Do You Prefer 2-Channel or Multichannel Music Recordings? - AVS Forum | Home Theater Discussions And Reviews
Baselworld is only a few weeks away. Getting the latest news is easy, Click Here for info on how to join the newsletter list. Follow our team for updates featuring event coverage, new product unveilings, watch industry news & more!

View Poll Results: Do You Prefer 2-Channel or Multichannel Music Recordings?
2-channel 186 36.12%
Multichannel, audience perspective 187 36.31%
Multichannel, stage perspective 96 18.64%
I've never heard a multichannel music recording 46 8.93%
Voters: 515. You may not vote on this poll

Forum Jump: 
Thread Tools
Old 07-02-2014, 11:25 PM - Thread Starter
AVS Special Member
Scott Wilkinson's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Burbank, CA
Posts: 2,337
Mentioned: 37 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1179 Post(s)
Liked: 3504
Do You Prefer 2-Channel or Multichannel Music Recordings?

The vast majority of music recordings are 2-channel, but multichannel recordings offer a different experience. Which do you prefer?


A multichannel surround system is essential for the full enjoyment of most movies, but it can also provide an enhanced musical experience. Multichannel recordings also offer more options than 2-channel—in particular, a choice of perspectives. Mixing engineers can put you in the audience with ambience (room reverb, audience noises during live shows, etc.) in the surround channels, or they can put you in the middle of the ensemble, what AIX Records—a leading provider of multichannel-music recordings—calls the "stage perspective." On the other hand, the sweet spot for multichannel is smaller than for 2-channel—a point in the middle of the speaker array instead of a line perpendicular to the plane of two speakers.

Which leads me to ask: When you sit down to listen to music, do you prefer 2-channel or multichannel recordings? If multichannel, do you prefer the audience or stage perspective?

Like AVS Forum on Facebook
Follow AVS Forum on Twitter
+1 AVS Forum on Google+

Scott Wilkinson
AVS Editor

Last edited by Scott Wilkinson; 07-03-2014 at 09:24 AM.
Scott Wilkinson is offline  
Sponsored Links
Old 07-03-2014, 01:56 AM
Advanced Member
Webmonkey's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Denmark
Posts: 946
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 35 Post(s)
Liked: 31
Live concert recordings in multichannel for me - for the authentic audience experience. Studio recordings in 2 channel. Beatles and other original mono recordings in mono ofcause :-D.

Plain and simple - they way it was went to be :-D
Sharp1080, gprace, neveser and 4 others like this.

Last edited by Webmonkey; 07-10-2014 at 02:38 AM. Reason: more details..
Webmonkey is offline  
Old 07-03-2014, 02:16 AM
AVS Special Member
tenthplanet's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: North of Mexico, South of Oregon, Not as far east
Posts: 2,458
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 627 Post(s)
Liked: 512
Number of channels is secondary to the quality of the music. If the music is good and multi-channel I would take advantage of it. Being two channel doesn't bestow some mystical sonic quality on recordings.

"If you build it they will come.." Ok, what is this "It" you speak of and who, are they???! Do I want to know?...
tenthplanet is offline  
Old 07-03-2014, 02:26 AM
Senior Member
cranster's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 287
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 152 Post(s)
Liked: 89
I love the immersion of multi channel music.
weekendtoy, Djoel and grtuck like this.
cranster is offline  
Old 07-03-2014, 02:31 AM
AVS Special Member
MSmith83's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 9,156
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 232 Post(s)
Liked: 191
I generally prefer a good two-channel experience. However, for me it is by and large about the music itself as I often enthusiastically listen to mono recordings of older content like golden age film scores.
sightsandsounds likes this.
MSmith83 is offline  
Old 07-03-2014, 03:04 AM
Senior Member
TorTorden's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 390
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 108 Post(s)
Liked: 149
To me it mostly comes down to mixing and masters as always.
I therefore prefer mostly 2 channel music, since many 'conversions' barely sound any better than Dolby DSP on the stereo track or often just using the extra speakers to blast up the volum, costing what little perspective and depth I have.

It also sets some extra criteria to your systems calibration, I have in many cases heard setups that are just awesome for movies since the surrounds plays mostly different sounds than the rest of the system, with many surround mixes they just blast everything through anything and if you move an inch out of sweet spot the timing between channels fall off.

