The legacy Fireballs are a different animal. They essentially made use of built in matrix video switchers and required that you have a run of component video cabling plus audio to your secondary zone.
Maybe I am missing something I think the whole point of the VISION is to stream all info digitally to the VC-1 players via Gigabit ethernet. There is NO need for there to be old style analog matrixed video switching in the new line.
I believe the only reason for there being an HDMI "INPUT" on the back of a VC-1 player is for systems where you may NOT have a VS server, but you could still have control of 1 HDMI Changer via a VC-1 player. (sort of in the same way that a current MX111 would not give you dual zone and multi-changer functionality but does offer control of 1 Sony 777 ES DVD changer)
If I understand correctly (I may be wrong here) you dont have to have a VS server to build a system, but could instead just opt for VC-1's connected directly to your LAN feeding off a 4 Terabyte VX-600 NAS. (or up to four VX-600's for a total of 16 Terabytes)
Given the way these things are priced, for me, it would make sense to disregard the VS-100 or VS-200 altogether and go for a VC-1 with a VX-600 NAS. What the VS servers will give you is MULTIPLE CHANGER control (up to 4) for those who may want this.
I probably confused the hell out of everyone. Sorry.
Maybe I am missing something I think the whole point of the VISION is to stream all info digitally to the VC-1 players via Gigabit ethernet. There is NO need for there to be old style analog matrixed video switching in the new line.
I believe the only reason for there being an HDMI "INPUT" on the back of a VC-1 player is for systems where you may NOT have a VS server, but you could still have control of 1 HDMI Changer via a VC-1 player. (sort of in the same way that a current MX111 would not give you dual zone and multi-changer functionality but does offer control of 1 Sony 777 ES DVD changer)
If I understand correctly (I may be wrong here) you dont have to have a VS server to build a system, but could instead just opt for VC-1's connected directly to your LAN feeding off a 4 Terabyte VX-600 NAS. (or up to four VX-600's for a total of 16 Terabytes)
Given the way these things are priced, for me, it would make sense to disregard the VS-100 or VS-200 altogether and go for a VC-1 with a VX-600 NAS. What the VS servers will give you is MULTIPLE CHANGER control (up to 4) for those who may want this.
I probably confused the hell out of everyone. Sorry.















