup that are 10 feet from the listening position. My front two speakers are 7 feet and the centre speaker is 6 feet away. My subwoofer is about 7 feet away. In my receiver settings I have set the distances to 7 feet for all of the speakers. However, I am unable to set the rear speakers to 10 feet unless I set the front two speakers to 10 feet. I know my set up is less than ideal, but that is how it has to be because of the layout of my house. There is a setting in my STR DA2000ES that allows me to increase the loudness of my rear speakers. So are there any general rules of thumb to increase the decibel levels per foot? Should I just leave it at its neutral position? The rear speakers are B&W DM 600 S3s and the front two are DM 602 S3s and my woofer is an ASW 600. I just want to get the most out of my current setup given its limitations.
Other than that... is there an "audible" problem/defecit with a specific aspect of your system?
If so, provide that info and perhaps someone can throw out an easy suggestion to help out. Otherwise... all you may get are suggestions to re-engineer your system and also have contractors reconstruct your room.
Ratman is offline  
Old 08-26-2014, 11:37 AM
AVS Special Member
 
DonH50's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Monument CO
Posts: 6,342
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 257 Post(s)
Liked: 295
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ivan Beaver View Post
Reflections do all sorts of weird things. Depending on the freq and the distance between the reflection path and the direct sound path, you can get addition (just a few dB) or complete cancellation.

This is of course distance and freq dependent.

Line sources ONLY has less attenuation WHEN they are LONG as compared to the wavelengths involved. Short "lines" are nothing but a marketing scheme.

And when you have a short line (even 8' tall considered kinda short), the "effect" of the line attenuation will vary with freq. The lower freq will fall off at 6dB while the upper freq will fall off at 3dB-making for different tonal balance at different seats. This is mainly a problem for larger seating areas than HT, but the same theory applies and people often don't realize how line arrays "work".

But marketing depts just tell what they "wish" the cabinets would act like. Let's forget all about those nasty lobes that are shooting out all over the place-let's just draw pretty pictures----------
Got it, that all matches my experience and fuzzy theory memories (vs. memories of fuzzy theories), including (especially) the marketing comments...

Thanks! - Don

"After silence, that which best expresses the inexpressible, is music" - Aldous Huxley
DonH50 is online now  
Old 08-27-2014, 11:16 AM
AVS Special Member
 
mtn-tech's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Nevada
Posts: 1,077
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 186 Post(s)
Liked: 150
Quote:
Originally Posted by capillariancrest View Post
I suppose what I meant to say was that there is an option to balance the speaker volume accordingly. https://docs.sony.com/release/STRDA2000ES.pdf Scroll down to page 38. I've set my speakers to "small" I've disabled the equalizer. Disabled the phase linearlizing and the cross over frequecy is set to 100hz however the only options I am allowed to select are 60hz, 100hz, and 150hz.
Since this AVR doesn't have automatic room correction, as you say, the channel volumes must be set manually (page 28 and 38) using an SPL meter or SPL meter app (or by ear but that isn't recommended):

Quote:
Adjust the speaker level and balance using the LEVEL menu so that the level of the test tone sounds the same from each speaker.
Quote:
Originally Posted by capillariancrest View Post
My subwoofer low pass filter is set to "out" and according to the manual, that should hand over the processing to the receiver.
Switching the subwoofer low pass crossover to "out" is correct, the AVR will do the low pass filtering to the sub output.

2-Ch (HT L/R): Oppo BDP-105 BD, Adcom GFP-750 pre, Bryston 10B Sub Xover, Bryston 4BSST2 / Paradigm Signature S4 v.2 (L/R), (2) SVS SB12-NSD (Subs)
Home Theater: Bryston 4BSST2 amp / Paradigm CC-590 (C), Outlaw 7700 amp / (4) Def Tech UIW-RSSII (LS/RS/LB/RB), Samsung 46” 3D LCD
mtn-tech is offline  
Old 08-27-2014, 06:55 PM
AVS Special Member
 
Ivan Beaver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,647
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Liked: 44
Quote:
Originally Posted by DonH50 View Post
Got it, that all matches my experience and fuzzy theory memories (vs. memories of fuzzy theories), including (especially) the marketing comments...

Thanks! - Don
I see no case in which a "line array" would offer ANY advantage (other than in the looks department and for guys that want a "lying array"-for whatever reason) in a home theatre situation.

A well behaved single source of sound will offer better quality performance-without all the interference and strange lobes bouncing all over the place.
Garidy likes this.

Danley Sound Labs

Physics-not fads
Ivan Beaver is offline  
Old 08-27-2014, 07:28 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Canada
Posts: 464
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 205 Post(s)
Liked: 69
Quote:
Originally Posted by RayDunzl View Post
Oh, perhaps I misread this specific question:

"So are there any general rules of thumb to increase the decibel levels per foot?"
Yes, acoustic inverse square law applies
Garidy is offline  
Old 08-27-2014, 07:29 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Canada
Posts: 464
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 205 Post(s)
Liked: 69
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ivan Beaver View Post
I see no case in which a "line array" would offer ANY advantage (other than in the looks department and for guys that want a "lying array"-for whatever reason) in a home theatre situation.