Now of course there are many many exceptions to this, the 5.1 surround mix of Dark side of the moon for example or pretty much any concert blueray benefit greatly from having surround.

In summary, providing it is done right I love it, if not give me stereo.
TorTorden is offline  
Old 07-03-2014, 03:38 AM
AVS Special Member
popalock's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Doha, Qatar
Posts: 4,933
Mentioned: 128 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1229 Post(s)
Liked: 1698
Send a message via Skype™ to popalock
I use the "expanded stereo" format option on my Pio Elite SC-57. While I don't feel the center channel adds much, I really like what the rears bring to the table.

While playing music I can go into my advanced settings and turn the rear surrounds on and off, which gives me perspective real time.

What I found was that the rear surrounds seem to pull the front stage from behind my screen to right directly in the middle of my room.

I've demo'd this for several people in my space and they agree.

While this may not be exactly what you are referring to in the context of "multichannel" music, I would still vote yes to perfering multichannel over 2 channel.
sightsandsounds likes this.
popalock is offline  
Old 07-03-2014, 04:34 AM
AVS Special Member
JWhip's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Wayne, PA
Posts: 4,894
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 564 Post(s)
Liked: 683
For Multichannel , I really only listen to live recordings, where the rears are used for ambiance. A perfect example of this is the SACD version of John Pizzarelli Live at Birdland. It is superb and places you right in the venue. I really don't like instruments in the rears as is the case with a lot of MC music recordings. There are also some superb DVDs and Blu-rays. Other than that type of thing, I generally prefer 2 channel and lost of my music listening is done in 2 channel.
JWhip is offline  
Old 07-03-2014, 05:05 AM
AVS Special Member
MIkeDuke's Avatar
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: eastern PA
Posts: 6,936
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 420 Post(s)
Liked: 168
In my room, with my gear, I listen to 2ch almost exclusively. If it is a CD it is only played back in 2ch in MY SYSTEM. With my layout, I get very little sound at all from music in my surrounds if I try one of those audio modes from my Integra 80.3 . Movies, they are fine, but not for music. Now that doesn't mean I don't like MC music. If it is recorded that way, like a multi-channel SACD or DVD-A then I do like the room filling sound. But again, only if it is mixed that way. If it's a CD, it's 2ch only and the center stage I get simply outstanding.
IronM@sk likes this.

It ain't easy being green.
My System
MIkeDuke is online now  
Old 07-03-2014, 05:35 AM
AVS Special Member
JoeKustra's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Ashland, PA 17921
Posts: 8,065
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 757 Post(s)
Liked: 305
A good surround mix is great. I don't use a center channel since I have a small viewing space now. In a larger room the best mix of BD I've heard is Cowboys vs. Aliens when a horse enters the scene from the rear and it sounds like it too. For BD audio, especially the Styx concert, multichannel is great. For TV, I just DSP it to death even when it's already 5.1.

Whatever sounds good to you is the right choice.
sightsandsounds likes this.
JoeKustra is online now  
Old 07-03-2014, 06:04 AM
AVS Special Member
HockeyoAJB's Avatar
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 1,931
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 931 Post(s)
Liked: 775
I'm not sure how you would categorize multichannel albums from Pink Floyd and the like that use all kinds of non-traditional instruments and sound effects that appear and disappear from various directions or even pan around you. Would you consider that as being on the stage or part of the audience? I'm not sure I would classify it as either. With their music, there doesn't really seem to be a stage, performers, or an audience, but rather an experience. In this case, multichannel recordings can be very effective and I would say that I prefer them over your basic stereo recording.

I own a few multichannel live concert Blu-Rays, which include video. However, I don't know if I would say that I prefer the audio on these discs moreso than the stereo studio recordings on CD. It depends, firstly, on the performance. If the band sounds great live and if the audio from the live performance is captured properly then it can be a treat. If not, then I'll take a stereo studio recording. It also depends on whether or not I am sitting down and attentively listening to the music without distraction as opposed to playing the music in the background while doing other things.
HockeyoAJB is offline  
Old 07-03-2014, 06:35 AM
dmspen's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 172
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Liked: 11
The Eagles 'When Hell Freezes Over' DVD contains a 5.1 audio only track of the song 'Seven Bridges Road'. It's pretty nifty.

