3D Television - Fad or Here To Stay? - Page 2 - AVS Forum
View Poll Results: 3D TV - Is it a Fad?
Fad - Current Theater Hype! 0 0%
Here to Stay - Bring on the content! 0 0%
Can only happen if we have standards! 0 0%
Voters: 0. You may not vote on this poll

Forum Jump: 
Reply
 
Thread Tools
post #31 of 2615 Old 05-14-2010, 03:54 PM
AVS Special Member
 
OTAhead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: In the Groves
Posts: 1,434
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Liked: 14
Not a fad. It is here to stay. Went to see Avatar 3D in the theater and had to wait 2 extra screenings because it was sold out...

That being said, stndards are a must (think VHS/Beta Max-Blue Ray/HD DVD). Let's not do that again please.

But it will become commonplace as time goes on, possibly culminating in holographic entertainment, perchance?

You never know where the LIMIT is until you EXCEED it... Dianne B. "Let's try that again... without the oops." (Will Smith and Jeff Goldblum in "Independence Day")
OTAhead is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #32 of 2615 Old 05-14-2010, 04:13 PM
AVS Special Member
 
Al Sherwood's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Victoria, BC Canada
Posts: 3,072
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Liked: 11
Quote:
Originally Posted by rexb610 View Post

If i had the extra money to buy newer 3DTV set, a new receiver (support for HDMI 1.4) and new blu-ray player although PS3 will get the update..sure i would have jumped on to 3D now.

I have to change all of my components (except PS3) just to get 3D. I saved for and built my current system piece by piece just cross the line to HD world (1080p, blu-ray, HD audio etc.) and not in a hurry to replace those with this new feature,fad or gimmick.

The way i look at it is that there are still a lot of different ways to get 3D and a lot of different versions so i'll enjoy and be content with what i have right now and see how the 3D pans out.

Maybe in 2 or 3 years when there is no need for 3D glasses, i'll jump on it.

I am in a very similar boat, but just bought a 58" plasma for the living room rather then firing up the theater for TV shows... but I didn't buy a 3D TV!

Thumbs down for glasses and any hint of multiple standards...

Al
Al Sherwood is offline  
post #33 of 2615 Old 05-14-2010, 04:15 PM
Advanced Member
 
bweissman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: California, USA
Posts: 731
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 16 Post(s)
Liked: 27
Bring it on!

I'm overdue for a home theater upgrade anyway, so I fully intend to buy 3D-ready gear. The additional cost is small enough not to be a factor, so why not? If the content doesn't appear, well, the equipment can still play 2D content.
bweissman is online now  
post #34 of 2615 Old 05-14-2010, 04:22 PM
Senior Member
 
Omen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 305
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
Today's 3D will be the View-Master of yesteryear

"So why don't you put her in charge?" - Hudson
Omen is offline  
post #35 of 2615 Old 05-14-2010, 04:24 PM
AVS Special Member
 
vancouver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: BC Canada
Posts: 3,995
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
Fad or not...I am way more into Ht then the average person and I will never chase 3D.
vancouver is offline  
post #36 of 2615 Old 05-14-2010, 04:27 PM
Member
 
waldwolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 51
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
Hate to show my age, but......

The first 3D movie I saw was way back (actually it was way, way, way, way back) in 1937 during the great depression.

The glasses were those red & green cardboard type. It was a 10-15 minute short with a speeding car negotiating sharp curves where "things popped out at you" as they showed up in the cars headlights. No plot. Just a random series of scary acts. Still gives me a fright (and headache) just remembering the experience.

Ah...the good old days, when a Saturday afternoon double, or triple-feature movie only cost a kid 12 cents, the streetcar ride was 3 cents and a large ice cream cone a nickel.


waldwolf is offline  
post #37 of 2615 Old 05-14-2010, 04:30 PM
AVS Special Member
 
ti-triodes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Damfino
Posts: 2,137
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13 Post(s)
Liked: 53
Definitely a fad unless they make a standard. Right now it's ridiculous.
ti-triodes is offline  
post #38 of 2615 Old 05-14-2010, 04:41 PM
AVS Special Member
 
BasementBob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Oakville, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 4,614
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Liked: 64
3D is an eventual must for home TV, but not until you don't need glasses to see it.
As long as you need glasses: it's just a fad.

