Quote:
Originally Posted by Evan_H
That fact that far fewer people read this sub-forum should be a good indicator that most people simply are not interested in downloads, regardless of technical feasibility.
^^
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheCrackedJack
You'd have to be the laziest person on earth to upgrade, just for the fact of not changing discs or have extra money laying around IMO. I also can't believe a studio would release that much...
Quote:
Originally Posted by William
Please show me this fact or is it a fake fact like: I read in a thread that someone said that a friend told them...
http://www.watch.impress.co.jp/av/do...0403/rt057.htm
Quote:
Originally Posted by krabapple
Put up or shut up. Point me to even ONE person here that is likely to have such an interest.
The fact is, all the extant research on human hearing suggests if the lossy encoding is well done,...
Quote:
Originally Posted by wakashizuma
I'm really curious that If you dont like this topic and find those "studies" useless, then why do you feel like you have to ruin the topic for those who are interested with your childish immature...
Quote:
Originally Posted by thebland
So...what is the point of this thread to the average Blu Ray owner with a lossless capable sound system?
this thread is for people who spend 10-20k on a processor/receiver, that I'm pretty sure...
Quote:
Originally Posted by krabapple
You've inverted the proof process. I've ALREADY pointed you, over and over, to standard sources of information about psychoacoustics and the limits on human perception. And that is where the...
Quote:
Originally Posted by krabapple
But you DO need to be sure that the two versions were mixed/mastered the same, that you have matched the levels to within 0.2 dB, and that you compare them blind. Otherwise your claim has little...