There are 10 types of people in the world. Thos that understand binary and those that don't.
dmspen is offline  
Old 07-03-2014, 06:44 AM
Senior Member
machavez00's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Phoenix, Az
Posts: 275
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9 Post(s)
Liked: 10
I remember quadraphonic LP's in the 70's. My neighbor had a quadraphonic system, but I never got to listen to it. Add me as: Live recordings multi, studio stereo.

Last edited by machavez00; 07-03-2014 at 06:47 AM.
machavez00 is offline  
Old 07-03-2014, 06:48 AM
AVS Special Member
MSchu18's Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 1,398
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 166 Post(s)
Liked: 358
2 channel for me... though multi channel is very enveloping.

multi channel also seem to alleviate some of the necessity for proper imaging and placement for Front L/R

My Name is Nobody...
Klipsch x11i - Klipsch x20i - Oppo HA2
Pioneer SC85 - Bel Canto REF 500M
Klipsch La Scala II - Klipsch Cornwall/Crites/Aletheia Audio - Klipsch RC64II - SW-115
Wyred 4 Sound DAC2 DSDse - OPPO BDP-93
Samsung PN64D8000
MSchu18 is offline  
Old 07-03-2014, 06:57 AM
AVS Special Member
audiofan1's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 5,261
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1453 Post(s)
Liked: 1433
I love both but do listen to 2/ch more as it's hard to argue against a proper setup and a well done recording but then again a well treated room + proper setup +Audyssey + a well mastered sacd =
audiofan1 is offline  
Old 07-03-2014, 07:04 AM
Senior Member
sjschaff's Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Alameda, CA
Posts: 496
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 62 Post(s)
Liked: 25
Got but 2 ears. As far as I know, all people in the business of making and recording of music have 2 as well. Keep it simple I say. Great mikes, well positioned in a great acoustic space is what matters most. Capture it right the first time and you can reproduce it back atcha' with a couple of speakers. Multi-channel is the side show at the carnival.
Cgallaway and sightsandsounds like this.

JVC RS500 - Stewart Firehawk - Lumagen Radiance Pro - Anthem D2V - Revel Salon speakers - SV Sound SB13 Ultra sub - Various sources
sjschaff is offline  
Old 07-03-2014, 07:10 AM
Advanced Member
Blacklightning's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Edmonton,AB Canada
Posts: 629
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 277 Post(s)
Liked: 181
I do not like adding any processes so all my cd's are 2 channel. Most of my Classical SACD's or DVD-Audio will be run in the pure 2 channel mode if the option is available. Right now I can only think of 1 SACD that I will pick the 4 channel track most of the time.

With the right room 2 channel can surround you with sound.
If I did listen to Live pop or rock concerts on DVD's I think I would pick the multichannel as it would be cool feeling the crowd around you. But for my classical stuff, my room becomes the concert hall and all the sound comes from the front just like the real thing.
sightsandsounds likes this.
Blacklightning is offline  
Old 07-03-2014, 07:19 AM
AVS Special Member
hernanu's Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Boston Suburbs
Posts: 3,505
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 495 Post(s)
Liked: 910
Multichannel if possible. If it's a bad mix or transfer, I assume it will be bad for both two channel or multichannel.

I prefer to be immersed in the music and as close to the original recording room as possible, so stage perspective.

Bluray for concerts, if it exists. A good lossless two channel is fine.
quad4.0 likes this.
hernanu is offline  
Old 07-03-2014, 08:21 AM
von Levi's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 81
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 26 Post(s)
Liked: 35
Multichannel. No question.

After all of these years, there's still a lot of factually incorrect beliefs about multichannel sound being spread by people who have never actually heard a multichannel recording. I still see plenty of people who write it off as a gimmick because they assume that all the rear channels do is pump in ambience, or, the rears are used to create a mix that puts you in the center of the musicians (there are certainly a handful of recordings that do this, but the vast majority don't).

On good multichannel recordings the rears help spread the stereo image much wider than you get with just two-channels, and there will be a greater sense of depth perception to the sound (on the latter point, it can take solo piano recordings to a whole new level).

