Quote:
Originally Posted by buddywhite
No sticker but it has "10th anniversary edition" on both back and front cover.
I don't trust my eyes
Go ahead and trust them. If it says "10th Anniversary", you're golden.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Leo_Ames
That's interesting, must be something on my end.
Here's how it looks for me...
I have the same problem with this and many of Ralph's reviews...I'm running what I believe to be the latest version...
Quote:
Originally Posted by Deviation
When it's an after the fact change to make a film look more "modern", I don't give a crap if the director approved it. It's a change for the worse.
This isn't remastering fixing an error like...
Quote:
Originally Posted by dvdmike007
Paramount's amazing discs you can count on one hand
SHUTTER ISLAND
The corrected SAVING PRIVATE RYAN
The corrected GLADIATOR
THE GODFATHER Collection: The Coppolla...
I would have said Paramount but their catalog titles have all but dried up recently, so I'm going with 20th Century Fox. Both studios have in common that, other than the occasional snafus (e.g. PREDATOR, which I think is far less...
Quote:
Originally Posted by Deviation
That's ridiculous. The contrast is obviously blown and thus the colors are obviously wrong. Whether Besson approved it or not doesn't matter. Claims have been made that Besson also approved the...
Quote:
Originally Posted by MovieSwede
Highlights is not the only thing that effects the PQ. Yes the Gaumont release blows the highlights in some scenes, but Sonys release is worse in most other aspects.
And what amazes me that people...
Quote:
Originally Posted by dougotte
Oops. IMDB confirms it. I stand corrected. Especially in contrast to EFNY, it didn't have that characteristic I associate with anamorphic lenses - slight curvature at the sides of the frame. Am I...
Quote:
Originally Posted by starman7
Are the extras and supplements the same on the "corrected" disc as they were on the old "poor" disc?
Down to the very last one; there is not one iota missing.