Posts by renethx

ASM1061 is a very popular SATA / PCIe controller chip with good reputation and used in almost every Intel 7-Series chipset mb if it has more than 6 SATA ports (GIGABYTE is the only exception, it uses Marvell 88SE92xx). And it looks like...

A6-5400K is the most cost effective solution for BR 3D (only $62) and as power efficient as IVB (if you use an AV receiver, it must be HDMI 1.4a, otherwise you have to add a HDMI sound card [A6-5400K to the 3D display and a HDMI sound...

Quote:Originally Posted by Elpee Quote:Originally Posted by renethx SYBA SI-PEX40064 (SATA 6Gbps 4-port PCIe 2.0 x1, Marvell 88SE9215 chip) SYBA says the interface is PCI Express 1.0, but the chip is PCI Express 2.0.Thanks for...

Quote:Originally Posted by olyteddy Quote:Originally Posted by renethx Which application supports Quick Sync encoder to transcode videos "on the fly"? Apparently none, so far. Glad to hear that. I thought I missed latest...

Quote:Originally Posted by leebo I take it even a Celeron is better than an old Pentium D dual core? PassMark CPU Benchmarks - Celeron G1610 (Ivy Bridge): 2,595 ($42) - Core 2 Duo E8400 (Wolfdale): 2,165 ($183)

SYBA SI-PEX40064 (SATA 6Gbps 4-port PCIe 2.0 x1, Marvell 88SE9215 chip) SYBA says the interface is PCI Express 1.0, but the chip is PCI Express 2.0.

Which application supports Quick Sync encoder to transcode videos "on the fly"?

Perhaps using an external player is the only solution unless your OS is 32-bit and you use ReClock with WMC (not recommended). MPC-HC+madVR is one solution. MPC-HC+AutoFrequency (tutorial) is another.

Basically the average rendering time is the only criterion you should look at to see if GPU is fast enough. Rendering time should be: - Films:

You are right, it's more like so-called frame interpolation. SVP requires lots of CPU / GPU processing power. It's interesting to see how effectively Intel's ASIC/EU does it. MadVR's FRC remains unique.