And not to sound too angry, but there are also lots of stereophiles who just scoff at the idea of listening to music using an A/V receiver connected to a transport via HDMI without actually having heard the results.

Lastly, another thing that has hurt the acceptance of multichannel is that you only realize just how superior it can be when you do a listening comparison to the stereo mix.
von Levi is offline  
Old 07-03-2014, 08:21 AM
AVS Special Member
trans_lux's Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: In my theater
Posts: 1,073
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 119 Post(s)
Liked: 163
I listen to everything in AMBIOPHONICS.
Its only a single person experience and you can't move your head.
But its worth it. No matter how bad the recording it sounds amazing!

Last edited by trans_lux; 07-03-2014 at 08:28 AM.
trans_lux is offline  
Old 07-03-2014, 08:32 AM
Senior Member
quad4.0's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: here
Posts: 476
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 132 Post(s)
Liked: 88
Originally Posted by sjschaff View Post
Got but 2 ears. As far as I know, all people in the business of making and recording of music have 2 as well. Keep it simple I say. Great mikes, well positioned in a great acoustic space is what matters most. Capture it right the first time and you can reproduce it back atcha' with a couple of speakers. Multi-channel is the side show at the carnival.
That is an excuse. I have "seen and heard" all the reasons not to listen to 5.1 music. Unfortunately, not all MC is good. Just like any recording, crap in-crap out! Elliot Scheiner does the best work, The Steely Dan and Fagen stuff is terrific. As is every other production he has been involved with. Stereo is wonderful, with proper imaging it always had me interested but when I hard dvd audio I went bonkers, WHY? Because MC allows for a more cleaner sound, dividing up the instruments into 5.1 speakers and allowing more "room" to allow a cleaner sound. Stuff a band into 2 speakers and it will be somewhat "muddy" especially some older productions, ( Tubular Bells) comes to mind as well as some other productions with a full compliment of instruments.
18labonte and Perpendicular like this.
quad4.0 is offline  
Old 07-03-2014, 08:39 AM
Advanced Member
BNestico's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Elysburg, Pennsylvania
Posts: 577
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 149 Post(s)
Liked: 214
I haven't heard many actual 5.1 studio mixes the one I'm most familiar with is from a prog/metal band called Between the Buried and Me. They released they're album The a Great Misdirect as a double sided disc with a DD 5.1 mix on one side. I really enjoyed listening to it. I've watched a ton of concerts on HDNet and Palladia in 5.1 and I love the sound. I've never seen one that can switch perspectives however. I notice on 2 channel CDs that the perspective of the drums in particular can vary. Some discs have the drums panned to sound like your sitting directly in front of the drum set the guys playing. Provided that bands drummer is a righty you'll notice the ride cymbal sounds coming from more to the left and hi-hats to the right. Toms descend from right to left. Other CD's flip this around and pan the sound as to what the drummer would hear sitting behind the drums. A good example of this is the drum solo at the beginning of "Say Goodbye" (track 6) from Dave Mathews "Crash".
Getting back to surround music, I never use the settings on my AVR to make a 2 channel track surround.
BNestico is offline  
Old 07-03-2014, 08:53 AM
Senior Member
boguspomp's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 230
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 118 Post(s)
Liked: 120
I voted multi stage. Why, because you can hear so much more, than on any stereo recording or even the audience multi recordings. As mentioned above, just listen to Steely Dan or Fagen or Pink Floyd or Tubular Bells in 5.1 and you are hooked for life. Another thing is, ask any mastering engineer. In stereo they have to tweak instruments with a lot of equalization to fit it into the mix. For example: 1 guitar has the mid range boosted way up and the other the mid range taken out. That way you can hear both guitar distinguished in the mix.With 5.1 they can leave the instruments mostly alone and give them the sound they should have in the first place.
boguspomp is offline  
Old 07-03-2014, 09:37 AM
AVS Special Member
audioguy's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Not far from Atlanta - but far enough!
Posts: 5,210
Mentioned: 23 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1555 Post(s)
Liked: 994
It all depends on the recording and the mood I am in. For most 2 channel studio recording, adding ambiance with my Integra does little. Live recordings can be quite excellent when played back with "expanded stereo" in 7.1.