Today at theatres, and Samsung warns for home 3D television: not to be watched by pregnant women, the elderly, and while intoxicated.

An amateur built the Ark. Titanic was built by professionals. Of course Noah took a little advice.
BasementBob is online now  
post #39 of 2615 Old 05-14-2010, 04:49 PM
Senior Member
 
Miles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Halifax, Canada
Posts: 442
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
3D is basically DOA, the people who bought the Samsung TV / Players still have nothing to watch other than Monsters vs Aliens.

Although the World Cup could change my mind...
Miles is offline  
post #40 of 2615 Old 05-14-2010, 05:14 PM
AVS Special Member
 
thedeskE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 3,577
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Liked: 61
I'm waiting for Goofy's 'How To Watch Your New 3D TV' from Disney
thedeskE is online now  
post #41 of 2615 Old 05-14-2010, 05:20 PM
Senior Member
 
KUJayhawk20659's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: St marys county MD
Posts: 463
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
Is it me or most of the people that say "fad" and I'll pass are the "senior" members?
I am 36 and love change, however I tend to see the older crowd as being "afraid" to change.
And in that being afraid excuses are made as to why i.e., extra glasses and etc.
I will/am jumping on it and will enjoy the heck out of it as long as it sticks around.
KUJayhawk20659 is offline  
post #42 of 2615 Old 05-14-2010, 05:23 PM
Senior Member
 
TheMarco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 272
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
Once the porn industry jumps on the 3D bandwagon these TVs are gonna sell like hotcakes, even if it means you have to wear glasses to wear it.

If I were a large TV manufacturer I'd try to do anything I can including subsidizing to make the major adult studios crank out 3D blu rays.

You may laugh but it would do miracles for sales.
TheMarco is offline  
post #43 of 2615 Old 05-14-2010, 05:31 PM
Advanced Member
 
UCFKevin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Queens, NY
Posts: 793
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
Having worn glasses all my life, I don't give a damn about having to wear glasses to see 3D. Boo friggin' hoo, people. You need glasses to see 3D?! OHHH NOOOO! TRAVESTY!

I don't think it's a fad but I don't think it'll be a standard, either. Somewhere in between.

If I wasn't into home theater, I'd have a whole lotta money.
UCFKevin is offline  
post #44 of 2615 Old 05-14-2010, 05:53 PM
AVS Special Member
 
Falcon_77's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: OC, CA
Posts: 2,602
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
I don't mind wearing the glasses in a theater, but for at home? No way! I'm rarely glued to my set when watching TV at home. I'm reading the paper, looking up something on the computer, fixing dinner, etc.

I have to wear the 3D glasses over my regular glasses and I can deal with that in the theater, but not for regular viewing.

A friend of mine has 3D for computer gaming and I think that has more promise, but the glasses he uses makes it almost impossible to see the keyboard! No, I can't type just by touch as I don't set my fingers at the home position.
Falcon_77 is offline  
post #45 of 2615 Old 05-14-2010, 06:05 PM
Senior Member
 
hemster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 241
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
I say "Fad".

However a lot of marketing pressure will mean plenty of 3D sets will be sold.

Wearing glasses... these are a pain. Firstly, they're expensive. I'll have to buy 9 pairs for my 9-seat theater! I certainly won't tell my friends that they must bring their own... Also, if one is wearing prescription eyeglasses already, then have to don the 3-D glasses, wouldn't that be awkward and uncomfortable?

Will there be content? Very little I think.

Remember all the hoopla about 7.1 channel gear? How many movies are out in 7.1 channel?

