You can go back to a point in this thread where XT was current and its use was widespread. There you will see many posts about how much better it was than no Room EQ. The FAQ can be disregarded in this respect IMO.
There is info particular to make/models found either nowhere else or in addition to elsewhere. I see that as a more common sense notion than contrarian and cause to champion a bit drama queen-ish. But a few have found the entry on page one burdensome. So be it.
When it comes to computer programs (which these are) of any complexity "flawed" is a meaningless term. They are all flawed. The degree of effectiveness between no room correction and XT is vast compared to between XT and XT32. You exaggerate.