Circle Surround available on Theta and I think Meridian is an excellent stereo expansion technique and Meridian had another expansion technology that was the best (don't recall the name).

I voted 2 channel.
audioguy is online now  
Old 07-03-2014, 09:55 AM
akcorr's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 171
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10 Post(s)
Liked: 18
akcorr is offline  
Old 07-03-2014, 10:15 AM
Bass Enabler
Scott Simonian's Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Clovis, CA
Posts: 20,133
Mentioned: 128 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4686 Post(s)
Liked: 3613
No option for both?

Though I guess I'd say 'multichannel' but there really isn't any +2ch content of the crap I listen to.
Scott Simonian is online now  
Old 07-03-2014, 10:37 AM
AVS Addicted Member
lovinthehd's Avatar
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: OROR
Posts: 15,601
Mentioned: 44 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4267 Post(s)
Liked: 4203
Hard to choose for me as well, would have preferred multiple choice response option. I just popped in a 7.1 blu ray of The Planets which is an audience perspective and very enjoyable, not quite like being in an actual concert hall but quite nice; the stereo version I have (different orchestra) is also quite nice but prefer the multichannel recording and don't think its the orchestra that makes the difference. However, for non-orchestral music I just popped in The Raven That Refused to Sing blu ray, and like the stage perspective, to be in the heart of it so to speak; I have been to a Steven Wilson show, where he actually uses surround speakers so that makes sense. Then there are 2 channel recordings I love and aren't available in a multichannel format. However, I would prefer to have multichannel recordings generally but hard to say whether stage or audience perspective as that would depend on the material and artist I think....what I really would prefer would be more available multichannel recordings!

Last edited by lovinthehd; 07-03-2014 at 10:41 AM.
lovinthehd is offline  
Old 07-03-2014, 10:48 AM
AVS Special Member
Ovation's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: St. Hubert, Quebec, Canada
Posts: 3,406
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 97 Post(s)
Liked: 62
MCH "in the band/on stage" is my preference if available.

Next is MCH audience position.

Next is MCH via DPLII Music (after tweaking to my liking--default setting on my AVR wasn't great). On rare occasions, this doesn't work well with a particular track or album, I stay in 2ch mode for the exceptions.

Then 2 ch--but mostly on the 2 ch rig in my living room.

As for "we have two ears", sure, but stereo means 3-D. Moreover, we don't hear in only two directions. As a reason to avoid MCH audio, it's pretty flimsy. A better reason would be the paucity of choice of MCH releases.
18labonte likes this.
Ovation is offline  
Old 07-03-2014, 11:13 AM
Groot Geluid's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 22
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 13
Originally Posted by sjschaff View Post
Got but 2 ears. As far as I know, all people in the business of making and recording of music have 2 as well. Keep it simple I say. Great mikes, well positioned in a great acoustic space is what matters most. Capture it right the first time and you can reproduce it back atcha' with a couple of speakers. Multi-channel is the side show at the carnival.
Not so. A speaker becomes a sound source. Having 2 speakers left and right, it becomes already difficult to reproduce a 'proper' mono signal. A very good test is with 3 identical speakers at the front, to play a mono signal via the Ls & Rs and then switch the same signal to the middle speaker alone. You will immediately hear a colouration when fed over 2 speakers. If done well a good surround recording in a great acoustic space, will sound so much better than a good stereo recording in that same space.
chirpie, 18labonte and jmtbe like this.
Groot Geluid is offline  
Old 07-03-2014, 11:21 AM
AVS Special Member
Djoel's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: NYC
Posts: 8,703
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 500 Post(s)
Liked: 382
Multi-Ch addict right here, I get piss when I'm waiting on a favorite or well received album whether it's a classic, reprint and it's only 2Ch hi rez, I feel it's a waste. Not like I don't buy it, but I wait to hear the reviews, and the price to come down!

My sacd collection Speaker: Ascend Tower RAAL, Horizon RAAL center, Tower NrT rears
Display: Samsung PN64D7000
Source: Oppo 105D, HTPC Haswell 16TB Jriver 21, Tivo Premier, Apple TV2g ,Roku 4
Power Management :Panamax M5300-PM
Djoel is offline  
Sponsored Links

frontpage , Polls
Thread Tools

Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off