Quote:
Originally Posted by gteague 
the century 0.55x lens is a quality piece of kit if you can deal with the fact it only works at the wide end of the zoom and, although some claim it will work up to half of the zoom range, i find it only works up to about one-quarter, perhaps 1/3rd the zoom range. i've used it on three cameras now and it is consistent in that regards.
also it does cause some softening at the edges and increases (causes?) some purple fringing.
in spite of these annoyances, i consider it an essential piece of my camera equipment and it stays on the lens more often than off.
/guy

the century 0.55x lens is a quality piece of kit if you can deal with the fact it only works at the wide end of the zoom and, although some claim it will work up to half of the zoom range, i find it only works up to about one-quarter, perhaps 1/3rd the zoom range. i've used it on three cameras now and it is consistent in that regards.
also it does cause some softening at the edges and increases (causes?) some purple fringing.
in spite of these annoyances, i consider it an essential piece of my camera equipment and it stays on the lens more often than off.
/guy
I have both the Century .55x and the Canon WD-H37. After testing both and in the field, I am having a tough time deciding on which one to keep. I love the Century's small size and wider coverage, but detest the very soft edges (actually about 1/8 screen width on each side or more) and not being able to zoom. The Canon's image quality and full zoom capability is superior, but it's added size and less coverage are negatives.
I could keep both, but I hate to have $120 adapter not being used.










so no start run cmd functionality over here... i might try it for shts and giggles through Terminal

I wonder how fast is the interal memory. I regret paying $85 more for the HF10 now. 