Relentless pursuit of perfection... within budget!
hemster is offline  
post #46 of 2615 Old 05-14-2010, 06:09 PM
AVS Addicted Member
 
VisionOn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Carrboro, NC
Posts: 10,979
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Liked: 310
Eventually it might get to the point where every new TV being produced is also 3D capable but when you consider how long the adoption of HD took before it got mainstream, I really can't see this taking off any faster. I bought my first HDTV back in 2002 and there was one channel available in my area.

3DTV requires consumers to learn not only about HD, but glasses, Blu-ray, HDMI compatibility, new channels, which providers, which programming etc.

HD was a relatively easy concept to grasp by comparison and people still didn't get it.

It also requires more bandwidth from providers. Something the majority of which cannot deliver for HD content.

People hate the glasses so much a new tech is bound to come along before 3DTV in it's current form becomes mainstream. In which case why jump in now unless you just want to spend a lot of money for the novelty value?


VisionOn is online now  
post #47 of 2615 Old 05-14-2010, 06:22 PM
Newbie
 
LJC7's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 7
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
I went with fad but I guess I may be biased based on the fact I can't see 3D lol. There is a fairly large number of people with eye problems and that will turn people away from 3D, but as technology advances 3D may not have a significant effect on the price, I can't say I hate it but I hope I don't start see 3D only blue movies coming out.

My buzzing PN58C6400/6500 video.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qr75qrsSbMw
LJC7 is offline  
post #48 of 2615 Old 05-14-2010, 06:22 PM
AVS Special Member
 
thedeskE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 3,577
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Liked: 61
Quote:
Originally Posted by hemster View Post

I say "Fad".

Remember all the hoopla about 7.1 channel gear? How many movies are out in 7.1 channel?

I'm trying to forget
thedeskE is online now  
post #49 of 2615 Old 05-14-2010, 06:24 PM
Senior Member
 
Shadowboricua's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 254
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
Video gaming will push it forward.
Shadowboricua is offline  
post #50 of 2615 Old 05-14-2010, 06:31 PM
Advanced Member
 
Steve.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Cape Cod
Posts: 576
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 11
I voted Fad, but who knows... One thing's for sure, glasses are here to stay, at least in our lifetime. Shutter glasses have been around for some time now as they are the best way to give the illusion of stereopsis on a 2D plane. Eye doctors use them in conjuction with a computer program that creates varying levels of "3D" on an LCD screen to measure a person's depth perception. It can also be done with red/blue or polarizing filters but as everyone now knows, shutter glasses are much better.
Steve. is offline  
post #51 of 2615 Old 05-14-2010, 06:45 PM
Advanced Member
 
AuralXTC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 573
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 12
Man oh man does it ever put a smile on my face when looking at the poll and seeing that "Fad" is getting the vast majority of votes with 69%.

I cannot stand 3D. Avarice..... pure avarice.

Why let facts or common sense get in the way of your opinions.

Quick shot of my gear/theater.
AuralXTC is offline  
post #52 of 2615 Old 05-14-2010, 06:50 PM
Advanced Member
 
DasRaven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Mesa, AZ
Posts: 516
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 11
It is a Fad and a money grab.
See signature because Ebert's absolutely right.

Built a new home, now filling it with sights and sounds!
DasRaven is offline  
post #53 of 2615 Old 05-14-2010, 07:00 PM
Member
 
EE_engineer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 35
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
Just an expensive FAD like charging higher for old progressive scan DVD players when all they did was a change of firmware programing. FYI the current technique used in home 3D results in half the brightness since only one eye at a time, is seeing the image, while the other eye is blanked out.
EE_engineer is offline  
post #54 of 2615 Old 05-14-2010, 07:00 PM
Member
 
infurno's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 27
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
Quote:
Originally Posted by DasRaven View Post

It is a Fad and a money grab.
See signature because Ebert's absolutely right.

That's a horrible article

Quote:


1. IT'S THE WASTE OF A DIMENSION.

Just stupid. I can't comment.

Quote:


2. IT ADDS NOTHING TO THE EXPERIENCE.

Adds nothing? 70% of people who watched Avatar at the theater saw it in 3D. Clearly it adds something or there would never be such a bias.

Quote:


3. IT CAN BE A DISTRACTION.

Like just about anything else...