A well behaved single source of sound will offer better quality performance-without all the interference and strange lobes bouncing all over the place.
Agreed!
Garidy is offline  
Old 08-28-2014, 08:30 AM
AVS Special Member
 
DonH50's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Monument CO
Posts: 6,342
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 257 Post(s)
Liked: 295
Well, now I'm confused. I thought a line array's pattern, while lobed differently, would exhibit less interaction with nearby walls and ceilings? Meaning first reflections are less an issue for a line array (over the frequency range it is actually a line source, natch)? The merits of their dispersion pattern can be debated, but I wasn't expecting such strong condemnation of them. I have used line arrays in the past for sound reinforcement (pro sound work) to take advantage of their pattern. I am not sure what "better quality performance" means in this context. The transition from line to "regular" radiation pattern at LF is well-known but I am not sure it is a major drawback (I mean that explicitly; I am not sure). It does mean any reasonable line source for home use (and all the ones I have used for pro work) is not a line source at lower frequencies just due to physical (size) constraints.

Anyway, the OP is not using line sources, my comment was a side-note about dispersion patterns. Did not mean to wander off, sorry. - Don

"After silence, that which best expresses the inexpressible, is music" - Aldous Huxley
DonH50 is online now  
Old 08-28-2014, 11:21 AM
AVS Special Member
 
Ivan Beaver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,647
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Liked: 44
Quote:
Originally Posted by DonH50 View Post
Well, now I'm confused. I thought a line array's pattern, while lobed differently, would exhibit less interaction with nearby walls and ceilings? Meaning first reflections are less an issue for a line array (over the frequency range it is actually a line source, natch)? The merits of their dispersion pattern can be debated, but I wasn't expecting such strong condemnation of them. I have used line arrays in the past for sound reinforcement (pro sound work) to take advantage of their pattern. I am not sure what "better quality performance" means in this context. The transition from line to "regular" radiation pattern at LF is well-known but I am not sure it is a major drawback (I mean that explicitly; I am not sure). It does mean any reasonable line source for home use (and all the ones I have used for pro work) is not a line source at lower frequencies just due to physical (size) constraints.

Anyway, the OP is not using line sources, my comment was a side-note about dispersion patterns. Did not mean to wander off, sorry. - Don
A "line array" has no control over the horizontal pattern-they pretty much just "spray" everywhere-so you will have lots of interaction with the walls.

The ceiling depends on the size of the array-and to the freq at which it actually has a "pattern". In most "home" arrays-this is only for the top octave or two-due to the short length. And since those freq are easily dealt with (carpet on the floor) acoustical or absorptive ceiling tiles, it is of little issue.

The thing that uses of line arrays "like to forget" of "won't talk about" is all the lobing that goes on-(sometimes the sound coming off the rear of the speaker is just as loud as the front).

There are all sorts of "spurious lobes" shooting out everywhere-but the marketing departments want you to "believe" that the radiation pattern is like a soup can cut in half so that produces a nice pattern. But if you actually look at REAL MEASURED DATA that does not have a ton of smoothing applied to it-you will see all those lobes coming off.

And those lobes will produce all sorts of different reflection patterns-causing all sorts of issues.

Now-granted-some people "like" that sound (just like the Bose 901) in which the sound is reflected all over the room and it makes them feel more "involved" in the experience.

HOWEVER that false experience you are getting IS NOT what the producer planned. The material (be it music or a movie) was done in a room WITHOUT reflections. So to hear the way it was INTENDED, you need to have a system with as few reflections as possible.

Or else the speaker system and its interaction with the room is coloring the sound.

But different strokes for different folks.

I know a number of sound "engineers" that don't like a accurate sound system. They want a system that makes you hurt-like an icepick between the eyes type of thing. They think that is what a sound system should sound like. Whatever makes you happy----------------

Danley Sound Labs

Physics-not fads
Ivan Beaver is offline  
Old 08-28-2014, 12:39 PM
AVS Special Member
 
DonH50's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Monument CO
Posts: 6,342
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 257 Post(s)
Liked: 295
OK, thank you. I was thinking a line array had a front and back lobe from the source (line drivers) but little output from the sides right at speaker, but not something I have a lot of experience with. A conventional driver sends sound all around, subject to the baffle of course. Learning things...

We agree on the impact of the room. I use planer speakers which do not have a true line array pattern, but I heavily treat my room (including killing the back wave, which for planer dynamic and ESL speakers is as large as the front wave as you say) so the ambience is from the recording, not the room. Lots of people like to hear the room; I do not, at least not in reproduction. Perhaps due to my work in the studio, but I've always felt taking the room out of the equation was best if you wanted to hear the recording and not the room. And of course a lot of people want a somewhat live room and feel the sound is dead in a treated room; to each his own. A live room is a step along the Bose path but heaven help you if you actually say that...

"After silence, that which best expresses the inexpressible, is music" - Aldous Huxley
DonH50 is online now  
 
Thread Tools


Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off