Quote:


4. IT CAN CREATE NAUSEA AND HEADACHES.

Of course it can if abused. So can 2D.

Quote:


5. HAVE YOU NOTICED THAT 3-D SEEMS A LITTLE DIM?

It's not that bad... Never bothered me

Quote:


7. THEATERS SLAP ON A SURCHARGE OF $5 TO $7.50 FOR 3-D.

True. However, installing and upgrading equipment for 3D projection is expensive too.
infurno is offline  
post #55 of 2615 Old 05-14-2010, 07:06 PM
AVS Special Member
 
thedeskE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 3,577
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Liked: 61
Quote:
Originally Posted by KUJayhawk20659 View Post

Is it me or most of the people that say "fad" and I'll pass are the "senior" members?
I am 36 and love change, however I tend to see the older crowd as being "afraid" to change.
.

Perhaps it's more of a 'Long Experience' attitude. For the moment, we're talking about people putting a filter over their eyes at home.
thedeskE is online now  
post #56 of 2615 Old 05-14-2010, 07:26 PM
AVS Special Member
 
westa6969's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: From Michigan now Retired to Naples, FL
Posts: 6,774
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 40 Post(s)
Liked: 109
3D Porn Content is what's really needed to make a go of it but of course we'll tell our spouses it's for the World Cup or new ESPN 3D channel.

If it's going to hurt my eyes it at least should have a reward and didn't all our Mothers tell us it would make us all go BLIND!!

Samsung 65F8000, 60D8000, 40HU6350, Panasonic 50E60 LCD's
westa6969 is offline  
post #57 of 2615 Old 05-14-2010, 07:34 PM
AVS Special Member
 
NEO Dan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: North East Ohio
Posts: 2,978
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 11
3D in consumer TV is a low cost high profit feature for the manufacturer. They are leveraging it to keep prices up. I would expect them to not settle on a standard quickly- the more product cycles they put out before a final standard is set the longer it will enhance profitability.

Personally I hope that while they futz round with this we end up with sets capable of reproducing sources with higher refresh-rate and resolution. True 120 and 240hz capability for display of all sources including PC's and game systems would make my day.

Regards,
Dan
NEO Dan is offline  
post #58 of 2615 Old 05-14-2010, 07:40 PM
AVS Special Member
 
73shark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: KC, MO area
Posts: 2,208
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Liked: 39
Quote:
Originally Posted by KUJayhawk20659 View Post

Is it me or most of the people that say "fad" and I'll pass are the "senior" members?
I am 36 and love change, however I tend to see the older crowd as being "afraid" to change.
And in that being afraid excuses are made as to why i.e., extra glasses and etc.
I will/am jumping on it and will enjoy the heck out of it as long as it sticks around.

Maybe the "seasoned citizens" have a better perspective since they've seen things like this come and go.

GO TIGERS!

In space, no one can hear you scream . . .
73shark is online now  
post #59 of 2615 Old 05-14-2010, 07:41 PM
AVS Special Member
 
73shark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: KC, MO area
Posts: 2,208
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Liked: 39
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheMarco View Post

Once the porn industry jumps on the 3D bandwagon these TVs are gonna sell like hotcakes, even if it means you have to wear glasses to wear it.

If I were a large TV manufacturer I'd try to do anything I can including subsidizing to make the major adult studios crank out 3D blu rays.

You may laugh but it would do miracles for sales.

That's one reason HDDVD lost cuz the porn industry went BD.

In space, no one can hear you scream . . .
73shark is online now  
post #60 of 2615 Old 05-14-2010, 07:57 PM
AVS Special Member
 
Waboman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Terraforming Planet Wabo
Posts: 6,578
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 73 Post(s)
Liked: 251
Until they can get it so nothing on your head is required, 3D will be a fad. Tried watching a 3D movie with my kids at home (red/blue old school glasses) and within 10 minutes both asked to switch back to 2D.

Growing Older But Not Up
Waboman is online now  
Reply Community News & Polls

Tags
Polls

User Tag List

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page


Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off